But the nation who sends you there doesn't expect you to come home alive.
But you do anyway.
Imagine worse it was all a myth.
Taking away your voice.
Taking your families voice
Taking your neighbors voice too.
All the voices stolen away everywhere.
So that in another day at the whim and call we are locked down and force fed garbage. Jabbed and poked, ventilated and choked in our own suburbs. Probably sitting on the sofa and smiling while it happens.
1. They live. Carpenter 1988. I enjoy the bad acting and costumes.
2. I cannot remember the title. :(
Succinct plot: the common mortals eat some kind of factory meat/burger, declared by the 'elites' delicatessen. That's their main staple. No one knows what are its secret ingredients until someone finds it out: humans.
"SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!" The New York Times and other 'serious' publications have recently toyed with the idea that cannibalism -- the last taboo (since they already seem to have normalized pedophilia) -- might be good for climate change. I wish I were joking.
Since the WHO Accord is designed to circumvent Senate approval, we should leave the WHO immediately, as the Accord is a violation of our sovereignty. Further, it would be a good idea to review ALL so called "executive agreements", and act to void those that Congress deems a violation of our sovereignty.
If this country is still a constitutional republic, I would expect our representatives to do no less. If they are not prepared to act, they should be replaced by representatives who will defend our sovereignty. And if that cannot be done, then we no longer live in such a republic.
Prioritize the evening with emails to these Senators, and at a minimum ALL Republican Senators. Prioritize the AM with phone calls to each saying the same. Show them SUPPORT. Use our voices.
This would fundamentally change our form of government. Under the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, WE are a government FOR the people and BY the people... only the PEOPLE have the right to change our FORM of government. Our 'consent to be governed' does not give 'elected leaders' carte blanche to act outside of or negate of our Bill of Rights. You cannot negotiate away RIGHTS that belong to the PEOPLE, and not to government. When they do that they are no longer a legitimate government. Period.
Render unto God, that which is due God... and unto man that which is due man. You are created in the image of God. You do not owe man your body or soul.
So if the GOP bill apparently won’t stop this, how about the GOP senators draft a bill that defunds the WHO altogether, since we are footing the bill for almost the entire organization?
I still can’t see how the WHO can just unilaterally come in and say “OK, this treaty wipes out every state constitution, every legal foundation of governance for every country in the entire world. While we should take it as a serious threat, I think what these megalomaniacs are proposing is perhaps the biggest overreach in history. DO NOT COMPLY.
It's way past time to leave all international organizations, including the UN and the WHO. Screw them. Stop funding them, and kick them out off US property.
Yes, the UN is especially EGREGIOUS ! Both agencies tentacles of the same monster. Check this out below. Scary but true and we must face & fight this evil or suffer forevermore.
I would do this on a case by case basis, as staying in some international organizations can still be useful. As with many things, it depends.... Also, we should not forget that much of the problem is caused by our own government, trying to help the WHO circumvent our own laws. If we still had a proper constitutional republic where the executive could be checked by a congress that was responsive to the people, it would never get to the point of an administration signing away our sovereignty to the WHO, or anyone else. Instead, this would lead to immediate impeachment and conviction of the president and his removal from office.
I agree with the spirit of your comment, but "if" is the biggest two letter word in the English language. If we could raise better people, we wouldn't have any serious problems. If we took responsibility for ourselves and those around us instead of deferring to "leaders" and "experts"... "Our own government" hasn't really been ours for decades. The administrative bureaucracy and a criminal cabal runs the show no matter who we put in Congress or who the president is. We do have an opening here though to push back against the globalists, "if"....
"“With all due respect to the sponsoring senators, that will not do the trick,” Francis Boyle, professor of international law at Illinois University, told The Epoch Times. The reason, he said, is that the WHO accord is drafted specifically to circumvent the Senate-approval process, and Congress instead should immediately withhold its yearly contributions to the WHO and take the United States out of the organization."
Looks like this bill is not necessary at all except as something that can be capitalized upon politically by all sides.
It appears that all Congress has to do is
withhold its yearly contributions to the WHO and take the United States out of the organization."
Best not to rely on any one president. (After all, the one you refer to brought us Operation Warp Speed, which was not a bargain.) We need such citizen pressure on congress that they will threaten the removal of any president that tries to sign away our sovereignty.
I LOVE Dr. Meryl Nass's Substack articles, but this article needs to cut to the chase. Forget the rules about Congress ratifying treaties -- let's go back to fundamentals -- the way rights are set out in the Constitution!
The Constitution divided rights into three categories. The central government (the feds) got a few things, the States got a few things, and We, the People, got everything else, enumerated or not. It's right there in black and white. Print out a copy and start reading -- or take the easy, social way out and start attending the free, 6-week simple constitutional classes put on by the John Birch Society. Or by Hillsdale College.
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: Did the States or the Federal Government get assigned any rights over health care decisions? No. Did the States or Federal Government get assigned any rights over the right to make a living and feed one's self and one's family? No. So who got those unenumerated rights? WE THE PEOPLE.
So, does the federal government, e.g., Biden, have ANY legitimate power to give control over health-related matters to ANYONE? A foreign power, like the WHO, a private cartel of parasites like the WEF, or a human parasite, like Count Dracula? No.
Well, what if Congress says it's okay, or what if Congress doesn't to anything? Guess what: It makes no difference -- the federal government and your state representatives cannot give away something they do not own -- YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. That's what makes our constitution unique. You get your rights from GOD -- not from the government. It says so right there in the Constitution.
So, stop acting like any of this is legitimate. Stop complying with the mask signs! Stop debating whether Biden can do this and what Congress should do.
A friend in Hayward got tired of this crap and filed a lawsuit in superior court for $1 million against a gym that wanted him to wear a mask -- and the gym fell over backwards and settled with him (not for $1 million, but it dropped its mask requirements). Behave like you know your rights. Be a lioness.
It looks like I and others who know how to do this, need to start holding workshops to help people file suits against these unlawful mandates!
One of our greatest Presidents, John F. Kennedy, said, “And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.” Begin like this: JUST SAY NO TO ALL "MANDATES"! They are "mandates" because they are dictators' demands, not laws.
Thanks for writing this - it relieved me of the necessity of doing the same. I was getting irritated the more I read the comments as I am not waiting for Congress to do something as I know that they are just performers putting on a show pretending everything is complex. Everything is really simple. Don't comply with tyranny - never, ever. One has to deal with tyrants the same way one deals with bullies. Stand up to them and never back down and watch them scurry away like the scum they are.
so now we have a demented "president" serving as a front for the deep state folks who want absolute power. they'll hold the pen in his hand and trace out his name to the document. congress has the power of the purse. they must get us out of the WHO now!
I have reviewed the U.S. v Belmont case and one other 1981 Supreme Court case involving attachment of Iranian assets when Iran took hostages under the Carter Administration. I'm not an international attorney and I have not read all cited cases for what Epoch Times says, or suggests, is the law (that a US President can effectively enter into a treaty without Senate approval). That said, the two cases I reviewed involved seizure or attachment or release of claims in foreign assets. The primary holding in Belmont was that a Presidential compact with Soviet Union regarding the disposition of assets trumped state (New York) law. I suggest with no other authority than my gut that a compact of this sort (i.e., about disposition of isolated foreign assets held in another country) is not tantamount to a treaty of the sort that is embodied in current talks at WHO and contemplated in the US Constitution. It could be there are Supreme Court cases holding otherwise since 1981.
My read of a summary of Belmont s that there are a lot of minor diplomatic things that would be unnecessarily burdened if subjected to Seante advice and consent. This actually makes sense. But I don’t think Belmont applies to the WHO thing because the latter is not a minor diplomatic activity but rather a very large concession of power. Only duly passed and signed legislation and duly consented and executed treaties can become law of the land because the people must necessarily be involved in that process. Therefore I do not believe this WHO thing can legally circumvent our constitution because Potus has no authority to unilaterally commit us to such a major thing.
Imagine going to war and fighting for freedom.
Freedom to earn, learn, live, give and to thrive.
But the nation who sends you there doesn't expect you to come home alive.
But you do anyway.
Imagine worse it was all a myth.
Taking away your voice.
Taking your families voice
Taking your neighbors voice too.
All the voices stolen away everywhere.
So that in another day at the whim and call we are locked down and force fed garbage. Jabbed and poked, ventilated and choked in our own suburbs. Probably sitting on the sofa and smiling while it happens.
Freedom was worth dying for once upon a time.
Remember that.
I struggle with whether I'll fight for the freedom of others who've done nothing but signal they'd prefer slavery. Thinking: NOT
Save yourself.
Just remember though no one can survive alone. Not indefinitely.
Remember rock, paper, scissors?
There will always be something you can't beat and something you can. Something you fear and something you fight.
Save yourself by building yourself a team.
A unit.
A medic. A signaller. Armorer. Drivers and command.
A village.
Farmers, bakers, butchers, plumbers and policemen.
A team. A gang. A tribe.
And fuck the rest.
Conway Judge
I'm on your team!!!
I will never forget.
"Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose."
Janis Joplin
Me & Bobby McGee
I so love Patti Smith's performance of A Hard Rain's Gonna Fall here.
Such a beautiful performance by a beautifully vulnerable soul. (Her son behind her.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=941PHEJHCwU
We watched this ceremony only because our friend colleague received the prize at this occasion, while another friend handed them the award <3.
We wondered whether the audience thought of the "message". Look at the faces especially the queen's!
And let's compare Janis & Patti to this garbage of a Madonna.
Look how her masters use her to tell us what's coming. Predictive programming.
Never watch Eurovision and I was completely unaware of this until a few months ago.
> lyrics & symbolism <
And the masses love this...
Madonna Eurovision 2019.
https://youtu.be/VG3WkiL0d_U
Watch the Joplin interview on Dick Cavett's show on YouTube
Two films come to mind.
1. They live. Carpenter 1988. I enjoy the bad acting and costumes.
2. I cannot remember the title. :(
Succinct plot: the common mortals eat some kind of factory meat/burger, declared by the 'elites' delicatessen. That's their main staple. No one knows what are its secret ingredients until someone finds it out: humans.
Found the title but cannot edit my post.
2. Soylent Green by Richard Fleischer, 1973.
"SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!" The New York Times and other 'serious' publications have recently toyed with the idea that cannibalism -- the last taboo (since they already seem to have normalized pedophilia) -- might be good for climate change. I wish I were joking.
I hate the NYT. I used to read it, one of the last few of the legacy media I read. No more.
They also install tracker and spy cookies on your computer. Most sites does but the NYT is one of the worst!
I just get alerts and then I find cached versions of any articles I might want. Such as...
https://archive.vn/XCu1K
This may also help :)
https://12ft.io/
I too wish you were joking. I also wish that geoengineering were a joke, but it's not.
I don't think you can edit on the phone app...
Found the title but cannot edit my post.
2. Soylent Green by Richard Fleischer, 1973.
Senators should do both. Pass the proposed Bill. Defund the WHO. ASAP.
Impeach Biden
Since the WHO Accord is designed to circumvent Senate approval, we should leave the WHO immediately, as the Accord is a violation of our sovereignty. Further, it would be a good idea to review ALL so called "executive agreements", and act to void those that Congress deems a violation of our sovereignty.
If this country is still a constitutional republic, I would expect our representatives to do no less. If they are not prepared to act, they should be replaced by representatives who will defend our sovereignty. And if that cannot be done, then we no longer live in such a republic.
Yes! Leave the WHO immediately.
Prioritize the evening with emails to these Senators, and at a minimum ALL Republican Senators. Prioritize the AM with phone calls to each saying the same. Show them SUPPORT. Use our voices.
Your "ifs" are adding up. Doesn't look promising at the moment.
Better to know than to live with illusions....
Understood. But we can’t afford to be demoralized or give up. They are counting on it!
Robert Auld
Many are going this route:
https://annvandersteel.substack.com/p/why-i-became-an-american-state-national
'they should be replaced by representatives who will defend our sovereignty'.
Sadly, there's nobody to replace them with. If one comes along, they will be killed, hindered etc.
This would fundamentally change our form of government. Under the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, WE are a government FOR the people and BY the people... only the PEOPLE have the right to change our FORM of government. Our 'consent to be governed' does not give 'elected leaders' carte blanche to act outside of or negate of our Bill of Rights. You cannot negotiate away RIGHTS that belong to the PEOPLE, and not to government. When they do that they are no longer a legitimate government. Period.
Precisely! WE the PEOPLE are the Government. Not some rogue corrupt president or hijacked non-elected appointees. We will not obey or complete.
Agreed. But what does it matter. They do what they want regardless.
You will know that when you do not comply, you are in the right legally and morally.
Render unto God, that which is due God... and unto man that which is due man. You are created in the image of God. You do not owe man your body or soul.
LDT
https://annvandersteel.substack.com/p/why-i-became-an-american-state-national
THERE'S THIS. IM seriously looking into it
No offense, but that ridiculously over complicated. That's the type of stuff that makes people run mad. I'm keeping my eyes on Jesus.
So if the GOP bill apparently won’t stop this, how about the GOP senators draft a bill that defunds the WHO altogether, since we are footing the bill for almost the entire organization?
I still can’t see how the WHO can just unilaterally come in and say “OK, this treaty wipes out every state constitution, every legal foundation of governance for every country in the entire world. While we should take it as a serious threat, I think what these megalomaniacs are proposing is perhaps the biggest overreach in history. DO NOT COMPLY.
Keep up the good battle Dr. Nass. We continue to stand with you!
It's way past time to leave all international organizations, including the UN and the WHO. Screw them. Stop funding them, and kick them out off US property.
Turtle dad51
Yes, the UN is especially EGREGIOUS ! Both agencies tentacles of the same monster. Check this out below. Scary but true and we must face & fight this evil or suffer forevermore.
https://rumble.com/v29k26a-k-o-n-k-r-e-t-emergency-defence-against-who-no-more-virus-psyops-the-facts.html
Thank you!
You're welcome! There was info I didn't previously know being discussed. More dot connections
I would do this on a case by case basis, as staying in some international organizations can still be useful. As with many things, it depends.... Also, we should not forget that much of the problem is caused by our own government, trying to help the WHO circumvent our own laws. If we still had a proper constitutional republic where the executive could be checked by a congress that was responsive to the people, it would never get to the point of an administration signing away our sovereignty to the WHO, or anyone else. Instead, this would lead to immediate impeachment and conviction of the president and his removal from office.
I agree with the spirit of your comment, but "if" is the biggest two letter word in the English language. If we could raise better people, we wouldn't have any serious problems. If we took responsibility for ourselves and those around us instead of deferring to "leaders" and "experts"... "Our own government" hasn't really been ours for decades. The administrative bureaucracy and a criminal cabal runs the show no matter who we put in Congress or who the president is. We do have an opening here though to push back against the globalists, "if"....
"“With all due respect to the sponsoring senators, that will not do the trick,” Francis Boyle, professor of international law at Illinois University, told The Epoch Times. The reason, he said, is that the WHO accord is drafted specifically to circumvent the Senate-approval process, and Congress instead should immediately withhold its yearly contributions to the WHO and take the United States out of the organization."
Looks like this bill is not necessary at all except as something that can be capitalized upon politically by all sides.
It appears that all Congress has to do is
withhold its yearly contributions to the WHO and take the United States out of the organization."
Josh Phillips did a good show about this issue.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/whos-power-to-govern-us-pandemics-back-on-the-table-biden-launches-sweeping-equity-programs_5071392.html?&utm_medium=Crossroads&utm_source=CRNewsletter&utm_campaign=WHOsPandemicControl&utm_content=02-21-2023
WHO’s Power to Govern US Pandemics Back on the Table
Congress already appropriated $5B to an international pandemic preparedness fund.
I'd like to see the WHO declared a Terrorist Organization. That would make funding it illegal and its operatives subject to arrest and deportation.
It's time to swear in the true president.
The one that has America's best interests at heart.
This shitshow has gone on long enough.
Best not to rely on any one president. (After all, the one you refer to brought us Operation Warp Speed, which was not a bargain.) We need such citizen pressure on congress that they will threaten the removal of any president that tries to sign away our sovereignty.
That's one mistake for Trump and I'm sure there are others.
The current illegitimately installed regime, however, has done untold damage to the country.
I LOVE Dr. Meryl Nass's Substack articles, but this article needs to cut to the chase. Forget the rules about Congress ratifying treaties -- let's go back to fundamentals -- the way rights are set out in the Constitution!
The Constitution divided rights into three categories. The central government (the feds) got a few things, the States got a few things, and We, the People, got everything else, enumerated or not. It's right there in black and white. Print out a copy and start reading -- or take the easy, social way out and start attending the free, 6-week simple constitutional classes put on by the John Birch Society. Or by Hillsdale College.
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: Did the States or the Federal Government get assigned any rights over health care decisions? No. Did the States or Federal Government get assigned any rights over the right to make a living and feed one's self and one's family? No. So who got those unenumerated rights? WE THE PEOPLE.
So, does the federal government, e.g., Biden, have ANY legitimate power to give control over health-related matters to ANYONE? A foreign power, like the WHO, a private cartel of parasites like the WEF, or a human parasite, like Count Dracula? No.
Well, what if Congress says it's okay, or what if Congress doesn't to anything? Guess what: It makes no difference -- the federal government and your state representatives cannot give away something they do not own -- YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. That's what makes our constitution unique. You get your rights from GOD -- not from the government. It says so right there in the Constitution.
So, stop acting like any of this is legitimate. Stop complying with the mask signs! Stop debating whether Biden can do this and what Congress should do.
A friend in Hayward got tired of this crap and filed a lawsuit in superior court for $1 million against a gym that wanted him to wear a mask -- and the gym fell over backwards and settled with him (not for $1 million, but it dropped its mask requirements). Behave like you know your rights. Be a lioness.
It looks like I and others who know how to do this, need to start holding workshops to help people file suits against these unlawful mandates!
One of our greatest Presidents, John F. Kennedy, said, “And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.” Begin like this: JUST SAY NO TO ALL "MANDATES"! They are "mandates" because they are dictators' demands, not laws.
Thanks for writing this - it relieved me of the necessity of doing the same. I was getting irritated the more I read the comments as I am not waiting for Congress to do something as I know that they are just performers putting on a show pretending everything is complex. Everything is really simple. Don't comply with tyranny - never, ever. One has to deal with tyrants the same way one deals with bullies. Stand up to them and never back down and watch them scurry away like the scum they are.
so now we have a demented "president" serving as a front for the deep state folks who want absolute power. they'll hold the pen in his hand and trace out his name to the document. congress has the power of the purse. they must get us out of the WHO now!
Our best hope is for African countries to stop this.
Unlikely it will happen. The USA exported their "democracy" everywhere.
Remember what happened to the president of Tanzania?
I have reviewed the U.S. v Belmont case and one other 1981 Supreme Court case involving attachment of Iranian assets when Iran took hostages under the Carter Administration. I'm not an international attorney and I have not read all cited cases for what Epoch Times says, or suggests, is the law (that a US President can effectively enter into a treaty without Senate approval). That said, the two cases I reviewed involved seizure or attachment or release of claims in foreign assets. The primary holding in Belmont was that a Presidential compact with Soviet Union regarding the disposition of assets trumped state (New York) law. I suggest with no other authority than my gut that a compact of this sort (i.e., about disposition of isolated foreign assets held in another country) is not tantamount to a treaty of the sort that is embodied in current talks at WHO and contemplated in the US Constitution. It could be there are Supreme Court cases holding otherwise since 1981.
My read of a summary of Belmont s that there are a lot of minor diplomatic things that would be unnecessarily burdened if subjected to Seante advice and consent. This actually makes sense. But I don’t think Belmont applies to the WHO thing because the latter is not a minor diplomatic activity but rather a very large concession of power. Only duly passed and signed legislation and duly consented and executed treaties can become law of the land because the people must necessarily be involved in that process. Therefore I do not believe this WHO thing can legally circumvent our constitution because Potus has no authority to unilaterally commit us to such a major thing.
Not one Democrat wants to live. Baby eating weirdos
What in the world can each of us do to counter this outrageous action?!