Having called the disease SARS CoV-2 "a man-made bioweapon developed through US Government funding, which got out of the lab and into the human population" in his Item 1.a., the author goes on to call the mRNA vaccines "essentially pre-planned antidotes to the bioweapon."
I don't believe that's accurate.
The mRNA injections are themselves intentional bioweapons to which an antidote is dearly needed.
In this situation it was the other way around. The countermeasure to the measure (both of them genetic creations from the same DOD gain of function SARS COV2 program) is properly conceptualized as an antidote to a weapon of war and was improperly and misleadingly sold to the public as a vaccine. It was a military countermeasure applied as a civilian medical therapy. It failed. I believe Deborah Birx when she stated they "hoped" it would work. It didn't. They should have known it would not work and they should have known it would harm. I believe it was willful blindness. Money can do that to people.
Your assertion, and that of many others, that the countermeasure was specifically designed to kill is not proven. The countermeasure was designed to save lives on the battlefield. The claim that the original thing that stimulated this entire response, was specifically designed to kill, has greater evidential support in my opinion.
The initial “trials”, which weren’t actually official trials but more of a demonstration, actually showed higher ACM in the “vaccine” group so it’s hard for them to honestly claim that they “hoped” they would help when they had adequate information from before the roll out that they would indeed cause a net harm.
I suspect there were different motivations for different individuals. Greed for some. Hubris for others. Fear. Misplaced trust. Power. The effects of propaganda.
Desmet’s book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, was very interesting. I’m fairly certain the ideas in his book don’t explain the motivations of those at the top but he tapped into the mindset of many in the general population.
Thank You So Much Dr. Baker and Dr. Meryl Nass!! You are both among the Heroes of Humanity. This “Ten New Year’s Resolutions…” is so beautifully written, and so important!! It is crucial that we (all who fight for medical freedom and freedom of speech) carefully follow these guidelines!!!
The writing on the wall is clear to those who can read.
Get the true facts about covid right or forget the rest.
We are just churning our wheels in sand - tiring ourselves out for no real gain.
Pfizer stated in the Brook Jackson case, that they delivered the fraud the US government demanded.
The Pfizer documents the courts forced to be released, proved that Pfizer knew the shots were deadly dangerous, and would cause untold suffering, injuries, illnesses and deaths.
The suppression of all adverse event statistics, including millions of deaths, by all nations, speaks clearly.
The shots were intentionally designed to cause, injuries, illnesses and deaths.
Continued support for the covid lies, and ongoing suffering and death, proves ongoing deliberate, criminal intent.
We need to face the facts.
Or get out of the kitchen.
We cannot mix lies, with facts, and expect positive outcomes.
I don’t think she “gets” Trump. She has a (tried and true) playbook that she thinks he should follow. And even though he doesn’t follow it, she was very impressed. Despite her desires not to be impressed. Seems to me Trump succeeded by doing it his way. He moved the needle. Step by step.
She seemed a little wounded feeling that she was being lumped into the Fake Media chamber. And that Trump should pander to them - do their work for them by providing summaries, bullet points, laundry list of accomplishments, etc. She feels this is necessary so that reporters don’t have to sift through the “ramblings” and (my words) hopefully, by chance and just maybe, maybe, maybe ….the reports will be fair and favorable. Good luck with that wishful thinking.
Why don’t the “reporters” do their JOB - research, go beyond what is “said” and tell the truth. Interestingly, she was surprised by a comment made by a reader who listed the numerous accomplishments- she commented how she was unaware about the Epstein part (Trump kicking him out of Mar-a-Lago, Trump volunteering to help with the sex trafficking investigation, etc. ) She asked for supporting documentation from the commenter. Another commenter provided that documentation immediately. If she had done her research, she would have discovered this among other accomplishments. This is not uncommon knowledge if you go beyond MSM.) Being spoon fed is reporter privilege I guess. Sorry, not sorry. I guess at least the interest was there and the comment wasn’t flatly rejected. Progress !!! Step by step.
Other comments by readers who astutely pointed out that plenty of eloquent orators who followed the playbook - including one of which she and her husband were connected to — spouted smooth, slick lies - is that what we really want ?
Bottom line is that these “reporters” won’t tell the truth because they take orders to NOT do this. Hence, the Fake Media moniker. More and more of the public are waking up to this. Step by step.
So why pander ? His style & approach just proves his point of Fake Media.
Seems like Trump being Trump is working despite all of the attacks, armchair advice and TDS. Most people need/want facts and the truth - not a long, word salad pontification filled with rhetoric (aka BS) …..ummm, the playbook version.
Those who know Trump describe him as smart. hI would agree with that based on what I have seen. Additionally, I would agree that he is not perfect but he sure knows how to expose the rats. Two out of three isn’t bad especially since no one is perfect.
Some bring up their difficulties with his support of the jab. Some want an apology. Others respond by pointing out all of the alternatives he promoted and his stance on NOT subjecting people to mandates.
It makes me wonder how this will play out. Maybe he has a strategy on this. Maybe he doesn’t and it just another example of WYSIWYG. Time will tell.
For me, she needs to stop pretending that she is not partisan (I recall something about protesting too much…).
Don’t get me wrong, I have read and followed her as she delved into the jabs -especially as it relates to the damage and injury to women and children. Good work. Maybe expand the view and dig deeper into the Why.
Many have dug deep into the what, when, where and how. As they should. The biggest questions to be answered are WHY and WHO. I think Sasha Latypova is down this road - first stop she has analyzed is the HOW- though it may be a really long road to travel to get to the WHY and the pinnacle of WHO. Without that Truth, it has been and will continue to be very difficult to find answers on how to get through this debacle. Those who conceived of & put into motion this world event - as this was NOT a mistake
WoW! Those Ten Commandments cover everything that must be done! We must demand that our representatives adhere to the Constitution and abide by what their constiutents want. We the people, are the government ; and they are paid salaries from taxpayer monies to listen to us...not to seek additional monies from Lobbyists. Lobbyists must be eliminated, too.
What about the hugely corrupt agencies and associations perpetuating the damages? CDC, FDA, AMA, etc., all in bed with pharma and our legislators, with revolving doors between them all?
According to Meryl Nass, the deadly bio-weapon escaped from a BSL4 Laboratory in Wuhan.....this oft-repeated 'story' is described by Sasha Latypova(SL) as a PSYOP(Psychological Operation)to lead people astray and blame the perfect scapegoat, Lee Harvey Oswald, China, the US' No.1 enemy, meaning that the unnatural bio-chemical product was spread by other means that were described by James W. Giordano.
This is what SL states.
SL also informs us that there are nearly 1000 Bio-Weapon Labs in the United States and the CDC reveals that each year there are 200 'accidents' that never cause public health emergencies!!
I reckon it's important that Meryl and Sasha Latypova discuss Covid-19's REAL ORIGIN further.
Sasha is wonderful but her assertion that the pathogens were spread by other means is a guess. It is not proven. We should stay with what we know until we learn more.
When talking about the COVID-19 shots keep in mind they technically are countermeasures issued under emergency powers under the PREP Act and the Patriots Act., they are not vaccines.
Dr. Baker's 1 a. b. and c. are concise and irrefutable. d. could be: When decision-makers saw the harmful effects of the "antidotes" in early 2021 they did nothing to stop them. Instead they doubled down on their advocacy and pushed mandates.
I would love to do some of these things but simply talking, or trying to talk, to everyone I meet regardless of their fund of knowledge accomplishes nothing. THOSE OF US WHO ARE SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND WILLING TO BE INVOLVED NEED TO BE GIVEN THE NAMES OF ORGANIZED GROUPS AND OR LEGISLATORS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH.
In my experience, no matter how loud I shout and put effort into it, no one, not even the "conservative" legislators who talk the talk will respond.
WE NEED A BULLY PULPIT AND WE NEED TO HAVE AS MANY TV ADS STATING THESE THINGS TO COMPETE WITH THE MEDIA BLITZ THAT CONVINCED EVERYONE THAT THIS WAS A REAL THREAT. BUT WE CANNOT DO IT IN ISOLATION!
We must work to educate the public on the HARMS of masks, remaining indoors with all the windows closed, social distancing and plexiglass everywhere. These measures are unhygienic, and in the case of masks, a blatant violation of OSHA clean air standards. IT IS NOT JUST THAT THESE THINGS DO NOTHING TO MITIGATE DISEASE SPREAD, THEY INCREASE IT.
Re: Item 1.b.
Having called the disease SARS CoV-2 "a man-made bioweapon developed through US Government funding, which got out of the lab and into the human population" in his Item 1.a., the author goes on to call the mRNA vaccines "essentially pre-planned antidotes to the bioweapon."
I don't believe that's accurate.
The mRNA injections are themselves intentional bioweapons to which an antidote is dearly needed.
That may be true but the statements are accurate. They were failed antidotes that created harms instead of cures.
To my knowledge, "vaccines" have never been classified as "antidotes."
...and these weren't really "vaccines" in the traditional sense, as your quotation marks indicate.
Exactly.
In this situation it was the other way around. The countermeasure to the measure (both of them genetic creations from the same DOD gain of function SARS COV2 program) is properly conceptualized as an antidote to a weapon of war and was improperly and misleadingly sold to the public as a vaccine. It was a military countermeasure applied as a civilian medical therapy. It failed. I believe Deborah Birx when she stated they "hoped" it would work. It didn't. They should have known it would not work and they should have known it would harm. I believe it was willful blindness. Money can do that to people.
Your assertion, and that of many others, that the countermeasure was specifically designed to kill is not proven. The countermeasure was designed to save lives on the battlefield. The claim that the original thing that stimulated this entire response, was specifically designed to kill, has greater evidential support in my opinion.
The initial “trials”, which weren’t actually official trials but more of a demonstration, actually showed higher ACM in the “vaccine” group so it’s hard for them to honestly claim that they “hoped” they would help when they had adequate information from before the roll out that they would indeed cause a net harm.
Yes, was it magical thinking, compartmentalization, pure greed?
I suspect there were different motivations for different individuals. Greed for some. Hubris for others. Fear. Misplaced trust. Power. The effects of propaganda.
Desmet’s book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, was very interesting. I’m fairly certain the ideas in his book don’t explain the motivations of those at the top but he tapped into the mindset of many in the general population.
Truth. I don’t know why she did not say this.
Thank You So Much Dr. Baker and Dr. Meryl Nass!! You are both among the Heroes of Humanity. This “Ten New Year’s Resolutions…” is so beautifully written, and so important!! It is crucial that we (all who fight for medical freedom and freedom of speech) carefully follow these guidelines!!!
Agree! An invaluable resource! God bless Meryl for sharing!
Silence speaks.
The writing on the wall is clear to those who can read.
Get the true facts about covid right or forget the rest.
We are just churning our wheels in sand - tiring ourselves out for no real gain.
Pfizer stated in the Brook Jackson case, that they delivered the fraud the US government demanded.
The Pfizer documents the courts forced to be released, proved that Pfizer knew the shots were deadly dangerous, and would cause untold suffering, injuries, illnesses and deaths.
The suppression of all adverse event statistics, including millions of deaths, by all nations, speaks clearly.
The shots were intentionally designed to cause, injuries, illnesses and deaths.
Continued support for the covid lies, and ongoing suffering and death, proves ongoing deliberate, criminal intent.
We need to face the facts.
Or get out of the kitchen.
We cannot mix lies, with facts, and expect positive outcomes.
If you think that Donald Trump is widely hated, you’re on the wrong planet.
Excellent critical focus list of ten.
Also serves as a comprehensive concise list to share with others who are not yet informed (awake?).
Thank you for bringing to our attention Dr Nass.
(Who and how many love or hate Biden or Trump is pretty irrelevant to the real purpose of this piece. Likely there are many in all camps.)
This for David M:
Check out this piece down to the Trump part. Naomi is an incredibly gifted writer and intellect, spot on with her comments.
https://open.substack.com/pub/naomiwolf/p/covering-president-donald-trump-at?
I don’t think she “gets” Trump. She has a (tried and true) playbook that she thinks he should follow. And even though he doesn’t follow it, she was very impressed. Despite her desires not to be impressed. Seems to me Trump succeeded by doing it his way. He moved the needle. Step by step.
She seemed a little wounded feeling that she was being lumped into the Fake Media chamber. And that Trump should pander to them - do their work for them by providing summaries, bullet points, laundry list of accomplishments, etc. She feels this is necessary so that reporters don’t have to sift through the “ramblings” and (my words) hopefully, by chance and just maybe, maybe, maybe ….the reports will be fair and favorable. Good luck with that wishful thinking.
Why don’t the “reporters” do their JOB - research, go beyond what is “said” and tell the truth. Interestingly, she was surprised by a comment made by a reader who listed the numerous accomplishments- she commented how she was unaware about the Epstein part (Trump kicking him out of Mar-a-Lago, Trump volunteering to help with the sex trafficking investigation, etc. ) She asked for supporting documentation from the commenter. Another commenter provided that documentation immediately. If she had done her research, she would have discovered this among other accomplishments. This is not uncommon knowledge if you go beyond MSM.) Being spoon fed is reporter privilege I guess. Sorry, not sorry. I guess at least the interest was there and the comment wasn’t flatly rejected. Progress !!! Step by step.
Other comments by readers who astutely pointed out that plenty of eloquent orators who followed the playbook - including one of which she and her husband were connected to — spouted smooth, slick lies - is that what we really want ?
Bottom line is that these “reporters” won’t tell the truth because they take orders to NOT do this. Hence, the Fake Media moniker. More and more of the public are waking up to this. Step by step.
So why pander ? His style & approach just proves his point of Fake Media.
Seems like Trump being Trump is working despite all of the attacks, armchair advice and TDS. Most people need/want facts and the truth - not a long, word salad pontification filled with rhetoric (aka BS) …..ummm, the playbook version.
Those who know Trump describe him as smart. hI would agree with that based on what I have seen. Additionally, I would agree that he is not perfect but he sure knows how to expose the rats. Two out of three isn’t bad especially since no one is perfect.
Some bring up their difficulties with his support of the jab. Some want an apology. Others respond by pointing out all of the alternatives he promoted and his stance on NOT subjecting people to mandates.
It makes me wonder how this will play out. Maybe he has a strategy on this. Maybe he doesn’t and it just another example of WYSIWYG. Time will tell.
For me, she needs to stop pretending that she is not partisan (I recall something about protesting too much…).
Don’t get me wrong, I have read and followed her as she delved into the jabs -especially as it relates to the damage and injury to women and children. Good work. Maybe expand the view and dig deeper into the Why.
Many have dug deep into the what, when, where and how. As they should. The biggest questions to be answered are WHY and WHO. I think Sasha Latypova is down this road - first stop she has analyzed is the HOW- though it may be a really long road to travel to get to the WHY and the pinnacle of WHO. Without that Truth, it has been and will continue to be very difficult to find answers on how to get through this debacle. Those who conceived of & put into motion this world event - as this was NOT a mistake
*see Margaret Anna Alice’s poem on her substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/margaretannaalice/p/mistakes-were-not-made-one-poem-to?r=j9c92&utm_medium=ios
and they absolutely know the answers of which we seek.
And above all, we NEED TO KNOW so as to NEVER allow this to repeat or evolve into something even far worse.
Great article. Thanks for sending out.
WoW! Those Ten Commandments cover everything that must be done! We must demand that our representatives adhere to the Constitution and abide by what their constiutents want. We the people, are the government ; and they are paid salaries from taxpayer monies to listen to us...not to seek additional monies from Lobbyists. Lobbyists must be eliminated, too.
What about the hugely corrupt agencies and associations perpetuating the damages? CDC, FDA, AMA, etc., all in bed with pharma and our legislators, with revolving doors between them all?
Bobbie Ann Cox was mentioned above... https://attorneycox.substack.com/p/the-administrative-state-is-destroying
"tell them the truth – coolly, rationally, and politely. If they don’t want to hear it, tell them anyway. " Yes!!!! Thanks for sharing.
Great stuff. Doc Baker is awesome and is doing what he recommends we all do. Thanks for posting this!
According to Meryl Nass, the deadly bio-weapon escaped from a BSL4 Laboratory in Wuhan.....this oft-repeated 'story' is described by Sasha Latypova(SL) as a PSYOP(Psychological Operation)to lead people astray and blame the perfect scapegoat, Lee Harvey Oswald, China, the US' No.1 enemy, meaning that the unnatural bio-chemical product was spread by other means that were described by James W. Giordano.
This is what SL states.
SL also informs us that there are nearly 1000 Bio-Weapon Labs in the United States and the CDC reveals that each year there are 200 'accidents' that never cause public health emergencies!!
I reckon it's important that Meryl and Sasha Latypova discuss Covid-19's REAL ORIGIN further.
CY
Sasha is wonderful but her assertion that the pathogens were spread by other means is a guess. It is not proven. We should stay with what we know until we learn more.
When talking about the COVID-19 shots keep in mind they technically are countermeasures issued under emergency powers under the PREP Act and the Patriots Act., they are not vaccines.
Dr. Baker states that well in # 1 b. A countermeasure is a "Counter" "Measure" an antidote to a weapon.
Agreed on every point.
Except: giving people “a brief smattering of truth.”
Surely it’s time the Covid cult got clubbed over the head with a massive hard-hitting cudgel of truth!
Dr. Baker's 1 a. b. and c. are concise and irrefutable. d. could be: When decision-makers saw the harmful effects of the "antidotes" in early 2021 they did nothing to stop them. Instead they doubled down on their advocacy and pushed mandates.
I would love to do some of these things but simply talking, or trying to talk, to everyone I meet regardless of their fund of knowledge accomplishes nothing. THOSE OF US WHO ARE SUFFICIENTLY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND WILLING TO BE INVOLVED NEED TO BE GIVEN THE NAMES OF ORGANIZED GROUPS AND OR LEGISLATORS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH.
In my experience, no matter how loud I shout and put effort into it, no one, not even the "conservative" legislators who talk the talk will respond.
WE NEED A BULLY PULPIT AND WE NEED TO HAVE AS MANY TV ADS STATING THESE THINGS TO COMPETE WITH THE MEDIA BLITZ THAT CONVINCED EVERYONE THAT THIS WAS A REAL THREAT. BUT WE CANNOT DO IT IN ISOLATION!
ONE MORE THING TO ADD;
We must work to educate the public on the HARMS of masks, remaining indoors with all the windows closed, social distancing and plexiglass everywhere. These measures are unhygienic, and in the case of masks, a blatant violation of OSHA clean air standards. IT IS NOT JUST THAT THESE THINGS DO NOTHING TO MITIGATE DISEASE SPREAD, THEY INCREASE IT.
Brilliant! Also, you might want to view the Medical Freedom Amendment that also quotes some of Dr. Baker's writing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU