Google has removed posts from my google blog. Once upon a time my google blog was number 1 for info on anthrax vaccine. Then one day it sunk very low...
This CDC document from 2007 declares that the seasonal flu is a "Pandemic Severity Level 1."
Understand what this means in relation to how pandemics are declared, what is a pandemic, what the definition of pandemic is. Seasonal Influenza *IS* considered a pandemic! Level 1. This means every single year prior to 2020 we endured pandemics. Nothing new. Not requiring any new intervention.
So we know for a fact that in official (but older) CDC pandemic planning documents even what the CDC said was a Level 5 pandemic, Spanish Flu-level, didn't call for any of the authoritarian disruptive and destructive 2020 plandemic response protocols.
But, since it was that obvious in their official guides their mandated response was uncalled for they had a problem on their hands when it started being shared amongst "skeptics." So this guide I've linked to that you will find on the CDC website has been revised and updated many times. Including in 2020-2021. Just like the MIT study I cite in another comment recommended be done. It's now a heavily censored and revised document. Which I will now prove.
I noticed the revisions between when I first read it in early 2020 and when I read it again in September, 2020. The masking area which the initial focus of my ire and skepticism had been edited. I wished I had saved the version prior to September, 2020 showing those changes. But because I knew it had been revised in those intervening months I decided to download that version in the event it was revised again. And it was!! By June, 2022 it had been revised. Again!
The most noticeable revisions that jumped out at me were the visualizations - just like the MIT study was focused on! Where the recommended interventions for the most severe pandemic levels were blanked out. Why would they blank out visualizations on an archived CDC guidance document? Here the different versions are saved side by side:
Pandemic Severity Index by Epidemiological Characteristics
Because the visualizations were the quickest, easiest to understand format of conveying that the plandemic "mitigation" efforts were overkill and completely uncalled for. Even cautioned against. Even in the worst of all worsts Spanish Flu severity.
What was that about Orwell's "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute"?
And, it is probably even more importantly a zone where the Mind Managers monitor the "zoo" animals they don't control. Researching, studying us, our discourse, determining which arguments we are making that are most effective, how to counter us, remain several steps ahead of the evolving public mind as found in the contrarian voices on Substack. Just like they monitored Facebook and Twitter in 2020, per this 2021 MIT study:
Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox
Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online
Study was about masking, plandemic "skeptics" being so adept at real science that our information we share is of the caliber and quality to be published in leading scientific magazines. That we're smart, capable, intelligent, not the Neanderthal's they imagined us to be. That we are effective communicators, use visualizations (e.g. memes, graphs) that resonate with readers.
All good stuff, right? Until they identify all of these positive attributes and conclude they have to try to discredit us (mock, denigrate, shame), censor us, declare us "domestic threats" for our "dangerous dis/mal/misinformation" threatening the "cognitive infrastructure" of the nation, a national security threat as declared by CISA five-six years ago, not retracted as policy. They even threw in a section about the J6 #FakeNews "Insurrection" as it was going to print to shore up their claims that "skeptics" are especially dangerous to the national security. Note that Kate Starbird is a listed as a contributor to the study, funded by both the NSF and NAS.
CISA's declarations that our "cognitive infrastructure," aka, our personal thoughts, ideas and beliefs, are a threat to the nation that needs to be "mitigated," i.e. Censored. Raised to threat level by insinuating foreign malign origins, but no line of demarcation exists between foreign malign origins and domestic:
This is the Deep State at its best. Facial recognition and mass surveillance is not only bi-partisan, but it is beyond all partisanship, and reaches into the intel and military community for its source. The worst part is the reason they are doing this, how far it will go (into our homes?) and what their end game is. The overall plan is the most frightening, and it goes hand-in-hand with their assaults on the Second Amendment. Identify all of us, and then render all of us helpless - and dependent upon the State.
Ah yes, our benevolent State -- the one that sprays us with air-born poisons, experiments on us with deadly injections, opens our country to unvetted migrants (who will feed upon our welfare system), sends our jobs overseas and sells our farmland to foreign nations, elevates sexual perversion and dismemberment, propagandizes us to hate each other, impoverishes us with taxes and inflation, and endangers our population with potential famine and vicious wars overseas. Yep, that's us.
FF - We know it's a multi-billion dollar investment effort to integrate AI cameras with all data that's in ALL databases, everywhere. Even your FitBit and Alexa, your car's active listening, eye detection. Gym membership. Library. Social Media. Internet surfing. Grocery purchases. Phone calls between family and friends. Ring cameras. All databases, integrated. Worldwide Social Credit Industry. Public-private partnerships, government-corporate. Not conspiracy. Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway's BusinessWire says so:
"The COVID-19 pandemic has facilitated substantial interest in citizen monitoring solutions
--Infrastructure to support social credit systems represents a $16.1B global opportunity by 2026
--Cameras and other optical equipment for social credit systems will reach $723M globally by 2026
--Advanced computing will be used in conjunction with AI to provide nearly flawless identification and tracking
--Social credit systems represent the ability to identify (mostly people but also some "things") and track activities for purposes of grading behaviors and applying "social credit" scoring. A given grading/scoring methodology depends largely on social credit system objectives and metrics.
However, most systems will have socially acceptable behaviour at their core. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity as a combination of government, companies, and society as a whole must determine "good", "bad", and "marginal" behavior within the social credit market.
Beginning as a trend largely orthogonal to public safety and homeland security concerns, the market for social credit system infrastructure will ultimately become a mainstream component of both business and public policy."
FF - Have you heard of GigaPan AI Imaging? Interactive high-density gigapixel imaging technology. Consumer-facing, not military-industrial level sophistication. But still high-tech:
FF - Notice that date. Thirteen years ago. The earliest images on the website go back to 2011. This is 15-year-old imaging technology. In 2011 Apple released its iPhone 4S to much fanfare. Today's iPhone 17 ProMax is the latest technology. Difference in technological performance is exponential. Same has happened in digital imaging. And, remember, this is consumer-facing. Military/Intelligence/LEO-facing is even more advanced.
For kicks and grins I took that GigaPan image from Barcelona in 2013 and zoomed in on some balconies far off in the distance to see what could be seen. Here's a montage of what is viewable on consumer-facing digital imaging cameras using 15yo technology. I zoomed and screenshot to show where this particular balcony I found is on the image:
(I just scrolled down to very bottom left of it, look for the yellow taxi on the road, there's a small black compact car with its sunroof open behind a burgundy SUV with NY license plate that begins with "DNN" - notice the family inside the car laughing it up, and the street surveillance camera just over them. They probably would notice the overhead camera, not the camera taking their picture from across the East River.)
Pair those images (with fifteen years more advanced digital imaging technology) with AI facial recognition software. Here's the consumer versions of AI facial recognition software available. Doxxers use these tools. Military/Intelligence/LEO-grade versions are much more sophisticated, not available to consumers:
Combine the camera technology, the AI facial recognition technology with the Worldwide Social Credit System being developed to "make sure we behave" and it's all there, right now, available to the public-private government/corporate authorities/leaders. But it's missing one big, one very big component to being the dystopian threat to humanity that many of us are uncomfortable with. And that's the ability to capture and crunch ALL that data from ALL those databases with ALL the digital images (and audioprints) to be an ever-present dystopian surveillance threat the alarmists are sounding the alarm over. And that is: AI Data Centers.
AI Data Centers have been deemed so important to our existence to warrant the new construction of and recommissioning of nuclear power plants. Once deemed existential threats to humanity themselves. So important that Bill Gates has come out saying Climate Change fears are overblown, disproportionate to the threat. Think AI Data Centers are that important just to make sure that Amazon and Walmart can better predict their Just-in-Time inventory systems, make them more efficient? Or to let grandma have a digital chat friend after losing grandpa?
Or...AI Data Centers are the necessary component of making all of the data that exists in all of the databases around the nation/world, including digital images like Ring Cameras or Beach/Ski cameras showing conditions (and who is at the beach or skiing) into patterns available for real-time analysis and tracking. AI Data Centers are the necessary component of a Minority Report 24/7 dystopian surveillance state with "Pre-Crime" units authorized to 'police' actions and even thoughts just like in the movie. And this is who is developing the AI Data Center systems and technology. And protocols. And saying what "crimes" are. Not your values, are they?:
This coming for the world. Unless we as free, sovereign human beings refuse to give it our consent. En masse. The writing is on the wall. Our moment is fleeting. If we do not act today, pressure those in power to protect our privacy and our freedoms as being non-negotiable we will rue the future, the lost opportunity we have been called upon to take. It's not just about us. Are we the generation that loses human dignity, freedom? Remember, it's about them:
Meryl, Here's the question that I just asked ChatGPT about your situation...and their response to it: A Meryl Nass, MD, is a respected and controversial MD, who has a regular blog on Substack, and she has recently sought to cross-post some other Substack blogs, but has been recently blocked several times from doing so. Does Substack have any written policies about what is and isn't allowed to be cross-posted? And what can supporters do to help Dr. Nass?
ANSWER
Substack official help page on cross-posting is the clearest public statement from Substack itself about what is allowed. According to Substack:
Writers can cross-post another publication’s free posts to their own subscribers.
Publications can opt out of being cross-posted.
Cross-posting is built into the platform as an intended feature.
The original publication retains control over whether its content may be cross-posted.
At the same time, Substack also maintains broader content-moderation policies and “community guidelines,” though critics on both sides of the political spectrum often argue that enforcement is inconsistent. Public reporting has repeatedly noted that Substack historically promoted a relatively “lightweight” moderation approach compared with Facebook, YouTube, or X/Twitter.
So, in practical terms:
Cross-posting itself is clearly permitted.
However, Substack still reserves discretion to block, limit, demote, or moderate content if it believes it violates platform policies, legal standards, spam rules, harassment rules, copyright issues, or broader trust-and-safety concerns.
Substack does not appear to publish a detailed public rulebook specifically defining every circumstance in which a cross-post may be blocked.
That ambiguity is part of why some writers—including controversial medical or political writers—sometimes feel they are being selectively restricted.
Regarding Meryl Nass specifically, she has become a polarizing figure because of her views on vaccines, COVID-era policies, and biosecurity issues. Supporters generally see her as an independent dissident physician defending medical freedom; critics argue that she has promoted misinformation. Those larger disputes likely shape how platforms evaluate her activity, even when the immediate issue is technically about reposting or cross-posting.
--Supporters who want to help Dr. Nass can do several lawful and constructive things:
-- Support her publication directly
-- Subscribing (free or paid), sharing links, commenting respectfully, and engaging with her posts increases visibility organically.
-- Encourage transparency from Substack
-- People can politely request that Substack clearly explain:
--whether a specific policy was violated,
--whether automated moderation was involved,
--whether the restriction was temporary or permanent,
--and whether appeals are available.
--Advocate for viewpoint-neutral enforcement
--Many writers across the political spectrum argue that moderation policies should be applied consistently regardless of ideology.
--Diversify distribution channels
Independent writers often reduce platform risk by:
--maintaining their own websites,
--building independent email lists,
--mirroring content on multiple platforms,
--and preserving subscriber contact information outside any one service.
--Remain factual and civil
--Campaigns that stay evidence-based, non-harassing, and professional are generally more persuasive and less likely to trigger additional moderation problems.
One interesting wrinkle here is that Substack has simultaneously defended some highly controversial speech in other contexts—even at the cost of public criticism and losing prominent writers. That makes situations like the one you describe especially confusing to users, because the company’s public posture often emphasizes openness and minimal censorship.
I owe you an apology for calling you out over some trolling several months ago. It was a bot that could become an imposter of users and was an imposter of you at the time. After my insulting you in response the damnable bot became an imposter of me, started trolling others in my name. Lots and lots of shifty stuff here on Substack. Again, I apologize for my prior interactions with you, the real you, as opposed to the imposter bot of you.
Although I cannot remember the details of the offense, I appreciate the apology (if it was to ME). Because you replied to my comment, I assumed it was to me.
Correct, meant for you. I was very insulting, very. Inappropriately so. I took extreme prejudice to the bot/malicious spoof actor. It ended up being a very sophisticated trolling operation, maybe state or NGO actor that continued, I tracked after it spoofed my account. My venom at you was sharp and undeserved. Seeing your name reminded me of need to apologize for past sins against you, your good name.
VIOLATIONS OF THE 4th AMENDMENT MUST NOT BE TOLERATED, AND CHALLENGED IN COURT; THE CAMERAS DESTROYED, AND THE COMPANIES BEHIND THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS ELIMINATED; THEIR C-SUITE CITIZEN ARRESTED; COUNTY CITIZEN GRAN JURIES.
I don't think it is Subtack who is doing censorship. Same with FB, Twitter etc. I believe it is more like the bad guys at the CIA, NSA or similar organization.
Those people have the power to do what they want, to enter Substack or FB without problem. They have the technology.
For those who haven't seen the movie ¨Snowden¨ yet, it is worth watching.
Snowden | Official Trailer [HD] | Open Road Films
¨Academy Award®-winning director Oliver Stone, who brought Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July, Wall Street and JFK to the big screen, tackles the most important and fascinating true story of the 21st century. Snowden, the politically-charged, pulse-pounding thriller starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Shailene Woodley, reveals the incredible untold personal story of Edward Snowden, the polarizing figure who exposed shocking illegal surveillance activities by the NSA and became one of the most wanted men in the world. He is considered a hero by some, and a traitor by others. No matter which you believe, the epic story of why he did it, who he left behind, and how he pulled it off makes for one of the most compelling films of the year.¨
How? This is the point that I am trying to explain. The CIA bad guys do what they want. They will say to Substack back off or perhaps just say nothing. The Substack owners are not sitting there watching all the millions posts. They don't know.
The Bag Guys at the CIA are working for a criminal cabal organisation.
When you're in the fight of your life talking strategy is an exercise in futility and then you die. They've already turned most of us into genetically altered post-humans... the era of Neo-humanity is by design. "The kind of man who wants the government to adopt and enforce his ideas is always the kind of man whose ideas are idiotic." [H.L. Mencken]
Like many other dissident writers I was hopeful Substack would be different, but it appears I was wrong. They're all part of the Big Tech complex so no surprise really.
They call them data centers because calling them mass surveillance centers would cause an uprising.
Substack is a containment zone. Try to get Google to index your pages.
Good one cg… containment zone … to blow off steam and vent …. Psych warfare.
Google has removed posts from my google blog. Once upon a time my google blog was number 1 for info on anthrax vaccine. Then one day it sunk very low...
The censorship is ubiquitous.
Meryl, are you familiar with this CDC document?
Interim Pre-pandemic Planning Guidance:
Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation in the United States
- Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions
CDC, February, 2007
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/pdf/community_mitigation-sm.pdf
This CDC document from 2007 declares that the seasonal flu is a "Pandemic Severity Level 1."
Understand what this means in relation to how pandemics are declared, what is a pandemic, what the definition of pandemic is. Seasonal Influenza *IS* considered a pandemic! Level 1. This means every single year prior to 2020 we endured pandemics. Nothing new. Not requiring any new intervention.
So we know for a fact that in official (but older) CDC pandemic planning documents even what the CDC said was a Level 5 pandemic, Spanish Flu-level, didn't call for any of the authoritarian disruptive and destructive 2020 plandemic response protocols.
But, since it was that obvious in their official guides their mandated response was uncalled for they had a problem on their hands when it started being shared amongst "skeptics." So this guide I've linked to that you will find on the CDC website has been revised and updated many times. Including in 2020-2021. Just like the MIT study I cite in another comment recommended be done. It's now a heavily censored and revised document. Which I will now prove.
I noticed the revisions between when I first read it in early 2020 and when I read it again in September, 2020. The masking area which the initial focus of my ire and skepticism had been edited. I wished I had saved the version prior to September, 2020 showing those changes. But because I knew it had been revised in those intervening months I decided to download that version in the event it was revised again. And it was!! By June, 2022 it had been revised. Again!
The most noticeable revisions that jumped out at me were the visualizations - just like the MIT study was focused on! Where the recommended interventions for the most severe pandemic levels were blanked out. Why would they blank out visualizations on an archived CDC guidance document? Here the different versions are saved side by side:
Pandemic Severity Index by Epidemiological Characteristics
https://i.imgflip.com/6jy8fj.jpg
Summary of Community Mitigation Strategies by Pandemic Severity
https://i.imgflip.com/6jy8kj.jpg
Because the visualizations were the quickest, easiest to understand format of conveying that the plandemic "mitigation" efforts were overkill and completely uncalled for. Even cautioned against. Even in the worst of all worsts Spanish Flu severity.
What was that about Orwell's "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute"?
After all this time, google still will not index my content.
And, it is probably even more importantly a zone where the Mind Managers monitor the "zoo" animals they don't control. Researching, studying us, our discourse, determining which arguments we are making that are most effective, how to counter us, remain several steps ahead of the evolving public mind as found in the contrarian voices on Substack. Just like they monitored Facebook and Twitter in 2020, per this 2021 MIT study:
Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox
Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online
MIT, January 20, 3021
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993.pdf
Study was about masking, plandemic "skeptics" being so adept at real science that our information we share is of the caliber and quality to be published in leading scientific magazines. That we're smart, capable, intelligent, not the Neanderthal's they imagined us to be. That we are effective communicators, use visualizations (e.g. memes, graphs) that resonate with readers.
All good stuff, right? Until they identify all of these positive attributes and conclude they have to try to discredit us (mock, denigrate, shame), censor us, declare us "domestic threats" for our "dangerous dis/mal/misinformation" threatening the "cognitive infrastructure" of the nation, a national security threat as declared by CISA five-six years ago, not retracted as policy. They even threw in a section about the J6 #FakeNews "Insurrection" as it was going to print to shore up their claims that "skeptics" are especially dangerous to the national security. Note that Kate Starbird is a listed as a contributor to the study, funded by both the NSF and NAS.
CISA's declarations that our "cognitive infrastructure," aka, our personal thoughts, ideas and beliefs, are a threat to the nation that needs to be "mitigated," i.e. Censored. Raised to threat level by insinuating foreign malign origins, but no line of demarcation exists between foreign malign origins and domestic:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220221213323/https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa_insight_mitigating_foreign_influence_508.pdf
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/June%202022%20CSAC%20Recommendations%20%E2%80%93%20MDM_0.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htRlU0JKdGg
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23A243/284490/20231010122124243_2023-10-10%20-%20Murthy%20v.%20Missouri%20-%20Response%20to%20Governments%20Third%20Supplemental%20Brief%20-%20Final.pdf
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/cisa-staff-report6-26-23.pdf
Well said, br’er Fox.
The global cult is in a race against time to keep their fake narratives alive. People are waking up and opposition is growing.
This is the Deep State at its best. Facial recognition and mass surveillance is not only bi-partisan, but it is beyond all partisanship, and reaches into the intel and military community for its source. The worst part is the reason they are doing this, how far it will go (into our homes?) and what their end game is. The overall plan is the most frightening, and it goes hand-in-hand with their assaults on the Second Amendment. Identify all of us, and then render all of us helpless - and dependent upon the State.
Ah yes, our benevolent State -- the one that sprays us with air-born poisons, experiments on us with deadly injections, opens our country to unvetted migrants (who will feed upon our welfare system), sends our jobs overseas and sells our farmland to foreign nations, elevates sexual perversion and dismemberment, propagandizes us to hate each other, impoverishes us with taxes and inflation, and endangers our population with potential famine and vicious wars overseas. Yep, that's us.
Regarding the subject of the link, my research, connecting dots, patterns:
Omnipresent AI cameras will ensure good behavior, says Larry Ellison
“We’re going to have supervision,” says billionaire Oracle co-founder Ellison.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/09/omnipresent-ai-cameras-will-ensure-good-behavior-says-larry-ellison/
FF - We know it's a multi-billion dollar investment effort to integrate AI cameras with all data that's in ALL databases, everywhere. Even your FitBit and Alexa, your car's active listening, eye detection. Gym membership. Library. Social Media. Internet surfing. Grocery purchases. Phone calls between family and friends. Ring cameras. All databases, integrated. Worldwide Social Credit Industry. Public-private partnerships, government-corporate. Not conspiracy. Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway's BusinessWire says so:
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211223005270/en/Worldwide-Social-Credit-Industry---Infrastructure-to-Support-Social-Credit-Systems-Represents-a-%2416.1-Billion-Opportunity-by-2026---ResearchAndMarkets.com
(excerpts)
"The COVID-19 pandemic has facilitated substantial interest in citizen monitoring solutions
--Infrastructure to support social credit systems represents a $16.1B global opportunity by 2026
--Cameras and other optical equipment for social credit systems will reach $723M globally by 2026
--Advanced computing will be used in conjunction with AI to provide nearly flawless identification and tracking
--Social credit systems represent the ability to identify (mostly people but also some "things") and track activities for purposes of grading behaviors and applying "social credit" scoring. A given grading/scoring methodology depends largely on social credit system objectives and metrics.
However, most systems will have socially acceptable behaviour at their core. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity as a combination of government, companies, and society as a whole must determine "good", "bad", and "marginal" behavior within the social credit market.
Beginning as a trend largely orthogonal to public safety and homeland security concerns, the market for social credit system infrastructure will ultimately become a mainstream component of both business and public policy."
FF - Have you heard of GigaPan AI Imaging? Interactive high-density gigapixel imaging technology. Consumer-facing, not military-industrial level sophistication. But still high-tech:
https://today.williams.edu/stories/gigapan-big-tech-meets-tiny-view/
This image is the largest gigapixel image you'll find on GigaPan's website:
Suria, Barcelona, Spain, 99.13 gigapixels, April 20, 2013
https://gigapan.com/gigapans/129541
FF - Notice that date. Thirteen years ago. The earliest images on the website go back to 2011. This is 15-year-old imaging technology. In 2011 Apple released its iPhone 4S to much fanfare. Today's iPhone 17 ProMax is the latest technology. Difference in technological performance is exponential. Same has happened in digital imaging. And, remember, this is consumer-facing. Military/Intelligence/LEO-facing is even more advanced.
For kicks and grins I took that GigaPan image from Barcelona in 2013 and zoomed in on some balconies far off in the distance to see what could be seen. Here's a montage of what is viewable on consumer-facing digital imaging cameras using 15yo technology. I zoomed and screenshot to show where this particular balcony I found is on the image:
https://i.imgflip.com/aphu18.jpg
Here's GigaPan's picture of a pot legalization rally in Denver (1.47 gigapixels):
https://gigapan.com/gigapans/128066
Here's GigaPan picture of Colorado Rockies game at Coors Field (0.15 gigapixels):
https://gigapan.com/gigapans/127277
GigaPan picture of Brooklyn from Grand Street in Manhattan (4.39 gigapixels):
https://gigapan.com/gigapans/28033
(I just scrolled down to very bottom left of it, look for the yellow taxi on the road, there's a small black compact car with its sunroof open behind a burgundy SUV with NY license plate that begins with "DNN" - notice the family inside the car laughing it up, and the street surveillance camera just over them. They probably would notice the overhead camera, not the camera taking their picture from across the East River.)
Pair those images (with fifteen years more advanced digital imaging technology) with AI facial recognition software. Here's the consumer versions of AI facial recognition software available. Doxxers use these tools. Military/Intelligence/LEO-grade versions are much more sophisticated, not available to consumers:
https://www.guru99.com/face-recognition-search-engines.html
Combine the camera technology, the AI facial recognition technology with the Worldwide Social Credit System being developed to "make sure we behave" and it's all there, right now, available to the public-private government/corporate authorities/leaders. But it's missing one big, one very big component to being the dystopian threat to humanity that many of us are uncomfortable with. And that's the ability to capture and crunch ALL that data from ALL those databases with ALL the digital images (and audioprints) to be an ever-present dystopian surveillance threat the alarmists are sounding the alarm over. And that is: AI Data Centers.
AI Data Centers have been deemed so important to our existence to warrant the new construction of and recommissioning of nuclear power plants. Once deemed existential threats to humanity themselves. So important that Bill Gates has come out saying Climate Change fears are overblown, disproportionate to the threat. Think AI Data Centers are that important just to make sure that Amazon and Walmart can better predict their Just-in-Time inventory systems, make them more efficient? Or to let grandma have a digital chat friend after losing grandpa?
Or...AI Data Centers are the necessary component of making all of the data that exists in all of the databases around the nation/world, including digital images like Ring Cameras or Beach/Ski cameras showing conditions (and who is at the beach or skiing) into patterns available for real-time analysis and tracking. AI Data Centers are the necessary component of a Minority Report 24/7 dystopian surveillance state with "Pre-Crime" units authorized to 'police' actions and even thoughts just like in the movie. And this is who is developing the AI Data Center systems and technology. And protocols. And saying what "crimes" are. Not your values, are they?:
https://truthsocial.com/@libsoftiktok/posts/116422117291531774
This coming for the world. Unless we as free, sovereign human beings refuse to give it our consent. En masse. The writing is on the wall. Our moment is fleeting. If we do not act today, pressure those in power to protect our privacy and our freedoms as being non-negotiable we will rue the future, the lost opportunity we have been called upon to take. It's not just about us. Are we the generation that loses human dignity, freedom? Remember, it's about them:
https://needtoknow.news/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/You-need-to-be-in-the-way-meme-1.jpg
WOW
Wow. This is incredible. Those pictures are terrifying on their detail. Unfortunately the last link didn't work...
Thank you. I found another link, same picture, replaced.
Meryl, Here's the question that I just asked ChatGPT about your situation...and their response to it: A Meryl Nass, MD, is a respected and controversial MD, who has a regular blog on Substack, and she has recently sought to cross-post some other Substack blogs, but has been recently blocked several times from doing so. Does Substack have any written policies about what is and isn't allowed to be cross-posted? And what can supporters do to help Dr. Nass?
ANSWER
Substack official help page on cross-posting is the clearest public statement from Substack itself about what is allowed. According to Substack:
Writers can cross-post another publication’s free posts to their own subscribers.
Publications can opt out of being cross-posted.
Cross-posting is built into the platform as an intended feature.
The original publication retains control over whether its content may be cross-posted.
At the same time, Substack also maintains broader content-moderation policies and “community guidelines,” though critics on both sides of the political spectrum often argue that enforcement is inconsistent. Public reporting has repeatedly noted that Substack historically promoted a relatively “lightweight” moderation approach compared with Facebook, YouTube, or X/Twitter.
So, in practical terms:
Cross-posting itself is clearly permitted.
However, Substack still reserves discretion to block, limit, demote, or moderate content if it believes it violates platform policies, legal standards, spam rules, harassment rules, copyright issues, or broader trust-and-safety concerns.
Substack does not appear to publish a detailed public rulebook specifically defining every circumstance in which a cross-post may be blocked.
That ambiguity is part of why some writers—including controversial medical or political writers—sometimes feel they are being selectively restricted.
Regarding Meryl Nass specifically, she has become a polarizing figure because of her views on vaccines, COVID-era policies, and biosecurity issues. Supporters generally see her as an independent dissident physician defending medical freedom; critics argue that she has promoted misinformation. Those larger disputes likely shape how platforms evaluate her activity, even when the immediate issue is technically about reposting or cross-posting.
--Supporters who want to help Dr. Nass can do several lawful and constructive things:
-- Support her publication directly
-- Subscribing (free or paid), sharing links, commenting respectfully, and engaging with her posts increases visibility organically.
-- Encourage transparency from Substack
-- People can politely request that Substack clearly explain:
--whether a specific policy was violated,
--whether automated moderation was involved,
--whether the restriction was temporary or permanent,
--and whether appeals are available.
--Advocate for viewpoint-neutral enforcement
--Many writers across the political spectrum argue that moderation policies should be applied consistently regardless of ideology.
--Diversify distribution channels
Independent writers often reduce platform risk by:
--maintaining their own websites,
--building independent email lists,
--mirroring content on multiple platforms,
--and preserving subscriber contact information outside any one service.
--Remain factual and civil
--Campaigns that stay evidence-based, non-harassing, and professional are generally more persuasive and less likely to trigger additional moderation problems.
One interesting wrinkle here is that Substack has simultaneously defended some highly controversial speech in other contexts—even at the cost of public criticism and losing prominent writers. That makes situations like the one you describe especially confusing to users, because the company’s public posture often emphasizes openness and minimal censorship.
I owe you an apology for calling you out over some trolling several months ago. It was a bot that could become an imposter of users and was an imposter of you at the time. After my insulting you in response the damnable bot became an imposter of me, started trolling others in my name. Lots and lots of shifty stuff here on Substack. Again, I apologize for my prior interactions with you, the real you, as opposed to the imposter bot of you.
Our foes never apologize for anything, no matter how insanely destructive. I think your handle suites you.
Although I cannot remember the details of the offense, I appreciate the apology (if it was to ME). Because you replied to my comment, I assumed it was to me.
Correct, meant for you. I was very insulting, very. Inappropriately so. I took extreme prejudice to the bot/malicious spoof actor. It ended up being a very sophisticated trolling operation, maybe state or NGO actor that continued, I tracked after it spoofed my account. My venom at you was sharp and undeserved. Seeing your name reminded me of need to apologize for past sins against you, your good name.
Substack has new tech investors who like censorship and own most of the company
Thanks Meryl, this bombshell is a biggie.
As I've said many times, we now have (until we dismantle it) "One empire, under surveillance, with deceit and oppression for all."
".... and the home of the fee and the slave."
And below the Facial Picture, few notes like: Activist - Trouble Maker - Limit or Block Access... :)
Disturbing!!!
VIOLATIONS OF THE 4th AMENDMENT MUST NOT BE TOLERATED, AND CHALLENGED IN COURT; THE CAMERAS DESTROYED, AND THE COMPANIES BEHIND THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS ELIMINATED; THEIR C-SUITE CITIZEN ARRESTED; COUNTY CITIZEN GRAN JURIES.
I don't think it is Subtack who is doing censorship. Same with FB, Twitter etc. I believe it is more like the bad guys at the CIA, NSA or similar organization.
Those people have the power to do what they want, to enter Substack or FB without problem. They have the technology.
But substack must be going along, right?
For those who haven't seen the movie ¨Snowden¨ yet, it is worth watching.
Snowden | Official Trailer [HD] | Open Road Films
¨Academy Award®-winning director Oliver Stone, who brought Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July, Wall Street and JFK to the big screen, tackles the most important and fascinating true story of the 21st century. Snowden, the politically-charged, pulse-pounding thriller starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Shailene Woodley, reveals the incredible untold personal story of Edward Snowden, the polarizing figure who exposed shocking illegal surveillance activities by the NSA and became one of the most wanted men in the world. He is considered a hero by some, and a traitor by others. No matter which you believe, the epic story of why he did it, who he left behind, and how he pulled it off makes for one of the most compelling films of the year.¨
https://youtu.be/QlSAiI3xMh4
I don't know if it's the case here. It could be just a simple technical problem.
But it is very specific, seems to me.
How? This is the point that I am trying to explain. The CIA bad guys do what they want. They will say to Substack back off or perhaps just say nothing. The Substack owners are not sitting there watching all the millions posts. They don't know.
The Bag Guys at the CIA are working for a criminal cabal organisation.
Watch again the movie ¨Snowden.¨
It was always only a matter of time before Substack caved to . . . what? Pressure, bribery, what?
They didn’t cave in: it was always designed for this!
We're allies with the A.I. assassins - by default - send them... everyone will know when the tables turn and who's on who's side.
You’ll show ‘em! Of course, the greatest projector of reality runs on hardware between the ears.
When you're in the fight of your life talking strategy is an exercise in futility and then you die. They've already turned most of us into genetically altered post-humans... the era of Neo-humanity is by design. "The kind of man who wants the government to adopt and enforce his ideas is always the kind of man whose ideas are idiotic." [H.L. Mencken]
Okay…be safe out there, brother!
Like many other dissident writers I was hopeful Substack would be different, but it appears I was wrong. They're all part of the Big Tech complex so no surprise really.
Two-face(d) --- https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/batmantheanimatedseries/images/e/ef/SB_P1_68_-_Two-Face.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20170709235351
I did it for you with this comment: "Larry Ellison thinks you should be observed at all times so you will be a good little boy or girl."
I was banned for 1,000 years by some substack site. I couldn't care less who bans me for speaking what I believe.