Hi Meryl, Thanks for this. FYI, and per the substance of your report, I wrote this👇👀 back in early 2021.
SUBJECT: The Great #SwineFlu Swindle of 2009
ARTICLE EXTRACT (SEE LINK BELOW ⬇️): ‘In a news feature from Britain’s Channel Four from 2010, Wolfgang Wodarg, the then Council of Europe health chief, accused BigPharma of “unduly influencing World Health Organisation (WHO) decisions” and orchestrating a global “campaign of panic”. This was in response to the so-called Swine Flu (H1N1) pandemic that made its auspicious debut the year before. Bear in mind that this was at the height of the ongoing fallout from the Global Financial Crisis that came knocking the year prior, a point to which we shall return.
By the time the penny dropped several months later that this much touted existential threat to humanity was far less than the sum of its overblown parts, major European countries (Britain, France, Germany etc.), were “burdened” with tens of millions of doses of useless vaccines for which they had forked out “hundreds of millions of dollars” of the taxpayers hard-earned. That the leaders of these countries were “burdened” also by any number of burning questions as to how they’d all been bamboozled is something we’ll consider shortly.
But for now, it’s enough to say all the “grim predictions” about the virus from the hand-wringing, hoodwinking hordes in BigPharma—the Crime Cartel from Hell—and the ever reliable wolf-criers in the corporate media Greek chorus proved to be a giant ‘fizzer’. That the former though is reportedly the source of upwards of 70% of the latter’s advertising revenue may or may not be coincidental. But with the benefit of hindsight we can safely say the ‘pig-pox’ was a false flag event of the pandemic kind, presumably to soften us up for a more ambitious gambit. You know, a kind of dress rehearsal for the Big One!
Now even if one is disinclined toward such conspiratorial musing, “one” would have to at least wonder if indeed the SwineFlu was not one hell of a shell-game, albeit one played out behind a smokescreen inside a hall of mirrors. It’s a pity that so many folks seem to have ‘deep-sixed’ this sorry episode into the darkest recesses of the collective Memory Hole. Such knowledge might have stood us all in good stead in dealing with our current travails in all things pandemic related. Which is to say, does any of this ring any bells pilgrims? It should do! Are we not experiencing a palpable sense of deja vu here? We should be!
Some of the less rhetorical questions asked at the time included: Were politicians misled or were they in on the scam? Who was deciding on the nature of the risks involved and the responses? Did these decisions involve conflicts of interest? Were these ever investigated? Did BigPharma “vastly exaggerate” these risks and dangers? Was this the “pandemic” that didn’t quite “live up to” expectations, because we didn’t die according to the predictions? What can we do to prevent these types of events occurring in the future?
Insofar as I’m aware, none of these questions were ever pursued beyond asking them, much less answered. An no-one has been held accountable for the monumental cock-ups and the under-the-table deals that were done.
We can ponder these questions forever and a day, though a few answer themselves in the asking. Either way, once folks take the trip down Memory Lane afforded us by the C4 segment below (and other links herein), the answers become more apparent. Indeed, you won’t need the test results back from the laboratory folks to know there were indeed🐀in that pot of gravy back in ‘09!
But here are for what they’re worth some cogent cogitations of a ‘Covidissident’. One of the key considerations which seems to be missing throughout the Covid ‘cause célèbre’ is that of “trust”. Our blind faith for example in the media mavens is key here. In my extended rumination on all things viral from earlier this year (see link below), a central talking point of the discourse was “doubt”. Measured doubt might be viewed in this context as the halfway house between blind trust, and its polar opposite irrational paranoia, on the continuum. We’re talking here a healthy scepticism, which like our immune systems and our civil liberties is under attack.
The prevailing brouhaha over Covid and the polarising impact on us all since its arrival has derived from those on the one hand who’ve accepted (i.e. placed their trust in) the official narrative, and those who’ve rejected (i.e. completely mistrust) it, albeit with many others occupying varying positions in between these two endpoints of the continuum. By confusing and dividing us they have conquered the narrative and commandeered the public discourse to accord with their agenda. From this angle the polarisation is understandable. But we’re at a crossroads here: we cannot afford to allow these apostles of angst and animus and prophets of panic and perfidy…..?
Many concerns, questions, queries and doubts have been posited about aspects of this multi-faceted crisis. And “yes” it is a “crisis” whichever way one looks at it, though not one defined by the parameters we might ordinarily bring to bear in using such a word. The crisis exists in part because of many people’s knee-jerk willingness to accord faith-based trust in the sermons from the mount regarding all things Covid. Any rationale we might otherwise bring to bear for questioning such easy acquiescence goes begging. To wit, here’s just a few of these questions and concerns, with readers invited to come up with a few of their own:
1. Is the Coronavirus as bad as our medical authorities and political leaders and other vested interests have claimed?
2. What irrefutable scientific and medical evidence is there to actually support this premise?;
3. Have the coercive, draconian compliance measures imposed been necessary or even effective?,
4. have these same people broken the law by denying us our basic civil and human rights in enforcing them;
5. Are the soon to be mandated—directly or indirectly—yet still experimental treatments (vaccines) safe, effective, or for that matter even necessary;
6. Why has there been little public debate, and more consensus reached, about alternative responses to minimising the spread of the virus and making available alternative treatments (Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine);
7. Why is the corporate media so determined to censor open debate about such responses and treatments, incl. the views of hundreds of medical & health science professionals;
8. Why do we continue to place so much trust in BigPharma, the media, and our political leaders when their collective track record for lying is well-documented;
9. Why should anyone believe what we are being told now about Covid-19 when the above mentioned 2009 SwineFlu pandemic was a massive global swindle?
And it perhaps is worthwhile considering that the SwineFlu (H1N1) “pandemic” that wasn’t arrived not long after of the onset of Global Financial Crisis and prevailed throughout the months-long fallout. Was this just a coincidence? Or was the SwineFlu scare a distraction from the main game? To answer this, it’s important to recall what occurred during this period: it was nothing less than the greatest transfer of wealth and property in history from the lower and middle classes to the already super rich and to the large multinational banks and corporations. And the recent crisis has similarly facilitated an even greater transfer of wealth and property to these same groups that makes the ‘09 sting pale in comparison.
An additional talking point in my essay mentioned earlier was what Carl Jung referred to as the psychic dangers of infected minds: herein it can not be denied—the “crisis” is a ‘virus’ to be sure. This has been more evident with the passage of time, with phrases like “mass psychosis”, “conditioning” and “brainwashing” becoming an increasing part of the alternative media’s and independent commentators lexicon as shorthand for explaining why so many people have bought into the official line without a greater degree of due diligence.
But getting back to trust: We’re placing an enormous level of trust in these institutions, corporations and organisations, when their past history would indicate we have very little reason to do so. Again, I refer people back to the Great Swine Flu Swindle, and a “swindle” it most definitely was. Yet, a significant proportion of the populace seem to have forgotten about this. In doing so they have once again replaced their natural tendency to doubt with a misplaced (i.e. faith-based) trust. Such levels of ‘blind faith’ would be the envy of any aspiring evangelist, con-man cum grifter or religious proselyte.
And when it comes to cynically abusing the public trust, the pharmaceutical firms are by nature recidivistic – that is they are repeat offenders, with a decades long history of corporate social irresponsibility, recklessness and grand felonious criminal conduct. No matter the number of fines and legal penalties they incur—invariably hard won by the litigants—they simply treat this as a cost of doing business. As Mike Papantonio from America’s Lawyer calls it, these people are sociopaths.
I remember clearly the 2009 scare. My children were in elementary school. It happened before I was skeptical and suspicious of public health organizations. I remember watching someone on the tv showing us all how to wash our hands properly to avoid infection and I had the distinct feeling that they were trying to make us all feel fearful over something that wasn’t scary in reality.
I actually asked the nurse at my children’s school what she thought about the vaccine and I will always be grateful for her wise response, “I’m not taking it” as she raised her eyebrows.
We both kind of laughed about how ridiculous all the hype was. And that was the last time I thought about it until I was watching Anthony Fauci and the CDC trying to scare us all about Covid. I thought about why people were freaking out this time compared to 2009 and in my mind the difference was the PCR testing and all the fear centered stories from the media.
The media is the most culpable in all this, in my opinion. They are completely controlled by the need to keep their main advertisers content. They could have, no, should have investigated every single thing that the public health agencies were telling everyone. Instead, the protected the public health agencies messaging from any scrutiny.
The media used to serve the people. Now they serve their advertisers. Sadly (in general), if the media people watch/read/listen to is free, and it’s not supported by viewers which means there are commercials, it means that they themselves are most likely the product being sold to industry.
I am still peeved that when my husband took my 14 month old daughter to the doctor, the doctor convinced him she needed the H1N1 shot. I was NOT happy, but nothing could undo whatever extra poisons went into her tiny body. Only God knows how this affected her. Amazingly, nobody in the rest of the family took this shot and nobody got sick. Ugh. Thank you for resurrecting this information, as most of us really do have short term memories-which is what these evil people count on.
The WHO and those of similar ilk have made an absolute killing - literally and figuratively - by shifting/obscuring clear definitions when it better suits their narrative and saying a lot without saying anything at all. Useless tools. A more ambiguous and specious pile of doo-doo you shall not find.
Thanks, pharma's evil goes back more than 100 years when the Rockefellers pushed for medical schools to go forward with a drug and surgery only agenda and get rid of any other health treatments. Herbs, diet, exercise, health spas, homeopathy, chiropractic, were all labeled as quack treatments, and doctors were kicked out of the profession for working in those areas. The WW1 had ended and the need for oil based products was lessening, and Rockefeller saw drugs and their sale as requiring oil based products to be used, thus drugs would be a money making project for him. He pushed for all medical schools to go to a drug and surgery format and found the means for these schools to get huge funding and most other medical schools just went out of business for lack of funding. Does this remind anyone of another drug and vaccine advocate named Bill Gates, who made billions off drugs and vaccines lately? These guys were not philanthropists they were and are greedy money grabbers. Thus we are now in this modern era dark ages of medicine, where drug companies are protected by the FDA, CDC, NIH, agencies which the drug companies have captured and control. This has been going on and growing for a long time and maybe now a few more people are waking up to this monster which has killed millions for profit over the last 100+ years.
Assuming that 10 out of 1,000 people become infected with a certain infectious disease, the FDA and pharmaceuticals define that if a vaccine is administered to only one person, the efficacy rate is 90%. However, if you think about it, anyone would think this is strange. This is because 990 people will not be infected in the first place.
The true effectiveness rate is 9/1000 = 0.9%.
There is a definition where the former is called relative effectiveness rate and the latter is called absolute effectiveness rate. According to the clinical trial report for BNT162b2, the relative efficacy rate is 95%, but the absolute efficacy rate that is significant for individuals is 0.7165%.
The same advertising effectiveness rate is used for the RSV-vaccine.
The FDA and pharmaceutical companies are a gang to sell vaccines.
Well explained! Have to keep the Allopathic Medicine Model growing by any means possible!
Not about good health initiatives, but about bottom line growth! Humanity is now officially lab rats! Gates is thrilled with how well his investments rewarded him!
they know how gullible the public has become, the rise in autism correlating with the ever expanding school vacks schedule proved that if you lied hard enough, any scam was possible
What about the CDC, NIH, NIAID and their negligence that protected Pharma from the horrendous statistics that are coming out slowly concerning the deaths that should actually be attributed to the COVID vaccine and not the virus and the deaths that occurred because of the ineffective protocols in the hospitals. The lack of early treatment was particularly suspect. Since when do you allow a respiratory virus to fester and become more lethal instead of treating it right away? Despicable medical advice and treatment in the hospitals that killed thousands.
The "Experts" at the WHO have a scurrilous agenda to lower the population and make money at the same time. Why would any reputable goverment or country deal with a Director who has a murderous and tyrannical backgroound? The Elite promote and back the WEF/UN and the WHO, etc.; all out to control the world. The top 1% seem to think they know everything...because they are in control of the money. Money does not equate with intelligence. They are riding for a fall, because of their ignorance.
Masterful piece of work..! Thank you for exposing their playbook...mankind needs the WHO terminated immediately.. Especially considering their role in the Crime against Humanity- The ongoing Global Psyop...
Well quite right Greg but then, (2009-2010) we did not have the eye openers/guidance of the like of Robert Malone, Meryl and many others over the US, the U.K. and Europe ! Even Joseph Mercola was mainly sticking to only (excellent) health subjects. This explains why the resistance and the fight are much stronger and effective this time around. Let’s keep it up and we will win! Francoise Berthet-Hall
Hi Meryl, Thanks for this. FYI, and per the substance of your report, I wrote this👇👀 back in early 2021.
SUBJECT: The Great #SwineFlu Swindle of 2009
ARTICLE EXTRACT (SEE LINK BELOW ⬇️): ‘In a news feature from Britain’s Channel Four from 2010, Wolfgang Wodarg, the then Council of Europe health chief, accused BigPharma of “unduly influencing World Health Organisation (WHO) decisions” and orchestrating a global “campaign of panic”. This was in response to the so-called Swine Flu (H1N1) pandemic that made its auspicious debut the year before. Bear in mind that this was at the height of the ongoing fallout from the Global Financial Crisis that came knocking the year prior, a point to which we shall return.
By the time the penny dropped several months later that this much touted existential threat to humanity was far less than the sum of its overblown parts, major European countries (Britain, France, Germany etc.), were “burdened” with tens of millions of doses of useless vaccines for which they had forked out “hundreds of millions of dollars” of the taxpayers hard-earned. That the leaders of these countries were “burdened” also by any number of burning questions as to how they’d all been bamboozled is something we’ll consider shortly.
But for now, it’s enough to say all the “grim predictions” about the virus from the hand-wringing, hoodwinking hordes in BigPharma—the Crime Cartel from Hell—and the ever reliable wolf-criers in the corporate media Greek chorus proved to be a giant ‘fizzer’. That the former though is reportedly the source of upwards of 70% of the latter’s advertising revenue may or may not be coincidental. But with the benefit of hindsight we can safely say the ‘pig-pox’ was a false flag event of the pandemic kind, presumably to soften us up for a more ambitious gambit. You know, a kind of dress rehearsal for the Big One!
Now even if one is disinclined toward such conspiratorial musing, “one” would have to at least wonder if indeed the SwineFlu was not one hell of a shell-game, albeit one played out behind a smokescreen inside a hall of mirrors. It’s a pity that so many folks seem to have ‘deep-sixed’ this sorry episode into the darkest recesses of the collective Memory Hole. Such knowledge might have stood us all in good stead in dealing with our current travails in all things pandemic related. Which is to say, does any of this ring any bells pilgrims? It should do! Are we not experiencing a palpable sense of deja vu here? We should be!
Some of the less rhetorical questions asked at the time included: Were politicians misled or were they in on the scam? Who was deciding on the nature of the risks involved and the responses? Did these decisions involve conflicts of interest? Were these ever investigated? Did BigPharma “vastly exaggerate” these risks and dangers? Was this the “pandemic” that didn’t quite “live up to” expectations, because we didn’t die according to the predictions? What can we do to prevent these types of events occurring in the future?
Insofar as I’m aware, none of these questions were ever pursued beyond asking them, much less answered. An no-one has been held accountable for the monumental cock-ups and the under-the-table deals that were done.
We can ponder these questions forever and a day, though a few answer themselves in the asking. Either way, once folks take the trip down Memory Lane afforded us by the C4 segment below (and other links herein), the answers become more apparent. Indeed, you won’t need the test results back from the laboratory folks to know there were indeed🐀in that pot of gravy back in ‘09!
But here are for what they’re worth some cogent cogitations of a ‘Covidissident’. One of the key considerations which seems to be missing throughout the Covid ‘cause célèbre’ is that of “trust”. Our blind faith for example in the media mavens is key here. In my extended rumination on all things viral from earlier this year (see link below), a central talking point of the discourse was “doubt”. Measured doubt might be viewed in this context as the halfway house between blind trust, and its polar opposite irrational paranoia, on the continuum. We’re talking here a healthy scepticism, which like our immune systems and our civil liberties is under attack.
The prevailing brouhaha over Covid and the polarising impact on us all since its arrival has derived from those on the one hand who’ve accepted (i.e. placed their trust in) the official narrative, and those who’ve rejected (i.e. completely mistrust) it, albeit with many others occupying varying positions in between these two endpoints of the continuum. By confusing and dividing us they have conquered the narrative and commandeered the public discourse to accord with their agenda. From this angle the polarisation is understandable. But we’re at a crossroads here: we cannot afford to allow these apostles of angst and animus and prophets of panic and perfidy…..?
Many concerns, questions, queries and doubts have been posited about aspects of this multi-faceted crisis. And “yes” it is a “crisis” whichever way one looks at it, though not one defined by the parameters we might ordinarily bring to bear in using such a word. The crisis exists in part because of many people’s knee-jerk willingness to accord faith-based trust in the sermons from the mount regarding all things Covid. Any rationale we might otherwise bring to bear for questioning such easy acquiescence goes begging. To wit, here’s just a few of these questions and concerns, with readers invited to come up with a few of their own:
1. Is the Coronavirus as bad as our medical authorities and political leaders and other vested interests have claimed?
2. What irrefutable scientific and medical evidence is there to actually support this premise?;
3. Have the coercive, draconian compliance measures imposed been necessary or even effective?,
4. have these same people broken the law by denying us our basic civil and human rights in enforcing them;
5. Are the soon to be mandated—directly or indirectly—yet still experimental treatments (vaccines) safe, effective, or for that matter even necessary;
6. Why has there been little public debate, and more consensus reached, about alternative responses to minimising the spread of the virus and making available alternative treatments (Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine);
7. Why is the corporate media so determined to censor open debate about such responses and treatments, incl. the views of hundreds of medical & health science professionals;
8. Why do we continue to place so much trust in BigPharma, the media, and our political leaders when their collective track record for lying is well-documented;
9. Why should anyone believe what we are being told now about Covid-19 when the above mentioned 2009 SwineFlu pandemic was a massive global swindle?
And it perhaps is worthwhile considering that the SwineFlu (H1N1) “pandemic” that wasn’t arrived not long after of the onset of Global Financial Crisis and prevailed throughout the months-long fallout. Was this just a coincidence? Or was the SwineFlu scare a distraction from the main game? To answer this, it’s important to recall what occurred during this period: it was nothing less than the greatest transfer of wealth and property in history from the lower and middle classes to the already super rich and to the large multinational banks and corporations. And the recent crisis has similarly facilitated an even greater transfer of wealth and property to these same groups that makes the ‘09 sting pale in comparison.
An additional talking point in my essay mentioned earlier was what Carl Jung referred to as the psychic dangers of infected minds: herein it can not be denied—the “crisis” is a ‘virus’ to be sure. This has been more evident with the passage of time, with phrases like “mass psychosis”, “conditioning” and “brainwashing” becoming an increasing part of the alternative media’s and independent commentators lexicon as shorthand for explaining why so many people have bought into the official line without a greater degree of due diligence.
But getting back to trust: We’re placing an enormous level of trust in these institutions, corporations and organisations, when their past history would indicate we have very little reason to do so. Again, I refer people back to the Great Swine Flu Swindle, and a “swindle” it most definitely was. Yet, a significant proportion of the populace seem to have forgotten about this. In doing so they have once again replaced their natural tendency to doubt with a misplaced (i.e. faith-based) trust. Such levels of ‘blind faith’ would be the envy of any aspiring evangelist, con-man cum grifter or religious proselyte.
And when it comes to cynically abusing the public trust, the pharmaceutical firms are by nature recidivistic – that is they are repeat offenders, with a decades long history of corporate social irresponsibility, recklessness and grand felonious criminal conduct. No matter the number of fines and legal penalties they incur—invariably hard won by the litigants—they simply treat this as a cost of doing business. As Mike Papantonio from America’s Lawyer calls it, these people are sociopaths.
https://gregmaybury.substack.com/p/the-last-of-our-human-freedoms
Greg Maybury
Dispatches from the No Fly Zone
I remember clearly the 2009 scare. My children were in elementary school. It happened before I was skeptical and suspicious of public health organizations. I remember watching someone on the tv showing us all how to wash our hands properly to avoid infection and I had the distinct feeling that they were trying to make us all feel fearful over something that wasn’t scary in reality.
I actually asked the nurse at my children’s school what she thought about the vaccine and I will always be grateful for her wise response, “I’m not taking it” as she raised her eyebrows.
We both kind of laughed about how ridiculous all the hype was. And that was the last time I thought about it until I was watching Anthony Fauci and the CDC trying to scare us all about Covid. I thought about why people were freaking out this time compared to 2009 and in my mind the difference was the PCR testing and all the fear centered stories from the media.
The media is the most culpable in all this, in my opinion. They are completely controlled by the need to keep their main advertisers content. They could have, no, should have investigated every single thing that the public health agencies were telling everyone. Instead, the protected the public health agencies messaging from any scrutiny.
The media used to serve the people. Now they serve their advertisers. Sadly (in general), if the media people watch/read/listen to is free, and it’s not supported by viewers which means there are commercials, it means that they themselves are most likely the product being sold to industry.
I am still peeved that when my husband took my 14 month old daughter to the doctor, the doctor convinced him she needed the H1N1 shot. I was NOT happy, but nothing could undo whatever extra poisons went into her tiny body. Only God knows how this affected her. Amazingly, nobody in the rest of the family took this shot and nobody got sick. Ugh. Thank you for resurrecting this information, as most of us really do have short term memories-which is what these evil people count on.
The WHO and those of similar ilk have made an absolute killing - literally and figuratively - by shifting/obscuring clear definitions when it better suits their narrative and saying a lot without saying anything at all. Useless tools. A more ambiguous and specious pile of doo-doo you shall not find.
Dr. Nass and her many readers and admirers might be interested in my recent essay, where I argue our Compliance Culture is literally killing citizens.
I use Dr. Nass as an example of a physician who refused to comply.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/comply-or-else?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Thanks, pharma's evil goes back more than 100 years when the Rockefellers pushed for medical schools to go forward with a drug and surgery only agenda and get rid of any other health treatments. Herbs, diet, exercise, health spas, homeopathy, chiropractic, were all labeled as quack treatments, and doctors were kicked out of the profession for working in those areas. The WW1 had ended and the need for oil based products was lessening, and Rockefeller saw drugs and their sale as requiring oil based products to be used, thus drugs would be a money making project for him. He pushed for all medical schools to go to a drug and surgery format and found the means for these schools to get huge funding and most other medical schools just went out of business for lack of funding. Does this remind anyone of another drug and vaccine advocate named Bill Gates, who made billions off drugs and vaccines lately? These guys were not philanthropists they were and are greedy money grabbers. Thus we are now in this modern era dark ages of medicine, where drug companies are protected by the FDA, CDC, NIH, agencies which the drug companies have captured and control. This has been going on and growing for a long time and maybe now a few more people are waking up to this monster which has killed millions for profit over the last 100+ years.
Assuming that 10 out of 1,000 people become infected with a certain infectious disease, the FDA and pharmaceuticals define that if a vaccine is administered to only one person, the efficacy rate is 90%. However, if you think about it, anyone would think this is strange. This is because 990 people will not be infected in the first place.
The true effectiveness rate is 9/1000 = 0.9%.
There is a definition where the former is called relative effectiveness rate and the latter is called absolute effectiveness rate. According to the clinical trial report for BNT162b2, the relative efficacy rate is 95%, but the absolute efficacy rate that is significant for individuals is 0.7165%.
The same advertising effectiveness rate is used for the RSV-vaccine.
The FDA and pharmaceutical companies are a gang to sell vaccines.
Well explained! Have to keep the Allopathic Medicine Model growing by any means possible!
Not about good health initiatives, but about bottom line growth! Humanity is now officially lab rats! Gates is thrilled with how well his investments rewarded him!
they know how gullible the public has become, the rise in autism correlating with the ever expanding school vacks schedule proved that if you lied hard enough, any scam was possible
What about the CDC, NIH, NIAID and their negligence that protected Pharma from the horrendous statistics that are coming out slowly concerning the deaths that should actually be attributed to the COVID vaccine and not the virus and the deaths that occurred because of the ineffective protocols in the hospitals. The lack of early treatment was particularly suspect. Since when do you allow a respiratory virus to fester and become more lethal instead of treating it right away? Despicable medical advice and treatment in the hospitals that killed thousands.
The "Experts" at the WHO have a scurrilous agenda to lower the population and make money at the same time. Why would any reputable goverment or country deal with a Director who has a murderous and tyrannical backgroound? The Elite promote and back the WEF/UN and the WHO, etc.; all out to control the world. The top 1% seem to think they know everything...because they are in control of the money. Money does not equate with intelligence. They are riding for a fall, because of their ignorance.
Latest Draft WHO Amendments to International Health Regulations Still Contain References To Power Over “Misinformation,” Vaccine Passports
The proposals, despite amendments, still contain controversial language that some feel would lead to a power grab.
https://reclaimthenet.org/whos-treaty-still-contain-references-to-power-over-misinformation-vaccine-passports
Masterful piece of work..! Thank you for exposing their playbook...mankind needs the WHO terminated immediately.. Especially considering their role in the Crime against Humanity- The ongoing Global Psyop...
Well said! 👏👏👏
Well quite right Greg but then, (2009-2010) we did not have the eye openers/guidance of the like of Robert Malone, Meryl and many others over the US, the U.K. and Europe ! Even Joseph Mercola was mainly sticking to only (excellent) health subjects. This explains why the resistance and the fight are much stronger and effective this time around. Let’s keep it up and we will win! Francoise Berthet-Hall
The "virus" lie is the biggest trick in the bag 😃 check out how Fan Wu et al invented SARS COV2 in an earlier post.