51 Comments

Never forget this:

“The World today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

― Bill Gates”

I love wearing my "We will not comply with tyranny" tshirt everywhere I go.

This one: https://tinyurl.com/3v736ww3

Expand full comment

At that same TED Talk, Bill Gates Highlights Population: 1 of These #s Are Going To Have to Come Pretty Near to 0 - Audience Bursts into Laughter: https://bitchute.com/video/ODce0dzhQMkX [14seconds]

Expand full comment

Honestly we would be safer and better off without bill Getz. Hes worthless in my book and has no value to humanity. His plans to depopulate by -5billion are a sign of a pathologic liar with sudden urges to commit mass murder and a hostile takeover of humanity.

We must remove him from society to survive.

Expand full comment

No where near enough push back against this nightmare

Expand full comment

You're right, and I just don't get it!

Expand full comment

I find a lot of the general public just don't know what's going on at all & when you try to tell them they look at you as if your crazy or get angry.

They're in for the shock of their lives

Expand full comment

that has always been the case and always will be

that does not matter at all

the American Revolution was fought and won with 5% support

the pubic is and will remain clueless on most things

Expand full comment

Yes, I heard you dont need massive numbers of resistors to win the day, but this community of brave Scientists, Researchers, Dr's & interested public on Substack are the only ppl I know (aside from about 3 others in person) who have any clue what's happening & what 'they' are planning for us all in the near future (inc my family who ridiculed me during Loockdown until others started speaking out & warning the ConVid jabs were lethal) & I fear it might be easier for them to achieve their evil aims now we are living in the AI/Digital/Cyber Satan age.

Expand full comment

Dr Nass - you will find this interesting. It has to do with defunding the WHO. It is HR 4665. Scroll down to p. 249, #13......https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr4665/BILLS-118hr4665rh.pdf

Expand full comment

So what does that mean?

Expand full comment

It now goes to the Senate. We will have to wait to see how they vote.

Expand full comment

Call your senators.

Expand full comment

202-225-3121 to make your voice heard.

Expand full comment

I think we can guess

Expand full comment

Good grief - 298 pages. There is a lot here, hmm. Would you happen to know off the top of your head where this is at, procedure wise?

Expand full comment

The WHO must be stopped. Richard Cook, "Our Country, Then and Now."

Expand full comment

Praying our “representatives” will vote to defund this tyrannical move while setting aside their petty interests and honoring their constituents.

Expand full comment

One veto on the UN Security Council would do the trick.

Expand full comment

This may interest you regarding the Security Council:

UN Security Council Mural is A Lucifer Phoenix Shedding His Skin Like a Snake - US Eagle = Phoenix https://bitchute.com/video/ArFqCP11v8md [5:06mins]

Expand full comment

Have you ever seen the artwork in Denver International Airport?

Expand full comment

Yes, I lived in Colorado Springs for a time when it was still being displayed. They've taken it down since because the plans are actively being executed now.

Expand full comment

The dedication plaque is still in place.

Expand full comment

Meet the greeting horse at that airport, bLucifer: https://hashtagcoloradolife.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Blucifer.jpg

Expand full comment

It is probably just a monument to their football team.

Expand full comment

Yes, and now. See Craig Bong on YT. He explains it. Cabalists love symbolism, and flag themselves with it. Now that they see their goas in sight, they flaunt it.

Expand full comment

I read they have no authority to adopt the amendments they did for the US without congress approval. They could only amend certain ones and they went above and beyond that. I hope that is true for us because congress is doing shit about it.

Expand full comment

Agreed - it is beyond the powers of the executive office. The Constitution does not permit the president to cede America's sovereignty via treaty or administrative regulation conceits. It takes a long time to get the issues into court, and a LOT of $$$, meanwhile they send out and implement illegal orders. I do not have the physical wherewithal to sustain helping enough in such efforts. I keyboard warrior, send my $5/month donations to the heavy lifters when I can.

Please God, save us.

Expand full comment

THANK YOU! So many people seem to believe that fellow-citizens in democracies who are transiently acting as salaried public servants in publicly-funded public office meant to serve the public interest can legally commit such crimes and betrayals as we see - and this might be the scariest part.

So wonderful to see people pointing this out - after all, the US Constitution was aimed at limiting government from becoming burdensome and oppressive to the point where they had to be ousted, tried and imprisoned, by the people themselves, if necessary.

Expand full comment

“...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed...”

-The Declaration of Independence

Expand full comment

Authority? Executives do not have authority to make mandates and law because that is supposed to be reserved to the legislature. Witness the actions during covid if you want to see the disrespect for authority. Mao was closer to the truth when he said that "___ comes from the barrel of a gun". Congress works for a higher authority than you citizen and it is not your vote. We should be so lucky if Congress did shit rather than make shit for us to eat.

Expand full comment

Control issues.

As the imperialists intentionally crash the global economy as a means to seize all wealth from the unprotected class. "That's we all" for the benefit of the protected class.

Much in the same way that the Bill Gates "wet dream" of absolute control over everyone's body annihilating the sovereignty of we all. These WHO aspirations still on the drawing board, hardly compare to the utilization of all investor's/ depositors assets when the protected class bankrupts their schemes.

Once your stocks bonds pension investments anywhere are gone, and everyone goes apeshit then we can all feed upon eaxh other subsisting aboard penitentiary planet.

The time to eat the rich is long overdue, in my humble opinion. humble opinion

Expand full comment

What a vengeful attitude "Eating the rich" is and destined to do no good. It is the debt based private fiat money banking system that is used by the ultra powerful that should be your target. Eating the rich will just leave you still a slave unless you leave the plantation.

Expand full comment

6,000 years of banking and we a world of debt slaves

Expand full comment

it is actually easier

How about getting the country permanently out of the WHO? Trump did it.

We need to get out not to consider...

Expand full comment

You rock

Expand full comment

As a sovereign entity, I have already opted out of teddy's tyranny for good.

Expand full comment

Who in the US has the authority to opt out? Who do we need to get to do this?

Expand full comment

How can anyone in any democracy claim any authority to give/throw away what belongs to others (such as their inherent and irremovable rights and the citizen's irremovable democratic self-rule of/by/for the people, with all to be equal under law and none 'above all law') and to the general public as a Commons, (this including the sovereignty of their self-ruled country and their existing rights-protective Constitutions/Bills of Rights/Charters forming the democratic rights-protective basis of law) with all this entailed forever, for those to come?

No-one can take away our inherent rights, they can only abuse them - and human rights abuses are CRIMES that can never be 'legally' imposed as 'legally binding' on anyone else.

This nonsense of claiming that using labels such as 'treaties', 'agreements', or whatever else somehow empowers anyone/any group to illegally abuse or betray their own people and country strikes me as a scam.

Also, those not even made party to a secretive, privately made agreement between conspirators, illegally claiming these intended victims to be disposable chattels, can hardly be held to be 'legally bound' to submit to the criminals behind this.

This only works if we're fooled into accepting the perps violations of pre-existing law by passing off as 'law' their own (after-the-fact-of pre-existing protections against) attempts at 'legalising' their own violations, while claiming to supersede what already renders their illegal 'laws' automatically null and void because violating all pre-existing democratic, Constitutional and foundational protections against exactly what they're trying to con us into accepting as 'inevitable'.

The perps cannot legally 'suspend' a Constitution meant to stand forever or 'remove' irremovable human rights in order to enable their own lawlessness and abuses - and for what other reason must protective law be withdrawn? No good one comes to mind. Scams...

Expand full comment

Every member of the UN is complicit to the UN, WHO narrative! In the Netherland early ‘23, they already made a law that prohibits to counter fact the politicians. The IIHR was formed to shorten the hospital beds.This started in 2005. The former Dutch finance minister Siegfried Kaag is member of this IHR. The lesser hospital beds the more people will not be helped and die. That is the UN Agenda 2030 to decimate the world population!

Expand full comment

I guess Bill G knows the more toxic shots they give, the more deaths. It's working really well!

Expand full comment

Yeah, IIRC, I believe that Deagle had the US depop estimate at 75%, having that memory pop up after seeing, again, an estimate that 75% of the US population had had at least one jab. And I wish that was unbelievable...

Expand full comment

Thank you for keeping us all informed.

Expand full comment