Thank you for the breakdown Meryl, I know how much time it would have required.
I'm beginning to think that we are sliding towards "freeze" response from the bureaucratic over-reaching folks.
I think it's catching up to them and they haven't a clue what to do. They have also been traumatised through all of this farcial world vs virus play.
Think some peeps from team reality better make some constructive and well thought, reasonable response suggestions, BEFORE someone less benign in motive steps into the bureaucratic vacuum that's beginning to open....😐😑🤗🙏
Great summary! Can you opine on the theory that (manipulated) data that (sometimes) appears to show vaccines/boosters may result in reduced severe outcomes but may also be impacted by survivor bias whereas vax deaths and those injured don't get more jabs (thereby decreasing the bad numerator of total adverse events)? Curious to know how stats would differ if we somehow accounted for potential or presumed vax deaths & injuries in the severe outcome analysis vs just negative covid outcomes.
Only widespread CARNAGE will expose these people to the REALITY of their decisions. They will be replaced, new useful idiots will take their place, and history will continue to repeat itself.
Thank you so much for that. It is something I can send people. Also, I believe T-Cell immunity is a reliable indicator of natural immunity. What about after spikeshots? I have + T-Cell and no antibodies, as does one daughter who had Covid. My other daughter who had covid tested + for ABs - didn't take the T-cell test.
I am simply repeating what the FDA and its experts said: No tests including T cell tests have been validated. I cannot tell you whether it is accurate. I can tell you that FDA will no longer attempt to authorize or license vaccines on the basis of the current neutralizing antibody titers following this very public admission. It must have been planned.
Then will they rescind the EUA for the 5-11 year olds? Was that not the only data they relied on since severity of illness was non existent in that age range?
We have to find a way to force them to do so. There seems to be no other oversight to make FDA follow its own rules and guidances--Congress does not seem to care
Interesting / disturbing free online conference this weekend, "Stepping Into the Future" (w/ session on "Moral Enhancement"). From the "Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies".
Sharing for FYI, I'm not affiliated with the group, nor do I know anything about them, just somehow on their mailing list.
I can believe there's (some) people, working on "posthumanism" with good intentions, who don't see these lines being crossed as violations of life itself ... who think they're the wisest ones to build the inevitable. . . Who don't understand how horrifically this can be misused, or who don't want others to understand that ...
From IEET -"This coming weekend, the Stepping Into the Future conference has session on "Moral Enhancement" - Are we fit for the future?
Arguably high degrees of moral fortitude are required for humans to coordinate through some potentially rough times ahead and avoid existential crises.
This session discusses enhancing human morality to achieve civilizational resilience, while considering freedom & autonomy.
It consists of 2 talks and a panel: Pramod K. Nayer (Hyderabad University) - Posthumanism and it's Moral Imperatives
James Hughes (IEET) - Cyborg Virtues: Using BCIs for Moral Enhancement
Panelists: James Hughes, PJ Manney and Pramod K. Nayer -
Panel: Are we fit for the future?
The three other sessions are “Engineering a Better Future”, “AI Safety & Longtermism” and “AGI Architectures & Agency”
(In this 2010 article, J. Hughes, executive director of IEET (& author of Citizen Cyborg), says -
"If the imaginary moral community of humanity is flexible enough to expand beyond white male property-owners to all human beings surely it can expand a little further to include gorillas, cyborgs and mutants.")
Meryl, what a complete dog's dinner this was. Thank you for sitting through it, and taking notes. I would have put my fist through the computer screen trying to grab them all by the throats and scream at them. Bless you.
Thanks for the rundown on the meeting, I've been curious to hear about it. I didn't want to spend all that time watching the whole thing, so I appreciate your report! 😊👍🏽💕
Thank you for the breakdown Meryl, I know how much time it would have required.
I'm beginning to think that we are sliding towards "freeze" response from the bureaucratic over-reaching folks.
I think it's catching up to them and they haven't a clue what to do. They have also been traumatised through all of this farcial world vs virus play.
Think some peeps from team reality better make some constructive and well thought, reasonable response suggestions, BEFORE someone less benign in motive steps into the bureaucratic vacuum that's beginning to open....😐😑🤗🙏
Wondering how much money it takes to convince all these so-called scientists that murder is OK?
Thank You, Dr. Nass.
Maybe the best we can hope for is a committee that can't decide anything forever.
That would be tremendously less bad than the rolling global maltreatment of humanity, which has been top-secret and DIA/CDC-guided in the US.
We seem to be the occupants of WW-2 Dresden in this play...
:-(
Great summary! Can you opine on the theory that (manipulated) data that (sometimes) appears to show vaccines/boosters may result in reduced severe outcomes but may also be impacted by survivor bias whereas vax deaths and those injured don't get more jabs (thereby decreasing the bad numerator of total adverse events)? Curious to know how stats would differ if we somehow accounted for potential or presumed vax deaths & injuries in the severe outcome analysis vs just negative covid outcomes.
I can't but perhaps a statistician will. Be aware that 12-15% of Americans who got a first shot of the 2 shot COVID series never went back for #2. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html
Sounds like a good question for the bad cat or eugyppius
Wow. Never thought of that.
Only widespread CARNAGE will expose these people to the REALITY of their decisions. They will be replaced, new useful idiots will take their place, and history will continue to repeat itself.
Thank you so much for that. It is something I can send people. Also, I believe T-Cell immunity is a reliable indicator of natural immunity. What about after spikeshots? I have + T-Cell and no antibodies, as does one daughter who had Covid. My other daughter who had covid tested + for ABs - didn't take the T-cell test.
I am simply repeating what the FDA and its experts said: No tests including T cell tests have been validated. I cannot tell you whether it is accurate. I can tell you that FDA will no longer attempt to authorize or license vaccines on the basis of the current neutralizing antibody titers following this very public admission. It must have been planned.
Then will they rescind the EUA for the 5-11 year olds? Was that not the only data they relied on since severity of illness was non existent in that age range?
We have to find a way to force them to do so. There seems to be no other oversight to make FDA follow its own rules and guidances--Congress does not seem to care
Send this to Senator Johnson. Maybe he can make them follow their own rules?
That's great news. Thanks
Gates/Fauci are working on a more deadly bio-weapon at this very moment. They need it in full force by the November election.
I hate to say it but it is entirely possible.
Oh, these experimental injections are totally safe and efficient. Here is proof!
872 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 571 Dead, After COVID Shot
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
Interesting / disturbing free online conference this weekend, "Stepping Into the Future" (w/ session on "Moral Enhancement"). From the "Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies".
Sharing for FYI, I'm not affiliated with the group, nor do I know anything about them, just somehow on their mailing list.
I can believe there's (some) people, working on "posthumanism" with good intentions, who don't see these lines being crossed as violations of life itself ... who think they're the wisest ones to build the inevitable. . . Who don't understand how horrifically this can be misused, or who don't want others to understand that ...
From IEET -"This coming weekend, the Stepping Into the Future conference has session on "Moral Enhancement" - Are we fit for the future?
Arguably high degrees of moral fortitude are required for humans to coordinate through some potentially rough times ahead and avoid existential crises.
This session discusses enhancing human morality to achieve civilizational resilience, while considering freedom & autonomy.
It consists of 2 talks and a panel: Pramod K. Nayer (Hyderabad University) - Posthumanism and it's Moral Imperatives
James Hughes (IEET) - Cyborg Virtues: Using BCIs for Moral Enhancement
Panelists: James Hughes, PJ Manney and Pramod K. Nayer -
Panel: Are we fit for the future?
The three other sessions are “Engineering a Better Future”, “AI Safety & Longtermism” and “AGI Architectures & Agency”
See more: http://www.scifuture.org/events/stepping-into-the-future/#agenda "
~~~~
(In this 2010 article, J. Hughes, executive director of IEET (& author of Citizen Cyborg), says -
"If the imaginary moral community of humanity is flexible enough to expand beyond white male property-owners to all human beings surely it can expand a little further to include gorillas, cyborgs and mutants.")
https://gizmodo.com/beyond-the-human-race-and-human-racism-5534623
Bilateral Policy Dialogue to Counter Disinformation
https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=338148
Meryl, what a complete dog's dinner this was. Thank you for sitting through it, and taking notes. I would have put my fist through the computer screen trying to grab them all by the throats and scream at them. Bless you.
Acute myocardial infarction: Development and application of and ICD-10-CM-based algorithm to a large U.S. healthcare claims-based database
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34197488/
That study goes from 2014 through 2017. Has there been an update since Covid started using the same algorithm?
I'm still looking.
Thank you for your excellent and expert reporting.
Use the word "faccine" - fake vaccine.
Thanks for the rundown on the meeting, I've been curious to hear about it. I didn't want to spend all that time watching the whole thing, so I appreciate your report! 😊👍🏽💕
Could the tide possibly, just maybe, be starting to turn? 🙏
Me too 🙏🏻