What is the proof that the W.H.O.'s pandemic treaty and/or IHR amendments (proposed) will truly grab sovereignty over global health and 'One Health'?
Michael Nevradakis answered that question in a Defender article. It's not simple, because the lawyers who formulated this did their best to hide their tracks.
Even if it wasn't an intentional usurpation of the right to self-determination, that is its effect.
The correlation with attempts to reclassify non-medical socially contentious issues as "public health" problems subject to regulation by "health authorities" makes the usurpation of sovereignty a cornerstone of the treaty.
There's a lot of money and political power at stake with this issue.
Another “crisis” or three has to happen for this to be forced into place in the US. They also need Fed digital currency to squeeze the noncompliant states. For that to happen, the financial system has to be crashed. Janet Yellen actually said it last week. Look it up. The real fun starts June 1.
Even if it wasn't an intentional usurpation of the right to self-determination, that is its effect.
The correlation with attempts to reclassify non-medical socially contentious issues as "public health" problems subject to regulation by "health authorities" makes the usurpation of sovereignty a cornerstone of the treaty.
There's a lot of money and political power at stake with this issue.
Another “crisis” or three has to happen for this to be forced into place in the US. They also need Fed digital currency to squeeze the noncompliant states. For that to happen, the financial system has to be crashed. Janet Yellen actually said it last week. Look it up. The real fun starts June 1.