I am not very hopeful, but the naysayers who dismiss the usefulness of such videos fail to appreciate that the vast majority of those participating in and facilitating the Globalist goals are themselves fully ignorant of them and not entirely indifferent to them. They may be pathetic or even revolting human beings but not always as bad as it is easy to imagine them and if—agreed it is a very big IF—they can be made to see something as horrible as the WHO Amendments/Treaty simply and clearly their minds may be changed. Aside from their operatives and their unwitting tools and their control of the media, the Globalists, like us, curse the fact that they too often have to engage in a process akin to herding cats, organizing chaos, instead of simply issuing diktat. The slow patient persistent and indefatigable efforts of Meryl & friends to get the attention and limited powers of understanding of the public and the politicians may well bear fruit and we had better hope so.
Superb video but lacks simple description about who are the "talking heads" we are listening to (Why should anyone care about their opinion ?). Also explain that WHO is NOT a Government Entity and receives PRIVATE funding from Big Pharma + Bill Gates (Collusion ?) ...
What was weird was how the corporate media decided that they were smarter than doctors who were saving lives, but then they deferred to Gates as an authority on the truth. That’s when I knew that we were going down the rabbit hole with Alice.
Something is truly wrong with Bill Gates being at the source of many health ventures. With him being a supporter of depopulation, that should tell us everything we need to know.
I agree. But remember that he paid lots of media sites tons of money to regurgitate his talking points. They aren’t going to bite the hand that feeds them. I think Pfizer did the same thing. Well duh…of course they did since so many news programs say that they are sponsored by Pfizer.
thank you for posting, the definitive WHO reel - very powerful presentation for some of us, but still to heavy on fear component for most of the vulnerable
but stop, we have great news today
we continue to "kicki ass" in alberta - home of the canada freedom convoy
please note a correction from above commentary, in the abscence of timely news sources we incorrectly reported that our "good news" story of the Rebecca Inglis case was concluded today. In fact , a facebook announcement below suggests on or about July 31, 2023
The BIGGEST , most AWESOME news for FREEDOM! They did it! They showed that our rights and freedoms were violated, and the court ruled in favour of our Charter Rights. WOW! Chris & Kerry with lawyers Leighton Grey & Jeffrey Rath about their landmark case in which the Alberta Chief Medical Officer’s Health (CMOH) Orders were ruled unconstitutional and illegal. And the implications of the ruling going forward. July 31, 2023
These 2 short videos are complimentary, and focus on the work of one former banking executive, now being treated for terminal illness due to COVID vaccinations.
In essence what it says is that through legal maneuverings, all of our security investments are now actually collateral that can be taken in a financial crisis. What you thought you owned in terms of securities aren't really your property, as a matter of law.
Is it a coincidence that the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has headquarters in Basel, Switzerland?
Good question. Regarding what Webb says, I think the takeaway is that when economic catastrophe threatens, cash out all stocks and bonds, as according to Webb these securities can serve as collateral to be taken by a 'higher' secured authority-- some bank or other entity that supposedly has claim to what you thought you owned. Your securities are actually being used as collateral without your knowledge or consent.
It seems to me that everything happening has its root in the abuse of law-- the use of law to abuse individual self-determination and property rights, as well as national sovereignty. The law, being written behind closed doors, is being used to take things from us and to subjugate us, with the person on the street oblivious to this because it's so obscured. What would the name for this process be? Legal abuse isn't specific enough, entrapment has a different meaning. If we can name it we can point to it.
Regarding individuals, my guess would be simply to be as self-sufficient as possible and save as much as possible in preparation for the worst. But also to work toward exposing what's happening.
Will we win this battle? We don't yet know--but it is certain we 'Will Not Win' if we sit back and watch. "We do it anyway--win or lose--because it is the right thing to do!"
Important video indeed. There might be a legal opening against the WHO: I came across an article, stating "The organization’s activities do not correspond to the tasks set for it in 1946 during the conference dedicated to its creation." That can be investigated by lawyers. An organization violating its rules / precepts since 1946 might not have the authority to continue (violating the rules / precepts on which its creation was based). The article mentioning the issue:
Good idea. That is what my case against the med board is based on: you were supposed to protect patients, not the vested interests of the chairperson, nor fight against the first amendment, etc.
The WHO already has been accused of failure re corona pandemic. As I cannot find the relevant article on Western search engines, this might suffice for experts to provide more arguments why the WHO NEVER can provide location-optimized responses for fast adapting pathogens (and especially in the case of bio-weapons).
---
“Not met expectations”: WHO was accused of failure while fighting the pandemic
Yes it is imperative for everyone to know that this is going on and I agree with the others who have complained about the hokey background music that totally delegitmizes the seriousness of the message. Let people assign their own level of alarm by listening to the words of the people talking. This kind of added theatrics is part of the reason that there aren't more people asking questions and calling their politicians.
Probably Substack readers have really good spider senses and intuition, but music is a very powerful way to access the right hemisphere of the brain, where imagination and faith and creativity mostly reside, and social media and the internet and phones keep people locked in the left hemisphere of their brains, which is aggressive, know it all, optimistic, and very given to mechanical mapping of the world. Most people are stuck in their left hemispheres (this is from Iain McGilchrist, psychiatrist and signer of the Westminster Declaration, and author of The Master and his Emissary, and the Matter with Things), so people like Substack readers don't need music to access their right hemispheres, whereas a majority of people do. I was just thinking this morning of how everyone in Chicago at the beginning of the pandemic leaned out their windows and sang Bon Jovi's" Livin on a Prayer" together, united. After 3 years of loss and betrayal and devastation and relentless psyops to divide us, we can hardly remember what that felt like, when everyone stood together, as the whole thing was fake, which only some of us know. They've got us in a mass formation and music can interrupt that by kicking people into right hemispheric mode.
Yes, music is very powerful in influencing how people react when viewing motion picture material, as Hollywood has long known. BUT, most people understand when it is appropriate to use music to heighten emotion (a love scene in a dramatic picture) and when it is not. This current video is a glaring example of when it is not appropriate to try such manipulation, and I do not believe that members of the general public--who we very much want to reach--are not aware of that.
It is one thing to make sure your message is clear, with good overall production values and good technical quality of picture and sound. It is quite another thing to undermine your message by using inappropriate manipulation techniques. The use of the musical soundtrack in this video distracts from the factual content it is trying to convey. Further, those who are on the fence about what is a controversial issue will be put off by the obvious attempt to manipulate their emotions.
No doubt it's easy to block creativity while locked up in left hemisphere as I sit here with phone in hand. Perhaps if with less volume the 'music' would be not so intrusive and my eighty year old ears could filter through the cliché drone.
As a seasoned Family Physician in the new health order, I can't get a persuasive word in sideways to the local school nurse's office, much less my city or state health departments. I wouldn't give Tedross' & Gates' W.H.O. a penny's worth of financial support nor would I implicitly defer to them on any serious health matter whatsoever. They now presume to claim ultimate global authority and jurisdiction over every imaginable human condition. By their own incompetence they are now relegated to the overflowing swamp of fear mongers and lying bureaucrats. They have squandered and depleted all their political capital. The world will be much healthier when they are cut back down to a purely advisory role. They will need decades to prove they are trustworthy in even that limited capacity..
Thanks for the "Likes." btw, I cannot believe for a minute that these health bureaucrats are behind this catastrophe. RFK Jr. has made it clear in "The Real Anthony Fauci" that the WHO is owned by Bill Gates and other Big Pharma billionaires. We know they have a vehement depopulation agenda which translates to global genocide. That's what is going on here. "Plandemics" are a myth, though weaponized gain-of-function viruses may be their weapon of choice.
I am not very hopeful, but the naysayers who dismiss the usefulness of such videos fail to appreciate that the vast majority of those participating in and facilitating the Globalist goals are themselves fully ignorant of them and not entirely indifferent to them. They may be pathetic or even revolting human beings but not always as bad as it is easy to imagine them and if—agreed it is a very big IF—they can be made to see something as horrible as the WHO Amendments/Treaty simply and clearly their minds may be changed. Aside from their operatives and their unwitting tools and their control of the media, the Globalists, like us, curse the fact that they too often have to engage in a process akin to herding cats, organizing chaos, instead of simply issuing diktat. The slow patient persistent and indefatigable efforts of Meryl & friends to get the attention and limited powers of understanding of the public and the politicians may well bear fruit and we had better hope so.
Thanks. Critically important information. What is their real motivation for this? What are they hiding? https://www.claritypress.com/product/our-country-then-and-now/
preordered
Superb video but lacks simple description about who are the "talking heads" we are listening to (Why should anyone care about their opinion ?). Also explain that WHO is NOT a Government Entity and receives PRIVATE funding from Big Pharma + Bill Gates (Collusion ?) ...
Thank-you for sharing. I also feel it is about also important in stopping the source of their funding.
What was weird was how the corporate media decided that they were smarter than doctors who were saving lives, but then they deferred to Gates as an authority on the truth. That’s when I knew that we were going down the rabbit hole with Alice.
Something is truly wrong with Bill Gates being at the source of many health ventures. With him being a supporter of depopulation, that should tell us everything we need to know.
I agree. But remember that he paid lots of media sites tons of money to regurgitate his talking points. They aren’t going to bite the hand that feeds them. I think Pfizer did the same thing. Well duh…of course they did since so many news programs say that they are sponsored by Pfizer.
He has no business wielding that that much power and influence in public health.
hello Meryl
thank you for posting, the definitive WHO reel - very powerful presentation for some of us, but still to heavy on fear component for most of the vulnerable
but stop, we have great news today
we continue to "kicki ass" in alberta - home of the canada freedom convoy
big win in the provincial courthouse today
https://rumble.com/v33v6t3-270731-chris-and-kerry-with-leighton-grey-and-jeffrey-rath.html
Tell us more...
27 10
please note a correction from above commentary, in the abscence of timely news sources we incorrectly reported that our "good news" story of the Rebecca Inglis case was concluded today. In fact , a facebook announcement below suggests on or about July 31, 2023
The BIGGEST , most AWESOME news for FREEDOM! They did it! They showed that our rights and freedoms were violated, and the court ruled in favour of our Charter Rights. WOW! Chris & Kerry with lawyers Leighton Grey & Jeffrey Rath about their landmark case in which the Alberta Chief Medical Officer’s Health (CMOH) Orders were ruled unconstitutional and illegal. And the implications of the ruling going forward. July 31, 2023
updates to follow
These 2 short videos are complimentary, and focus on the work of one former banking executive, now being treated for terminal illness due to COVID vaccinations.
Under 2 min. with Andrew Brigdon, UK Parliamentarian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7NPITXCSHE
Under 5 min. "Cutting off the head of the beast" in Geneva, Switzerland, where the WEF has diplomatic immunity: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XkB8eEwmCU06/
See also this by David Rogers Webb: The Great Taking. https://thegreattaking.com/
In essence what it says is that through legal maneuverings, all of our security investments are now actually collateral that can be taken in a financial crisis. What you thought you owned in terms of securities aren't really your property, as a matter of law.
Is it a coincidence that the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has headquarters in Basel, Switzerland?
How does one protect themselves from this takeover? Go off-grid?
Good question. Regarding what Webb says, I think the takeaway is that when economic catastrophe threatens, cash out all stocks and bonds, as according to Webb these securities can serve as collateral to be taken by a 'higher' secured authority-- some bank or other entity that supposedly has claim to what you thought you owned. Your securities are actually being used as collateral without your knowledge or consent.
It seems to me that everything happening has its root in the abuse of law-- the use of law to abuse individual self-determination and property rights, as well as national sovereignty. The law, being written behind closed doors, is being used to take things from us and to subjugate us, with the person on the street oblivious to this because it's so obscured. What would the name for this process be? Legal abuse isn't specific enough, entrapment has a different meaning. If we can name it we can point to it.
Regarding individuals, my guess would be simply to be as self-sufficient as possible and save as much as possible in preparation for the worst. But also to work toward exposing what's happening.
Thank you! Here’s more on this:
https://palexander.substack.com/p/the-most-interesting-man-in-the-world
Total power and control over the future of humanity! Stop it now!
I look forward to the sudden onset turbo cancer death of the WHO as an organisation. It will be baffling, they seem fine one day and then wham, dead.
Will we win this battle? We don't yet know--but it is certain we 'Will Not Win' if we sit back and watch. "We do it anyway--win or lose--because it is the right thing to do!"
Important video indeed. There might be a legal opening against the WHO: I came across an article, stating "The organization’s activities do not correspond to the tasks set for it in 1946 during the conference dedicated to its creation." That can be investigated by lawyers. An organization violating its rules / precepts since 1946 might not have the authority to continue (violating the rules / precepts on which its creation was based). The article mentioning the issue:
https://tsargrad.tv/articles/vsjo-stanovitsja-na-svoi-mesta-mirovoe-pravitelstvo-legalizujut-pod-predlogom-kovida_455284
Good idea. That is what my case against the med board is based on: you were supposed to protect patients, not the vested interests of the chairperson, nor fight against the first amendment, etc.
The WHO already has been accused of failure re corona pandemic. As I cannot find the relevant article on Western search engines, this might suffice for experts to provide more arguments why the WHO NEVER can provide location-optimized responses for fast adapting pathogens (and especially in the case of bio-weapons).
---
“Not met expectations”: WHO was accused of failure while fighting the pandemic
---
https://vm.ru/news/855176-ne-opravdala-ozhidanij-voz-obvinili-v-provale-po-borbe-s-pandemiej
‼️December 1 is the DEADLINE FOR US TO OPT OUT OF THE UN PANDEMIC TREATY AMENDMENTS!!!🩼🩼🚫
Yes it is imperative for everyone to know that this is going on and I agree with the others who have complained about the hokey background music that totally delegitmizes the seriousness of the message. Let people assign their own level of alarm by listening to the words of the people talking. This kind of added theatrics is part of the reason that there aren't more people asking questions and calling their politicians.
Yes, a very important video for everyone to see but marred by extremely annoying creepy background music.
No need to manipulate our emotions with the music ... the evidence can and does speak for itself.
The Bible on spotting
propaganda: Near the top of the list “Do not trust anything that has motivational music playing in the background! “
Probably Substack readers have really good spider senses and intuition, but music is a very powerful way to access the right hemisphere of the brain, where imagination and faith and creativity mostly reside, and social media and the internet and phones keep people locked in the left hemisphere of their brains, which is aggressive, know it all, optimistic, and very given to mechanical mapping of the world. Most people are stuck in their left hemispheres (this is from Iain McGilchrist, psychiatrist and signer of the Westminster Declaration, and author of The Master and his Emissary, and the Matter with Things), so people like Substack readers don't need music to access their right hemispheres, whereas a majority of people do. I was just thinking this morning of how everyone in Chicago at the beginning of the pandemic leaned out their windows and sang Bon Jovi's" Livin on a Prayer" together, united. After 3 years of loss and betrayal and devastation and relentless psyops to divide us, we can hardly remember what that felt like, when everyone stood together, as the whole thing was fake, which only some of us know. They've got us in a mass formation and music can interrupt that by kicking people into right hemispheric mode.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYtY0YYAZBk
Yes, music is very powerful in influencing how people react when viewing motion picture material, as Hollywood has long known. BUT, most people understand when it is appropriate to use music to heighten emotion (a love scene in a dramatic picture) and when it is not. This current video is a glaring example of when it is not appropriate to try such manipulation, and I do not believe that members of the general public--who we very much want to reach--are not aware of that.
It is one thing to make sure your message is clear, with good overall production values and good technical quality of picture and sound. It is quite another thing to undermine your message by using inappropriate manipulation techniques. The use of the musical soundtrack in this video distracts from the factual content it is trying to convey. Further, those who are on the fence about what is a controversial issue will be put off by the obvious attempt to manipulate their emotions.
No doubt it's easy to block creativity while locked up in left hemisphere as I sit here with phone in hand. Perhaps if with less volume the 'music' would be not so intrusive and my eighty year old ears could filter through the cliché drone.
As a seasoned Family Physician in the new health order, I can't get a persuasive word in sideways to the local school nurse's office, much less my city or state health departments. I wouldn't give Tedross' & Gates' W.H.O. a penny's worth of financial support nor would I implicitly defer to them on any serious health matter whatsoever. They now presume to claim ultimate global authority and jurisdiction over every imaginable human condition. By their own incompetence they are now relegated to the overflowing swamp of fear mongers and lying bureaucrats. They have squandered and depleted all their political capital. The world will be much healthier when they are cut back down to a purely advisory role. They will need decades to prove they are trustworthy in even that limited capacity..
Thanks for the "Likes." btw, I cannot believe for a minute that these health bureaucrats are behind this catastrophe. RFK Jr. has made it clear in "The Real Anthony Fauci" that the WHO is owned by Bill Gates and other Big Pharma billionaires. We know they have a vehement depopulation agenda which translates to global genocide. That's what is going on here. "Plandemics" are a myth, though weaponized gain-of-function viruses may be their weapon of choice.
Is there a link that does not require TWITTER log in? I have fiends who are not on X/Twitter.
https://vimeo.com/878074715
I added it to the post too