33 Comments

Do not comply.

Expand full comment

if the law is in place you will be forced to comply or you will get fined, loess your job, or even forced to take any injections. The only option would be to emigrate to a country that did not sign the dame thing.

I guess if many people object and do not comply they will try scare tactics like before. But it will take millions to march more than last time to stop it when its been agreeded.

Simply put we all will be slaves, and subject to being depopulated.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately,the places unwilling to be part of WHO and global govt. are dictatorships. Perhaps we should all go to TX or FL!

Expand full comment

Ahhh...Scamdemic Season. I'm already warming up my middle finger. Up down, up down, up....hold it....hold it.

Expand full comment

Well, we now know the CDC and FDA are useless and a bunch of liars, but maybe we should be convincing them (psychological warfare) that THEY should not cede their authority to the WHO with this treaty?!? The only issue is all of Bill Gates’ money that lines their pockets….

Expand full comment

I really do think the followers of this blog should take a serious look at the COVID-related research of Dr. Lewis Coleman. Those who have had the COVID jab are at risk of serious illness or death. Dr. Coleman gives some hope for treatment.

https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/02/are-the-covid-mrna-vaccination-injections-thinly-disguised-genocide/

Expand full comment

The next scamdemic will be coming soon and before the next election! They have been saying it all along and this next one will be much worse than the C19 shot. They may even aerosol and create one that will be self-spreading. This was the reason for the petitions to send to your reps. Please paper their desks.

Expand full comment

Petitions and letters to our congressman. How quaint

Expand full comment

What would you suggest?

Expand full comment

Find like minded people, buy guns and prepare to defend yourself, your family, your country.

Keep informed while not despondent.

Peace

Expand full comment

Done!

Expand full comment

America and Americans are different.

I'd be glad to face 1000 commies on battlefield with 15 Americans ON MY SIDE.White trash if possible😂😂😂😂😂

BETTER DEAD THAN A SLAVE

Expand full comment

Hah hah-- "they" will just turn these loose in our neighborhoods when we get too far out of line: https://www.commondreams.org/news/report-warns-killer-robots

Expand full comment

That was likely only said because the people you allude to are complicit.

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

Many A Paid Liars , money 💰 talks

Expand full comment

Totalitarianism isn't a psychological phenomenon (Desmet): it's not caused my mass psychology. Mass psychology is the result of a totalitarian or totalitarian-like state (High Covid,) not the cause.

Totalitarianism is caused by state power run amok and dictating every aspect of a population's life. The problem is an overbearing state. The WHO wants to be that overbearing state.

Each country is perfectly capable of handling any medical emergencies on its own and thanks to the internet, the sharing of ideas and solutions is now seamless. Top-down mandatory dictates are superfluous and exist only to aggregate power for those who wish to have power.

Expand full comment

beautifully stated…💯

Expand full comment

The W.H.O. is merely the hands of the Billionaire Controllers pumping (pimping?) money into it. Think Bill Gates...

Expand full comment

The DEI/ESG virus has already infected millions of brains. Fortunately, many are immune. The mistake is thinking that the virus needs to be isolated or viewed under a microscope to validate its existence. The presence of the identifiable material virus is not necessary for it to cause raging infections, which have already attained massive destructive effects. Is the virus a bogeyman then, a fantasy, a mental construct. I do not for a moment suggest such a thing. But our binary understanding of reality suggests that it either is or isn't. Both may be true.

Expand full comment

I'm sure they'll wait at least 5 minutes.

Expand full comment

Perhaps.

Expand full comment

A good essay by Dr. Dalgleish, with just a bit of dry humor.

;-)

Expand full comment

Thank you, Doctor Nass. By the grace of God I picked up a new job and got off pause and became a yearly subscriber. You are a freedom fighter and inspiration to us all.

PDC

Expand full comment

I've read the comments. It appears that people's theories are getting VERY close to what I believe could be involved with the causes of different cancers, as we have come to know them. Their "cure" becomes far more difficult when the patient's life-style remains carelessly the same.

So, logically speaking, if a radical upgrade to one's health through diet, and the other 7 "laws" of health, were to ensue, and the patient's will to live is in tact, and their life-force (being much stronger at earlier ages) is all there, and the results after couple months looks promising, then it would be good evidence that having a strong immune system plays a key role in this cancer quest (and applies to probably many other ailments as well).

Barbara O'Niell made the comment on one of her health lectures, that "cancer" is a natural process of degradation and part of the natural course of life. When things die in nature, all sorts of opportunistic life forms get to work to feed on the lifeless organ or body. She even went as far as to suggest that there is a metamorphosis by which these organisms are able to change character, according to the task they attend.

Now, this is astounding info! It' is difficult to believe, but the alternative is to trust the Med Ind. Complex which "feeds" directly on an ignorant and trusting public. That is assured by all that we see and hear and know. So I would be far more inclined to trust a lady as informed as she is, and who is also a believer in God's Creation (|SDA taught), than the drug-pushers in white.

I believe that the cancers which are plaguing societies are a product of, not the cause of illness. Naturally, if a bunch of mice get a direct concentrated injection of some nasty viral fluid, their systems simply cannot take it. The probability of being wrong in something like this is pretty high. But it does stand to reason one could question that there are many different "cancers" which effect different parts of the body; each one specific. That does not set well in my thinking. And combining that posit with how MASSIVE the industry is as it expands or metastacizes throughout first-world societies (like the very "cancer" it pretends to treat) one might well have a closer look at things unseen.

If a loved one were given the prognosis of a soon demise due to "cancer," I would suggest a RADICAL change over in habits, and circumvent the industry's protocol. What would there be to lose?

R

Expand full comment

Screw teddy and his WHO thugs.

Expand full comment

I offer two quibbles with Dr. Dalgleish. First, people are fundamentally irrational and are thinking and behaving just as they always have throughout these wretched times under unusual input from sources most are unable to question and distrust. Their irrationality is simply more painfully apparent to those of us who are rational and who understand the stakes.

Second, if under some circumstances HIV plays a causal role in AIDS it is precisely in the same way that the polio virus plays a causal role in polio—in sufficiently weakened individuals it can sometimes cause poliomyelitis (spinal inflammation) resulting in paralysis. The vast number of cases of “polio” cured by the polio vaccines were due to toxic pesticides causing spinal inflammation as shown first by Suzanne Humphries in “Dissolving Illusions” and again and even more persuasively by the anonymous authors of “Turtles All the Way Down.” In AIDS, the vast number of afflicted individuals had their inflammations and others factors that destroyed their immune systems caused by other factors, especially gross abuse of drugs. To understand this matter in more detail I recommend 109. --- (1977). Specific etiology and other forms of strong influence: Some quantitative meanings. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2, 33-53 supplemented by J.L. Mackie’s INUS analysis of causality.

Expand full comment

KEEP PUSHING, NWO. KEEP PUSHING.

Expand full comment

Reading the insert of a psychotropic, it says suicidal thoughts and ideation, bizarre thoughts & delusions, agitation-akatisia, depression, paranoia, hallucinations,…..can all be caused by the drug. Now neurological viruses can do the same, and I strongly doubt there isn’t a neurological sequence in Sars-CoV-2 too, psychotropics might be a solution for the effects of these neural viruses, but and this is my own experience seen in one of my family members, results are zero.

Expand full comment