There are times when the Deep State purposely puts out fake information (e.g. tweets) to "prove" there are enemies attempting to perpetrate x, y and z.
With all of Malone's claims I carry a bucket of salt; the man that developed the mRNA tech that never made it past animal trials for good reason suddenly trusted in these poisonous injections? Does that make any logical sense?
It's preposterous and Malone could be presenting this "evidence" to appear the victim yet again.
Not that Peter Breggin needs an excuse just something else for him to blather on and on and on about. It takes him longer to say nothing than it does Kamala.
After reading the last post about Dr. Malone and the rest, I am saddened and dismayed at the amount of suspicion, outright lies and stinking thinking that goes on between people! This is the most dangerous factor in this whole mess... the arguing without facts, the deep slimy energy of hatred and projection. If anything brings us down as a nation it will be this! Not just the corruption of institutions, but the hatred from people like those who responded to this piece. Using good judgement and intuition has gone out the door in favor of in-fighting. You know this better than most, so sad!
It is VERY difficult to determine truth in all the noise. Accusations from both sides make it extremely difficult. I use observation of 'doingness' and actions on either side, to cut through the noise. I have found that Dr Malone has done more to expose regulatory capture, infiltration of deep state, as well as other global influences, that can easily be exposed and he continues to focus on that. I have not seen the other side to the same.
Thanks for posting this Meryl. Your input into CHD and your own substack are a fine source of sanity. Stuff like this is called divide and rule. It's been an incredibly hard 3 years. Harder for some than for others I know. I decided early on that the so called vacs were far from safe and effective. Heneghan warned early 2020 that they couldn't work. The research I did as follow up made it abundantly clear. As did research into masks etc. I am so grateful to those who researched, argued, put careers on the line to keep the light of truth out there. Everyone did their bit and I really don't want to start criticising anyone by saying they didn't do enough or weren't 'perfect'. There are enough real enemies out there without attacking our own. I read there was a psychological theory to explain why the imprisoned people start fighting each other once 'freed'. But surely we're smarter than that. There is still a lot more to do - we haven't won yet and we need all the allies we can get. From my point of view I have huge respect for everyone who has stood up and been counted.
it's a nice catch. why did it take so long to catch? this one confused me a long time ago. either way it;s nice that people realize that malone has done and is doing some good things. sounds like we would never have heard of Ed Dowd if not for Malone. Even so , there is no getting around how flagrantly bad it is to sue 'Breggins for $25M. Drop it to $5k and Malone;s cred will skyrocket. Leave it at $25M and we'd all rather hear Stormy Daniels podcast with Pelosi than hear Malone.
Third, you know Malone and your opinions are based on your personal relationship. The rest of us are unable to make sure judgments about him from our remove. We have clear data points, however.
1) Malone’s actions created a conflict that hurts our movement.
2) Ginger and Peter Breggin are some of the most courageous and self-sacrificing people I have ever seen.
3) Psychopaths commonly bully and torment less wealthy people with lawsuits. If, for example, a NYC coop mistakenly allows a billionaire into their group, they can be subjected to this.
So please opine more openly about your opinions. Is Malone simply incredibly thin skinned, aggressive, and naive about the legal process? Does he understand what we fight for: the foundational First Ammendment? How could a “chess player” of his stature with that career behind him act like he has without ill intent?
You have been sure he is not a partial hangout. I try to remind myself that getting fooled by the next psychopath can happen to me any time; they do not possess the operating system of ethics that would be a “tell” for anyone else.
Were Malone to abandon the lawsuit, all doubts about him would vanish. No one has to apologize or kiss and make up.
So did Malone think the mRNA problems were ironed out so he was comfortable taking it, along with his loved one? What made him think so is what I would be interested to know.
Meryl, are you insinuating that the Breggins are a part of a deep state operation and/or are working with the deep state to smear Malone?
Dr. Peter Breggin has a track record of successfully fighting to stop lobotomies and bringing attention to the dangers that psychiatric drugs has claimed and continues to claim on our society.
If anything, you and Malone having closer ties to big government than the Breggins have. Wouldn't you agree?
Thanks a million, Dr. Nass for posting this as well as your previous post re: Dr. Malone’s smearing by the Breghins as well as others. Through discernment, I was able to come to the conclusion that an extraordinary smear campaign was launxhed against Dr. Malone, whom has taken a constant, steady and level-headed approach with the covid vaccine narrative. He’s been nothing but careful and thoughtful with his verbage throughout the time since I discovered him in the Dark Horse podcast. Unless both Dr. Malone and his wife Jill have multiple-personality disorder, which I highly doubt, they’ve both been smeared in the most unkind and profoundly dangerous way. As a matter of fact, I recall Dr. Malone succinctly saying that he didn’t want to enter into a lawsuit with the Breggins’, but due to their failure to comply with the cease and desist order he was put into a position where he needed to defend his and his wife’s reputation. Again, thanks for your recent posts on this subject matter.
So this faked tweet on a first level seems to have been fabricated to "incriminate" him ("look what a scheming cynic he is"). But on a second level it could just as well have been fabricated to "exonerate" him ("look how they scheme to make him look bad"). Both give no information about him either way.
I believe there are certain people in the health freedom space, like Malone, despite questionable histories, deserve to be heard out. Through his substack he sure has been a vociferous advocate for health freedom and exposing the Deep State. Elon is another example of this. He is as deeply connected to the Oligarchs as anyone on earth, yet he speaks against robbing us of our freedom. Should we wish to shut him up about that? I’ll take allies where I can get them. This a matter of addition as opposed to subtraction. Must we all lose the benefit of the doubt among us and let ourselves be manipulated into fighting eachother? Even the Elect, if it we’re possible, may be deceived…
There are times when the Deep State purposely puts out fake information (e.g. tweets) to "prove" there are enemies attempting to perpetrate x, y and z.
With all of Malone's claims I carry a bucket of salt; the man that developed the mRNA tech that never made it past animal trials for good reason suddenly trusted in these poisonous injections? Does that make any logical sense?
It's preposterous and Malone could be presenting this "evidence" to appear the victim yet again.
Be very careful.
Not that Peter Breggin needs an excuse just something else for him to blather on and on and on about. It takes him longer to say nothing than it does Kamala.
It’s extremely difficult to know what’s true anymore. Be aware.
After reading the last post about Dr. Malone and the rest, I am saddened and dismayed at the amount of suspicion, outright lies and stinking thinking that goes on between people! This is the most dangerous factor in this whole mess... the arguing without facts, the deep slimy energy of hatred and projection. If anything brings us down as a nation it will be this! Not just the corruption of institutions, but the hatred from people like those who responded to this piece. Using good judgement and intuition has gone out the door in favor of in-fighting. You know this better than most, so sad!
It is VERY difficult to determine truth in all the noise. Accusations from both sides make it extremely difficult. I use observation of 'doingness' and actions on either side, to cut through the noise. I have found that Dr Malone has done more to expose regulatory capture, infiltration of deep state, as well as other global influences, that can easily be exposed and he continues to focus on that. I have not seen the other side to the same.
Thanks for posting this Meryl. Your input into CHD and your own substack are a fine source of sanity. Stuff like this is called divide and rule. It's been an incredibly hard 3 years. Harder for some than for others I know. I decided early on that the so called vacs were far from safe and effective. Heneghan warned early 2020 that they couldn't work. The research I did as follow up made it abundantly clear. As did research into masks etc. I am so grateful to those who researched, argued, put careers on the line to keep the light of truth out there. Everyone did their bit and I really don't want to start criticising anyone by saying they didn't do enough or weren't 'perfect'. There are enough real enemies out there without attacking our own. I read there was a psychological theory to explain why the imprisoned people start fighting each other once 'freed'. But surely we're smarter than that. There is still a lot more to do - we haven't won yet and we need all the allies we can get. From my point of view I have huge respect for everyone who has stood up and been counted.
Troll infestation. Reason why I only allow paid subscribers to comment on my substack columns.
it's a nice catch. why did it take so long to catch? this one confused me a long time ago. either way it;s nice that people realize that malone has done and is doing some good things. sounds like we would never have heard of Ed Dowd if not for Malone. Even so , there is no getting around how flagrantly bad it is to sue 'Breggins for $25M. Drop it to $5k and Malone;s cred will skyrocket. Leave it at $25M and we'd all rather hear Stormy Daniels podcast with Pelosi than hear Malone.
First, thank you for your service. I’m one of the fans who follow you like Deadheads did the Grateful Dead.
Second, do not burn out. This may help: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/213-what-max-the-iditarod-sled-dog#details
Third, you know Malone and your opinions are based on your personal relationship. The rest of us are unable to make sure judgments about him from our remove. We have clear data points, however.
1) Malone’s actions created a conflict that hurts our movement.
2) Ginger and Peter Breggin are some of the most courageous and self-sacrificing people I have ever seen.
3) Psychopaths commonly bully and torment less wealthy people with lawsuits. If, for example, a NYC coop mistakenly allows a billionaire into their group, they can be subjected to this.
So please opine more openly about your opinions. Is Malone simply incredibly thin skinned, aggressive, and naive about the legal process? Does he understand what we fight for: the foundational First Ammendment? How could a “chess player” of his stature with that career behind him act like he has without ill intent?
You have been sure he is not a partial hangout. I try to remind myself that getting fooled by the next psychopath can happen to me any time; they do not possess the operating system of ethics that would be a “tell” for anyone else.
Were Malone to abandon the lawsuit, all doubts about him would vanish. No one has to apologize or kiss and make up.
Best wishes and thank you again for all you do.
So did Malone think the mRNA problems were ironed out so he was comfortable taking it, along with his loved one? What made him think so is what I would be interested to know.
Meryl, are you insinuating that the Breggins are a part of a deep state operation and/or are working with the deep state to smear Malone?
Dr. Peter Breggin has a track record of successfully fighting to stop lobotomies and bringing attention to the dangers that psychiatric drugs has claimed and continues to claim on our society.
If anything, you and Malone having closer ties to big government than the Breggins have. Wouldn't you agree?
All Malone has to do is something he will not do: drop the lawsuit.
Thanks a million, Dr. Nass for posting this as well as your previous post re: Dr. Malone’s smearing by the Breghins as well as others. Through discernment, I was able to come to the conclusion that an extraordinary smear campaign was launxhed against Dr. Malone, whom has taken a constant, steady and level-headed approach with the covid vaccine narrative. He’s been nothing but careful and thoughtful with his verbage throughout the time since I discovered him in the Dark Horse podcast. Unless both Dr. Malone and his wife Jill have multiple-personality disorder, which I highly doubt, they’ve both been smeared in the most unkind and profoundly dangerous way. As a matter of fact, I recall Dr. Malone succinctly saying that he didn’t want to enter into a lawsuit with the Breggins’, but due to their failure to comply with the cease and desist order he was put into a position where he needed to defend his and his wife’s reputation. Again, thanks for your recent posts on this subject matter.
So this faked tweet on a first level seems to have been fabricated to "incriminate" him ("look what a scheming cynic he is"). But on a second level it could just as well have been fabricated to "exonerate" him ("look how they scheme to make him look bad"). Both give no information about him either way.
Meryl, Thank You for clarifying the what-and -why of the arracks on Robert Malone. I have believed him to be honest and have integrity.
I believe there are certain people in the health freedom space, like Malone, despite questionable histories, deserve to be heard out. Through his substack he sure has been a vociferous advocate for health freedom and exposing the Deep State. Elon is another example of this. He is as deeply connected to the Oligarchs as anyone on earth, yet he speaks against robbing us of our freedom. Should we wish to shut him up about that? I’ll take allies where I can get them. This a matter of addition as opposed to subtraction. Must we all lose the benefit of the doubt among us and let ourselves be manipulated into fighting eachother? Even the Elect, if it we’re possible, may be deceived…