What was considered dangerous? Posts about vaccine safety and the rapid speed of production. Hat tip to the wonderful John Stone.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates a large amount of money to the BBC.
Do you think there is any chance that the BBC is ever going to say anything bad about the vaccines?
"Last night, government sources praised Ms Connolly’s work ethic and professionalism. 'As a hard-working civil servant, she’s an impartial adviser – not a puppeteer,' one said." Eichmann was also a "hard-working civil servant."
"She said one of its “big” functions was “talking to social media platforms and passing information over. It gets information back from them, and encourages that swift takedown – the swift dealing with the platforms. The cell has daily interactions with almost all the platforms”.
Isn't this definition of "state-run" social media platforms.
Meryl, You're a great warrior in the battle for the integrity of mankind. ❤️
The gall of these people.
There might be a far more concerning reason for the vehement jab policy, censorship, and the efforts for WHO dictatorship. It's related to climate. The greatest genocide had a population effect even the BBC published (Stanford published it first, and withdrew it) : https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47063973
When someone like Francis Boyle comes to the conclusion that the mRNA jab is a bioweapon, it's rather likely TPTB still intend to use the depopulation mechanism to "fix" the climate. Without a censorship mechanism this would have been public knowledge.
I'm not sure what can be done in the UK to hold these people to account. Free speech is not an enshrined right in English law. It's implied only.
I don't see the needle move at all on my most recent Substack post, about citizen initiated grand juries, even though comments I've made about that and other things on popular stacks since then have gotten many likes. Its hard to believe that *not one person* wandered over to my stack and looked at the most recent post.
I put this to the support zendesk at Substack, and got no response, except a survey about how they handled the issue, when they didn't address it at all.
Let's face it, Substack shadowbans. They may be the kinder gentler censors compared to Twitter or Facebook, but they are still censors for the regime.
It wasn’t the subject matter experts who were overseeing Mao’s Great Reset--I mean “Leap Forward”--it was the political beasts that were in charge. They had no clue, for example, how to run an agricultural program. The result, of course, was 50 million people starving to death. Never mind 1984--let’s look at history!
Does anyone here have a copy of the letter that a British psychiatrist wrote to HMG related to the military grade propaganda?
Remember the public draft card burnings of the sixties? Who else can think of relevant actions now?
The rats are scurrying and doing their damndest to cover their pHARMa/globalist tracks.
Could this be the same John Stone at CHD who banned me for expressing an opinion that he disagreed with?
So this psychotic lady - Sarah Connolly - should be accused & prosecuted for Mass-Murder now!
The BBC and HMG will continue to slither their way out of any culpability for the harm they have caused. Sadly (this has always been the case with the government,) the BBC is but a shadow of it’s bygone self and should be immediately sold off.