Whose idea was the Pandemic Treaty? And the amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Whose idea was the Pandemic Treaty? And the amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Why was the WEF in on the ground floor? Who knew about inequitable distribution of vaccines only 3 months into the rollout? Was vaccine inequity baked into the pandemic response to justify a Treaty?
My comments are in italics
Reuters Staff
23 countries and the WHO plan [to—sic] create an international treaty to make the world more resilient against future health emergencies such as COVID-19. What do they mean by resilient?
The treaty's goal is to improve universal and equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics. Is it a coincidence that pharma and healthcare companies and investors are major donors to the WHO, especially Bill Gates, who has even received diplomatic immunity in Geneva?
It is also designed to create a sense of shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation on a global scale. Pretty words, but neither the public nor the less important countries have been able to gain insight as to why the WHO bureaucrats included certain proposed amendments and dropped others. The amendments have been negotiated for a year but we only saw the very first draft 10 months ago and ever since there has been a veil of secrecy over them.
Leaders of 23 countries and the World Health Organization backed an idea to create an international treaty that would help the world deal with future health emergencies like the coronavirus pandemic now ravaging the globe.
The idea of such a treaty, which would ensure universal and equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for pandemics, was floated by the chairman of European Union leaders Charles Michel at a G20 summit last November (2020). Next time, no one will be allowed to avoid the poison vaccines.
The treaty got the formal backing of the leaders of Fiji, Portugal, Romania, Britain, Rwanda, Kenya, France, Germany, Greece, Korea, Chile, Costa Rica, Albania, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, the Netherlands, Tunisia, Senegal, Spain, Norway, Serbia, Indonesia, Ukraine and the WHO. What did these leaders get?
“There will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies. No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone,” the leaders wrote in a joint opinion article in major newspapers. We have handled pandemics alone before and it seems we managed them better than when the WHO was issuing recommendations for the mismanagement of COVID. What expertise can the WHO offer to nations? Actually, none.
“We believe that nations should work together towards a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response,” they said. Who really wrote this opinion article?
The main goal of such a treaty would be to strengthen the world’s resilience to future pandemics through better alert systems (none so far have worked), data sharing (your medical records, globally), research and the production and distribution of vaccines (liability-free, produced under advance purchase agreements that guarantee a profit but make no guarantees for safety, efficacy or quality), medicines (but only the ones we say you can have, not those other ones), diagnostics (whose standards can be set to produce many or few cases) and personal protective equipment (like the masks Massachusets’ Governor Baker purchased directly from China that failed to filter correctly but were distributed anyway, because, well, politics), they said.
The treaty would also state that the health of humans, animals and the planet are all connected and should lead to shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation globally. (Ah, One Health, aka making the youth so ashamed of their consumption of planetary resources they would willingly be treated as equal to animals).
“We are convinced that it is our responsibility, as leaders of nations and international institutions, to ensure that the world learns the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic,” the leaders wrote.
(Please, world leaders, we beg you: be very explicit. What are the lessons of the COVID pandemic? What are the problems your Treaty and Amendments are here to solve? What is it the WHO can do better than we can do for ourselves?)
The major lesson would be to leave the WHO ASAP and to terminate "personhood" from corporations. Next, full accountability for producers, not just for medical products. That alone would improve health more than the WHO & corporate friends ever could.
Hatched at the UN in 2016 - Gates, Rockefeller etc https://www.ageofautism.com/2021/11/id-2020-re-visited.html
Lockstep 2010 http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf
The trouble is someone like F William Engdahl wrote about it but it didn’t seem real. Or if it seemed real how could you possibly persuade anyone else. And yet the reality was always that these people wanted to subdue and reduce the rest of us and it was always just a question of tightening the screws.