66 Comments

In California, Gavin had 3 years worth of water dumped into the ocean. And now suddenly farmers can't have water? Why do I think this is an effort to grab the farm land on the cheap? And China is on the hunt for land to feed their people.

Expand full comment

Gavin is a tool.

Expand full comment

W.E.F. stooge, along with Jay Inslee, Pete Buttegieg, Angela Merkel, Zelenskyy, Putin, Trudeau, Macron-- We need to "out" all the W.E.F. participants and make sure they are not elected, appointed or employed.

Expand full comment

Some think Putin has left the WEF plantation.

Expand full comment

Although he went through the damnable W.E.F. Young Leader Institute training I think he has, too, especially considering the 30-odd U.S.-run biowarfare labs next door in Ukraine. There's such a massive black-out of any news coming from Russia, at first I wasn't even sure there really was fighting over there and we are still NOT hearing Russia's side of the story. When we do it's always the Blue-pilled media mocking and laughing at the Russians and making them look like total idiots. And yet our countries are ALL cooperating at a highest level on the climate engineering shenanigans. I think "they" want to stealth-implant 5G chips in everyone by vaccination and control our minds through RF, which is insane. Putting nanotech transmitters in humans by injecting into the blood stream and controlling by ionizing the atmosphere and checking on us all via microwaves is really gonna muck up your cardio functioning. There will be a lot of deaths doing something this so colossally stupid. But that's what "they" want anyway.

Expand full comment

I love reading my trusted Slav correspondent, Rolo Slavisky

https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/

He provides what I find to be a trustworthy perspective on the Slavlands.

Expand full comment

China has PLENTY of land by which to feed their 2 billion people...

Expand full comment

Land yes, not all arable. Lots of desert and mountainous. And flooding.

Expand full comment

YES, I do in fact understand China's geography. They are the smartest people in the world and you really think they can't figure out how to feed their people? Chinese are not going to get loaded onto boats and move over here by the container ship boatload. There are already too many of them in the U.C. system, hah hah hah-- and they ain't gonna go back. Let's conscript them to fight the invaders competing for THEIR food here, hah hah hahhh!

Expand full comment

Lol. I'm reminded of a quote I read in a book on Benjamin Franklin re: early Pennsylvania efforts to bring the Indians into the PA higher education system and return them back to their tribes. The Indian tribes said that when we returned them to the tribes, they were useless. They suggested the Americans send them some of their boys and they would return them as men.

Expand full comment

Found it : From Benjamin Franklin - An American Life, by Walter Isaacson, page 153.

"He [Franklin] also told the story of some Massachusetts commissioners who invited the Indians to send a dozen of their youth to study free at Harvard. The Indians replied that they had sent some of their braves to study there years earlier, but on their return 'they were absolutely good for nothing, being neither acquainted with the true methods for killing deer, catching beaver, or surprising an enemy.' They offered instead to educate a dozen or so white children in the ways of the Indians 'and make men of them.' "

Expand full comment

Meryl: I have some experience with these matters having lived in the South West for over 20 years and have worked in local politics and with water boards.

Colorado is a head water state, and the primary source of the Colorado River. I am somewhat familiar with these issues, as have dealt with them over time. Still, it is a complex subject, and I do not consider myself an expert.

Water and water rights are covered under Colorado Law as described in non legal terms here:

https://issuu.com/cfwe/docs/weco_cgwlaw_5thed_final

We are also governed by an interstate compact.

Snow pack depth and water content generally determines the amount of next years water flow, and weather we will have water use restrictions.

The amount of water rights owned by a local utility or farmer generally indicates how the available water will be allocated.

Historically, municipalities have purchased farmers water rights from them in order to provide water to their residents. This tends to mean the farms that have sold those rights dry up.

Water in the West is a scarce resource and historically has been allocated by ownership of water rights under a "first in use, first in right" doctrine.

This is not a new problem. Colorado has a system of water courts going back to the 1800's... I have visited the one in Greeley, an approximately 10 story building built in what was a farming community in the very early 1900''s, proudly built without debt (as the plaque on the building reads).

This is a complex subject, and I think you should consider talking with someone who is an expert in it, perhaps an old time water attorney, specializing in this stuff. Anything else is uneducated speculation.

Expand full comment

Continuation of above: there is the debate over whether Global Warming is real, and if it is real, is it caused by very small changes in CO2 and whether thse would really make any significant difference, and if it is worth giving up our industrial civilization, and all the things that make life easier in order to remedy it. The Wokies would say it is, but I am not so sure. There is still a good bit of scientific debate on the subject, and the historical record from ice cores indicates that there have been periods of much higher CO2 than now, and somehow, we are still here.

Personally, I am not ready to give up my cars (I am rural), or go back to horses (expensive and lots of CO2 and manure), even though we might have the space for same. And I am certainly not willing to inflict this view or degradation of life style on others.

What we have seen with this climate change, global warming thing, is a certain unanimity of the press on this… similar in some ways to the press behavior under this last Covid psyop. It turns out from the Twitter files, that Twitter 1.0 was taking direct suggestions from the FBI as to who to censor, and which accounts to eliminate with regular weekly meetings and reviews and a direct portal for input. My guess is the same thing or something similar was done at Google and Facebook… and possibly other members of the media, old and new. For Covid, this was politics and IMHO mind control for the purpose of political control and implementing of an agenda. Control of the narrative, the scientific method and free debate be dammed.

There was definitely an attempt to control the media, which almost succeeded, in spite of the First Amendment. Is the same thing happening with the politicization of science re global warming, and the related reductions in individual freedom, and lifestyle proposed by the WEF? I certainly see indications of that.

The whole history of the left reeks of authoritarianism. Socialism and its evil twin Communism at the extremes requires compliance with authoritarianism… do what we say or we take your stuff, and its off to the camps with you… but for a good cause of course... and we will "re-educate" your kids.

What we know, and don’t know:

1. Is it drier than usual on the Colorado Front Range. Yup, for sure.

2. Is it drier than it has been in the past (say 2001 – 2003)? No, not yet.

3. Is this related to CO2? Not sure, and debatable. Lots of people, lots of opinions.

4. Is there any way to be sure? Aside from running this experiment on another similarly situated planet, I am not sure there is.

5. Does this ‘fix’ work? Maybe C02 can be reduced, but at what cost? Also, plants, including food plants, like it… and its a necessary life ingredient for them.

6. Will it reduce global warming in a significant way? Hard to say.

7. At what cost in personal lifestyles?

a. Ready to give up your car(s) or buy a Tesla? And where will the power come from to run it?

1. Ready to fork out aprx $60,000 for a product with a battery that cost $20,000 to replace

and starts degrading on day 1? I am not.

2. And I am not willing to force my neighbors to do that either.

b. Ready to give up your home and land and livestock, and move to a building in the city

(see the current adventure with the EU in the Netherlands). Nope, not me.

1. Are you ready to inflict that on your neighbors. Nope.

8. There are definitely more people in Colorado, and particularly in the Front Range than in the past. This is true for most of the Southwest. There is not much more water, though there is more water storage (but not enough IMHO). More people, same resource = shortage. This kind of thing is very predictable, but you can not keep folks from coming. This is a nice place to live.

9. Add to the above, the environmental extremeists have made it very difficult to get Federal approval for new water projects. It takes 10 - 16 years of studies and approvals before you can even break ground, never mind the cost. This has an expense in terms of the number of people that can be supported (use the resource) or agriculture that can be supported. Policies, that are IMHO, misguided.

These are my thoughts on the subject.

Expand full comment

For The Big Picture going over the last few decades check out https://www.geoenginewringwatch.org

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Dec 19, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Thank you for spreading this well-researched reality of what is happening to us via the pharmaceutical "solution" to global warming, or so we're led to believe, in our skies. Re the "snake venom" theories: Quite a number of snake and cone snail toxins were definitely researched and funded by NIAID, Fauci's flunkies. The toxins have been copied and are available for purchase, ostensibly for "research" purposes. A number of respectable institutions of higher learning (Univ. of AZ, University of Louisville, a couple of Italian research institutions) have noticed that toxins isolated from COVID patients match the toxins of quite a few very toxic venomous snakes as well as cone snails, very highly toxic venoms. Some believe it possible that we are being sprayed via Stratospheric Aerosolized Geoengineering from tanker jets releasing god-knows-what in their chemical dispersions, possibly including pathogens and these toxins in order to sicken us. Personally I think "they" are trying to poison, sicken, weaken, starve, freeze and fry us to death as well impoverish and ruin our economy to keep us from driving and thereby heating up the atmosphere via release of greenhouse gases. What better way to accomplish this than by calling a "pandemic," then hooking us all up to "social credit" accounts :-(

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Dec 20, 2022Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

No, it isn't "either/or," that is such passe white male "thinking." As Rosalind Peterson of California Skywatch correctly nailed it, "We have multiple agencies with multiple agendas operating with NO coordination, NO oversight and NO public discussion." Stop thinking in just "black," OR "white" only. That's a "UUUGE" problem with the extreme red-pilled. The left side of their brains are dragging, along with their knuckles 🤣👍🤣👍🤣👍

Expand full comment

Yes, get in touch with Dane Wigington, chief researcher at geoengineeringwatch.org, an honest and honorable man of Native American descent. He has experts including former USDA, Fish & Game and Wildlife inspectors, as well as access to NOAA planes equipped with instruments to capture air samples, as well as all the patents for weather modification, and videos of the two most prominent geoengineers, one caught on record talking about seeding clouds with pathogens, the other bragging about how cheap and "safe" it would be to spray the planet with tons of nanoparticulate aluminum annually. Well, you stuff enough particles in the atmosphere and rain droplets cannot form. That is very well-known SCIENTIFIC FACT. HARD STOP. PERIOD. Dane's on our side regarding the toxic phony-baloney quack-cines. He met with Gov. Newsolini who does in fact know about the spraying going on. The idea is to sacrifice the west coast-- what do you suppose that means? A. They steal our water vapor via ionospheric heaters, move the jet stream and dump the water east of the Rockies in order to chemically cool it off via ice nucleation technology so that the bulk of America won't notice the global warming. Just take a look at world temps on a map-- the U.S., strangely, is ALWAYS the coolest, while everywhere else is sweltering!

Expand full comment

This is the next ‘weapon’ and there are major companies working to meter every drop we use in the future. A huge part of coming scarcity ( according to said companies ) is our lack of recycling water ( only 1% in US ) while Israel is 90%. Of course Industry is the big consumer here, but what I gleaned from the company pitch is ‘water shaming’ and much stricter measures for single family homes. Another page in the great reset manual.

Expand full comment

The weather modification patents go back for seventy (70) years. There are patents for taming hurricanes, there are technologies for steering hurricanes. How do you get a SNOWSTORM in the upper midwest out of Gulf of Mexico moisture? Easy. Visit geoengineeringwatch.org and tune in to the Global Alert News every Saturday to learn what's going on, why and how it's being done to you, by unelected bureaucrats and corrupt, greedy corporate-banking-military-industrial assassins.

Expand full comment

They’ll do anything to get their money and way, we are working with sociopaths.

Expand full comment

I was just thinking that only truly evil people are capable of planning the genocide of the entire planet. Removing the useless bottom feeders as Schwabs advisor likes to say. We must fight these bastards every step of the way, any way we can. Do Not Comply

Expand full comment

Only caveat...do not lose your soul, it’s precious and fragile. He lives within you!

Expand full comment

Never!

Expand full comment

The drought is real and the water level issues in most of our rivers that drain out west are also real. Maybe not due to the climate change narrative per se. But certainly possible due to 1) Mother Nature prefers a warmer planet and she may be trying to get us back to where she was before all the glaciation cooled us off. We might need to change to accommodate her preferences. 2) We have been sucking more water out of those rivers - especially the CO. We build in stupid places and arrogantly think we can escape water issues in desserts; hurricanes in areas prone to those; earthquakes in areas prone to those; etc. We farm irresponsibly and use way more water than is needful in big ag style farming practices which have never answered our hunger needs, globally or locally. Most goes to cattle/animal farming or ethanol production vs real food. True sustainable and regenerative farming and ranching in local communities, raising things the locale is designed to provide woukd use less water; no fertilizers; and feed everyone. But that is not want our globalists woukd like to have happen. Mass starvation and thirst are the goals and so no checks on our foolishness have occurred over the decades. There is an answer to this but we need to change our ways. As in so much else regarding the global take-downs we have blinded ourselves to the real issues which has gotten us to where we are. The predators have taken advantage of that but we need to step up and acknowledge what we’ve done and then make the changes. If local communities are feeding themselves and getting around through various means in their area and providing the fuels they need, we coukd thumb our noses at those folks and restore our world and learn to live in. AND eat steak and carrots and whatever we wish. And medicate ourselves to boot. We could do this if we put our minds to it. Even tiny yards in urban settings can be transformed into self-sufficient farms. I had a friend in a metroplex area who did just that many years ago and has inspired me ever since.

Expand full comment

See my post above. Get informed. Visit https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org, and the Global Alert News every Saturday, archived, strangely enough, on YouTube. The "red-pilled" need to understand that's what's going on is NOT a hoax.

Expand full comment

Yes, our "Lords and Masters of the Universe" are in fact creating drought in order to serve as the pretext for starving us to death. Either "coincidental" massive crop failure will ensue, or severe rationing, attached to our "social credit" scores. You behave for Herr Schwabb, you vill get ze foodt. Get informed, visit https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org to learn what's up with your extremely "managed" alleged weather. This is where the plandemic and global warming narratives converge.

Expand full comment

You have been through a LaNina drought.. during that time Australia has seen massive wet... it is a well known cyclical weather cycle ENSO..due to rising and falling ocean temps in the mid Pacific...

The opposite cycle is El Niño bringing dry to eastern Australia and wet to California western USA...

These are global systems that interact with others pattern such as the Indian Ocean Dipol..IOD

What true of these cycles is warming water from Hot dry conditions increases atmospheric H20 that moves across massive distances where the air cools and the moisture drops causing massive rain..in 2019 the IOD caused dry warming conditions over Indonesia that in turn caused severe drought in Australia..but in Somalia massive floods...

Cycles of drought and floods remain unchanged for thousands of years..and these processes have nothing to do with local chem trails or CO2 levels

What had been consistent is increasing demand on limited water resources.. a documentary on the Colorado River showed this was a problem in 1970s ..

Your facing cyclical shortages and ever rising demand... simple as that..

But the outcomes are very real and many are suggesting famine ... prepare.

Expand full comment

How much water does Las Vegas use? It's an artificial oasis built on someone else's water.

Expand full comment

That was a topic of an entire post on geoengineeringwatch.org. Check it out.

Expand full comment

I wonder if there would be enough water without millions of illegals invading the region. Or northern California pouring millions of gallons into the bay. A good drought is useful to remind people the government isn't their friend.

Expand full comment

the approach has always been: bring more people. nothing can ever go wrong with that plan. we need more people. all the time. forever. what we do not need is more infrastructure. we don't even need to maintain the *existing* infrastructure. millions and millions of additional people just show up and take care of everything automatically. it's magical. the USA is magic.

Expand full comment

I wish someone would tell the farmers about key line plowing and swales sooner than later

Expand full comment

Dr. Mercola and Vandana Shiva have been talking about biodynamic and restorative agriculture for years. Who's listening?

Expand full comment

Fewer humans means less need for food. Just ask the tyrants like gates. Or, you can have a McCricket sandwich in the future.

Expand full comment

Congratulations, Dr. Nass... you win the 'climate science' kewpie doll! Water is the most urgent climate issue that we face, 'global warming' being a mostly a twentieth century phenomena that is on the decline. (Don't take my word for it, check out the YT videos of William Happer and Patrick Moore on the subject, or Steve Koonin's book if reading is your preference.)

Water, not hydrocarbons, is indeed the 21st century's most pressing climate challenge, and it's far more difficult to solve as you point out.

Expand full comment

"The federal government has called on the seven Western states that rely on Colorado River water to cut usage by 2 to 4 million acre-feet — up to a third of the river’s annual average flow —"

It may be a coincidence or just a meaningless observation on my part, but I keep seeing things reduced by thirds..

Netherlands farmlands- a third.

Water usage here a third.

It looks like a repetitive amount based on some calculation of what percentage it takes to leverage control.

Expand full comment

“Will it be the excuse for less food production?” They will use anything that helps them achieve their goals.

Expand full comment

Folks, this IS what's going on with your weather/climate change: https://youtu.be/E-D4beOvtj4. From Lyndon Johnson announcing that "he who controls the weather controls the world," to Air Force 2025's chapter titled "Owning the Weather in 2025," it shoould be very clear to anyone with intact critical thinking skills that "someone" is playing with the weather-- who, and why? Listen, visit the website and then decide for yourselves if this information is a willy-nilly "hot mess" of disorganized "propaganda."

Expand full comment