32 Comments

People in the know, know that bioterrorism was simply renamed “Gain of function” research and Fauci never stopped the US bioweapons research…

Zoonotic origin my ass

Expand full comment

So, when is the last time you received a 68 percent raise at your job?

"From 2004 through 2007, Fauci received a 68-percent pay increase from $200,000- to $335,000-a year. This award was permanent and carried forward through 2020. Fauci’s permanent pay raise was to “appropriately compensate him for the level of responsibility… especially as it relates to his work on biodefense research activities.” "

This might explain Fauci's incredibly high pension. He most likely got an additional golden sceptor and a magic carpet as a parting gift.

Making diabolical GOF bio weapons is a Faustian bargain requiring cash incentives. Also, royalties from drug patents continue, even though these drugs were developed using taxpayers money, so the consumer pays twice; once in taxes, once for product.

Expand full comment

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

I’m a highly trained research scientist by training. For many years, I believed in initiatives like this. However, as time has worn on, I’ve seen how science has gradually been co-opted and corrupted by politics and ideology. That’s actually been going on for a very long time since before I was even born, but exponential growth works over long periods before it becomes widely noticeable.

It’s quite obvious to me that this initiative was designed solely to control scientific inquiry, debate and creativity of thought. It is also designed to quell public skepticism and dissent, by creating an entirely captured and politically driven global “repository” for approved “facts” that are not allowed to be questioned. What is happening is that the globalists are trying to replace the actual pursuit of science with a husk of science that still LOOKS like science to lesser trained eyes, because the surface characteristics are still there, but which has been hollowed out and filled with the pus of anti-humanistic authoritarianism. It’s a clever ploy to create a “final solution” for all the actual scientists out there who will pursue facts and data wherever they lead, and replace them with bodies in white coats and business suits whose purpose is to parasitize and suck the literal life out of your wallet, your body, your mind and your soul.

This document is a clear declaration of evil intent. We must expose it for all to understand, and defeat it at all cost.

Expand full comment

The WHO is very good at making bad things sound good.

Expand full comment

Yes, they are. And, sadly, millions fall for it over and over.

Expand full comment

If WHO launched it, it is a fraud.

Expand full comment

The entire world community can no longer be trusted. Any organization that begins with the word "One" is highly suspect

Expand full comment

This zoological transmitted disease push is a fake, but it is absolutely a necessary step in their big plan to isolate the rural populations and relocate them to smart cities. This unnatural isolation from nature will be done for our safety of course, always for our safety (and more important everyone else's safety). The idea has been mass planted in our collective consciousness most recently when a bat gave the world covid and it is still going on, now with moneypox, bird flu etc. The CDC has even started chipping away at pet ownership by making a big red tape deal about bringing your dog back in from Canada. The blowback received got them to back off a little, but did manage to move that particular dystopian needle quite a ways. Now your pet needs a chip implant with proof of vaccinations recorded on that chip, you need to fill out forms 72 hours prior to returning to the US or else possibly be denied entry. We are under attack, and if I tried to explain it to the average head in the sand person they will look at me like I am a nutter.

Expand full comment

I don't believe anything I don't either see with my own eyes or experience personally anymore. They can keep trying this stuff, but it falls on deaf ears at this point. They've gone too far and now I (and many others) will NEVER trust one word, study or anything else that comes out of their NWO, WEF, WHO lying mouths!

Expand full comment

I so appreciate you keeping up with this. As a veterinarian I am disgusted by the veterinary colleges embracing the WHO's One Health agenda. I bet they have been paid to do so. If not outright, then by grants for research to promote the narrative. Every time I see the words One Health it makes me sick but I didn't get the sickness from an animal!!! Am considering eliminating my donation to my alma mater that is in my will.

Expand full comment

— I F “THE W.H.O” •••. KNEW T H A T - WOULDN’T T H E Y U S E I T ••• ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️•••

Expand full comment

Seems like if they write as lengthy and boring as can be, they know people will just scroll through to get to the end of things without really digesting the actual content. Wonder if that's intentional sometimes? Or is that "always and forever?"

Expand full comment

Wow, another WHO "scientific advisory board", they seem to have hundreds of these, how ever do they keep up!

Thanks for alerting me to Scientific Advisory Group on the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), I had no idea they were established. I've added them to the pandemic timeline

https://totalityofevidence.com/timeline/who-scientific-advisory-group-on-the-origins-of-novel-pathogens-sago-established/

Note Professor Christian Drosten is acknoweledged in the report as a member of SAGO

https://web.archive.org/web/20240905012044/https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/epp/sago/who_sago_global-framework.pdf

A quick word search of the document reavealed no mention of lab/laboratory "leak", "escape" or "gain of function". But there is a chapter titled "Laboratory biosafety and biosecurity element" which was "developed in collaboration with the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Biosafety" that covered a "possible breach of laboratory biosafety or biosecurity" that "may be caused by an accidental event or a procedural or engineering failure that results in the infection of staff working in a laboratory, when they are handling animals or collecting and handling specimens, either in a field or laboratory setting".   The framework DOES NOT cover "the deliberate or intentional release of pathogens from laboratories" ", nor the intentional functional manipulation of viruses "studied" in laboratories - i.e. dual use research

Expand full comment

These organizations need to seriously fuck off! Just sayin.

Expand full comment

Run for the hills...it's teddy-pox!

Expand full comment

😂😂 Teddy pox -brilliant! Can anyone design a graphic of someone shirtless sporting a bunch of pustules, each one bearing Tedros’ face on it?

Expand full comment

Tedros talking about 'moral imperatives' is like Charles Manson stumping for women's rights....

Expand full comment

Indeed, key issue to prevent more malicious WHO scheming is "simple and inexpensive test for lab-made (or "biowarfare approved") pathogens".

Expand full comment

Ah yes, but an ACCURATE test.

Expand full comment

True, and the companies that could design one, already exist: those offering a covid-vax damage repair kit.

Expand full comment

Biowarfare Warren-Commission?

:-o

Expand full comment

Maybe we should have it declawed.

Expand full comment