Each of those 2 things puts your population at higher risk of COVID TODAY than it would otherwise be. Not good for a governor seeking reelection next month on her pro-mandate platform.
It is almost like the jab 'is' the infection. Times some multiplier in the 10-100000 range.
The correlation is tight, globally.
Recently some have come out saying it is in fact ~100 times worse from the vial than the 'natural' patented virus.
Not sure if that is just the Spike, if it counts the toxic LNPs. Or if it counts the other redacted stuff that is included in the vial, from GO/rGO on.
Either way, we know it messes with the immune system. We all know people who have gotten it over and over again in a short period.
Igor has written about this. About immune depletion. Like a battering ram.
Then there are the cancers and other latent disease that are let off the leash.
For authorities to still be pushing these bioweapons like no drug dealer in history, clearly there is an Agenda that has nothing to do with the health of humans.
I am an amateur mathematician/statistician, so don't trust my calculations.
Verify them for yourself.
During the given time period and accepting the data as accurate (yeah, right), it seems like the shots resulted in...
Hospitalization:
- Relative Risk Reduction: 15%
- Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.01673%
Death
- Relative Risk Reduction: 12.7%
- Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.00418%
Sooooooooo...
If "the jabbed" in Maine experienced an overall increased hospitalization rate of more than 0.01673% above normal, and additional deaths at an absolute rate of more than 0.00418% above normal, then one might conclude that the Jabs are causing more severe disease and death than they are preventing.
If you think the "jabs" caused over 171 additional hospitalizations and over 43 deaths in Maine, then...
YOU SHOULD SUPPORT STOPPING THE SHOTS.
Please check my math.
(and realize that combining the unjabbed and the partially jabbed is data fraud)
Nothing to do with Maine's sheeple dying off, but I just learned about Andrew Yang's "Forward" party. Sounds like Democrat-lite. Perfect. Reckon you should promote the hell out of it, as it will split the Democrat vote. Specifically, if there is no Forward Party candidate in next month's gubernatorial elections in CA (Google won't tell me whether there is or not -- wonder why) you should get one onto the ballot, asap. It's your best and I would say only chance of getting rid of Newsom.
California has a jungle primary where any candidate with a certain number of ballot signatures can run. There are no separate party primaries. The top to vote getters in the jungle primary advance to the general election. So, there are no third-party candidates at all in the general election unless a member of a third-party candidate is one of the top two in the jungle primary.
Ah, thank you. So yes, a straight vote-splitting move would not work, However, apparently the GOP candidate did so poorly last time that if somebody were to contact the Yang Gang and ask them to run a candidate in the CA jungle primary, your top two MIGHT end up being Newsome and the Forward Party candidate. And given that CA is full of college students, the younger, hipper, Forward Party candidate might well win such a battle in the final. Not nearly as likely to succeed as what I originally suggested, I agree, But still may be a better chance of getting rid of Gavin than just relying on the GOP guy?
ANYBODY who is leaning Republican and looked into the policies of the Forward Party would avoid the Forward Party like the plague. Yang's wife actually advertises 'her pronouns'. I know about this stuff, since I participated in splitting the Labour vote in 1990 in NZ by standing for New Labour (the opposite of the UK New Labour Party -- long story). The ONLY voters we attracted were Labour Party voters who thought the actual Labour Party (our Democrat equivalent) had gone a bit too far.
PS: Because that 1990 election in NZ was pretty tight anyway -- and because our small, more-Labour-than-Labour, third party attracted actually quite a small percentage of the Labour (read Democrat) vote -- National (read GOP) won the election. Splitting the vote of a party you want rid of has long been a standard tactic in real-politick. In the present circumstance, if you mix in the fact that Andrew Yang's parents originated in Taiwan (which obviously is keen to stop China pushing forward on the re-taking their island) there are obvious reasons why the Yang Gang (as they like to call themselves) might want to evict the Democrats. Biden & Co seem hell-bent on prodding both mainland China AND Russia into taking some sort of drastic action which would allow Biden to dig out the nuclear football. The MAGA clan, on the other hand, basically want to quieten everything down and halt this whole mad, globalist power grab being pushed by Biden et al. So my reading of the situation is that facilitating the rise and rise of the Yang Gang would be your best way of neutralising the totalitarian "Democrats" who wrote this disgraceful gagging order in California. Get a Foreward Party candidate on the bill in CA QUICK. I'll shut up now.
PS: Oh OK: apparently the jail part was nothing to do with running against Gavin. According to Mr Google (who is of course not to be trusted, but still) "Sometimes homeless taxi driver in San Francisco, Kaplan has been arrested for playing guitar naked in the park and for stalking. He also ran for Mayor..." Fame at last!
But if you want to know the truth and have the time you can read thusfar first 70 pages in thirteen installs of Grasshopper's Appeal in my substack, free.
and absolutely loved it -- especially the bit about the baby sealion ("S/he would swim just several feet away from swimmers, as if to say, oh swimming, I can do that!" ). Grasshopper Kaplan, you are the epitome of the TRUE San Franciscan. SF used to be a brilliant city -- and it will be again, one day. These sad, bad seeds like Newsom and Boss Biden won't last long. Kia kaha, e hoa ma.
If breaking apart the partially vaccinated and the unvaccinated categories strengthened the mainstream narrative, they would do it. That tells me that the numbers would reflect poorly on the narrative. what those numbers tell me is that there is no difference in any category between vaccinated and unvaccinated including hospitalization and death.
Some people are not getting new booster because they clearly see that the vaccine does not work, they don't need official data to figure this out. Yet I know others that have gotten it because they still believe it is going to help them and they don't have any desire to seek out information about the side effects. They are still scared of COVID and don't think there is an risk...Fauci did a good job brainwashing them. The campaign for the Covid vaccines has gotten into some people's souls and runs strong. As far as voting this November, many people I know will vote for the democrat because they are so mad about woman's right to choose an Abortion being taken away. For me the mandates for COVID are a far worse attack on individual's liberty. In NY State Gov Kathy Hochul not only backed vaccine mandates but she told constituents that God wanted them to have the vaccine. I will not support her no matter what I think of the guy running against her. I hope she looses as there is no reason to believe she won't do it again. In a more perfect society these 2 lady Democratic leaders would apologize for what they did to people and admit they were wrong. But in actuality they seem to be keeping it up.
Not to worry -- those same silly people will soon find out that being "vaccinated" really IS birth control. If these shots don't killya, they make you infertile. Silliness is being systematically eradicated. Good? Trouble is, it will take too long.
So, how do Fauci and his minions (our entire Public Health System) get away with the lie that even if you get Covid-19 after vaccination, you won't be as sick as an unvaccinated person and at least won't be hospitalized or die? The monkeys running our Health Care System see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. . .they are blind, deaf and gagged.
a minor point, but nyt says 82% of mainers took the kill shot. maine cdc says 76%. possible that both may be wrong and the numbers are propaganda to increase uptake? maybe times have changed but i find it hard to reconcile how three out of four residents of this beautiful and often ruggedly independent state would just kill themselves off like that...
According to this "study" cited in the CDC website, vaccination of pregnant mothers is associated with "reduced hospitalization of <6 month old infants."
I do not believe a single word of it, but I wonder if anyone has looked over this garbage study to expose its deficiencies?
How come we don’t hear an official shame campaign about this pandemic of the VACCINATED? Where’s all the guilt propaganda to make them feel so awful for existing and taking up all those hospital beds?!
I’ll never forgive them for treating we the unjabbed like trash over the wise personal health choice to remain the control group in this mass experiment.
Thank you Dr. Nass. Are these stats proving ADE or Original Antigenic Sin to be correct theory? If so, does it mean we are going to have a very rough winter?
Also, wondering if these numbers prove that being vaxed offers none to little protection bc for example if a state is having 79% of ppl vaxed in the hospital, and the other remaining unvaxed is 21% in the hospital, doesn’t that about match the number of vaxed to unvaxed anyhow in the US?
These are official data from Maine CDC fwiw. They appear to show that the vaxxed do no better than the unvaxxed in terms of hospitalizations and deaths.
They also show that in a population which has had less COVID than average for the US, as Australia and New Zealand went. so goes Maine. In other words, we Kept the big waves out for longer than most, leaving us with greater than average susceptibility, and so now in the current wave we have more cases, deaths and hospitalizations than average.
More jabs, more variants, more immune suppression, more death.
Especially if you deny people early treatment with effective off-label drugs.
Avoid the slab jabs!
It is almost like the jab 'is' the infection. Times some multiplier in the 10-100000 range.
The correlation is tight, globally.
Recently some have come out saying it is in fact ~100 times worse from the vial than the 'natural' patented virus.
Not sure if that is just the Spike, if it counts the toxic LNPs. Or if it counts the other redacted stuff that is included in the vial, from GO/rGO on.
Either way, we know it messes with the immune system. We all know people who have gotten it over and over again in a short period.
Igor has written about this. About immune depletion. Like a battering ram.
Then there are the cancers and other latent disease that are let off the leash.
For authorities to still be pushing these bioweapons like no drug dealer in history, clearly there is an Agenda that has nothing to do with the health of humans.
Peace.
Well stated, Andreas.
I am an amateur mathematician/statistician, so don't trust my calculations.
Verify them for yourself.
During the given time period and accepting the data as accurate (yeah, right), it seems like the shots resulted in...
Hospitalization:
- Relative Risk Reduction: 15%
- Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.01673%
Death
- Relative Risk Reduction: 12.7%
- Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.00418%
Sooooooooo...
If "the jabbed" in Maine experienced an overall increased hospitalization rate of more than 0.01673% above normal, and additional deaths at an absolute rate of more than 0.00418% above normal, then one might conclude that the Jabs are causing more severe disease and death than they are preventing.
If you think the "jabs" caused over 171 additional hospitalizations and over 43 deaths in Maine, then...
YOU SHOULD SUPPORT STOPPING THE SHOTS.
Please check my math.
(and realize that combining the unjabbed and the partially jabbed is data fraud)
Nothing to do with Maine's sheeple dying off, but I just learned about Andrew Yang's "Forward" party. Sounds like Democrat-lite. Perfect. Reckon you should promote the hell out of it, as it will split the Democrat vote. Specifically, if there is no Forward Party candidate in next month's gubernatorial elections in CA (Google won't tell me whether there is or not -- wonder why) you should get one onto the ballot, asap. It's your best and I would say only chance of getting rid of Newsom.
California has a jungle primary where any candidate with a certain number of ballot signatures can run. There are no separate party primaries. The top to vote getters in the jungle primary advance to the general election. So, there are no third-party candidates at all in the general election unless a member of a third-party candidate is one of the top two in the jungle primary.
Ah, thank you. So yes, a straight vote-splitting move would not work, However, apparently the GOP candidate did so poorly last time that if somebody were to contact the Yang Gang and ask them to run a candidate in the CA jungle primary, your top two MIGHT end up being Newsome and the Forward Party candidate. And given that CA is full of college students, the younger, hipper, Forward Party candidate might well win such a battle in the final. Not nearly as likely to succeed as what I originally suggested, I agree, But still may be a better chance of getting rid of Gavin than just relying on the GOP guy?
The Forward Party could also attract Independents, which would not be good if they were otherwise leaning Republican.
ANYBODY who is leaning Republican and looked into the policies of the Forward Party would avoid the Forward Party like the plague. Yang's wife actually advertises 'her pronouns'. I know about this stuff, since I participated in splitting the Labour vote in 1990 in NZ by standing for New Labour (the opposite of the UK New Labour Party -- long story). The ONLY voters we attracted were Labour Party voters who thought the actual Labour Party (our Democrat equivalent) had gone a bit too far.
PS: Because that 1990 election in NZ was pretty tight anyway -- and because our small, more-Labour-than-Labour, third party attracted actually quite a small percentage of the Labour (read Democrat) vote -- National (read GOP) won the election. Splitting the vote of a party you want rid of has long been a standard tactic in real-politick. In the present circumstance, if you mix in the fact that Andrew Yang's parents originated in Taiwan (which obviously is keen to stop China pushing forward on the re-taking their island) there are obvious reasons why the Yang Gang (as they like to call themselves) might want to evict the Democrats. Biden & Co seem hell-bent on prodding both mainland China AND Russia into taking some sort of drastic action which would allow Biden to dig out the nuclear football. The MAGA clan, on the other hand, basically want to quieten everything down and halt this whole mad, globalist power grab being pushed by Biden et al. So my reading of the situation is that facilitating the rise and rise of the Yang Gang would be your best way of neutralising the totalitarian "Democrats" who wrote this disgraceful gagging order in California. Get a Foreward Party candidate on the bill in CA QUICK. I'll shut up now.
Sneaky! I like it!
I ran against Gavin and went to jail.
Would run again, but skip jail please
Why jail??
PS: Oh OK: apparently the jail part was nothing to do with running against Gavin. According to Mr Google (who is of course not to be trusted, but still) "Sometimes homeless taxi driver in San Francisco, Kaplan has been arrested for playing guitar naked in the park and for stalking. He also ran for Mayor..." Fame at last!
But if you want to know the truth and have the time you can read thusfar first 70 pages in thirteen installs of Grasshopper's Appeal in my substack, free.
Regards,
Wonderful! I picked at random this instalment https://grasshoppper.substack.com/p/grasshoppers-appeal-part-9
and absolutely loved it -- especially the bit about the baby sealion ("S/he would swim just several feet away from swimmers, as if to say, oh swimming, I can do that!" ). Grasshopper Kaplan, you are the epitome of the TRUE San Franciscan. SF used to be a brilliant city -- and it will be again, one day. These sad, bad seeds like Newsom and Boss Biden won't last long. Kia kaha, e hoa ma.
PS: And the music track on part 10 is truly amazing. Man's a genius.
I hate eugenics programs!
oops
And, of course, the 'not fully vaccinated' are lumped together with the 'unvaccinated' 'cause Science!
In this instance:
"Science" = Fraud
If breaking apart the partially vaccinated and the unvaccinated categories strengthened the mainstream narrative, they would do it. That tells me that the numbers would reflect poorly on the narrative. what those numbers tell me is that there is no difference in any category between vaccinated and unvaccinated including hospitalization and death.
Some people are not getting new booster because they clearly see that the vaccine does not work, they don't need official data to figure this out. Yet I know others that have gotten it because they still believe it is going to help them and they don't have any desire to seek out information about the side effects. They are still scared of COVID and don't think there is an risk...Fauci did a good job brainwashing them. The campaign for the Covid vaccines has gotten into some people's souls and runs strong. As far as voting this November, many people I know will vote for the democrat because they are so mad about woman's right to choose an Abortion being taken away. For me the mandates for COVID are a far worse attack on individual's liberty. In NY State Gov Kathy Hochul not only backed vaccine mandates but she told constituents that God wanted them to have the vaccine. I will not support her no matter what I think of the guy running against her. I hope she looses as there is no reason to believe she won't do it again. In a more perfect society these 2 lady Democratic leaders would apologize for what they did to people and admit they were wrong. But in actuality they seem to be keeping it up.
We will lose the only opportunity to prevent a complete totalitarian takeover of the country because silly people think abortion is birth control.
Not to worry -- those same silly people will soon find out that being "vaccinated" really IS birth control. If these shots don't killya, they make you infertile. Silliness is being systematically eradicated. Good? Trouble is, it will take too long.
It's a shame that most of Maine is so liberal and anti trump that she will most likely win her bid for re election
So, how do Fauci and his minions (our entire Public Health System) get away with the lie that even if you get Covid-19 after vaccination, you won't be as sick as an unvaccinated person and at least won't be hospitalized or die? The monkeys running our Health Care System see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. . .they are blind, deaf and gagged.
I am so proud of being a true American so I got 4 shots and last time I even had paxlovid.
I am looking for the gold standard statement that I am proud of what I have done.
It is probably along the lines from well known others: Biden, Fauci, head of Pfizer, etc.
Now that I have covid for the n th time, I need to have the right line so I might be noticed.
Please help me
a minor point, but nyt says 82% of mainers took the kill shot. maine cdc says 76%. possible that both may be wrong and the numbers are propaganda to increase uptake? maybe times have changed but i find it hard to reconcile how three out of four residents of this beautiful and often ruggedly independent state would just kill themselves off like that...
That number really surprised me too. Some people apparently get those fake vax cards.
Your data assumes honest reporting, which is unlikely - likely the truth is worse.
According to this "study" cited in the CDC website, vaccination of pregnant mothers is associated with "reduced hospitalization of <6 month old infants."
I do not believe a single word of it, but I wonder if anyone has looked over this garbage study to expose its deficiencies?
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7107e3.htm
How come we don’t hear an official shame campaign about this pandemic of the VACCINATED? Where’s all the guilt propaganda to make them feel so awful for existing and taking up all those hospital beds?!
I’ll never forgive them for treating we the unjabbed like trash over the wise personal health choice to remain the control group in this mass experiment.
Thank you Dr. Nass. Are these stats proving ADE or Original Antigenic Sin to be correct theory? If so, does it mean we are going to have a very rough winter?
Also, wondering if these numbers prove that being vaxed offers none to little protection bc for example if a state is having 79% of ppl vaxed in the hospital, and the other remaining unvaxed is 21% in the hospital, doesn’t that about match the number of vaxed to unvaxed anyhow in the US?
These are official data from Maine CDC fwiw. They appear to show that the vaxxed do no better than the unvaxxed in terms of hospitalizations and deaths.
They also show that in a population which has had less COVID than average for the US, as Australia and New Zealand went. so goes Maine. In other words, we Kept the big waves out for longer than most, leaving us with greater than average susceptibility, and so now in the current wave we have more cases, deaths and hospitalizations than average.