45 Comments

The devil's always in the fine print. It is outrageous that congress never reads any of these bills. Since when is the FDA a constitutional created agency? The FDA and CDC are to be completely ignored if you want to save your life from their dictates.

Expand full comment

Changing the rules to create more tyranny, not honoring the reasons laws and Constitutional amendments were written in the first place, Constantly moving the goalposts to further the NWO agendas. It's very scary. What few back-handed protections we did have under the EUA rules were destroyed.

Expand full comment
Feb 1, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

Perhaps equally charming is the vaccine cash bonanza in the "inflation reduction" act, which basically puts a 29-shot bounty on the head of every incarcerated person in America: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/3833708-white-house-focusing-on-vaccine-access-for-vulnerable/

Expand full comment

omg...well that explains why we are now hearing the SOE will end. Complete rogue congress. Let's just make up rules to keep the tyranny train rolling. Is this LEGAL??

Expand full comment

Illegal laws are not laws. Illegal declarations are not capable of declaring anything valid or defensable whatsoever. They are all treason and will be treated in exactly that way. They cannot take what is not in their power to take. Those not paying attention will be taken but the majority will not.

Expand full comment

From the FDA's website:

"Importantly, the ending of the public health emergency declared by HHS under the Public Health Service Act will not impact FDA’s ability to authorize devices (including tests), treatments or vaccines for emergency use. Existing emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for products will remain in effect and the agency may continue to issue new EUAs going forward when criteria for issuance are met."

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/faqs-what-happens-euas-when-public-health-emergency-ends

(I don't know what parts of the FDA's answer above, which are at the top of the page and labeled "January 31 update", are due to the new provisions in the spending bill that were mentioned in the post.)

Expand full comment

Jeff never disappoints.

Expand full comment

The problem with those who lie and manipulate is it takes extraordinary effort and consistency to pay attention to what they are doing. Meanwhile the beauty of being human silently slips by.

Expand full comment

The corruption in the system is absolute.

Expand full comment

Oh, and it's even better: As of today, you don't need a positive corona test to get a pharmacist to hand you Paxlovid or Lagevrio ("Today, FDA revised the Letters of Authorization for two EUAs, Paxlovid and Lagevrio, to remove the requirement for positive test results to prescribe these products." https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization)

So you don't need an emergency for an EUA, and you don't need to test positive for a virus in order to get antivirals. And either the taxpayer or the people who pay into your insurance plan are picking up the tab. This is one amazing and sweet deal for Pfizer and Merck. What's especially exciting is the precedent it sets for any other patentable molecule. It doesn't have to clear the FDA approval bar or be limited in its administration to people who are actually sick. It just has to ... I don't know, be made by a pharmaceutical firm and not be off-patent?

Expand full comment

I'm sure most congressmen were unaware of what they were signing. They need to take back their authority from the "big boys" that are sticking this stuff in to legislation, as they have been doing, for at least a half century ( see Bailywick News substack).

First we must open their eyes. Let's all send this post to your representative.

Expand full comment

I feel bad that Meryl Nass is being harassed by this medical licensure abuse that is a form of Despotism without due process at the front end, imaginary accusations for which no facts can be produced, and continued harassment to not immediately declare Meryl Nass's medical license valid simultaneously with withdrawing the invalid associated charges. This is extremely cruel punishment for something that is not punishable--helping patients live with legally prescribed pharmaceuticals that have been safe and effective for decades, when others killed their patients. This is despotism that is very unAmerican by definition in the founding documents of America. That barbarous Board of tyrants that oppresses Meryl Nass is unfit to have power over medical professionals in a free nation. They have proven themselves intentionally deaf to the voice of injustice. Why isn't this board pulling the licenses of medical professionals who didn't protect their patients in this way and prescribed drugs after being warned such drugs would kill their patients? The Founding documents pre-empt anything done by the FDA and CDC, especially an FDA or its overseer HHS that illegally evaded its legal responsibility to first call an institutional review board, which should have determined that Meryl Nass's prescriptions were the gold standard protocol to treat COVID-19.

Expand full comment

wow, the fourth reich fascist billionaires write the laws and own all branches of government.

Expand full comment

All roads lead to protection, profits and power for Pfizer and the MIC.

Expand full comment

Do we know which piece of scum in our Congresd inserted that?

Expand full comment

They are just waiting until last jab recipients are either dead or finally disappointed. And since some are literally never openly disappointed and jabs are so far not deadly for most people, it may take a lot of time.

Expand full comment