Don’t acquire or retain them (BWC)—versus every nation must go out and find them (IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty draft of October 30, 2023) Don’t transfer them to others (BWC)—versus transfer them to WHO’s Biohub that will “share them globally” (Pandemic Treaty draft of October 30, 2023)
"Natural law theories all understand law as a remedy against the great evils of, on the one side anarchy (lawlessness), and on the other side tyranny. And one of tyranny’s characteristic forms is the co-optation of law to deploy it as a mask for fundamentally lawless decisions cloaked in the forms of law and legality."
They'll ignore their own laws and simply do whatever they want to: "fundamentally lawless decisions cloaked in the forms of law...." It descends into arbitrariness, which is why the counter to this must be based on natural law.
Philosophers and legal theorists expert in natural law theory could explicate the need for natural law applied to these moves against the people, moves intended to cause violence and theft against the people and clearly counter to all natural law theories, and human decency. The laws the globalist want to set up are essentially power moves in the cloak of law, whereas we need to assert the rational basis for natural law as a parallel legal paradigm based on authentic human decency.
In other words, we need to make it crystal clear that what the globalists are doing is essentially lawless, no matter how they frame it.
Yup! it's a very 'olde English' village with a history of 'tobacco smugglers' from centuries ago. In the middle of nowhere about 3 miles from the sea. Apparently the smugglers had tunnels to neighbouring villages, but I've never proved this suggestion. Pronounced HOOOOOO! Mick.
So Bio-weapon technology had been assumed as one of the, now obsolete, World Health Organisation's responsibilities before we, the people, decided to terminate the CORRUPTED WHO?
When authorities rule by violation of laws they once made, the rule of law is dictatorship. It implies all means for submission are on the table and using the rule of law against such authorities not only is useless but might be or become counterproductive ("subversion as we see it, will be punished by death"). Against those authorities is that they're blinded by their own hubris. One example of that is the US military, now (vastly) inferior to that of Russia and China, let alone both of them. But a feasible "we the people" action model based on the adversary's hubris won't be easy.
One can only hope that the sincere speech ends and at some point the (well informed) riots begin. One doesn't get the feeling that the WHO is very much concerned with details, or needs to be.
The WHO and its will to power is something we had better get ready to face as a permanent feature. Laws, natural or positive, mean nothing to these raptors.
Let's not forget the OECD from 1961 dear. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Look into that if not familiar. Or their 5 year POM plan. Program Objective Memorandum
This supports the idea that the WHO Pandemic Treaty is intended as an instrument of depopulation and genocide.
This is why Reiner Fuellmich presented Grand Jury evidence based on natural law. Then they arrested him under pretense of "law."
Natural law, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories/
"Natural law theories all understand law as a remedy against the great evils of, on the one side anarchy (lawlessness), and on the other side tyranny. And one of tyranny’s characteristic forms is the co-optation of law to deploy it as a mask for fundamentally lawless decisions cloaked in the forms of law and legality."
They'll ignore their own laws and simply do whatever they want to: "fundamentally lawless decisions cloaked in the forms of law...." It descends into arbitrariness, which is why the counter to this must be based on natural law.
Philosophers and legal theorists expert in natural law theory could explicate the need for natural law applied to these moves against the people, moves intended to cause violence and theft against the people and clearly counter to all natural law theories, and human decency. The laws the globalist want to set up are essentially power moves in the cloak of law, whereas we need to assert the rational basis for natural law as a parallel legal paradigm based on authentic human decency.
In other words, we need to make it crystal clear that what the globalists are doing is essentially lawless, no matter how they frame it.
Lack of Knowledge..lack of Knowledge..of most of humanity..
That is the number one problem..
How to fight against what is not known of this evil Agendas..being forced on the World? 🙏🏽
Yup! it's a very 'olde English' village with a history of 'tobacco smugglers' from centuries ago. In the middle of nowhere about 3 miles from the sea. Apparently the smugglers had tunnels to neighbouring villages, but I've never proved this suggestion. Pronounced HOOOOOO! Mick.
So Bio-weapon technology had been assumed as one of the, now obsolete, World Health Organisation's responsibilities before we, the people, decided to terminate the CORRUPTED WHO?
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
Will share this on the continuing path of educating our representative
When authorities rule by violation of laws they once made, the rule of law is dictatorship. It implies all means for submission are on the table and using the rule of law against such authorities not only is useless but might be or become counterproductive ("subversion as we see it, will be punished by death"). Against those authorities is that they're blinded by their own hubris. One example of that is the US military, now (vastly) inferior to that of Russia and China, let alone both of them. But a feasible "we the people" action model based on the adversary's hubris won't be easy.
Casablanca gambling? I'm shocked!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME
One can only hope that the sincere speech ends and at some point the (well informed) riots begin. One doesn't get the feeling that the WHO is very much concerned with details, or needs to be.
That works for me because I am pretending that WHO and the UN do not exist.
The WHO and its will to power is something we had better get ready to face as a permanent feature. Laws, natural or positive, mean nothing to these raptors.
End running the U.S.Congress & Judiciary via the Fed Exec branch (& its fed agencies) & via cities/mayors, et al.
Let's not forget the OECD from 1961 dear. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. Look into that if not familiar. Or their 5 year POM plan. Program Objective Memorandum
Many of us certainly know otherwise huh Dr. Meryl