Not prosecuted were Comey and Rosenstein who lied to the FISA court, as well as the numerous other FBI upper echelon who committed crimes, Clinton for creating the Russian hoax, and the numerous other conspirators, including Lisa Monaco, and Jake Sullivan, currently working in the Biden administration. Complete miscarriage of justice.
They are all POS's -- all the Crats, all the leaders of the FBI and CIA, and the other alpha agencies; the Globalists and most of the Repubs in office!
Kunstler's statement is indeed profound and extremely accurate. However, I suspect your last paragraph is more wishful thinking.
Remember, the global wannabe elites have a 2030 target for turning the entire world into a 500 million fake human cesspool and they need a brain dead bug wit like Joey as the defacto dictator of the US.
Even on life support, he will be kept in the black house...he's 80% there now. And there is nothing established that will ensure fair elections come 2024.
If the Titanic was really sunk to make way for the Jekyll Island meeting that created the Federal Reserve, then maybe the sub was deep 6'd to.....oh, ok.
Barr and Durham are dismal characters among many of all political stripes and parties.
I see the destruction that is everywhere now in our nation and the world to have been in the works for millennia.
"I am alleging, with evidence…” Mr. Shapley testified under oath, “…whatever the motivations, at every stage decisions were made that had the effect of benefiting the subject of the investigation."
I am struck by the phrase "at every stage decisions were made" and compare it to my thoughts regarding how "SARS-CoV-2 came to be. In science, I have always thought that what matters for it to be science is that there be no motivations, no agenda. When there is a specific agenda, it is easy to design experiments and studies computer modeling and formulas to sort of be made to be on cruise control. Not much deliberation and tough decision making in steps along the track after the agenda is set in motion. Not much personal quality of character needed.
It is unfortunate that C-Span chose to place the emphasis on those few seconds of Durham at the end with his nothingburger response to her question. It was U S Representative Hageman's words that were truly laudable and patriotic. Mr. Durham spent years and millions to give us his report that did not result in any true accountability or transparency. Wray and Comey and Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and Hillary Clinton have never been arrested and indicted and sentenced to prison as they should have been. So Mr. Durham's work in fact resulted in a form of exoneration to those criminals and the more firm establishment of the two-tier justice system.
*
Video unavailable
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.
*So disgusting that YouTube is continuing with their anti- USA termination of free speech YouTube content creators / channels.
I live in a relatively red part of Southern Oregon and my republican house rep Cliff Bentz is such a colossal disappointment compared to Hariet Hageman. He is absolutely worthless. Democrats are disgusting and milk toast republicans are demoralizing.
The "decisions" made by the ACIP Committee were not decisions at all, simply more extorted political theater. This is why morale and respect for science / medical / public health matters is at an all-time low.
Setting aside the argument "my body my choice" I have to say (1) abortion is now for the most part a state issue -- the POTUS has no say in it and (2) to decide not to support a presidential candidate due to his/her position on one issue that is a state issue and for which the SCOTUS has rendered its decision, which the candidate supports as a law-abiding Constitutionalist, is a questionable choice IMHO.
The SCOTUS renders a lot of decisions which conflict with one another.
There is still talk of packing the Supreme Court.
This decision cost 68 million American lives, higher if we factor in the families they would have had over the past 50 years. It is the most important issue of our time.
It is THAT hill.
The democide started before 1972 - unrestricted murder of civilians harkens to WWII and the willful fire and atomic bombing of non-combatants in Europe and Japan.
Humanity lost its moral compass then. Roe v Wade was just another symptom of the sociopathy.
The malthusian acceptance of the jabs and lockdowns was another symptom of the spiritual malaise.
Yes, RFK recently said that he could compromise a bit in his Presidential run on any subject, except Abortion -- that his supporters will abandon him if he even mentions the thought of trying to work with the other side of the aisle on Abortion/Pro Life compromises.
OrangeManBad has rubbed me the wrong way since the 80s when my dad took us kids to Trump Towers. Of all people, however, he landed the heavy blows to take on the demonic, Gate-Family inspired Temple of Moloch (Planned P of Amerika)
It's becoming a challenge to find links like this:
Truth is, we are in a "State." A state of awe as to the depths of corruption, the breadth of its reach, and the degree to which we have deluded ourselves with reassurances that thinking about it, talking about it, and dissecting it will somehow eradicate its pall over all existence.
We need to get off the posit treadmill and actually toe the mark, hold the line. Do one thing - anything - today that expends energy toward a state of conviction and share your push-back story with at least one other. Tomorrow's agenda: Repeat. Be assured, evil never takes a day off.
Thank you Mr. Kunstler for your succent descriptions of the truly disgusting machinations of treason in the highest office of the land. Our countries poor showing of our leadership has been very, very damaged in the last 3+ years by the incredible incompetence of the people who have TAKEN power.
There is a prophecy uttered back in the 1800's that the Constitution will hang as if by a thread.. I'm deeply comforted by knowing that there was no utterance of it being completely destroyed. We must do all we can to preserve it. IT IS GOD'S GIFT TO US!
If that is where you wish the credit to go, then God's gift to us was the Declaration of Independence. That document -- its declaratory affirmations of our inalienable rights and its firm declaration of the rights of man -- is what made this country possible. 𝑵𝒐𝒕 the Constitution.
Dr. Nass wrote: "but is it not the case that witnesses can be prompted to recall events when presented with evidence? E.g., “…here is your smartphone..."
Yes, witnesses can be prompted, but they still may "not remember." In a Congressional hearing, if a witness lies, Congress can hold them in Contempt of Congress if they WANT to. That usually doesn't happen. Congressional hearings can be helpful, but they are usually meant as investigational. They are not trials.
In a court of law, whether a criminal or civil case, when cross examining an adverse witness, an attorney can ask questions to try to get the other sides' witness to answer in a way helpful to the attorney. You have an increased chance of their answering honestly and giving "the WHOLE truth", because if it can be shown that they "lied under oath" in a court of law about anything even slightly relevant," the Judge can hold them in Contempt, and this court Contempt is SERIOUS, with serious ramifications.
An attorney who cross examines an adverse witness should always know ahead how that witness will need to answer, or the attorney is risking asking the question. Done properly, this information is discovered through pre-trial "Discovery." Usually, the information is determined by the attorney taking a Deposition of the Adverse witness which happens, upon request. This is complicated but the Attorney best approaches this by utilizing questions they have prepared and asking those questions of the Opposing witness. There, the attorney can ask different questions (both leading questions and open-ended) in different ways and approaches to find out what the Opposing witness knows AND what and how they are going to answer that question in trial. They have been sworn in at the Deposition, and so everything they say (a court reporter writes it all down) can be used against them in court.
In court, if and when they testify that they "have forgotten" what was asked, the questioning attorney typically reminds them by saying,
"Mr. Smith, do you remember coming to my office on May 5, 2023, and giving your Deposition under Oath?" (Yes)
"On page 10, lines three through six of the copy of your Deposition, you said, "(attorney reads aloud in court what they said)." "Does this refresh your memory?"
At this point, the witness, knowing they have been caught, is probably furrowing their brow, looking at their attorney for guidance, and is not sure what to say.
The Judge looks over at them sternly, and then the witness replies, "Oh, yes, that's correct." Once that has been established, the questioning continues.
If this "not remembering" continues a bit more, the Judge will say to the other attorney, "Counsel, instruct your client to answer the questions. Let's quit wasting the Court's time." The other attorney straightens up quickly and their Client knows to start remembering as the questions are asked.
If the other Attorney allows the evading answers to continue, they can be censured by the Court. This is BAD. Eventually, their law license could be taken away, plus they will have lost standing among other lawyers they work with in their community.
Coming back to a Congressional hearing, there are usually no attorneys who could get in trouble like in a court, and the more power the person has who is being deposed, the less likely Congress is going to agree to refer him or her to be prosecuted for Contempt by the DOJ -- especially if the Attorney General is of the same party (Republican or Democrat) as is the witness.
So, Mr. Durham is not incorrect in opting to not pursue questioning. He knows it's very unlikely that anything will come of it, plus I believe it can be degrading when a very powerful person, like James Comey or Tony Faucci, just smiles like a fox, and answers, "I don't remember," knowing they will get away with it. Some other people are powerful, but they may have to undergo questioning anyway, because of politics and/or hate, with the hope that they will slip up on anything they might answer, and say it little bit incorrectly. This is particularly true if the person is a non-government-aware person who does not suspect any question traps.
An example would be some Congressional members' feelings toward Donald Trump, (or any greatly disliked Democrat, for that matter.) These Congressional members will often continue to ask questions of that person "under Oath," for many days, in an attempt to harass and/or trip them up, when they know that they aren't going to be stopped from doing so by either the House or the Senate, perhaps because their party either holds a Majority, or because they have called in a favor from a member across the aisle,convincing them to not object.
If, however, a witness who does not have strong support of enough members in Congress, should be caught in a lie, it is possible for them to be fined, or even jailed, if the DOJ wants to pursue that, and some have.
As well respected as it would seem he is, John Durham probably does not have the Congressional support to have Comey or Faucci prosecuted by the DOJ because this would mean the Attorney General pursuing deep-state Democrats. John Durham knows that the Attorney General is a Democrat, and was appointed by the Democrat deep-state Biden administration.
I hope this helps. Please feel free to ask me a follow up question or any other questions about topics you are interested in better understanding.
"....like James Comey or Tony Faucci, just smiles like a fox, and answers, "I don't remember," knowing they will get away with it."
Isn't this by definition that we live in a defacto state where the powerful can act with impunity?
Impunity means the unwillingness, de facto or de jure (in practice or in law), of bringing the perpetrators of violations to account – whether in criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary proceedings and/or refusal to comply with compensatory obligations as determined as appropriate body.
Impunity is state of the nation where no one (in power or powerful) is accountable for anything. Who can be believe that there is such a thing as justice?
MTG should have raised her voiceat her, "Look, look at this," while she held up the chart of the still births and miscarriages. And then added, "And wipe that smirk off your face!"
Not prosecuted were Comey and Rosenstein who lied to the FISA court, as well as the numerous other FBI upper echelon who committed crimes, Clinton for creating the Russian hoax, and the numerous other conspirators, including Lisa Monaco, and Jake Sullivan, currently working in the Biden administration. Complete miscarriage of justice.
They are all POS's -- all the Crats, all the leaders of the FBI and CIA, and the other alpha agencies; the Globalists and most of the Repubs in office!
"Hillary MyTurn" 🤣
Aka...”Hell”ery
Reptiles throughout the planet are thoroughly disgusted that they're constantly being compared to grubby sadistic pyschopaths.
Btw, Bill Barr's father got collegeless degreed Jeffrey Epstein his math teaching position at the prestigous Dalton School.
Kunstler's statement is indeed profound and extremely accurate. However, I suspect your last paragraph is more wishful thinking.
Remember, the global wannabe elites have a 2030 target for turning the entire world into a 500 million fake human cesspool and they need a brain dead bug wit like Joey as the defacto dictator of the US.
Even on life support, he will be kept in the black house...he's 80% there now. And there is nothing established that will ensure fair elections come 2024.
”God save the Queen”
(Babbled Joe Biden in a recent, typically mortifying public statement, apparently unaware she is deceased.)
He may even have meant something by it. It sounds like the British Commonwealth was on his mind.
Mind????
If only we all had the gumption to clean up our lives and stop worshipping Moloch.
If the Titanic was really sunk to make way for the Jekyll Island meeting that created the Federal Reserve, then maybe the sub was deep 6'd to.....oh, ok.
And the Administrative State, not to be confused with the Deep State, or even THE STATE, continues as before.
What’s the difference between the Admin State and Deep State? I thought Deep State referred mainly to the SES.
Speaking of the Bidens and recent crimes, I found the testimony of Wyoming U S Representative Harriet Hageman to be beautiful and uplifting.
'YOU ARE DISAPPOINTED' Wray Loses His Mind after Durham EXPOSES 'no cooperation' D.IRT to Matt Gaetz
'YOU ARE DISAPPOINTED' Wray Loses His Mind after Durham EXPOSES 'no coop...
Play
.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QQaLh2pcN4.....
11:26 full videoi runtime
go to 5:47 through end
Barr and Durham are dismal characters among many of all political stripes and parties.
I see the destruction that is everywhere now in our nation and the world to have been in the works for millennia.
"I am alleging, with evidence…” Mr. Shapley testified under oath, “…whatever the motivations, at every stage decisions were made that had the effect of benefiting the subject of the investigation."
I am struck by the phrase "at every stage decisions were made" and compare it to my thoughts regarding how "SARS-CoV-2 came to be. In science, I have always thought that what matters for it to be science is that there be no motivations, no agenda. When there is a specific agenda, it is easy to design experiments and studies computer modeling and formulas to sort of be made to be on cruise control. Not much deliberation and tough decision making in steps along the track after the agenda is set in motion. Not much personal quality of character needed.
The youtube link is no longer available, but I found this, but while good its not the one I think we need to watch.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5075420/user-clip-important-statement-question-durham-answer-end-durhams-hour-testimony-today-happened
Thank you for finding a good link.*
It is unfortunate that C-Span chose to place the emphasis on those few seconds of Durham at the end with his nothingburger response to her question. It was U S Representative Hageman's words that were truly laudable and patriotic. Mr. Durham spent years and millions to give us his report that did not result in any true accountability or transparency. Wray and Comey and Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and Hillary Clinton have never been arrested and indicted and sentenced to prison as they should have been. So Mr. Durham's work in fact resulted in a form of exoneration to those criminals and the more firm establishment of the two-tier justice system.
*
Video unavailable
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.
*So disgusting that YouTube is continuing with their anti- USA termination of free speech YouTube content creators / channels.
I live in a relatively red part of Southern Oregon and my republican house rep Cliff Bentz is such a colossal disappointment compared to Hariet Hageman. He is absolutely worthless. Democrats are disgusting and milk toast republicans are demoralizing.
The "decisions" made by the ACIP Committee were not decisions at all, simply more extorted political theater. This is why morale and respect for science / medical / public health matters is at an all-time low.
On point, Meryl, as usual.
One gripe: Demons cannot drive out demons. RFK, Jr. is or was a pro-abortionist like his elders.
Democide is always backed by demons, and either RFK, Jr. faces this reality as a daily communicant or he's full of hot air.
https://www.wmur.com/article/new-hampshire-robert-f-kennedy-jr-abortion/44322645
Setting aside the argument "my body my choice" I have to say (1) abortion is now for the most part a state issue -- the POTUS has no say in it and (2) to decide not to support a presidential candidate due to his/her position on one issue that is a state issue and for which the SCOTUS has rendered its decision, which the candidate supports as a law-abiding Constitutionalist, is a questionable choice IMHO.
The SCOTUS renders a lot of decisions which conflict with one another.
There is still talk of packing the Supreme Court.
This decision cost 68 million American lives, higher if we factor in the families they would have had over the past 50 years. It is the most important issue of our time.
It is THAT hill.
The democide started before 1972 - unrestricted murder of civilians harkens to WWII and the willful fire and atomic bombing of non-combatants in Europe and Japan.
Humanity lost its moral compass then. Roe v Wade was just another symptom of the sociopathy.
The malthusian acceptance of the jabs and lockdowns was another symptom of the spiritual malaise.
Appreciate your feedback
Hoping that’s parody
It’s a false claim
Even leftist WaPo admits it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/29/planned-parenthoods-false-stat-thousands-women-died-every-year-before-roe/
Yes, RFK recently said that he could compromise a bit in his Presidential run on any subject, except Abortion -- that his supporters will abandon him if he even mentions the thought of trying to work with the other side of the aisle on Abortion/Pro Life compromises.
OrangeManBad has rubbed me the wrong way since the 80s when my dad took us kids to Trump Towers. Of all people, however, he landed the heavy blows to take on the demonic, Gate-Family inspired Temple of Moloch (Planned P of Amerika)
It's becoming a challenge to find links like this:
https://vocal.media/theSwamp/covid-ops-history-of-eugenics-and-sterilization almost like an invisible hand is working overtime to erase the malfeasance of the Gates/Bush/Rockefeller/Ford families trying to erase humanity
https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/eugenics-record-office-cold-spring-harbor-laboratory-1910-1939
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/04/INV006350
Expose these moloch workers at every turn
Truth is, we are in a "State." A state of awe as to the depths of corruption, the breadth of its reach, and the degree to which we have deluded ourselves with reassurances that thinking about it, talking about it, and dissecting it will somehow eradicate its pall over all existence.
We need to get off the posit treadmill and actually toe the mark, hold the line. Do one thing - anything - today that expends energy toward a state of conviction and share your push-back story with at least one other. Tomorrow's agenda: Repeat. Be assured, evil never takes a day off.
Thank you Mr. Kunstler for your succent descriptions of the truly disgusting machinations of treason in the highest office of the land. Our countries poor showing of our leadership has been very, very damaged in the last 3+ years by the incredible incompetence of the people who have TAKEN power.
There is a prophecy uttered back in the 1800's that the Constitution will hang as if by a thread.. I'm deeply comforted by knowing that there was no utterance of it being completely destroyed. We must do all we can to preserve it. IT IS GOD'S GIFT TO US!
If that is where you wish the credit to go, then God's gift to us was the Declaration of Independence. That document -- its declaratory affirmations of our inalienable rights and its firm declaration of the rights of man -- is what made this country possible. 𝑵𝒐𝒕 the Constitution.
There's a lot of truth to that as well.
Dr. Nass wrote: "but is it not the case that witnesses can be prompted to recall events when presented with evidence? E.g., “…here is your smartphone..."
Yes, witnesses can be prompted, but they still may "not remember." In a Congressional hearing, if a witness lies, Congress can hold them in Contempt of Congress if they WANT to. That usually doesn't happen. Congressional hearings can be helpful, but they are usually meant as investigational. They are not trials.
In a court of law, whether a criminal or civil case, when cross examining an adverse witness, an attorney can ask questions to try to get the other sides' witness to answer in a way helpful to the attorney. You have an increased chance of their answering honestly and giving "the WHOLE truth", because if it can be shown that they "lied under oath" in a court of law about anything even slightly relevant," the Judge can hold them in Contempt, and this court Contempt is SERIOUS, with serious ramifications.
An attorney who cross examines an adverse witness should always know ahead how that witness will need to answer, or the attorney is risking asking the question. Done properly, this information is discovered through pre-trial "Discovery." Usually, the information is determined by the attorney taking a Deposition of the Adverse witness which happens, upon request. This is complicated but the Attorney best approaches this by utilizing questions they have prepared and asking those questions of the Opposing witness. There, the attorney can ask different questions (both leading questions and open-ended) in different ways and approaches to find out what the Opposing witness knows AND what and how they are going to answer that question in trial. They have been sworn in at the Deposition, and so everything they say (a court reporter writes it all down) can be used against them in court.
In court, if and when they testify that they "have forgotten" what was asked, the questioning attorney typically reminds them by saying,
"Mr. Smith, do you remember coming to my office on May 5, 2023, and giving your Deposition under Oath?" (Yes)
"On page 10, lines three through six of the copy of your Deposition, you said, "(attorney reads aloud in court what they said)." "Does this refresh your memory?"
At this point, the witness, knowing they have been caught, is probably furrowing their brow, looking at their attorney for guidance, and is not sure what to say.
The Judge looks over at them sternly, and then the witness replies, "Oh, yes, that's correct." Once that has been established, the questioning continues.
If this "not remembering" continues a bit more, the Judge will say to the other attorney, "Counsel, instruct your client to answer the questions. Let's quit wasting the Court's time." The other attorney straightens up quickly and their Client knows to start remembering as the questions are asked.
If the other Attorney allows the evading answers to continue, they can be censured by the Court. This is BAD. Eventually, their law license could be taken away, plus they will have lost standing among other lawyers they work with in their community.
Coming back to a Congressional hearing, there are usually no attorneys who could get in trouble like in a court, and the more power the person has who is being deposed, the less likely Congress is going to agree to refer him or her to be prosecuted for Contempt by the DOJ -- especially if the Attorney General is of the same party (Republican or Democrat) as is the witness.
So, Mr. Durham is not incorrect in opting to not pursue questioning. He knows it's very unlikely that anything will come of it, plus I believe it can be degrading when a very powerful person, like James Comey or Tony Faucci, just smiles like a fox, and answers, "I don't remember," knowing they will get away with it. Some other people are powerful, but they may have to undergo questioning anyway, because of politics and/or hate, with the hope that they will slip up on anything they might answer, and say it little bit incorrectly. This is particularly true if the person is a non-government-aware person who does not suspect any question traps.
An example would be some Congressional members' feelings toward Donald Trump, (or any greatly disliked Democrat, for that matter.) These Congressional members will often continue to ask questions of that person "under Oath," for many days, in an attempt to harass and/or trip them up, when they know that they aren't going to be stopped from doing so by either the House or the Senate, perhaps because their party either holds a Majority, or because they have called in a favor from a member across the aisle,convincing them to not object.
If, however, a witness who does not have strong support of enough members in Congress, should be caught in a lie, it is possible for them to be fined, or even jailed, if the DOJ wants to pursue that, and some have.
As well respected as it would seem he is, John Durham probably does not have the Congressional support to have Comey or Faucci prosecuted by the DOJ because this would mean the Attorney General pursuing deep-state Democrats. John Durham knows that the Attorney General is a Democrat, and was appointed by the Democrat deep-state Biden administration.
I hope this helps. Please feel free to ask me a follow up question or any other questions about topics you are interested in better understanding.
"....like James Comey or Tony Faucci, just smiles like a fox, and answers, "I don't remember," knowing they will get away with it."
Isn't this by definition that we live in a defacto state where the powerful can act with impunity?
Impunity means the unwillingness, de facto or de jure (in practice or in law), of bringing the perpetrators of violations to account – whether in criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary proceedings and/or refusal to comply with compensatory obligations as determined as appropriate body.
Impunity is state of the nation where no one (in power or powerful) is accountable for anything. Who can be believe that there is such a thing as justice?
The recent congressional testimony by CDC Director Rachelle Walensky could smile with such smugness the lies she can get away with regarding myocarditis, deaths, miscarriages and stillbirths associated with the COVID19 vaccine. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5074366/exchange-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-cdc-director-dr-rochelle-walensky
MTG should have raised her voiceat her, "Look, look at this," while she held up the chart of the still births and miscarriages. And then added, "And wipe that smirk off your face!"
YES, YES, YES!
One of the finest and most entertaining commentaries every written about the tragic fall our great [?] republic.
Interesting statement regarding RFK Jr. will have to built it up from scratch. Hmmmm Kinda putting the cart before the horse. Just my observation.