56 Comments

From your lips to God's ears, Dr. Nass. (Ending virologists and the evil labs especially.)

Expand full comment

We need Putin to get a legion together and end the bioweapons labs once and for all. That’s if he’s been successful in Ukraine.

Expand full comment

I will ignore any bug the weffers suggest i bend my knee to in weakness and fear.

I bend my knee to God alone.

Expand full comment

"It is the Global Biosecurity Agenda that must be stopped."

The Global Biosecurity Agenda is totally integrated into the military industrial complex, so to stop one you'd have to stop both.

Expand full comment

"It is the lab-designed bugs that are the problem. We need to stop them. Close the labs, the BSL4s, reduce the BSL3’s and get rid of basic research on “selected agents,” destroy the samples, end this form of “science” that has proven its ability to kill millions and cause worldwide economic destruction. End the field of virology and evolutionary viral genetics—which seem to be peopled by a large group of ‘scientists’ who were in cahoots to keep the lab origin covered up…or at a minimum were afraid to tell the public the truth. Keep a few medical virologists around who did not get their hands dirty. Who needs most of them? They have proven their societal value—which is NEGATIVE—over and over these last three years." I'm so happy to hear someone of your stature writing those words. This weekend is the 3-year anniversary of the Lockdown of the world. Here is a brief and readable synopsis of how and why 300,000,000 US citizens were easily cajoled into self-imprisonment at warp speed (hint-It WAS NOT a once in a century plague) : https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-all-of-this-happen/

Expand full comment

Speaking as a weak and frail 68 year old, I'll take my chances with Mother Nature. NEVER will I EVER trust a physician, or our government again. The only silver lining in his entire tragedy is that it shed light on the evil and corruption that is our government and big pharma.

Expand full comment

Ask 100 physicians: what would do to avoid a nasty case?

CoV times made it easy to find the ones you can trust your life. The problem is: I still can not adjust to whom I can‘t trust my life, and why it is such a tiny fraction that is not captured. And I am talking of family as well. The more educated the heavier mass formatted, side effect: denialism or cognitive dissonance.

Expand full comment

I understand - my gyno took the shots and doesn't feel well yet he told my pregnant daughter not to take them - his mom had a heart issue with it so she stopped. Then my FORMER internist told my other daughter that since she had covid she didn't need a booster - (betting she realized the dangers but didn't want to say) then my endocrinologist nodded but didn't say a word. They all knew I used Ivermectin AND so did my entire family. They're afraid of losing their jobs. Sad to say. I do telemed with Dr. Kory's group for my Ivermectin - and always keep it in the house. Sad thing is, I've heard great physicians wonder if it's good for cancer etc. but since it's off patent we will never know.

Expand full comment

How were you acquiring ivermectin with US rx or ordering from overseas?

Expand full comment

Jon Rappoport's take on Covid origins seems so much more credible than a lab leak or "gain of function." Subscribe to Jon's Substack.

People STILL don’t get it; a different COVID origin story; straight outta Wuhan

Jon Rappoport

Mar 7

I put all this together, nearly three years ago. I published the story several times, in several different versions.

But most people didn’t get it (and still don’t), because they’re fixated on the virus.

The origin story of COVID involves pollution, protests, and pneumonia.

In the year leading up to the announcement of a pandemic, protests were breaking out in Chinese cities, including Wuhan.

People were risking their futures, their freedom, their lives, protesting against air pollution, because it was making them sick.

People don’t take that level of risk in China, unless the problem is serious. Very serious.

People wouldn’t risk being carted away to prison, and maybe never coming home, if they were facing Los Angeles level smog. No, the air pollution in Chinese cities was much worse.

What do you get when you walk around in that soup? Lung congestion. Fever, fatigue, major shortness of breath. Pneumonia. Year in, year out, roughly 300,000 people in China die from pneumonia.

What was announced as THE symptom in the first cases of so-called COVID in Wuhan? Pneumonia.

If, in certain respects, the pneumonia in those cases looked atypical on X-rays, in the first month of 2020, there was a good reason:

The air pollution was atypical. It was an unprecedented mix of early industrial age and modern industrial age compounds—because that is the mixed picture of Chinese civilization and its factories.

No one has ever studied the synergistic effects, on the lungs, of the “old and new” polluting compounds in the air of Chinese cities.

Pollution, protests, pneumonia.

Equals what? A new outbreak of a viral disease? That’s about as sensible as saying ongoing car crashes on icy highways are the result of new paint jobs on the cars.

Wuhan is known for something deadly besides air pollution. Ask the DEA, they’ll tell you. Wuhan is Global Central for exporting the precursor chemicals for making the deadly drug FENTANYL.

One major route: Wuhan, Mexican cartel labs, US southern border, the entire US.

This gives rise to speculation about cover stories, distractions, diversions—calling Wuhan the origin of COVID obscures the city as the source of chemical warfare (fentanyl) against the West.

The admirable independent investigator, Jim West, has shown that early clusters of “COVID” cases were reported in several centers of deadly air pollution: Chinese cities, North Italy, Spain, for example.

Pollution. Lung infections. Pneumonia. The deceptive label, “COVID.”

The inferences aren’t big leaps. They aren’t leaps at all.

The method for diagnosing COVID is the PCR test. Much can be said about this deceptive test. And I have. Here I’ll simply point out that the NY Times ran a shocking article during year one of the “pandemic”—pointing out that up to 90% of all tests positive for COVID could have yielded FALSE results. Could have been WRONG.

Why? Because labs were adjusting the sensitivity of the PCR far too high; it was catching and registering meaningless fragments.

Take all that one step further. Did researchers ever discover and isolate the “COVID virus” in the first place? My answer, which I’ve explained in detail many times, is no. But I don’t need to invoke that proof to demonstrate what I’ve shown above, in this piece.

Chills, fever, fatigue, lung infection, pneumonia, plus a completely unreliable PCR test result—and they call it a COVID case.

No symptoms of any kind plus a positive PCR—and they call that COVID, too.

For more than a hundred years, people have known industrial air pollution causes lung problems.

And in 2020, that obvious fact was the real origin story of COVID in Wuhan.

-- Jon Rappoport

Expand full comment

I’ll avoid doing anything recommended by alphabet agencies. Especially the WHO!

Expand full comment

You need to say this to the Congressional investigative committee because there are still witnesses testifying that there is value in keeping open and funding GOF labs; of course, these paid shills don't really care about safety, as they claim, but in making their next fortune when they create the next pathogenic bioweapon and the next plandemic with the newest "vaccines".

Expand full comment

YES! The Congress Critters need to hear Dr. Nass testify! How do we make this happen?

Expand full comment

the difference between the two is that "bio-weapons" are chemical toxins only and "natural pathogens" do not exist.

Frankly Dr Nass, I am surprised that you are still pursuing this line given that the evidence that virology is a scam, and has been since its inception, is rather overwhelming.

Ditto for epidemiology and immunology.

Expand full comment

Yes but the same thing has to be done whatever you “believe”. The bioweapons labs have to go,....getting them will expose the past ones and when they started, who started them and why. It’s going to go back a long way......long long way.

Expand full comment

Are you claiming that viruses and pathogens don’t exist?

Expand full comment

The most important thing is we do not get split over this, and unite in care for each other.

I think it is his construction of reality, which is always an individual dynamic model of the world. Your personal projection.

If it explains his observations, be it so.

I think that some pathogens or he may call it exosomes or dirt travel mainly through droplets and may transport symptoms of disease.

When my son stood up from table, retreated one meter, softly and retained blew his nose, disinfected bla bla and sat down again, after 1.5days 5 other people had the same symptoms of common cold.

We measured the travel span, which was infection up to 2.4m and no infection at 2.5m.

So in my perception we produce 10,000 of droplets, shooting out up to 3m ballistically, then hanging in air like invisible nebula, needing 40s to sink down. Searching any slit between mask and face line where fleece is only sitting lightly on the skin, letting even droplets pass.

Defending this 3m bowl around you after sneezing, coughing or nose blowing would be necessary to stop the spread.

Or „detox“ aka apply antiseptics to the upper airways.

We use iota-carrageenan and or xylitol and or inorganic antiseptic based nasal sprays. In one minute, do 4 rounds of: breathing in, spray to nose and throat and 1 under the tongue. This emulates gargling.

So yes, problem solved.

Did I use the word virus?

No.

Normally, I do.

But all that matters to end the spread can be done regardless of your beliefs. Just do.

We will be weighed by our deeds.

Expand full comment

Did he wash his hands after he blew his nose or spread it all over dishes on the table as they went around. I do my hands before going into and leaving any establishment. Hmmmm. 1.5 days? That’s weird. I thought it was closer to 3 days before symptoms, .....of course that too probably depends on how good the immune system is.

Expand full comment

He was >1.5m away from any other dish, as he stepped back from table a good meter, and yes, he got rid of the tissue properly and thoroughly washed his hand. He also did not touch any things afterwards others ingested. It is proven for CoV that every 1000-thds infection is via surfaces only, so the hand washing scrubbing disinfecting especially my little one suffered from in school (30% eczema cases untill parents cried STOP, and donated dead sea washing lotion diluted for a foam dispenser and hand lotion for care) just reduced norovirus, OK, “hygiene works” one could conclude, IF pathogen-adopted :) IF someone like CDC’s claims to fight a respiratory virus, it could „help“ to do MUCOSAL HYGIENE. It could … be efficient like 98%.

1.5 days incubation time is possible for common cold pathogens, as they make our cells popp, so incubation time is reduced.

Normally, cells encapsulate the produced pathogens (60k per cell) and only neighbouring cells are infected by cell-cell channels or diffusion. Then it takes a good deal of the incubation period to grow to the top layer, where mucosal cells are programmed to dissolve, to donate their mucilage and feed the biome.

CoV does not do this, but enhanced contagiousness seemingly due to hastened life cycle of the cells, perhaps fiddling with the conditions for the cell walls to dissolve.

The spread to distant parts of our own mucosa, like nose and lungs, can thus be efficiently PREVENTED by MUCOSAL HYGIENE by anything antiseptic that is diffusing into the layers of dead cells comprising the mucosa, and then into the cells inactivating pathogens before release. This is done by every INORGANIC ANTISEPTIC. And mustard oils like horseradish probably as well, as they diffuse insides bacterial films, I once read. Inorganic antiseptics are :

NaHClO CIO2 NO I2 PVP-I H2O2 etc., each having it’s own properties and all having a nice safety band, for nasal wash, mouth rinse and gargle, nasal spray also sprays droplets inhalable for tracheae, and for alveoli also as nebulised INHALATION (ClO2 only up to 5ppm! General rule: no cough urge, no impaired breathing while or after inhalation session, compared to before, mindfully watch it, and you can do dose finding like for me (and family ca.) personally: per inhalation session, we used up to:

- 1.5ml 800ppm NaHClO (mouth or wound wash Plasm@ Liq. eg),

- 1-5ml 2% H2O2 (buffer pH to 6.5 ca., “tasting just neutral”),

- 1ml 3% PVP-I (also buffer to neutral),

- 1-10ml 5ppm CIO2(aq)).

Or you place a film on top of mucosa that is antiviral and keep it 24/7 intact, which is the iota-carrageenan route. Leaving biome alone.

The Xlear/Xylimed route is something in between, and enforces germs to behave or get washed away, and GSE also killing some, and the working principle of xlear was excellently explained by its inventor there: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/xylitol-nasal-spray-prevents-sars/comments

Everyone can DIY the nasal wash.

With whatever is available.

The most important thing is: call it as you like, “dirt” eg, it is something smaller than bacteria (which we can see under microscope), it spreads, and the “hygiene rules” of CDC’s of the world HELP IT SPREAD.

- 1.5 m : lie! 3m!

- no mentioning of hovering time of >40secs

- no mentioning even soft nose blow or cough or sneeze produces 10,000ths of droplets

- no mentioning of SINGLE droplet carrying the infectious dose (explaining failure of masks to protect, where inner fleece not compressed to skin on 5mm at least is transparent even for droplets, ALL masks having segments to skin line that are not tightly sealing)

- droplets dominate infections. Lie: aerosol domination of infections, making fear from the “unseen and for hours” horror. NO, aerosols mostly TRAIN your innate antibodies provided by nK up to STERILIZING IMMUNITY.

(Still, disinfect aerosols by placing one jar glass 10ml CDS 0.3% CIO2 per 10m^2 room area if you like, DONE; for school etc “official building” kindergarten dilute to drinking water 20ppm by filling 1.5L PET bottle and only lightly screw on lid or diy diffusion lid from old goretex jacket’s membrane.)

Droplets with sterile pathogens of course train even better.

This TRAINING masks DO prevent by 99%.

So masks have 1:100 effect:costs, and without masks NO PLANDEMIC is possible, as endemic state is reached too quickly.

Without nK reducing epigenetic REPROGRAMMING by PEG2k medical device of

MRNA vaccine NO PLANDEMIC is possible due to strong nK.

Without FEAR PORN no PLANDEMIC is possible as it also efficiently and measurably reduces nK (in timely absorption of main stream media NEWS) - just invent a real time sensor and measure!

Then call any journalist to prison that dares to take the word virus in the mouth and fails to say „anything antiviral!).

But love, care, laughing in faces and seeing the mouth region and touching skin BOOSTS nK.

(What again was forbidden because you kill your granny?)

So yes, I have obviously a „viruses do exist reality model“ in my head, and it explains a lot for me if applied humanistically. But I do not care about wheather they „really“ exist.

Explaining a lot:

Like instantly (in 2yrs :) forming heretic theories:

Eg:

DIY vaccine:

emulate passive immunisation by broken pathogens helping us to live with all of them for millions of years by instinct behaviour WITHOUT evoking b-cell based antibodies:

Upon ill, every social mammal retreats from family/group. Feeling better, if nK is OK, upon coming back in the group, shedding only broken viruses, it gives a free round of training to family/group, so they stay operational when next wave hits, having only mild symptoms. After some rounds of training, 2-3?, sterilising immunity is reached. After more than 1-1/R0 have this, call it Herd Immunity. (eg R0 omicron = ca 10 so 1 incidence case would infect ca 10 people naive to the virus (not existing any more) so we need 90% with competent nK and trained innate antibody based immunity).

All nasal hygiene does not completely prevent passive immunisation.

But we could take primary infected’s snot, sterilise, filtrate and put it in a nasal spray and emulate shedding eg 5x/day for one week spray one puff in nose. Or wherever a pathogen starts.

Add one drop of H2O2 as preservative.

End heresy.

Expand full comment

No one has ever Ever seen a picture of a virus. Yet I have a early 1900 s medical book that has all kinds of pictures of corona viruses. They turn out to be pieces of dead flesh albeit with pathogens on it way bigger than what a virus would be. The only thing I can think of with the magnetic flux world, is a swirling energy of data ready to affect any wrong energy in the system. We have lots of them.

The Misconception called “Virus” by Stefan Lanka

Expand full comment

So when scientists around the world study viruses and synthesize RNA code they’re all in on a big hoax? All of them? How does biological warfare work then?

Expand full comment

Maybe someone can tell us about https://www.luminexcorp.com/the-verigene-system/. This “verigene” system that I think is a database for detection of pathogens.

Expand full comment

This is a paper from the Royal journal of Chemistry 2017.

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/cs/c6cs00693k#fn1

As far as I have ever been able to discern, is that you cannot test for a virus, only a bacterium. Now I have been told that a ‘virus’ goes in and makes its way into the cells, making a pathway for bacteria to grow causing an infection. It’s the infection that causes the symptoms. That’s why “only bacterial infections can be treated with antibiotics. THIS ALWAYS SOUNDED OFF TO ME. It’s like ok so if you have a viral infection, it’s changing things but does not need antibiotics,.......it sounds like certain pathogens made with other animal proteins that don’t belong in our biological system, have been created with our RNA to be able to get deep into our system to create havoc and bacterial infections response from immune.

It also sounds like this ‘dead cell’ containing this made pathogen can be spread over any surface. I suspect that what they have been working on these past decades is how to make the pathogen stay viable longer in the open air. Which they have succeeded in doing so more people can spread it around.

Hmmmm

Expand full comment

The reason why it primarily happens in Africa is due to toxic environmental conditions.

The virus is the cover story.

Remember when those Americans were brought back with Ebola?

They got better real quick, just by being away from the toxic area in Africa that made them sick.

https://viroliegy.com/2022/08/29/the-marburg-virus-precursor-to-ebola/

Expand full comment

Clean water and food, sanitation, proper shelter, etc. does wonders for one's health, but the "philanthropists" never seem to focus on those things.

Expand full comment

You are exactly correct.Remove the profit and the problem will evaporate.

Expand full comment

Bravo!

Expand full comment

We don’t know 100% we do know military personnel from Fort Detrick traveled to the Wuhan military games after the biolabs closure due to “Problems” or the mysterious Pneumonia outbreak !

Expand full comment

Where nazis and communists failed- they did not have enough time- to create The New Human- financial liberal order had a huge success: the Predatory Human who transformed his world in a jungle and is proud of himself, hungry for more and more power and money. Without realizing we can easily get used with the abnormal. For many, the pandemic was a revelation, the revelation of the jungle without any law, with no reason and no understanding that Life is sacred .

A world where everything can be sold and bought is a world returned to barbarism. A world separated from God will finally collapse, in a way or another.

Expand full comment

Viruses most definitely do not exist.

Pathogens, it depends on what you mean by that, precisely. If you mean bacteria, then certainly bacteria exist, but are they pathogens? Or are bacteria, found in 'infections' for example, actually attempting to remedy the problem, or causing the problem? pharma 'science' claims the bacteria is causing the problem and so you must buy their product. Toxins are a far more logical culprit. Without bacteria we do not exist. Viruses only exist 'in silico', which is why they can 'transmit' globally so fast, just an email away.

Expand full comment