40 Comments

My stupid health practitioner at an urgent care named Dr. Bethune had a space suit on to help protect him from Covid and promoted paxlovid and I told him that was simply an EUA and I wanted ivermectin. He said ivermectin didn’t work and asked what an EUA was. Wow.

Expand full comment

Why are you seeing a "stupid health practitioner"???

If you see this person again you are the one who is "stupid". Believe me. I am a MD.

Expand full comment

Bottom line! Paxlovid is just an expensive harmful proprietary Rx drug to blunt and replace Ivermectin as the drug of choice! Discrediting Ivermectin was necessary to validate the need to inject everybody with RNA that reprogram cellular function! It is the opening salvo and the new direction of corporate medicine in the 21st-century, without any regards to the harm that it has caused, and will cause! Sickcare is out of control and this needs to be corrected NOW!

Expand full comment

I want to be a horse!!!

Expand full comment

Well, in this day and age just identify as one! Your pronouns can be Equis/whinny/neigh!

🤪🐴

Expand full comment

No better off! They have RNA injections for horses too! Our cattle and hogs are already being injected. There is no end to the the creativity of the medicine man who has discovered a new form of snake oil!

Expand full comment

Naaaaaaay! A wild horse, it must be, 🤡

Expand full comment

👍😎

Expand full comment

More to the point is when was the last time the FDA or CDC did something appropriate to improve the health of humanity? Since they are big pharma thugocracies, they are now agents of death.

Expand full comment

Let’s have a look at the “epic” trial. The original, NEJM publication lists the word “placebo” 81 times, and nirmatrelvir only 70 times. The reader may have the impression that the placebo was really important. Until you read “Procedures”: “...Nirmatrelvir and matching placebo were manufactured by Pfizer...” Why the placebo should be “matching” the tested substance? Why was it provided by the manufacturer of the tested substance? Sure, the local drugstore may have run out of stock of regular saline solution...

What was the actual placebo that was used? The composition was of so little significance that it was simply omitted from the publication. Nobody knows what it was. Under truly “rigorous” standards this one thing should invalidate the whole trial.

“...The primary analysis compared proportions of patients in the two groups who were hospitalized for Covid-19 or died from any cause through day 28...” What about those who could have had C-19 symptoms but were not hospitalized? Were they required to report anything? Did they? What about events past Day 28? Did anybody care?

Some participants discontinued treatment: 47 out of 1,126 participants in the placebo group had adverse events - but only 23 in the drug group. What? Why would a single person experience an adverse event if he/she was given placebo? Twice as many adverse events in the placebo group when compared to the tested substance group? No explanation. Anyway, the obvious conclusion is that the (supposedly inert, inactive, neutral to the body) placebo used in the trial was 204% more effective in causing adverse effects than the tested drug... Make sure this is printed on the labels, it may help increase the uptake.

Now you know why “trust” is needed - in the absence of facts and verification, you have nothing else left.

Expand full comment

Anything that is said to be "good" without providing verifiable complete access to the "facts" leading to the conclusion is not. Trust in such a case is misplaced for whatever reasons make one comfortable.

Expand full comment

Just 3 years ago, and some change, we all trusted medics almost unconditionally. We never asked questions, we didn’t demand informed consent forms, and we were pretty much sure that folks in white or blue or green gowns know what they do.

We have been trained and educated to trust the uniform and to be sure that people in uniforms only want good for us. We also have been taught that formal suits are sort of synonymous to knowledge, authority or care.

On top of that, we have been conditioned to obey the elders and to worship those in charge (of anything). Moreover, we have been ardently trained to respect and obey those with formal titles or a bunch of letters that are more important than their names. Now, this program is extremely emphasised nowadays, when “alt” covidians never forget to say “doctor” about themselves.

These programs, long imprinted in our minds, override family values, survival instinct and basic human curiosity. We as human beings are so corrupted that we rarely wake up from these default beliefs. It is most obvious when we hand over our kids to undergo medical procedures, never ever asking the medic one basic question: “Do you know what you are doing?”

I am writing it with humbleness. It’s a miracle that we have managed to survive so far. Despite all good-doers.

We have only started learning how to ask for reasons or justification. The year 2020 is in a way Year 1 of a new human being: truly caring about interactions with others. It’s a pity that this new education is based on fear and lies. Whatever, it’s only the first step.

Expand full comment

In the 21st century wars are fought in the mind using mass hypnosis and nanotechnology. Brains are the battlefield, and the spoils of war.

More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-first-world-mind-war

Expand full comment
Jul 1, 2023·edited Jul 2, 2023

and now, gates is releasing billions of genetically modified mosquitos ... crazy times

Expand full comment

The military pharma billionaire industrial complex is at war with the entire world. Russia, China, Europe (Nordstream), and the American people (Covid bioweapons). Not to forget the War on Terror, the War on Drugs, the War on Covid and the War on Poverty.

More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/forever-wars-are-highly-profitable

Expand full comment

Why do I now distrust everything I hear and see coming out of Big Pharma and the medical fraternity?

Since 2019 when they launched Covid in order to sell a new, useless but dangerous injection they call a vaccine, everything seems to have been sinisterly planned for our demise.

My opinion now follows all the way down the medical chain because even Doctors and nurses refused to question the dubious goings on from day one of the Covid scamdemic.

No proper Vax Safety Trials. Manipulated Vax Safety Data. Absolutely no LIABILITY for adverse events and DEATHS that follow the injections. Manipulation of the Press and media. 'Informed Consent' was outlawed. 'Do No Harm' used to be the Doctor's Hippocratic Oath. I could go on!

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to olive longer.

Expand full comment

Evidence that FDA is a subsidiary of Pfizer.

Expand full comment

As a physician with the ability to critically think and truly understand what’s going on this is an entire crock. First of all there is no Covid virus. It was never isolated or purified, or underwent any scientific observational objective evidence that it ever existed. It’s a Propaganda operation of terror using super antigens to kill off unobserved nursing home victims. The drugs they are are pushing on us and the vaccines they’re pushing were created out of thin air and approved per there ability to stealthily kill your ass.This whole thing just pisses me off people arguing about what drug to use or experimental jab is better.If you have any questions in your own mind which any scientist with a functioning brain does read the literature. “Vaccination mania” by Sam Bailey is a must read to save your life. You will wake up and realize vaccines are money making immoral burdens on societies. Now they morphed into genetically mutating killers guaranteed to stop your carbon footprint so they can fly their jets. This may sound crazy but never take a vaccine for a supposed virus. It’s complete BS.

Expand full comment
author

Wrong again! Why are you providing readers with incorrect information that you clearly did not even check?

Expand full comment

Licensing and approval are two different things.

Nothing need be approved to be licensed.

This doesn't change the EUAs.

Expand full comment
author

In FDA lingo, approved means licensed. EUA is termed authorized. I believe you are mistaken.

Expand full comment

If it comes from the FDA, you have to refer to what they mean by it.

Authorized only means approved at the FDA.

Licensing restricts those without one from accessing that which is licensed.

If a drug is licensed, only those pay the license fee can use it.

A prescription is a license.

Expand full comment

This was the rebound effect drug. When you stop taking it, Covid returns worse... but take it anyway, safe&effective!

Expand full comment

Why license Paxlovid? The participants in both EPIC trials had to be not vaccinated. Does it explain why the control group (“without the benefit of our breakthrough drug”) had more problems than the other participants? Was it the reason to prepare a special placebo “matching” the intervention substance?

Both EPIC trials were on not vaccinated participants. Shouldn’t the potential group of recipients be limited to those who were not vaccinated? Maybe there is some data about studying this drug in covid-vaccinated subjects? What about adverse effects in them?

By the way, “Placebo was selected as the comparator because there is no globally approved SoC treatment for this patient population as of June 2021.” [Protocol, p. 30, 158] So, the intention of the trial was not to assess the “safety” (or actual effectiveness) of the intervention substance (against true placebo), but to push it to the market. This is exactly what you would expect from a business.

Expand full comment
Jul 1, 2023·edited Jul 1, 2023

I don't trust it, but I have 2 male seniors who were sick and willingly took the Pax.

They are alive and well...

Alive anyhow...

Expand full comment

It’s almost as if there is a ripoff formula for big pharma to follow that has been developed snd improved on over the decades? Like 0 & 00 on the roulette wheel in Vegas.

Expand full comment

Another bad pill........

Expand full comment

Spike protein test??

why doesnt FDA approves a Spike Protein test?? a japanese doctor has developed it ... this is important so people can check.

Expand full comment

Why does who developed the test make any difference, please?

Expand full comment
Jul 1, 2023·edited Jul 2, 2023

there was a japanese doctor ... not sure where i heard it

Expand full comment