59 Comments

Thanks for informing us, Meryl. I am continually amazed at your level of productivity. ✔️✔️✔️

Expand full comment

The UN's Global governance and dominance is to be transformed and strengthened. No thanks!

"We will transform global governance domination" which will lead "to a brighter future for all of oppressed humanity."

Tell the UN we're not interested in their oppression and control and we now regard the UN as unfit for purpose. The UN no longer exist as an influence upon humanity. We, the people have spoken!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) Fighting for freedom and for Pfizer to accept LIABILITY for their deadly injections!

Expand full comment

All of a sudden, we find ourselves immersed neck deep in tragedies in the making like Springfield, Ohio. I can't speak for anybody else, but we have nothing but springtime rosebuds about to bloom in dear old Connecticut and the governor and his co-believers have said NOTHING about our impending doom. It's all about our progress expected in our rosy futures, a land of catch-free wonderfulnesses that are unlimited. Covid vaccines are still treated as Nirvana with Needles, blessed be Pfizer and Murderna. And our fabulously wealthy governor is balls to the wall with his rejoicing about our futures. Business as usual, Baby, we are going up, up, and uppa you know where. He doesn't know, he doesn't care, he's totally oblivious to what is joyfully celebrated as our impending visit thanks to mana from heaven. You think Congress is deficient, hey, our governor is heavily invested in our anticipated demise and nobody throws this stuff in his face, why?

Expand full comment

Groupthink? Brainwashing? Electromagnetic waves to the brain?

Four score years of dumbing down education?

Expand full comment

Because his thought processes ares based on insane WEF New World Order philosophies, like the other puppets who seem mesmerised by such lunacy. Tell him to get a proper job and to stop scaring the weak and vulnerable. Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Expand full comment

We only need One Point to respond to them:

We are tens of millions, we are armed, and we will execute them.

Expand full comment

That sounds like the perfect Plan! Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

Well said!! Thank you!!

Expand full comment

Rest assured, whatever "they" say about this "treaty", think of it in terms of exactly the opposite in meaning. The WHO must be dissolved because all they are are a Band of Thieves. They are good for absolutely NOTHING.

Expand full comment

I have read the parts of the UN Pact and agree that they use flowery, non specific, vague , solution barren language with the message of "Trust Us". This doesnt work for me as I don't hand any organization my trust when their track record shows they accomplished almost nothing in their entire 70 plus years of existance. I had a phone call from a former client, now retired who was exasperated with a couple of contractors who took deposits on construction work then disappeared. Yep the world if full of scoundrels and the UN in its present incarnation strikes me as being the biggest liar I have ever seen.

Expand full comment

A quote from the Guardian Sept 7, 2015:

In its 70 years, the United Nations may have been hailed as the great hope for the future of mankind – but it has also been dismissed as a shameful den of dictatorships. It has infuriated with its numbing bureaucracy, its institutional cover-ups of corruption and the undemocratic politics of its security council. It goes to war in the name of peace but has been a bystander through genocide. It has spent more than half a trillion dollars in 70 years.

Expand full comment

Long overdue to create a NEW international organization outside the US and UN jurisdiction that is responsive to the demands of the people. Imperial powers NOT welcome!

Expand full comment

Aw c'mon Jon - with all due respect.

The LAST THING we need is a NEW INTERNATIONAL ANYTHING!

We need ALL OUR OWN PEOPLE'S NEEDS MET FIRST, before we even think about the possibility of there being any value in anything international!

We have tons of useless national non-representatives, warming seats, drinking coffee, shuffling papers, attending meetings and conferences, taking regular trips on hot air balloons and delivering nothing burgers!

Why would we want international non-representatives of the same caliber devouring our hard earned resources, while delivering virtually NOTHING of any real value?

We can't even keep the pigs and the criminals out of our own "governments"!

No hope whatsoever of keeping them out of international "organisations"!

Expand full comment

What I am talking about is very different from how you characterize it. I mean reps from governments that actually stand up to the empire on principle, and organize accordingly. More strength together. Imagine for instance something initiated by Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Bolivia, with a strong contingent from anti-colonial African countries and others from Pacific island nations and Asia. Mutual aid without dominance or interference; collective action on matters that ARE international in scope, like opposition to aerial spraying, rainforest desruction, pesticide overuse, etc.

Expand full comment

Our few knights in shining armour charging around on white horses are setting our nations right?

They are just wasting their time because the majority of our "duly elected reps" have sold out however, to whoever, for whatever reasons!

"More strength together", or just more national resources wasted on fruitless international efforts?

Aerial spraying, pesticide abuse and geoengineering are CRITICAL NATIONAL ISSUES HERE AND NOW!

There is no international will to change these things!

Anti-colonial sentiments will not undo the dollar collar!

"Mutual aid without dominance or interference" will be limited by the

dollar collar and the power pyramid!

Plus it isn't realistic unless we can meet the needs of our own FIRST!

We don't have resources for the extravagances of "international representatives" when many are struggling just to survive!

If we can't fix it at home, we ain't gonna fix it over the hills and far away!

I get your point but ...

Billions wasted on UN lies that could have saved millions of lives!

Co-operatives of nations that are not sovereign?

Pie in the sky does not put food on the table!

Expand full comment

"Billions wasted on UN lies that could have saved millions of lives!" Exactly! Which is why I wrote what I did. Worse than wasted, as it has been counter-productive! Defund (not defend) the empire! Defiance, not compliance!

Expand full comment

You are just a genius at reading through this codswallop and picking out the most salient points. Thank you! Hopefully, your incredible ability to digest this shite will make people aware internationally and these freaks can be routed. It's probably the high levels of ozone in the air today, but stocking up on tar and feathers seems like a fine form of prepping to me this afternoon lol.

Expand full comment

Yes, visualize Fauxi, Schwab, Harrri and Blinken tarred and feathered and set loose on the field just prior to the Superbowl on live TV. What a hoot!

Expand full comment

It's called the One World Government result

Expand full comment

You see how the Oligarchy, composed of mostly Financial Parasites or Banksters, loves institutional control over all of us, hiding the people pulling the strings. That's a big problem with that setup, "the Leader" just becomes a figurehead and we aren't told who is really running the show. And you can be sure the Puppet Masters are not subject to any sort of vote or election. Not even by individual nations.

Let's be perfectly clear, Antonio Guterres is an idiot. Incapable of running much of anything. It is like having another version of Joe Biden running the World. Guterres is the imbecile making such outlandish statements like:

"Our world is hurting and our planet is burning",

"The Era of Global Warming is over, the Era of Global Boiling has begun",

"humanity has opened the gates of hell” by unleashing worsening heatwaves, floods and wildfires seen around the world",

"The World is on Fire".

There is literally zero science to back that up. Even the IPCC doesn't make such ridiculous claims. You're going to put that moron in charge of the World?

Expand full comment

Thanks Meryl

Sounds like “war of the worlds “

There are more of us then there are of them

“STAND UP GET UP DON’T GIVE UP THE FIGHT!!!!”

Expand full comment

I like that you have warned us, but dislike the content of what is reported. We need to declare loudly and visibly, "NO!" Posters, billboards, leaflets, pamphlets, and of course on-line activity best done with with scathing ridicule that mocks their pretensions as "out of order". Using the phrase that is so often used against us citizens, we declare that such declarations HAVE NO STANDING to be binding on us and will be met with resistance at every turn. Enact sovereign measures.

Expand full comment

In terms of National security, I have a better idea. Withdraw from the UN.

Expand full comment

Who are the authors of the Pact for the Future?

Beware of the group of people who step into the spotlight with a plan to fix the whole world. A plan that contains an enormous amount of information that is vague, altruistic and hard to resist. A plan written in language that is intentionally obscure and deceivingly hopeful for the purpose of camouflaging the “genocide for innovation” exchange underneath the surface of their pretty language. Weaponizing medicine to eradicate poverty through innovation and research does not make a solid foundation for any civil society.

Expand full comment

One empire, under surveillance, with deceit and oppression for all.

Expand full comment

Under "Outlandish aspirations", I read it as their way of saying that they intend to kill most of us and give the survivors brain implants to induce pleasure when they obey and agony when they disobey, and they won't really need much food, fuel or luxury, once that's taken care of.

9. Outlandish aspirations

Some Pact aspirations are frankly outlandish, such as "achieve a world in which humanity lives in harmony with nature." [paragraph 29(a)]

Or, "We believe there is a path to a brighter future for all of humanity, including those living in poverty and vulnerable situations. Through the actions we take today, we resolve to set ourselves on that path, striving for a world that is safe, peaceful, just, equal, inclusive, sustainable and prosperous, a world in which human wellbeing, security and dignity and a healthy planet are assured."

This is good from CHD. You have probably seen it: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/united-nations-pact-future-digital-ids-vaccine-passports-censorship/

Expand full comment

Uncle Klaus (who of course has a long-standing "Memorandum of Understanding" with the UN), has lately fessed up and openly admitted that Covid-19 was a beta test of the willingness of global populations to comply with any lunatic commands they're given by authority figures: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/ says "1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility. " And as we all know, WAY too many people passed this test (from the globalists' point of view, which means failed it utterly from ours). Stanley Milgram and The Holocaust also showed how hopeless most people seem to be in terms of doing what they're told, no matter what. So while I of course wish us luck, history suggests that it may not be possible to change this sad human tendency.

Expand full comment

As they get more desperate the pathocrats will call attention to their invented emergencies which will invite more scrutiny and further weaken their position, until they have nothing much left except an appeal to trust them, at which point some of their minions will begin to scurry to safety and divulge a lot of damaging inside information. Then the rest of the public, at least the ones who can read or follow discussions, will give up on them. Then people will begin to stir and demonstrations will begin in earnest for the first time in 5 years. Then nobody will remember wearing masks, believing injections were safe or believing that we were boiling the planet.

Expand full comment

Meryl, very revealing observations, thank you.

Likewise: Something crucial that I noticed in the document is that the term "stakeholders" is used 16 times in it. Most significant is that every single time that term is used it's immediately preceded with the adjective "relevant." Every time, no exception.

So it's the relevant stakeholders that will be served. Begs the question, what's the difference between all stakeholders (i.e., everyone on earth) compared to the relevant stakeholders, as I'm sure is determined by them?! How do they decide who is and isn't relevant?! And what happens if you aren't determined to be a RELEVANT stakeholder in their estimation?

This is curious since the very first line of the document is: "1. We, the Heads of State and Government, representing the peoples of the world..." which seems to imply all peoples, not just the relevant ones. So how are the non-relevant stakeholders of the world then represented, or to be treated?

Expand full comment

Thank you so much! Great job! Godspeed! ❤️

Expand full comment