The amazing Dr. Faust, who is the expert witness testifying against my ability to practice medicine, is a buddy of Rick Bright, who conspired w/ FDA to issue the EUA to kill hydroxychloroquine

Let's look a little closer at this part-time ER doctor, who is being paid $500/hr by the Maine medical board to give them a reason to revoke my license. Hired gun or hired clown?

The FSMB is the Federation of State Medical Boards, which started the witchhunt against doctors for misinformation and treating early COVID in July 2021. The FSMB, a ‘nonprofit’ recommended Jeremy Faust to the Maine medical board staff as they desperately needed someone who would testify against me. But his fee was 4x their maximum—despite the fact that this is his first expert witness case ever, he said. So then the Maine Medical Board assistant director, Tim Terranova, asked the Federation of State Medical Boards if they could contribute to his fee! We don’t know if they did. But if they didn’t, how did the Maine Board evade its strictures on maximum payments to experts? Judicial Watch obtained the following email exchange between an FSMB staffer and Tim Terranova, assistant staff director of the Maine Board. It sounds like the Maine Board realized that by following the FSMB’s instructions, it is depleting its financial reserves with just one case—mine—by overpaying the expert that the FSMB recommended to prosecute the non-crimes FSMB told the Board to prosecute. Hmmm. I wonder what Mainers think about having their taxes spent on costly malicious prosecutions, that are likely to cost them even more when we get into a real court. I just heard Faust asked for $650/hour but settled on $500.

Tim Terranova gave a talk (at the FSMB’s request) to the international medical board society. Whose headquarters are located within the FSMB’s own building. Guess what his talk was about? Doctors spreading misinformation. And the Maine medical board chairwoman, Maroulla Gleaton MD, who has been sleeping for a good portion of every hearing day, is an elected member of the FSMB Board of Trustees.

Can you begin to see how the prosecution of yours truly got cooked up? In an incestuous cocoon of the FSMB and the Maine Board of Medicine.

Rick Bright, who as head of BARDA (and a former researcher in Vietnam along with Jeremy Farrar (007)) was one of the conspirators who admitted he worked with Janet Woodcock at FDA to sink HCQ. He then became an alleged whistleblower against Trump, and was made a VP at the Rockefeller Foundation as his reward. He appears to be a buddy of Dr. Faustus.

Dr. Faust, as you can see, is extremely professional.

He also loves making snide remarks about public figures. Especially if they are Trumpers. In this case he is rude about Alan Dershowitz.

Even though Dr. Faust is a very good friend of CDC, and coauthored an article with Rochelle Walensky, the CDC Director, he lets us know that CDC had incorrect info on its website for years regarding the dire risk of fentanyl for first responders, and finally removed it. He wrote about this on his own substack, titled “Inside Medicine,” where he stated that his substack is supported by CDC. Hmmm. That appears to mean he is financially supported by CDC. He denied this in testimony in my case, probably perjuring himself. But here it is in black and white, as Dr. Faustus begs for more paid subscribers:

He was also dissing the Washington Post in that article for claiming that not all the COVID deaths reported by CDC were actually deaths due to COVID. Even though CDC agrees it is true. Jeremy knows best.

It seems the video he referenced was deliberately misleading regarding the risk of overdose faced by first responders when in possible contact with fentanyl. CDC exaggerating, not again?

Now, in the case below, Dr. Faustus had been tweeting wildly about masks and the need for everyone to be masked on transportation. He was especially incensed by videos of passengers on airplanes applauding when the mask mandate was removed in-flight. His tweet then was picked up by the Daily Mail, which called him a “rag[ing] woke liberal.”

What he had tweeted out was, “Imagine celebrating the deaths of a small number of kids so that you don’t have to wear a mask on a plane.”

Apparently Dr. Faust had neither read the literature on masks, nor had looked into the likelihood of kids dying from COVID after traveling on an unmasked airplane.

The thing about Dr. Faust is that he thinks he knows more than everyone else. He never studied epidemiology but he claims he is an epidemiologist. He has never used HCQ or treated COVID outpatients, but he thinks he knows a lot about that—enough to claim I cannot interpret medical literature and should have my license permanently revoked for using HCQ and IVM—on his word.

Below he makes fun of a tweet by physician Ronny Jackson for using all caps. Dr. Jackson had been the White House doctor for Trump, and is now a Republican Congressman from Texas.

I could not resist adding this one to the list. Jeremy always knows more than the experts. In this article, he recommends extra shots in pregnancy and for infants.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/faustfiles/103792

3. Pregnancy warrants boosting.

WHO will be recommending boosting during pregnancy, "if the last dose was given more than 6 months earlier." This is almost exactly what I wroteopens in a new tab or window with two experts on this topic, Sonja Rasmussen, MD, MS, and Denise Jamieson, MD, MPH, last November in an important ob-gyn journal. (We said more than 4 months, and I actually stand by that, though I'm open to revising if the WHO readout is compelling.) This is smart because boosting protects mothers during a risky time and especially if the booster is given in the third trimester, the infant will be born with COVID-19 antibodies that might last several months, which is crucial during that fragile neonatal period. This recommendation is a major win.

4. Pediatric vaccine policy update (The WHO missed a key insight on infants).

For children, the WHO will recommend "considering the primary series and booster dose for healthy children and adolescents only within country context, including disease burden in this age group, cost-effectiveness, other health or programmatic priorities, and opportunity costs." Anti-vaxxers are foaming at the mouth here, saying that the WHO has rejected COVID-19 vaccines for children. But that's not what the WHO is saying. The question is not whether vaccines are safe and effective for children (that's a yes), but rather whether the juice is worth the squeeze in all nations. If, for example, it costs $5,000,000 worth of vaccines to save one life of a 15-year-old, a cold economic analysis might find this to be unsustainable for low-and-middle income countries. (That said, the ghost of Paul Farmer, MD, PhD, is spinning in his grave at this type of analysisopens in a new tab or window.)

However, as I've also writtenopens in a new tab or window, there is one pediatric group that absolutely needs vaccination because their risk is so much higher than all other children (and even many adults): infants. Infants are unlikely to have been infected before (infection provides substantial protection from future severe disease, even without a vaccine) and they are also the most likely to be hospitalized of all children. Since Omicron showed up, infants have had even higher hospitalization risksopens in a new tab or window than adults ages 50-64.