10 Comments

I usually manage to keep my emotions in check since I see all the terrible things they are doing every day. This particular incident really makes my blood boil, not just because of the grave injustice you are suffering, but because of what it means for everyone. I will refrain from profanity, however.

What this means is that the rule of law is almost completely eroded. BRAZEN is the word to describe all the violations of law all these evil actors are perpetrating, right out in the open, because they are convinced they will get away with it. We see it in how the HI Governor is using the (likely purposely set) fires in Lahaina to steal the land, which is also happening in various ways all over the country, especially with farms and rural land. Full scale assault.

I'm glad you are suing them individually. Their conduct is beyond despicable.

Expand full comment

I am thrilled that 11 countries were astute enough, including Russian Federation, to object! Great news!

Expand full comment

As long as cronyism permeates the rule of law and the Constitution is viewed as nothing more than a mere speed bump these despiscable NGO's will stop at nothing to push their BS agendas.

Expand full comment

Done.

It really does only take two minutes to send the letter to your Representatives right here.

Expand full comment

I’ve been asking, begging and pleading with my state reps and senators to get US out of the UN for 20+ years. But I’m up for one more letter. Who knows, maybe this time they’ll listen.

Expand full comment

"Guilty ... of saving lives"

I love it!

Expand full comment

You could also say:

"Innocent of manslaughter and battery" (unlike my accusers).

Expand full comment

This is a tough neighborhood, heh, heh, heh ... :-)

The objections were conveyed in a letter dated 17 September 2023 to the President of the UN General Assembly H.E. Dennis Francis that was signed by the permanent representatives of the following countries:

Belarus

Bolivia

Cuba

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Eritrea

Islamic Republic of Iran

Nicaragua

Russian Federation

Syrian Arab Republic

Venezuela

Zimbabwe

Expand full comment

“At all times you should be guided by state law that gives this board and all occupational and professional licensing boards their purpose which is to protect the public health and welfare by insuring that the public is served by competent and honest practitioners.”

Words read out loud by Assistant Attorney General Tim Steigelman to the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine during the reading of the verdict of Meryl Nass.

It sounds like the guilty verdict was generated by a biased ChatGPT because there is no real depth, reasoning, or true understanding of this case at any level, period. The verdict is one-sided and sounds like it was programmed to ignore anything in your defense. And there is only one molecule of human scent in this verdict (probably from the reader).

My question is who protects the public health and welfare from the Medical Licensing Boards when they go rogue and tyrannically demand that physicians not criticize the governments precious vaccine that was concocted and manufactured without regulatory oversight in the warp speed time of one year, using technology that had never before been approved by the FDA, and pushed on the public as being safe and effective -- for everybody? Who protects the public health and welfare from Medical Licensing Boards who threaten physicians that their license to practice medicine will be revoked if they speak critically of the governments’ pie-in-the-sky miracle vaccine that can do no wrong? This tyrannical demand to stifle free speech has never been attempted publicly in the history of the United States. That’s a big red flag on the Medical Licensing Boards for anybody who cares about freedom, the foundation of our country. And at a critical time when a virus out of nowhere shows up everywhere, the Medical Licensing Boards insult our physicians and in a threatening stinky way try to restrict a physician’s long standing right to treat a patient as he or she sees fit, with safe repurposed drugs. Who is going to protect the public health and welfare from people serving on Medical Licensing Boards who claim there was not one safe drug already approved by the FDA that would be acceptable for treating early signs of Covid-19. Instead, get yourself to the hospital when you’re really, really, sick and we’ll experiment on you. This asinine idea, turned protocol is the cause of millions of deaths. Who is protecting who here?

Expand full comment

I've been calling for the County of Santa Cruz in CA, which is seriously ground zero for the Agenda 21 smart city dystopia, to call a Truth and Reconciliation Commission for the era of covid. I do not actually expect that it will happen, although it could be done without hiring any expensive consulting firms cause there are tons of smart people here and stories that need to be heard. But it is a way to continually speak some truth in a way that ideally is oriented toward creating MORE PUBLIC SPACE. I think of it as consistent with creating a local space that empowers local medical professionals and people with an interest in genuine justice and democracy. The young person in my life who is tech savy is preoccupied with legal matters right now. If anyone might help me with this it would be much appreciated. My two minute bit begins about minute 20:36 http://santacruzcountyca.iqm2.com/Citizens/SplitView.aspx?Mode=Video&MeetingID=1988&Format=Agenda

Expand full comment