https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/17/lancet-covid-pandemic-failure-reforms/ “The ability of the public health system to identify cases, trace contacts, and isolate infected individuals can be overwhelmed in just a few weeks of uncontrolled community transmission,” the report says.
We let this happen. There was a clear pattern of latching on to any potential viral crisis, and amping up fear if for no other reason than to get money....it is oft about money. The Zika scare was a big flop as it was found rather early that the women who were giving birth to deformed babies were aggressively vaxxed with DPT while pregnant and drinking larvicide laced water. It was reported there were 1000 new cases of Zika in Puerto RIco every week but no microcephaly. Well,,,, that didn't fit the narrative so the narrative vanished.
We can't have anyone looking at the DPT vaccine now as a problem, so that story dried up faster than you can say it has been known the DPT causes a 10 x increase in overall mortality in aged matched controls (Aaby et al).
Before Zika was the Mex Swine flu. Again, it was known early on the virus was man made and even tho the info was in the New England Journal of Medicine, no one asked why a lab created virus was in a slum in Mexico City. The CDC was announcing how many millions would die from this and ordering body bags by the plane load, but the whole thing fizzled .
These are just two examples and no one was held accountable so why not try it again, and again and again. Pharma makes money, the CDC gets billions to fight the illness whether or not the illness actually manifests
Lest we forget, it is thanks to voting of China, Africa and others there is no such thing as WHO covid power over nations...... because otherwise we forget who wants WEF NWO, and who does not..... aka WHO treaty
My third attempt to address the question of the WHO has so far failed to be published in BMJ Rapid Responses:-
TITLE: ‘Or is it an error for sovereign nations to put all their eggs in one basket?’
Dear Editor
Perhaps we should reflect on what happened in the United Kingdom [1]. On 19 March 2020 the Four Nations HCID Group put out this notice [2]:
“ As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.
“The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
“The ACDP (Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID...”
. What then happened? It seems that the Government decided to ignore the in-house advice and pursue an agenda dictated by the World Health Organization although the advice from both committees has never been changed [2]:
“ The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to consider COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), therefore the need to have a national, coordinated response remains and this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.”
In fact, in answer to a Parliamentary question Health Minister Jo Churchill told John Redwood that Covid despite the draconian measures was not considered high consequence and had not been since March [3]:
“The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.
“Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.
“COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.”
In other words it could be that social and economic catastrophe has been visited on our country by adhering to the agenda of an outside entity, the WHO. Nor is it obvious where the WHO’s sudden reputation for universal competence and disinterest comes from [4,5,6,7,8].
[1] Shaun Griffin, ‘Covid-19: Commission describes “massive global failures” of pandemic response’, BMJ 2022; 378 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2237 (Published 14 September 2022)
[4] Peter Doshi, ‘ Calibrated response to emerging infections’, BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3471 (Published 03 September 2009)
[5] Deborah Cohen & Philip Carter, 'WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”' BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010)
[6] Tom Jefferson, Peter Doshi, ‘Time for change, WHO’, BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3461 (Published 29 June 2010)
[7] Peter Aaby, Ane B Fisker, Anders Björkman, Christine Stabell Benn, ‘ WHO’s rollout of malaria vaccine in Africa: can safety questions be answered after only 24 months?’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6920 (Published 24 January 2020)
[8] Peter Doshi, ‘ WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards”’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m734 (Published 26 February 2020
A narrative was constructed as we went along, beginning in June 2019, when they failed to discover the cause of all those deaths at a retirement community near Ft. Detrick, just before its virology lab got closed for a few months, until November 2019. Number of cases in the US was managed initially by number-of-test-kits, and the orders to "only test the very sickest".
When you read about the "WHO", substitute "Bill Gates". Bill Gates donates more to the WHO through his various foundations than any other entity by far, almost $1.5 billion in 2021. Put that together with the whistleblowers from the WHO who saw sweeping changes after Gates bought his way in about eight years ago. One of the first things he did when he elbowed his way in was to abolish the internal Ethics Committee. Most obvious was the 180 on lockdown polices, where the WHO historically encouraged economies to stay open and advised that lockdowns would cause more harm that good.
Clearly Gates isn't the only monster here, but he's one of the biggest ones.
Constant attempts to recenter their narrative, just like they moved the goalposts when breakthrough cases became evident.
More psychomanipulative content from one of biggest spook venues. Trusted media!
This is their MO. Get a prominent voice to seed the message, then propagate it throughout the media landscape through opinion pieces and uncritical parrot reporting. Repeat until everyone has been exposed to the mind-virus message. Eventually, even people who don’t pay attention to the news will have heard it as a passing sound bite.
This is all part of an orchestrated camapign to get approval to transfer US sovereignty to the WHO for management of Pandemics..
The only surprise here is that the US would surrender ANY sovereignty to anyone - something it NEVEr does. One can only surmise that with USG and Gates providing the bulk of WHO funding and with puppet Tedros in place, the US must believe that it has total control over WHO from outside?
I think it important to separate the Establishment (Including The Lancet - one of the firecest proponents of totaltarian Covid responses) WHO issue from the Jeff Sachs (and others) "virus origins" issue, which was (by force?) very much diluted in the final Lancet Commission Report.
WRT the virus, all we know for sure is that the viral genetic sequence known as SC-2 is man-made in a Lab (The Furin cleavage site etc). But we do NOT know which Lab and we do NOT know how it was released. For many reasons (elaborated elsewhere) I think that an "accidental leak" is highly improbable and the timelines now being establsihed in any case suggest strongly that the virus was in circulation in several countries (including the US) before the Chinese Authorities even had it on their radar screen. So it seems to me that the binary choice (Zoonotic or an accidental leak at WIV) being allowed through the Overton window might be yet another distractionary limited hangout similar to "Twelve Saudis with boxcutters".
Absolutely nothing should have been done. An airborne virus cannot be stopped, only slowed, and slowing it only slows reaching herd immunity, and wastes money in doing so.
10Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation G3986 - peirasmos, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, G3986 - peirasmos: an experiment, attempt, trial, proving; blueletterbible
Keep the ball rolling. Call or e-mail the Washington Post Opinion staff and let them know what you think of this latest example of their ongoing epic fail on our current reality:
The advocates of World Government have always said it is needed because national governments cannot be trusted, need supervision. BUT why would a World Government be any better?
All the indicators from the pandemic times show that UN and WHO are among the most corrupt, tyrannical and dangerous organisations on the planet.
COVID VACCINES "SUCCESSFUL" IN BRINGING ABOUT HERD AMMUNITY
Hello Meryl and other truthseekers:
I hear that there's a push to declare "herd ammunity." Sounds like another success!
First of all, please accept my moniker of "Conspiracy Theorist" which has been bestowed upon me by those who excuse themselves from truth while name-calling to discredit reality. All they seem to need are lies, censorship and fake factcheckers, and of course hold most of the cards in the deck.
I heard a theory today on Fox Radio (Clay and Buck show) that the Covid vaccines have been so ineffective that they have actually helped to foster herd ammunity. Sure, the hoodwinked masses take the vaccine and falsely believe they're safe. How many times have you heard someone say, as they reach to shake your hand, "oh don't worry I'm FULLY vaccinated? That always brings me an internal smile.
So, with this false security, they move about with abandon. Covid spreads, people are sickened and develope antibodies against it. However, those who have not yet awakened, still love that Fauci. But thanks to individuals like Meryl, many seem to be arising from their slumber.
Now, I was careful to call this assertion a
theory. Even so called Conspiracy Theorists don't have all the facts. But I believe that this one is based upon some pretty solid footing.
We let this happen. There was a clear pattern of latching on to any potential viral crisis, and amping up fear if for no other reason than to get money....it is oft about money. The Zika scare was a big flop as it was found rather early that the women who were giving birth to deformed babies were aggressively vaxxed with DPT while pregnant and drinking larvicide laced water. It was reported there were 1000 new cases of Zika in Puerto RIco every week but no microcephaly. Well,,,, that didn't fit the narrative so the narrative vanished.
We can't have anyone looking at the DPT vaccine now as a problem, so that story dried up faster than you can say it has been known the DPT causes a 10 x increase in overall mortality in aged matched controls (Aaby et al).
Before Zika was the Mex Swine flu. Again, it was known early on the virus was man made and even tho the info was in the New England Journal of Medicine, no one asked why a lab created virus was in a slum in Mexico City. The CDC was announcing how many millions would die from this and ordering body bags by the plane load, but the whole thing fizzled .
These are just two examples and no one was held accountable so why not try it again, and again and again. Pharma makes money, the CDC gets billions to fight the illness whether or not the illness actually manifests
Lest we forget, it is thanks to voting of China, Africa and others there is no such thing as WHO covid power over nations...... because otherwise we forget who wants WEF NWO, and who does not..... aka WHO treaty
....and we can fix all these problems if everyone will agree to biodigital ID surveillance implants.
My third attempt to address the question of the WHO has so far failed to be published in BMJ Rapid Responses:-
TITLE: ‘Or is it an error for sovereign nations to put all their eggs in one basket?’
Dear Editor
Perhaps we should reflect on what happened in the United Kingdom [1]. On 19 March 2020 the Four Nations HCID Group put out this notice [2]:
“ As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.
“The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
“The ACDP (Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID...”
. What then happened? It seems that the Government decided to ignore the in-house advice and pursue an agenda dictated by the World Health Organization although the advice from both committees has never been changed [2]:
“ The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to consider COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), therefore the need to have a national, coordinated response remains and this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.”
In fact, in answer to a Parliamentary question Health Minister Jo Churchill told John Redwood that Covid despite the draconian measures was not considered high consequence and had not been since March [3]:
“The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.
“Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.
“COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.”
In other words it could be that social and economic catastrophe has been visited on our country by adhering to the agenda of an outside entity, the WHO. Nor is it obvious where the WHO’s sudden reputation for universal competence and disinterest comes from [4,5,6,7,8].
[1] Shaun Griffin, ‘Covid-19: Commission describes “massive global failures” of pandemic response’, BMJ 2022; 378 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2237 (Published 14 September 2022)
[2] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
[3] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-09-28/95975
[4] Peter Doshi, ‘ Calibrated response to emerging infections’, BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3471 (Published 03 September 2009)
[5] Deborah Cohen & Philip Carter, 'WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”' BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010)
[6] Tom Jefferson, Peter Doshi, ‘Time for change, WHO’, BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3461 (Published 29 June 2010)
[7] Peter Aaby, Ane B Fisker, Anders Björkman, Christine Stabell Benn, ‘ WHO’s rollout of malaria vaccine in Africa: can safety questions be answered after only 24 months?’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6920 (Published 24 January 2020)
[8] Peter Doshi, ‘ WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards”’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m734 (Published 26 February 2020
A narrative was constructed as we went along, beginning in June 2019, when they failed to discover the cause of all those deaths at a retirement community near Ft. Detrick, just before its virology lab got closed for a few months, until November 2019. Number of cases in the US was managed initially by number-of-test-kits, and the orders to "only test the very sickest".
When you read about the "WHO", substitute "Bill Gates". Bill Gates donates more to the WHO through his various foundations than any other entity by far, almost $1.5 billion in 2021. Put that together with the whistleblowers from the WHO who saw sweeping changes after Gates bought his way in about eight years ago. One of the first things he did when he elbowed his way in was to abolish the internal Ethics Committee. Most obvious was the 180 on lockdown polices, where the WHO historically encouraged economies to stay open and advised that lockdowns would cause more harm that good.
Clearly Gates isn't the only monster here, but he's one of the biggest ones.
Constant attempts to recenter their narrative, just like they moved the goalposts when breakthrough cases became evident.
More psychomanipulative content from one of biggest spook venues. Trusted media!
This is their MO. Get a prominent voice to seed the message, then propagate it throughout the media landscape through opinion pieces and uncritical parrot reporting. Repeat until everyone has been exposed to the mind-virus message. Eventually, even people who don’t pay attention to the news will have heard it as a passing sound bite.
This is all part of an orchestrated camapign to get approval to transfer US sovereignty to the WHO for management of Pandemics..
The only surprise here is that the US would surrender ANY sovereignty to anyone - something it NEVEr does. One can only surmise that with USG and Gates providing the bulk of WHO funding and with puppet Tedros in place, the US must believe that it has total control over WHO from outside?
I think it important to separate the Establishment (Including The Lancet - one of the firecest proponents of totaltarian Covid responses) WHO issue from the Jeff Sachs (and others) "virus origins" issue, which was (by force?) very much diluted in the final Lancet Commission Report.
WRT the virus, all we know for sure is that the viral genetic sequence known as SC-2 is man-made in a Lab (The Furin cleavage site etc). But we do NOT know which Lab and we do NOT know how it was released. For many reasons (elaborated elsewhere) I think that an "accidental leak" is highly improbable and the timelines now being establsihed in any case suggest strongly that the virus was in circulation in several countries (including the US) before the Chinese Authorities even had it on their radar screen. So it seems to me that the binary choice (Zoonotic or an accidental leak at WIV) being allowed through the Overton window might be yet another distractionary limited hangout similar to "Twelve Saudis with boxcutters".
Absolutely nothing should have been done. An airborne virus cannot be stopped, only slowed, and slowing it only slows reaching herd immunity, and wastes money in doing so.
GOD bless you Dr. Nass ...
10Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation G3986 - peirasmos, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, G3986 - peirasmos: an experiment, attempt, trial, proving; blueletterbible
Keep the ball rolling. Call or e-mail the Washington Post Opinion staff and let them know what you think of this latest example of their ongoing epic fail on our current reality:
Ruth Marcus
Deputy Editorial Page Editor
Ruth.Marcus@washpost.com
202-334-7529
Karen Tumulty
Deputy Editorial Page Editor
Karen.Tumulty@washpost.com
202-334-9576
Jo-Ann Armao
Associate Editorial Page Editor
Joann.Armao@washpost.com
202-334-6080
Michael Duffy
Opinions Editor-at-Large
Michael.Duffy@washpost.com
202-334-6432
Michael Larabee
Op-Ed Editor
Michael.Larabee@washpost.com
202-334-7528
Jen Balderama
Associate Op-Ed Editor
Jen.Balderama@washpost.com
Autumn Brewington
Associate Op-Ed Editor
Autumn.Brewington@washpost.com
Mark Lasswell
Associate Op-Ed Editor
Mark.Lasswell@washpost.com
Eli Lopez
Senior Editor for International Opinions
Eli.Lopez@washpost.com
202-334-7333
Christian Caryl
Democracy Post Editor
Christian.Caryl@washpost.com
202-334-4652
Jamie Riley
Local Opinions & Letters Editor
Jamie.RileyKolsky@washpost.com
202-334-6215
Trey Johnson
Chief Multiplatform Editor
Trey.Johnson@washpost.com
202-334-9245
Becca Clemons
Director, Operations & Strategy for Opinions
Rebecca.Clemons@washpost.com
202-334-5124
Kate Woodsome
Senior Producer, Opinions Video
Kate.Woodsome@washpost.com
202-334-4972
Nana Efua Mumford
Editorial Talent and Logistics Manager
NanaEfua.Mumford@washpost.com
202-334-6162
It was a complete debacle, except for the corporate marketing successes, and WHO was involved.
The advocates of World Government have always said it is needed because national governments cannot be trusted, need supervision. BUT why would a World Government be any better?
All the indicators from the pandemic times show that UN and WHO are among the most corrupt, tyrannical and dangerous organisations on the planet.
COVID VACCINES "SUCCESSFUL" IN BRINGING ABOUT HERD AMMUNITY
Hello Meryl and other truthseekers:
I hear that there's a push to declare "herd ammunity." Sounds like another success!
First of all, please accept my moniker of "Conspiracy Theorist" which has been bestowed upon me by those who excuse themselves from truth while name-calling to discredit reality. All they seem to need are lies, censorship and fake factcheckers, and of course hold most of the cards in the deck.
I heard a theory today on Fox Radio (Clay and Buck show) that the Covid vaccines have been so ineffective that they have actually helped to foster herd ammunity. Sure, the hoodwinked masses take the vaccine and falsely believe they're safe. How many times have you heard someone say, as they reach to shake your hand, "oh don't worry I'm FULLY vaccinated? That always brings me an internal smile.
So, with this false security, they move about with abandon. Covid spreads, people are sickened and develope antibodies against it. However, those who have not yet awakened, still love that Fauci. But thanks to individuals like Meryl, many seem to be arising from their slumber.
Now, I was careful to call this assertion a
theory. Even so called Conspiracy Theorists don't have all the facts. But I believe that this one is based upon some pretty solid footing.
Love you dearly.