27 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Brody's avatar

The Polaris II project is a scam, just as COVID was. It's a framework for redistributing power from sovereign nations to technocrats incorrectly identified as public health professionals. It's an attempt to end democracy, bring the locus of power into the hands of the plutocrats who populate the WEF, Bilderberg Group, TLC and CFR. The fake virtue signaling of there being a motivation for health security and population protection is a transparent lie, just as with COVID.

These are criminals operating under cover, but their cover is no longer fooling enough people. They still think they can get away with it, like any criminal too in love with his idea to care about how others see things.

MSB's avatar

May I add dispicable and depraved criminals to your description. It's also been reported that WHO has collaborated with Rutgers on sex education basically teaching children to have no inhibitions. I believe they produced a video for the Netherlands with an adult talking to a young girl about sexual pleasure.

Jason Brain's avatar

Remember when Substack was (briefly, and ostensibly originally) free of algorithmic obfuscation?

C Taylor's avatar

"Substack does not let me cross post important (Robert Malone) article on the WHO..." If that is a legitimate issue--and I don't doubt that it is--then Substack has crossed over from being a legitimate tool of discourse to one of censorship and control. Perhaps we should all start looking for another--or better yet: building our own.

Retired Medical-Tech Writer's avatar

Build you own? Better have money..."Health Ranger" Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon video hosting platform, said several years ago that start-up fees for an alternative to a censor platform is estimated to be in excess of $100,000... for the hardware alone.

Jeroen.'s avatar

Thank you! And sharing

Susan Hojdik's avatar

I don’t trust Malone:/

Meryl Nass's avatar

who do you trust?

John's avatar

I don't trust anyone, especially people in positions of power and those who support them, but I don't let that get me down!

Susan Hojdik's avatar

Not too many. Sasha L. , Major P, Mike A.

Webe1's avatar

Agreed. His history speaks for itself.

Bob LeBlanc's avatar

When he stays in his lane. He is clueless about geopolitics.

Meryl Nass's avatar

He got this one right

bj jp's avatar

U r always the best. I hope u sleep. Big thanks for bringing hope in the form of reliable info, well researched....a stalwart supporter

Alamo Dude's avatar

Now that we have had the Cruise Ship and the mouse outbreak in Oz down under… Tom Hanks and his wife will develop HantaVirus on a 747 heading to Brisbane. To seed all of Australia with the Hanta. But he will brave through it with his typewriter. Per the Spielberg CO~vid 2.0 script.

All the homeless camps, I mean unHoused, will get locked down with Plague and Hanta from rsts. And Zuck will put up new ballot boxes to stuff with preprinted ballots from China. 6 foot social distancing, masks…except in strip clubs, liqueur stores, weed shops and no Kings riots of course.

🙃🍿🍿🍿

LW's avatar

TRY THIS?

Why not just ask the author and copy the Contant into a new post of your own. Make clear the credit for content. Maybe include the direct link to the other person’s article if it still works?

(that said, I don’t write a Substack post; thus otherwise ignorant of possible reasons, this might not work)

Sepp Hasslberger's avatar

Question from a substack beginner ... is cross posting different from re-stacking?

Meryl Nass's avatar

yes. I had to google this.

Deep Diver's avatar

Restacking is Substack’s social sharing feature, similar to retweeting. When you restack a post, note, or comment, it appears on your Notes feed for your subscribers and followers to see. It does not send an email notification to your subscribers, and it is primarily used to recommend content within the Substack social network.

Cross-posting allows you to publish another writer’s post directly to your newsletter subscribers via email. You can add your own introductory commentary, and the post appears in your subscribers' inboxes as well as on your publication’s homepage. This feature is designed to share valuable content directly with your existing audience, and you must have the original author’s permission to cross-post their work.

Sepp Hasslberger's avatar

Thank you Deep Diver, that was a clear explanation...

Nevermore's avatar

Yay! Chinese fire drills from here to the horizon, from now to eternity.

Jon Olsen's avatar

I like that yo alerted us about this travesty, not the putrid content. I found myself speculating about oreshniks

Dianne Stoess's avatar

I subscribe to Dr. Malone's Substack as well and read it. Excellent. Shared his and will share yours. Thank you!

Gringo's avatar

The Pandemic Agreement was adopted by consensus at the World Health Assembly with 11 abstentions and no objections, which sounds like overwhelming consensus until you remember that most member state populations have no idea any of this happened? Get ready for another bamboozled Agreement with no Official Authority. The W.H.O has their own Bio-weapons Hub brewing Pandemic Pathogens for the unvaccinated. Wake Up & Exercise Your Inherent Rights!

Mike Zimmer's avatar

I ran into a reposting issue on a Sayer Ji article a day or so again. What is going on?

Karin's avatar

You have to ask?????

Mike Zimmer's avatar

Yes, I do have to ask. I have cross posed 1000s of Substack articles over a number of years, and only run in to this problem twice as far as I can remember. Almost all of the cross posts are alternative, dissident content. So, what is going on is a legitimate question. Do you know, as opposed to speculation.