WHO, Gro Brundtland, the Plan to leave no one unjabbed using untested 100 day vaccines, and how portable vaccine factories will allow the entire human herd to be jabbed simultaneously--but with what?
WHO, Gro Brundtland, the Plan to leave no one unjabbed using untested 100 day vaccines, and how portable vaccine factories will allow the entire human herd to be jabbed simultaneously--but with what?
We simply don't know what is being done. We do know that (Merck I think) had a livestock mRNA vaccine for livestock--the vaccine talk in the Attack on Food symposium I hosted on March 4 had a slide on mRNA vaccines for animals.
you cannot buy meat in the US that has not been vaccinated with some vaccines, 99.9% of the time, as the USDA requires its inspectors check every animal butchered.
A number of your customers are concerned about mRNA vaccines being put into the meat we consume from your store. We spend many thousands of dollars per year in your store, and do not wish to have these vaccines, or mRNA agents, in either our meat, or our vegetables, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany. Yes, I am aware that there is no mandate to vaccinate livestock, per this AP article No, farmers aren’t required to vaccinate livestock with mRNA vaccines, but that, of course, is not the question as AP disingenuously reports; rather, the question is, is this being done anyway? Do you do it with your products, and if so, are we consumers being notified? (Basically, as far as I’m concerned, AP article outright lies, writing that mRNA is “typically gone within days of receipt”; as a matter of fact, we know a fact that the mRNA from the Covid shot remains at least 60 days, if not longer – much longer To wit: Per Dr. Peter McCullough in his March 17, 2023 article, Critical Role of Pseudouridine in Synthetic mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines “Fertig et al found lipid nanoparticles with mRNA were measurable in plasma for—15 days. Recently, Castruita et al demonstrated mRNA in blood out to 28 days. Roltgen et al have found mRNA in lymph nodes 60 days after injection. None of these studies demonstrated complete clearance of mRNA from a group of patients. This is worrisome since injections are recommended in some populations just a few months apart implying there will be stacking of long-lasting mRNA in the body without adequate opportunity for clearance and elimination.” Former science editor for the NY Times Alex Berenson wrote, wrote about a little-noticed report in the highly respected, peer-reviewed journal Cell reveals that mRNA materials from the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines remain in lymph nodes for at least 60 days, while “free-floating spike proteins circulate at high levels in the blood after vaccination.’ That’s not what the info-gatekeepers have been telling us. The famed journal Cell, itself, writes in Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination genetic materials actually remain in the body for up to two months; here, in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, the mRNA lasts for at least a month. The man who invented the mRNA platform, Dr. Robert Malone, says “When a vaccine is injected into a patient’s arm, the RNA from the vaccine, which is a modified RNA, is supposed to last for only a couple of hours, but a study from Stanford University shows that “the RNA sticks around for at least 60 days.” Malone also says using needle biopsies, these have shown RNA persists in axillar lymph nodes for at least 60 days. They didn't test any longer than that, so it could be far longer. Japanese doctors reported summer, 2022 that mRNA-induced spike proteins from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” do persist in the body for at least several months post-injection. See Persistent varicella zoster virus infection following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with the presence of encoded spike protein in the lesion in the Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy.by Mayuko Yamamoto MD, PhD and Shigetoshi Sano, MD, PhD, out of Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Japan. I could go on, but you get the point I assume.
The AP article quotes U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesperson Marissa Perry: “There is no requirement or mandate that producers vaccinate their livestock for any disease. It is a personal and business decision left up to the producer and will remain that way,” and quotes Jason Menke, a National Pork Board spokesperson, that the “decision to use vaccines and other medical treatments to protect animal health and well-being are made by the farmer under the direction of the herd veterinarian.” Again, this is subterfuge and typical government legalese/waffle-ese. I repeat: Are we, the consumers, being notified with legal informed consent if our food is “vaccinated?” NOT “it might be”; not “it is the at the producer’s discretion”; not “the decision is made under the direction of a vet (but we ain’t gonna tell you, poor unwashed rubes in flyover country”; simply are you complying with the law of informed consent, yes or no.” The AP article does quote Suresh Kuchipudi, a veterinary scientist and chair of emerging infectious diseases at Penn State University, saying animals get immunizations do not rely on mRNA technology. Fine. What are they? Where do we find this simple information? Heck, there’s a database now for almost every mosquito found on earth – certainly this list can’t be that hard to come up with?
If you read nothing else, my request is simple: Can you legally verify that no mRNA-based vaccines or agents are in the meat or fish you sell? In turn, this will be disseminated to a wide range of readers I have. AP – which as already shown itself to be misinformed as above – tells us “are no animal vaccines currently licensed in the U.S. against any disease that use the same mRNA approach as humans’ COVID-19 vaccines.” So, if this is true, the task is simple: Verify that we are not being fed mRNA in our meat or vegetables, and if we ever are, we will have informed consent. If this is true that there is no mRNA vaccines in our food, should be a 10 minute project for you.
I understand that you may well consider this to be “tin foil hat” type of concerns. To that end, I am citing studies from universities like UCLA, statements from President Biden, and more, illustrating that this issue is a valid, scientific concern. The information will be quite lengthy, with the sole purpose of proving that this is anything but “fake news.” You need not read all of this, but is there for reference. Lawyers such as Tom Renz also feel unwitting vaccinated meat being pushed onto customers without their consent or knowledge is a valid concern. See his tweet on the subject here, or his substack here. Here’s the point: the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association is 100% opposed to #Missouri #HB1169, which bars mRNA vaccines in meat. If they aren’t putting gene altering drugs in the cows why do they oppose the bill? The fact is that they probably are and want to do more. And vaccines in our veggies “fake news?” Turns out that, for example, Univ. of California Riverside scientists, collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon Univ are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories, per SciTech Daily here; similarly in News-Medical Life Sciences, in an article from two years ago, Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines, here, we are also told that plant based vaccines are in development. See also Edible vaccines by William HR Langridge at UCLA Note that we are not claiming Bill Gates has tweeted anything about vaccines in our food. Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most heavily published cardiologist in history in his cardiology field, published Data on miRNA Transfer from Food into Human Body are Inconclusive. One study he cites said “Mar-Aguilar et al, reviewed the literature on experiments that attempted to get miRNA into food, ingested, and be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into mammals. In short, the studies were conflicting largely because miRNA was difficult to measure in vivo at the time the studies were performed. As you can see selected studies from the evidence table are not conclusive, however, some were able to show absorption.” But here is the thing: what if it ends up that absorption is taking place, and it is damaging? Some may want to take that risk, but I do not – and certainly not without my legal right of informed consent.
And is this following substack true? American Farmers To Begin Injecting Livestock With mRNA Shots This Month I simply don’t know, and am asking for clarification on this. Certainly, even NPR has reported on the possibility, such as here: Researchers Look To Cattle For Treatment For COVID-19 - NPR. The famed feminist icon Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed with attorney Tom Renz here. Is it “conspiracy theory” to take with sincerity something lawyers, PhDs and even the Missouri congress thinks is an issue?
The “ask” here is simply what the Missouri congress has in its bill:
a. That there is labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.
b. That if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘Hey, how does this spread? Does it shed? Is it spread through contact – through sexual contact? Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”
c. That we have legal, informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … that we have informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.
... ... well, that's the max characters I can post
Thanks Dr. Nass. These globalist people are truly insane. They always start in their favorite test bed of Africa, just like that colossal piece of scientism trash Gates. Their global eugenics plans will fail - they are collectively a bunch of idiots. Thanks for all the great work you pour out day after day. Let there be peace on this earth. :-)
Apr 16, 2023·edited Apr 16, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass
This is a great summary of where we stand. I have a few words to say about the difficulty in fixing it. I watched enough of CHD’s “Inside the Belly of the Beast” https://rumble.com/v2i8dv2-inside-the-belly-of-the-beast.html to register the surprise if not shock by Drs. Mumper and Setty who attended it to learn that the vast majority of folk involved in the World Vaccine Congress are sincere, not evil, ignorant, and not malevolent. So too Tupperware salespeople (except there the leaders also believe in a genuinely good product). I could not watch past the point where new strategies for reaching the inbetweeners were broached. This is hardly a new problem, and making new information available is not the key. The key is the pseudo-science of propaganda discussed in that video. Persuasion, except for a negligible minority of the population, is not a rational process.
For about a decade I mentored a 9/11 Truth activist about covert ops. He could not persuade his wife despite all the evidence of 9/11 being a PSY-OP involving the controlled demolition of three buildings in downtown Manhattan. I recently sent him the below excellent cartoon video “BEYOND THE RESET” about an impending future because its protagonist faced this same crisis with his wife. He kept handing her a copy of Klaus Schwab’s book, “The Great Reset” and she kept refusing to look at it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWkepoLUZfs&ab_channel=3DEpixInc. BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film
I was close friends with Vince Salandria, the father of the JFK researchers, whose wife loved him dearly and respected his opinion on all matters legal and geopolitical but scoffed at his ideas about the significance of JFK and 9/11. When I asked what she made of them and him in this respect the answer was “monotopical delusion.” Meryl appeared on the Dr. Drew show with Kelly Victory and related that she quickly cured her MD son of COVID with HCQ but he later concluded that the HCQ had no effect, so not only was he unable to read the research himself, he was unable to appreciate that his mother could and was a great deal smarter than he and that even if he could not follow the argument himself, he should defer. I too am a 9/11 widow of sorts. My best friend of 39 years, and co-author of two papers we wrote when he came to me with problems he couldn’t solve, was also the son of a CIA mind-control psychiatrist who experimented on a captive population of federal prisoners. I broke off the friendship after being unable to bear his stupidity and condescension on 9/11, an example of which is contained in one of my essays:
“My best friend of nearly 40 years, and former co-author, now ensconced at Harvard, has trouble taking me seriously when I discuss 911. Within the past months he admitted not knowing that a 47 story steel building (WTC7) not hit by anything, and with only a few small fires, had collapsed as a perfect implosion would, nor did he know that the 911 Commission had refused even to mention WTC7 in its report, nor did he think much of these facts nor of his ignorance of them. This is a very smart man, open-minded in many respects, but giving up the world-view he inhabits is simply too hard, especially when there is nothing coherent with which to replace it.”
At the time I failed to appreciate that the “world-view” problem was just one of two key factors, the other being that the social “self” constructed by and for most people is itself clung to with religious fervor vis-à-vis a broad range of charged beliefs even when changing those beliefs does not require radical restructuring of a world-view. To put it far too briefly in order to fit space: I love losing a debate to someone smarter than me who knows more than I do because I end up learning something; and almost everyone else in the world feels just the opposite. As I put it to a mentor:
“I made a stab at explaining this phenomenon in my last online essay in 2010, deliberately providing only an outline. Orwell does a fine job of describing the phenomenon of political self-deception at the clinical level, but errs gravely in depicting it as imposed at least initially primarily from without. Both Lippmann and Bernays provide a better understanding of the mechanics of how to induce it without the violent threats of Big Brother, but none of them comes close to seeing and understanding it as the embrace of a lover, the solution of man’s search for meaning, the buffer and succor against the enemy of the existential void – if we can be a little highfalutin here. That achievement belongs to the theologian Jacques Ellul (Propaganda, The Formation of Men’s Attitudes), which put my mind to rest on the matter (despite his book being riddled with contradictions that require frequent translations into the correct logical form, e.g., universal claims that are only pervasive stochastic generalities). Ellul makes clear that secular worldviews provide the very same sense of meaning, identity, prestige and self-respect as do religions and are clung to and defended against rational evidence which threatens them with the same tenacity and ferocity as religious faith.”
Older conspiracy theorists know that the Globalists operate via an “open conspiracy” in which they make plain in public what they are doing, how they are doing it and why they are doing it. It is there for all to see who wish to see but it does not make the headlines. It is an ongoing proof of their superiority and their right to proceed; and if they were not such motherfucking evil bastards it would be hard to disagree with them. If you read Klaus Scwab’s “COVID-19: The Great Reset” pp. 247-250, it states plainly that “the corona crisis is (so far) one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years.” But it is being used as a pretext to replace “failed ideas, institutions, processes and rules with new ones better suited to current and future needs.” And this in turn explains fully why you must obey whatever you are told, as in the below “no one will be safe” video. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ghKp60XvTaE3/ Is This A Threat? : Klaus Schwab “no one will be safe” until everyone is vaccinated
The final video is for those who want a look at some of the background work leading up to the consolidation of global power that Meryl so skillfully exposed in her post.
“WHO's proposed 'reform' is just the latest manifestation of an increasing cosiness between the UN and big business. This trend is often said to have started at the 1992 UN Conference on the Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. At that time, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland influenced environmental policies in her capacity as chairperson of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Ever since, closer UN-business relationships seem to have become a leitmotif in UN reforms.
In 1997, the newly elected UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan advocated strengthening ties with the business community as a particular focus of his UN reform proposal. He launched the Global Compact initiative as the flagship of this trend at the 1999 World Economic Forum in Davos. This multi-stakeholder initiative was presented as a means to increase corporations' social responsibility with respect to nine selected principles in the field of human rights, labour and the environment.
In 1998, Brundtland, newly elected as Director-General of WHO, told member states that one of the hallmarks of her term would also be increased cooperation with the private sector under the name of public-private partnerships.”
Where did they and Mandela get the idea to call such elder statesmen ‘stakeholder’ NGO ‘The Elders’? Well yes it could be a reference to the elders of the church but that’s unlikely as none have ever pronounced themselves as Jesus’ followers.
More likely it is from the Chinese Communists’ Eight Elders. “ the Eight Elders(Chinese: 八老; pinyin: Bā lǎo), were a group of elderly members of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) who held substantial power in the last two decades of the 20th century.”. And created AT THE SAME TIME!
That a British spook was involved in taking over the entire globe via a mechanism like Agenda 2030/Sustainability Equity BS is no surprise. New Colonialism . All built up for our new Pagan Green King?
As he said in his WEF speech ‘he now has enough billions to reset the globe. And he has enough military power’. Who is he? If it was Charles he’d have said ‘we’.
Is He the Antichrist? Because these plans fit revelations very well.
No place to run and no place to hide from CEPI’s Joint Coordination Group (JCG). Could this be a synonym for The Hunger Games? I am sure almost everyone saw at least a sequel to this movie.
These people have been letting us know what their plans are for us and the world for a long time.
It's hard to know who to fight. We have a veritable extinction protocol coming at us from all sides.
Gro Brundtland was also an avowed socialist (communist). In 1983, Brundtland was invited by then United Nations Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar to establish and chair the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), widely referred to as the Brundtland Commission. She developed the broad political concept of sustainable development in the course of extensive public hearings, that were distinguished by their inclusiveness. The commission, which published its report, Our Common Future, in April 1987, provided the momentum for the 1992 Earth Summit/UNCED, which was headed by Maurice Strong, who had been a prominent member of the commission. The Brundtland Commission also provided momentum for Agenda 21. She is RED through and through. I keep telling people everything we are facing today is UN Agenda 21 (with new titles it is still A21) and I have been screaming about it for the past 20 years but people refuse to acknowledge our own government signed on to a pact with communism. She is also on the board of WEF.
Sustainable, Inclusive, no one is allowed to opt out and “mobile vaccine factories” Sick, simply thoroughly sick. And, whereas the US claimed mobile bio weapons labs of Iraq never existed, it appears that the concept has been purposefully picked up to be used as “mobile vaccine factories”, this time for real. Why mobile? Because they would be valid targets for destruction.
We simply don't know what is being done. We do know that (Merck I think) had a livestock mRNA vaccine for livestock--the vaccine talk in the Attack on Food symposium I hosted on March 4 had a slide on mRNA vaccines for animals.
you cannot buy meat in the US that has not been vaccinated with some vaccines, 99.9% of the time, as the USDA requires its inspectors check every animal butchered.
Portable vaccine factories should be afforded the same treatment as Kid Rock's pile of Bud Light.
Whole Foods Headquarters
550 Bowie St. Austin, TX 78703
Attn.: Sam Ferguson, VP, Mark Ehrnstein, VP
customer.questions@wholefoods.com
A number of your customers are concerned about mRNA vaccines being put into the meat we consume from your store. We spend many thousands of dollars per year in your store, and do not wish to have these vaccines, or mRNA agents, in either our meat, or our vegetables, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany. Yes, I am aware that there is no mandate to vaccinate livestock, per this AP article No, farmers aren’t required to vaccinate livestock with mRNA vaccines, but that, of course, is not the question as AP disingenuously reports; rather, the question is, is this being done anyway? Do you do it with your products, and if so, are we consumers being notified? (Basically, as far as I’m concerned, AP article outright lies, writing that mRNA is “typically gone within days of receipt”; as a matter of fact, we know a fact that the mRNA from the Covid shot remains at least 60 days, if not longer – much longer To wit: Per Dr. Peter McCullough in his March 17, 2023 article, Critical Role of Pseudouridine in Synthetic mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines “Fertig et al found lipid nanoparticles with mRNA were measurable in plasma for—15 days. Recently, Castruita et al demonstrated mRNA in blood out to 28 days. Roltgen et al have found mRNA in lymph nodes 60 days after injection. None of these studies demonstrated complete clearance of mRNA from a group of patients. This is worrisome since injections are recommended in some populations just a few months apart implying there will be stacking of long-lasting mRNA in the body without adequate opportunity for clearance and elimination.” Former science editor for the NY Times Alex Berenson wrote, wrote about a little-noticed report in the highly respected, peer-reviewed journal Cell reveals that mRNA materials from the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines remain in lymph nodes for at least 60 days, while “free-floating spike proteins circulate at high levels in the blood after vaccination.’ That’s not what the info-gatekeepers have been telling us. The famed journal Cell, itself, writes in Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination genetic materials actually remain in the body for up to two months; here, in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, the mRNA lasts for at least a month. The man who invented the mRNA platform, Dr. Robert Malone, says “When a vaccine is injected into a patient’s arm, the RNA from the vaccine, which is a modified RNA, is supposed to last for only a couple of hours, but a study from Stanford University shows that “the RNA sticks around for at least 60 days.” Malone also says using needle biopsies, these have shown RNA persists in axillar lymph nodes for at least 60 days. They didn't test any longer than that, so it could be far longer. Japanese doctors reported summer, 2022 that mRNA-induced spike proteins from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” do persist in the body for at least several months post-injection. See Persistent varicella zoster virus infection following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with the presence of encoded spike protein in the lesion in the Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy.by Mayuko Yamamoto MD, PhD and Shigetoshi Sano, MD, PhD, out of Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Japan. I could go on, but you get the point I assume.
The AP article quotes U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesperson Marissa Perry: “There is no requirement or mandate that producers vaccinate their livestock for any disease. It is a personal and business decision left up to the producer and will remain that way,” and quotes Jason Menke, a National Pork Board spokesperson, that the “decision to use vaccines and other medical treatments to protect animal health and well-being are made by the farmer under the direction of the herd veterinarian.” Again, this is subterfuge and typical government legalese/waffle-ese. I repeat: Are we, the consumers, being notified with legal informed consent if our food is “vaccinated?” NOT “it might be”; not “it is the at the producer’s discretion”; not “the decision is made under the direction of a vet (but we ain’t gonna tell you, poor unwashed rubes in flyover country”; simply are you complying with the law of informed consent, yes or no.” The AP article does quote Suresh Kuchipudi, a veterinary scientist and chair of emerging infectious diseases at Penn State University, saying animals get immunizations do not rely on mRNA technology. Fine. What are they? Where do we find this simple information? Heck, there’s a database now for almost every mosquito found on earth – certainly this list can’t be that hard to come up with?
If you read nothing else, my request is simple: Can you legally verify that no mRNA-based vaccines or agents are in the meat or fish you sell? In turn, this will be disseminated to a wide range of readers I have. AP – which as already shown itself to be misinformed as above – tells us “are no animal vaccines currently licensed in the U.S. against any disease that use the same mRNA approach as humans’ COVID-19 vaccines.” So, if this is true, the task is simple: Verify that we are not being fed mRNA in our meat or vegetables, and if we ever are, we will have informed consent. If this is true that there is no mRNA vaccines in our food, should be a 10 minute project for you.
I understand that you may well consider this to be “tin foil hat” type of concerns. To that end, I am citing studies from universities like UCLA, statements from President Biden, and more, illustrating that this issue is a valid, scientific concern. The information will be quite lengthy, with the sole purpose of proving that this is anything but “fake news.” You need not read all of this, but is there for reference. Lawyers such as Tom Renz also feel unwitting vaccinated meat being pushed onto customers without their consent or knowledge is a valid concern. See his tweet on the subject here, or his substack here. Here’s the point: the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association is 100% opposed to #Missouri #HB1169, which bars mRNA vaccines in meat. If they aren’t putting gene altering drugs in the cows why do they oppose the bill? The fact is that they probably are and want to do more. And vaccines in our veggies “fake news?” Turns out that, for example, Univ. of California Riverside scientists, collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon Univ are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories, per SciTech Daily here; similarly in News-Medical Life Sciences, in an article from two years ago, Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines, here, we are also told that plant based vaccines are in development. See also Edible vaccines by William HR Langridge at UCLA Note that we are not claiming Bill Gates has tweeted anything about vaccines in our food. Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most heavily published cardiologist in history in his cardiology field, published Data on miRNA Transfer from Food into Human Body are Inconclusive. One study he cites said “Mar-Aguilar et al, reviewed the literature on experiments that attempted to get miRNA into food, ingested, and be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into mammals. In short, the studies were conflicting largely because miRNA was difficult to measure in vivo at the time the studies were performed. As you can see selected studies from the evidence table are not conclusive, however, some were able to show absorption.” But here is the thing: what if it ends up that absorption is taking place, and it is damaging? Some may want to take that risk, but I do not – and certainly not without my legal right of informed consent.
And is this following substack true? American Farmers To Begin Injecting Livestock With mRNA Shots This Month I simply don’t know, and am asking for clarification on this. Certainly, even NPR has reported on the possibility, such as here: Researchers Look To Cattle For Treatment For COVID-19 - NPR. The famed feminist icon Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed with attorney Tom Renz here. Is it “conspiracy theory” to take with sincerity something lawyers, PhDs and even the Missouri congress thinks is an issue?
The “ask” here is simply what the Missouri congress has in its bill:
a. That there is labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.
b. That if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘Hey, how does this spread? Does it shed? Is it spread through contact – through sexual contact? Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”
c. That we have legal, informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … that we have informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.
... ... well, that's the max characters I can post
.
These people are insane.
Thanks Dr. Nass. These globalist people are truly insane. They always start in their favorite test bed of Africa, just like that colossal piece of scientism trash Gates. Their global eugenics plans will fail - they are collectively a bunch of idiots. Thanks for all the great work you pour out day after day. Let there be peace on this earth. :-)
This is a great summary of where we stand. I have a few words to say about the difficulty in fixing it. I watched enough of CHD’s “Inside the Belly of the Beast” https://rumble.com/v2i8dv2-inside-the-belly-of-the-beast.html to register the surprise if not shock by Drs. Mumper and Setty who attended it to learn that the vast majority of folk involved in the World Vaccine Congress are sincere, not evil, ignorant, and not malevolent. So too Tupperware salespeople (except there the leaders also believe in a genuinely good product). I could not watch past the point where new strategies for reaching the inbetweeners were broached. This is hardly a new problem, and making new information available is not the key. The key is the pseudo-science of propaganda discussed in that video. Persuasion, except for a negligible minority of the population, is not a rational process.
For about a decade I mentored a 9/11 Truth activist about covert ops. He could not persuade his wife despite all the evidence of 9/11 being a PSY-OP involving the controlled demolition of three buildings in downtown Manhattan. I recently sent him the below excellent cartoon video “BEYOND THE RESET” about an impending future because its protagonist faced this same crisis with his wife. He kept handing her a copy of Klaus Schwab’s book, “The Great Reset” and she kept refusing to look at it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWkepoLUZfs&ab_channel=3DEpixInc. BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film
I was close friends with Vince Salandria, the father of the JFK researchers, whose wife loved him dearly and respected his opinion on all matters legal and geopolitical but scoffed at his ideas about the significance of JFK and 9/11. When I asked what she made of them and him in this respect the answer was “monotopical delusion.” Meryl appeared on the Dr. Drew show with Kelly Victory and related that she quickly cured her MD son of COVID with HCQ but he later concluded that the HCQ had no effect, so not only was he unable to read the research himself, he was unable to appreciate that his mother could and was a great deal smarter than he and that even if he could not follow the argument himself, he should defer. I too am a 9/11 widow of sorts. My best friend of 39 years, and co-author of two papers we wrote when he came to me with problems he couldn’t solve, was also the son of a CIA mind-control psychiatrist who experimented on a captive population of federal prisoners. I broke off the friendship after being unable to bear his stupidity and condescension on 9/11, an example of which is contained in one of my essays:
“My best friend of nearly 40 years, and former co-author, now ensconced at Harvard, has trouble taking me seriously when I discuss 911. Within the past months he admitted not knowing that a 47 story steel building (WTC7) not hit by anything, and with only a few small fires, had collapsed as a perfect implosion would, nor did he know that the 911 Commission had refused even to mention WTC7 in its report, nor did he think much of these facts nor of his ignorance of them. This is a very smart man, open-minded in many respects, but giving up the world-view he inhabits is simply too hard, especially when there is nothing coherent with which to replace it.”
At the time I failed to appreciate that the “world-view” problem was just one of two key factors, the other being that the social “self” constructed by and for most people is itself clung to with religious fervor vis-à-vis a broad range of charged beliefs even when changing those beliefs does not require radical restructuring of a world-view. To put it far too briefly in order to fit space: I love losing a debate to someone smarter than me who knows more than I do because I end up learning something; and almost everyone else in the world feels just the opposite. As I put it to a mentor:
“I made a stab at explaining this phenomenon in my last online essay in 2010, deliberately providing only an outline. Orwell does a fine job of describing the phenomenon of political self-deception at the clinical level, but errs gravely in depicting it as imposed at least initially primarily from without. Both Lippmann and Bernays provide a better understanding of the mechanics of how to induce it without the violent threats of Big Brother, but none of them comes close to seeing and understanding it as the embrace of a lover, the solution of man’s search for meaning, the buffer and succor against the enemy of the existential void – if we can be a little highfalutin here. That achievement belongs to the theologian Jacques Ellul (Propaganda, The Formation of Men’s Attitudes), which put my mind to rest on the matter (despite his book being riddled with contradictions that require frequent translations into the correct logical form, e.g., universal claims that are only pervasive stochastic generalities). Ellul makes clear that secular worldviews provide the very same sense of meaning, identity, prestige and self-respect as do religions and are clung to and defended against rational evidence which threatens them with the same tenacity and ferocity as religious faith.”
Older conspiracy theorists know that the Globalists operate via an “open conspiracy” in which they make plain in public what they are doing, how they are doing it and why they are doing it. It is there for all to see who wish to see but it does not make the headlines. It is an ongoing proof of their superiority and their right to proceed; and if they were not such motherfucking evil bastards it would be hard to disagree with them. If you read Klaus Scwab’s “COVID-19: The Great Reset” pp. 247-250, it states plainly that “the corona crisis is (so far) one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years.” But it is being used as a pretext to replace “failed ideas, institutions, processes and rules with new ones better suited to current and future needs.” And this in turn explains fully why you must obey whatever you are told, as in the below “no one will be safe” video. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ghKp60XvTaE3/ Is This A Threat? : Klaus Schwab “no one will be safe” until everyone is vaccinated
The final video is for those who want a look at some of the background work leading up to the consolidation of global power that Meryl so skillfully exposed in her post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyDWt9nHwmg&ab_channel=ScandinavianFreedomEvents
Jacob Nordengård at Northern Light Convention Malmo
Excellent expose on UN and WHO getting in bed with private interests, and Brundtland's pioneering role:
https://www.twn.my/title2/resurgence/2015/298-299/cover02.htm
“WHO's proposed 'reform' is just the latest manifestation of an increasing cosiness between the UN and big business. This trend is often said to have started at the 1992 UN Conference on the Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. At that time, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland influenced environmental policies in her capacity as chairperson of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Ever since, closer UN-business relationships seem to have become a leitmotif in UN reforms.
In 1997, the newly elected UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan advocated strengthening ties with the business community as a particular focus of his UN reform proposal. He launched the Global Compact initiative as the flagship of this trend at the 1999 World Economic Forum in Davos. This multi-stakeholder initiative was presented as a means to increase corporations' social responsibility with respect to nine selected principles in the field of human rights, labour and the environment.
In 1998, Brundtland, newly elected as Director-General of WHO, told member states that one of the hallmarks of her term would also be increased cooperation with the private sector under the name of public-private partnerships.”
Notice most are INSANE ( satanic) and doddering in their 80’s! I’m no spring chicken, however.... look at them!!!!!!!
I'm wondering why they feel the need to do this since the plan is just to put it in our food
Where did they and Mandela get the idea to call such elder statesmen ‘stakeholder’ NGO ‘The Elders’? Well yes it could be a reference to the elders of the church but that’s unlikely as none have ever pronounced themselves as Jesus’ followers.
More likely it is from the Chinese Communists’ Eight Elders. “ the Eight Elders(Chinese: 八老; pinyin: Bā lǎo), were a group of elderly members of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) who held substantial power in the last two decades of the 20th century.”. And created AT THE SAME TIME!
That a British spook was involved in taking over the entire globe via a mechanism like Agenda 2030/Sustainability Equity BS is no surprise. New Colonialism . All built up for our new Pagan Green King?
As he said in his WEF speech ‘he now has enough billions to reset the globe. And he has enough military power’. Who is he? If it was Charles he’d have said ‘we’.
Is He the Antichrist? Because these plans fit revelations very well.
No place to run and no place to hide from CEPI’s Joint Coordination Group (JCG). Could this be a synonym for The Hunger Games? I am sure almost everyone saw at least a sequel to this movie.
These people have been letting us know what their plans are for us and the world for a long time.
It's hard to know who to fight. We have a veritable extinction protocol coming at us from all sides.
We need God on our side or we won't survive.
"CEPI was founded by.... the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the WEF"...
Gee, what could go wrong?
Gro Brundtland was also an avowed socialist (communist). In 1983, Brundtland was invited by then United Nations Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar to establish and chair the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), widely referred to as the Brundtland Commission. She developed the broad political concept of sustainable development in the course of extensive public hearings, that were distinguished by their inclusiveness. The commission, which published its report, Our Common Future, in April 1987, provided the momentum for the 1992 Earth Summit/UNCED, which was headed by Maurice Strong, who had been a prominent member of the commission. The Brundtland Commission also provided momentum for Agenda 21. She is RED through and through. I keep telling people everything we are facing today is UN Agenda 21 (with new titles it is still A21) and I have been screaming about it for the past 20 years but people refuse to acknowledge our own government signed on to a pact with communism. She is also on the board of WEF.
Why are they so intent on getting a mRNA vaccine into EVERYONE??
no choice but to dismantle the apparatus.
Sustainable, Inclusive, no one is allowed to opt out and “mobile vaccine factories” Sick, simply thoroughly sick. And, whereas the US claimed mobile bio weapons labs of Iraq never existed, it appears that the concept has been purposefully picked up to be used as “mobile vaccine factories”, this time for real. Why mobile? Because they would be valid targets for destruction.