We let this happen. There was a clear pattern of latching on to any potential viral crisis, and amping up fear if for no other reason than to get money....it is oft about money. The Zika scare was a big flop as it was found rather early that the women who were giving birth to deformed babies were aggressively vaxxed with DPT while pregnant and drinking larvicide laced water. It was reported there were 1000 new cases of Zika in Puerto RIco every week but no microcephaly. Well,,,, that didn't fit the narrative so the narrative vanished.
We can't have anyone looking at the DPT vaccine now as a problem, so that story dried up faster than you can say it has been known the DPT causes a 10 x increase in overall mortality in aged matched controls (Aaby et al).
Before Zika was the Mex Swine flu. Again, it was known early on the virus was man made and even tho the info was in the New England Journal of Medicine, no one asked why a lab created virus was in a slum in Mexico City. The CDC was announcing how many millions would die from this and ordering body bags by the plane load, but the whole thing fizzled .
These are just two examples and no one was held accountable so why not try it again, and again and again. Pharma makes money, the CDC gets billions to fight the illness whether or not the illness actually manifests
"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition" - Monty Python
"Nobody expects Western governments to turn against their own people, abuse, brainwash and torture them, then murder them using a slow-release formula while also crashing the world economy" - WEF-UN Anti-humanist Cabal
Well, you didn’t let it happen, Meryl didn’t let it happen and I didn’t let it happen but not enough people were listening -and not enough people now, though many more. In November 2019 I wrote:
“ But the heat was turned up again at the beginning of 2019 when the World Health Organization declared “the vaccine hesitant” to be a threat to world health [2], and the Global health terror over measles was launched despite inadequate evidence either for the spread, or the casualties[1,4-6]. Also, of course, pinned to the tails of the largely artificial measles scare, was the demand for compliance with a host of other products to combat other diseases. Implausibly, health officials continue to stick to the baseless proposition that a two-month old infant can benefit from unlimited barrage of biological products without risk of harm, and never seem to have heard of the concept of “over-medication” [7].”
Re: Measles cases rise 300% globally in first few months of 2019 - how long is a piece of string?
Perhaps the WHO know how difficult it is to come up with meaningful data in regard to measles outbreaks [1]. Some of the pitfalls were memorably described in a letter to the columns by Hilary Butler years ago [2]. How many reported? How many confirmed? How many sub-clinical? How much is simply an artefact of looking for cases? How many merely projected by the WHO? For instance, in a publication last November the WHO had only 28,474 reports of measles cases for 2017 in SE Asia (but how many of those were real cases?), while they projected 35,925 measles deaths for the region [3]. But if there was any reality to that mortality figure would 70 deaths in the Philippines earlier this year be especially worth remarking upon?
Similarly, I commented in relation to an earlier report this year [4,5]:
"Nor is it helpful to cite random "facts" about measles.. .For instance, in Brazil, how many of the 10,262 cases for 2018 were confirmed? Is it really possible to believe there were no cases in 2017? How far is any of this real, and how much an artefact of simply looking? Brazil is a country of approximately 210m, so how many "red rashes" which might have been measles... did not get reported in 2017?"
And if we do not know what was going on in 2017 and 18, how do we know what is going on now? One thing is certain that the WHO, and various other people want us to be extremely worried about measles [5,6], but how much is real, how much smoke and mirrors? It is important that we have real information because increasingly it is not only health but liberty which is a stake [5,6]. How can people make informed decisions with data like this?
[1] Elisabeth Mahase, 'Measles cases rise 300% globally in first few months of 2019',
Lest we forget, it is thanks to voting of China, Africa and others there is no such thing as WHO covid power over nations...... because otherwise we forget who wants WEF NWO, and who does not..... aka WHO treaty
My third attempt to address the question of the WHO has so far failed to be published in BMJ Rapid Responses:-
TITLE: ‘Or is it an error for sovereign nations to put all their eggs in one basket?’
Dear Editor
Perhaps we should reflect on what happened in the United Kingdom [1]. On 19 March 2020 the Four Nations HCID Group put out this notice [2]:
“ As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.
“The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
“The ACDP (Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID...”
. What then happened? It seems that the Government decided to ignore the in-house advice and pursue an agenda dictated by the World Health Organization although the advice from both committees has never been changed [2]:
“ The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to consider COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), therefore the need to have a national, coordinated response remains and this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.”
In fact, in answer to a Parliamentary question Health Minister Jo Churchill told John Redwood that Covid despite the draconian measures was not considered high consequence and had not been since March [3]:
“The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.
“Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.
“COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.”
In other words it could be that social and economic catastrophe has been visited on our country by adhering to the agenda of an outside entity, the WHO. Nor is it obvious where the WHO’s sudden reputation for universal competence and disinterest comes from [4,5,6,7,8].
[1] Shaun Griffin, ‘Covid-19: Commission describes “massive global failures” of pandemic response’, BMJ 2022; 378 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2237 (Published 14 September 2022)
[4] Peter Doshi, ‘ Calibrated response to emerging infections’, BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3471 (Published 03 September 2009)
[5] Deborah Cohen & Philip Carter, 'WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”' BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010)
[6] Tom Jefferson, Peter Doshi, ‘Time for change, WHO’, BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3461 (Published 29 June 2010)
[7] Peter Aaby, Ane B Fisker, Anders Björkman, Christine Stabell Benn, ‘ WHO’s rollout of malaria vaccine in Africa: can safety questions be answered after only 24 months?’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6920 (Published 24 January 2020)
[8] Peter Doshi, ‘ WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards”’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m734 (Published 26 February 2020
A narrative was constructed as we went along, beginning in June 2019, when they failed to discover the cause of all those deaths at a retirement community near Ft. Detrick, just before its virology lab got closed for a few months, until November 2019. Number of cases in the US was managed initially by number-of-test-kits, and the orders to "only test the very sickest".
When you read about the "WHO", substitute "Bill Gates". Bill Gates donates more to the WHO through his various foundations than any other entity by far, almost $1.5 billion in 2021. Put that together with the whistleblowers from the WHO who saw sweeping changes after Gates bought his way in about eight years ago. One of the first things he did when he elbowed his way in was to abolish the internal Ethics Committee. Most obvious was the 180 on lockdown polices, where the WHO historically encouraged economies to stay open and advised that lockdowns would cause more harm that good.
Clearly Gates isn't the only monster here, but he's one of the biggest ones.
Constant attempts to recenter their narrative, just like they moved the goalposts when breakthrough cases became evident.
More psychomanipulative content from one of biggest spook venues. Trusted media!
This is their MO. Get a prominent voice to seed the message, then propagate it throughout the media landscape through opinion pieces and uncritical parrot reporting. Repeat until everyone has been exposed to the mind-virus message. Eventually, even people who don’t pay attention to the news will have heard it as a passing sound bite.
This is all part of an orchestrated camapign to get approval to transfer US sovereignty to the WHO for management of Pandemics..
The only surprise here is that the US would surrender ANY sovereignty to anyone - something it NEVEr does. One can only surmise that with USG and Gates providing the bulk of WHO funding and with puppet Tedros in place, the US must believe that it has total control over WHO from outside?
I think it important to separate the Establishment (Including The Lancet - one of the firecest proponents of totaltarian Covid responses) WHO issue from the Jeff Sachs (and others) "virus origins" issue, which was (by force?) very much diluted in the final Lancet Commission Report.
WRT the virus, all we know for sure is that the viral genetic sequence known as SC-2 is man-made in a Lab (The Furin cleavage site etc). But we do NOT know which Lab and we do NOT know how it was released. For many reasons (elaborated elsewhere) I think that an "accidental leak" is highly improbable and the timelines now being establsihed in any case suggest strongly that the virus was in circulation in several countries (including the US) before the Chinese Authorities even had it on their radar screen. So it seems to me that the binary choice (Zoonotic or an accidental leak at WIV) being allowed through the Overton window might be yet another distractionary limited hangout similar to "Twelve Saudis with boxcutters".
Absolutely nothing should have been done. An airborne virus cannot be stopped, only slowed, and slowing it only slows reaching herd immunity, and wastes money in doing so.
Funny you should mention that. Are you aware of The Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), which was, of course, riduclued, censored and its authors "cancelled"?
10Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation G3986 - peirasmos, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, G3986 - peirasmos: an experiment, attempt, trial, proving; blueletterbible
The advocates of World Government have always said it is needed because national governments cannot be trusted, need supervision. BUT why would a World Government be any better?
All the indicators from the pandemic times show that UN and WHO are among the most corrupt, tyrannical and dangerous organisations on the planet.
COVID VACCINES "SUCCESSFUL" IN BRINGING ABOUT HERD AMMUNITY
Hello Meryl and other truthseekers:
I hear that there's a push to declare "herd ammunity." Sounds like another success!
First of all, please accept my moniker of "Conspiracy Theorist" which has been bestowed upon me by those who excuse themselves from truth while name-calling to discredit reality. All they seem to need are lies, censorship and fake factcheckers, and of course hold most of the cards in the deck.
I heard a theory today on Fox Radio (Clay and Buck show) that the Covid vaccines have been so ineffective that they have actually helped to foster herd ammunity. Sure, the hoodwinked masses take the vaccine and falsely believe they're safe. How many times have you heard someone say, as they reach to shake your hand, "oh don't worry I'm FULLY vaccinated? That always brings me an internal smile.
So, with this false security, they move about with abandon. Covid spreads, people are sickened and develope antibodies against it. However, those who have not yet awakened, still love that Fauci. But thanks to individuals like Meryl, many seem to be arising from their slumber.
Now, I was careful to call this assertion a
theory. Even so called Conspiracy Theorists don't have all the facts. But I believe that this one is based upon some pretty solid footing.
It's worth watching for anyone who missed it. If NO ONE complies with these stupid, inhuman / anti-human measures, we could stop tyranny in its tracks.
We let this happen. There was a clear pattern of latching on to any potential viral crisis, and amping up fear if for no other reason than to get money....it is oft about money. The Zika scare was a big flop as it was found rather early that the women who were giving birth to deformed babies were aggressively vaxxed with DPT while pregnant and drinking larvicide laced water. It was reported there were 1000 new cases of Zika in Puerto RIco every week but no microcephaly. Well,,,, that didn't fit the narrative so the narrative vanished.
We can't have anyone looking at the DPT vaccine now as a problem, so that story dried up faster than you can say it has been known the DPT causes a 10 x increase in overall mortality in aged matched controls (Aaby et al).
Before Zika was the Mex Swine flu. Again, it was known early on the virus was man made and even tho the info was in the New England Journal of Medicine, no one asked why a lab created virus was in a slum in Mexico City. The CDC was announcing how many millions would die from this and ordering body bags by the plane load, but the whole thing fizzled .
These are just two examples and no one was held accountable so why not try it again, and again and again. Pharma makes money, the CDC gets billions to fight the illness whether or not the illness actually manifests
"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition" - Monty Python
"Nobody expects Western governments to turn against their own people, abuse, brainwash and torture them, then murder them using a slow-release formula while also crashing the world economy" - WEF-UN Anti-humanist Cabal
Ken
Well, you didn’t let it happen, Meryl didn’t let it happen and I didn’t let it happen but not enough people were listening -and not enough people now, though many more. In November 2019 I wrote:
“ But the heat was turned up again at the beginning of 2019 when the World Health Organization declared “the vaccine hesitant” to be a threat to world health [2], and the Global health terror over measles was launched despite inadequate evidence either for the spread, or the casualties[1,4-6]. Also, of course, pinned to the tails of the largely artificial measles scare, was the demand for compliance with a host of other products to combat other diseases. Implausibly, health officials continue to stick to the baseless proposition that a two-month old infant can benefit from unlimited barrage of biological products without risk of harm, and never seem to have heard of the concept of “over-medication” [7].”
https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/10/the-id2020-alliance-the-global-totalitarian-project-hiding-behind-the-vaccine-drive.html#more
Footnote 4 describes just what they were doing
Re: Measles cases rise 300% globally in first few months of 2019 - how long is a piece of string?
Perhaps the WHO know how difficult it is to come up with meaningful data in regard to measles outbreaks [1]. Some of the pitfalls were memorably described in a letter to the columns by Hilary Butler years ago [2]. How many reported? How many confirmed? How many sub-clinical? How much is simply an artefact of looking for cases? How many merely projected by the WHO? For instance, in a publication last November the WHO had only 28,474 reports of measles cases for 2017 in SE Asia (but how many of those were real cases?), while they projected 35,925 measles deaths for the region [3]. But if there was any reality to that mortality figure would 70 deaths in the Philippines earlier this year be especially worth remarking upon?
Similarly, I commented in relation to an earlier report this year [4,5]:
"Nor is it helpful to cite random "facts" about measles.. .For instance, in Brazil, how many of the 10,262 cases for 2018 were confirmed? Is it really possible to believe there were no cases in 2017? How far is any of this real, and how much an artefact of simply looking? Brazil is a country of approximately 210m, so how many "red rashes" which might have been measles... did not get reported in 2017?"
And if we do not know what was going on in 2017 and 18, how do we know what is going on now? One thing is certain that the WHO, and various other people want us to be extremely worried about measles [5,6], but how much is real, how much smoke and mirrors? It is important that we have real information because increasingly it is not only health but liberty which is a stake [5,6]. How can people make informed decisions with data like this?
[1] Elisabeth Mahase, 'Measles cases rise 300% globally in first few months of 2019',
BMJ 2019; 365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1810 (Published 16 April 2019)
[2] Hilary Butler, 'In response to Peter Flegg's use of data', 29 November 2008, https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/response-peter-fleggs-use-...
[3] Dabbagh et al, "Progress towards regionalmeasles elimination – worldwide, 2000–2017", Table 1, WHO, Weekly epidemiological record, 30 NOVEMBER 2018, 93th YEAR, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/276217/WER9348.pdf?ua=1
[4] Owen Dyer, 'Measles: alarming worldwide surge seriously threatens children, says UN', BMJ 2019; 364 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l981 (Published 01 March 2019)
[5] John Stone, 'Information and Misinformation: the Global Health Security Agenda', 5 March 2019, https://www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.l981/rr
[6] Peter Hotez, 'Measles in America—what’s playing out in New York State is nightmarish',
March 28, 2019, https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/03/28/peter-hotez-measles-in-america-what...
https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l1810/rr
Lest we forget, it is thanks to voting of China, Africa and others there is no such thing as WHO covid power over nations...... because otherwise we forget who wants WEF NWO, and who does not..... aka WHO treaty
....and we can fix all these problems if everyone will agree to biodigital ID surveillance implants.
It’s so sadly horrifying, I laugh.
My third attempt to address the question of the WHO has so far failed to be published in BMJ Rapid Responses:-
TITLE: ‘Or is it an error for sovereign nations to put all their eggs in one basket?’
Dear Editor
Perhaps we should reflect on what happened in the United Kingdom [1]. On 19 March 2020 the Four Nations HCID Group put out this notice [2]:
“ As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.
“The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
“The ACDP (Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID...”
. What then happened? It seems that the Government decided to ignore the in-house advice and pursue an agenda dictated by the World Health Organization although the advice from both committees has never been changed [2]:
“ The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to consider COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), therefore the need to have a national, coordinated response remains and this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.”
In fact, in answer to a Parliamentary question Health Minister Jo Churchill told John Redwood that Covid despite the draconian measures was not considered high consequence and had not been since March [3]:
“The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.
“Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.
“COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.”
In other words it could be that social and economic catastrophe has been visited on our country by adhering to the agenda of an outside entity, the WHO. Nor is it obvious where the WHO’s sudden reputation for universal competence and disinterest comes from [4,5,6,7,8].
[1] Shaun Griffin, ‘Covid-19: Commission describes “massive global failures” of pandemic response’, BMJ 2022; 378 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2237 (Published 14 September 2022)
[2] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
[3] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-09-28/95975
[4] Peter Doshi, ‘ Calibrated response to emerging infections’, BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3471 (Published 03 September 2009)
[5] Deborah Cohen & Philip Carter, 'WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”' BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010)
[6] Tom Jefferson, Peter Doshi, ‘Time for change, WHO’, BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3461 (Published 29 June 2010)
[7] Peter Aaby, Ane B Fisker, Anders Björkman, Christine Stabell Benn, ‘ WHO’s rollout of malaria vaccine in Africa: can safety questions be answered after only 24 months?’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6920 (Published 24 January 2020)
[8] Peter Doshi, ‘ WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards”’, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m734 (Published 26 February 2020
A narrative was constructed as we went along, beginning in June 2019, when they failed to discover the cause of all those deaths at a retirement community near Ft. Detrick, just before its virology lab got closed for a few months, until November 2019. Number of cases in the US was managed initially by number-of-test-kits, and the orders to "only test the very sickest".
When you read about the "WHO", substitute "Bill Gates". Bill Gates donates more to the WHO through his various foundations than any other entity by far, almost $1.5 billion in 2021. Put that together with the whistleblowers from the WHO who saw sweeping changes after Gates bought his way in about eight years ago. One of the first things he did when he elbowed his way in was to abolish the internal Ethics Committee. Most obvious was the 180 on lockdown polices, where the WHO historically encouraged economies to stay open and advised that lockdowns would cause more harm that good.
Clearly Gates isn't the only monster here, but he's one of the biggest ones.
Constant attempts to recenter their narrative, just like they moved the goalposts when breakthrough cases became evident.
More psychomanipulative content from one of biggest spook venues. Trusted media!
This is their MO. Get a prominent voice to seed the message, then propagate it throughout the media landscape through opinion pieces and uncritical parrot reporting. Repeat until everyone has been exposed to the mind-virus message. Eventually, even people who don’t pay attention to the news will have heard it as a passing sound bite.
And it is true because everybody knows it.
Received wisdom. Just like that impending climate crisis.
It’s the deceptions that are built on kernels of truth or virtue that become endemic...
This is all part of an orchestrated camapign to get approval to transfer US sovereignty to the WHO for management of Pandemics..
The only surprise here is that the US would surrender ANY sovereignty to anyone - something it NEVEr does. One can only surmise that with USG and Gates providing the bulk of WHO funding and with puppet Tedros in place, the US must believe that it has total control over WHO from outside?
I think it important to separate the Establishment (Including The Lancet - one of the firecest proponents of totaltarian Covid responses) WHO issue from the Jeff Sachs (and others) "virus origins" issue, which was (by force?) very much diluted in the final Lancet Commission Report.
WRT the virus, all we know for sure is that the viral genetic sequence known as SC-2 is man-made in a Lab (The Furin cleavage site etc). But we do NOT know which Lab and we do NOT know how it was released. For many reasons (elaborated elsewhere) I think that an "accidental leak" is highly improbable and the timelines now being establsihed in any case suggest strongly that the virus was in circulation in several countries (including the US) before the Chinese Authorities even had it on their radar screen. So it seems to me that the binary choice (Zoonotic or an accidental leak at WIV) being allowed through the Overton window might be yet another distractionary limited hangout similar to "Twelve Saudis with boxcutters".
Absolutely nothing should have been done. An airborne virus cannot be stopped, only slowed, and slowing it only slows reaching herd immunity, and wastes money in doing so.
Funny you should mention that. Are you aware of The Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), which was, of course, riduclued, censored and its authors "cancelled"?
GOD bless you Dr. Nass ...
10Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation G3986 - peirasmos, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, G3986 - peirasmos: an experiment, attempt, trial, proving; blueletterbible
It was a complete debacle, except for the corporate marketing successes, and WHO was involved.
The advocates of World Government have always said it is needed because national governments cannot be trusted, need supervision. BUT why would a World Government be any better?
All the indicators from the pandemic times show that UN and WHO are among the most corrupt, tyrannical and dangerous organisations on the planet.
COVID VACCINES "SUCCESSFUL" IN BRINGING ABOUT HERD AMMUNITY
Hello Meryl and other truthseekers:
I hear that there's a push to declare "herd ammunity." Sounds like another success!
First of all, please accept my moniker of "Conspiracy Theorist" which has been bestowed upon me by those who excuse themselves from truth while name-calling to discredit reality. All they seem to need are lies, censorship and fake factcheckers, and of course hold most of the cards in the deck.
I heard a theory today on Fox Radio (Clay and Buck show) that the Covid vaccines have been so ineffective that they have actually helped to foster herd ammunity. Sure, the hoodwinked masses take the vaccine and falsely believe they're safe. How many times have you heard someone say, as they reach to shake your hand, "oh don't worry I'm FULLY vaccinated? That always brings me an internal smile.
So, with this false security, they move about with abandon. Covid spreads, people are sickened and develope antibodies against it. However, those who have not yet awakened, still love that Fauci. But thanks to individuals like Meryl, many seem to be arising from their slumber.
Now, I was careful to call this assertion a
theory. Even so called Conspiracy Theorists don't have all the facts. But I believe that this one is based upon some pretty solid footing.
Love you dearly.
Early on, I begged people to JUST SAY NO.
I used KrisAnne Hall's Noncompliant Movie as inspiration: https://libertyfirstsociety.com/noncompliantmovie/
It's worth watching for anyone who missed it. If NO ONE complies with these stupid, inhuman / anti-human measures, we could stop tyranny in its tracks.