The Netherlands Government finally bows to its parliament and announces it will not vote Yes, although it will not vote No for any treaty documents that come to a vote at the WHO today
More coming
World news: Dutch parliament opposes WHO treaty
The Dutch government will not vote in favour of the Pandemic Treaty and the amended International Health Guidelines (IHR) of the WHO, but it will not oppose them either. In the early morning of 22 May, this unclear commitment by Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport Pia Dijkstra ended the emergency debate on the 'WHO motion' by Mona Keijzer (BBB), in which the House instructs the government not to agree to the two WHO initiatives, which was adopted by the House of Representatives. Dijkstra had previously announced that he would not carry out this motion, to the indignation of the House.
After contentious discussions in the Dutch parliament this week, the Dutch health minister had to retract his position and move to neutral saying the Dutch government would neither accept nor reject the two treaties at the World health assembly this week.
Previously he had dared to say he would act against the instructions of parliament.
This is simply one example of the power of the globalists behind these WHO initiatives. it also reveals that if the parliament does not go along, it does have ultimate control.
I thought that the deal was that, unless explicitly rejected by a member country, the IHR revisions would be considered tacitly accepted by that country. In other words, taking a neutral position would be the same as acceptance--only a clear expression of rejection would oppose acceptance. This would allow lazy politicians to do nothing, end up with the revisions accepted and the "pandemic treaty" entered, then be able to say, "gee, now our hands are tied...sorry" to their sold-out constituents. I hope I'm wrong about this...
Considering that at times I can be a shallow person, I want to hear and watch Rob Roos telling the WHO to take a hike.