Just a few tweets provides a lot of information. Thx again to A Midwestern Doctor for decoding his hogwash (or someone's hogwash with his name appended to it) for us.
Meryl- I blocked him years ago as he was a self promoting troll arguing against the Low Carb community. I found him just looking for attention and he writes before he thinks, otherwise he has little understanding of cordial relationships. I believe he got lambasted after he had a harsh comment about a low carb doc whose office burnt down. My guess is he found another way to gain attention. He should just be ignored.
I'd like to see a survey of people who believe in culling and or eugenics.
Every person close to me believes in Eugenics, even the ones who believe in the Bible, who cry over people suffering. One is on government aid, is against the covid vax and still feels people should be culled, that maybe this is all for the best.
I'm the only person I know who doesn't, aside from my son who cannot speak
Maybe this is naive, but I believe every creature on the planet that is meant to survive and adapt will, and to tamper either way, to keep a species afloat past it's time or to tamper with the reproduction of another for any reason leaves everything more out of balance than allowing Mother nature and whatever higher power looking down upon us all providing its own nurturing and discipline will accomplish..
Reality is, if you ask a real biologist about "survival of the fittest," you'll get the reality from much observation by many, that species actually survive by COOPERATION, and NOT by killing everything they see because it's a "rival." Only stupid, heartless humans who "need" to be "on top" all of the time do that. And notice how The Homicidal are also the Suicidal. The "Survival of the Fittest" was uttered by a 19th-Century white man who only saw part of The Elephant, so to speak, then declared it to be the Total of reality-- NOT.
Get a Heart. Your mind has been programmed with your 'survival of the fittest theory'. We are all victims. Your heart will lead you to the true way of God, our Creator...
I have no such theory as usually ascribed. I merely believe God and nature have the greater wisdom in how things should evolve over time. Both God and nature reward the good and punish evil. I would ascribe to a god the programming of nature to this end, but I do not exclude God from intervening outside of the normal patterns as it sees fit. It is man who, thinking he is God, believes he knows better what species, races or people should be either exterminated or carried along past their time. That is not an issue of the "fittest" per se, but of controlled intelligent design that does grant part of its workings to what may appear as such without a broader look of the philosophical notion of things. Enjoy your week.
I find your comment somewhat fascinating yet mostly depressing if, as you say, you know so many with thoughts to push the agenda further. And who are the unfortunate receivers of this undue punishment in their eyes ?
They seem to think they are innocent in their thoughts. I'm not exactly sure who they aim to kill but for those who've taken the vaccine, I doubt they see the person being culled is them.
2 of the people I spoke with are poor, on aid, older who admitted they are worthless. They lump themselves and other people I love into a category of, maybe they should die. They believe in eugenics so much they dont even care their own grandson would be in the cull category because he is disabled. Sick. Pisses me off. This is why I'd like to see an honest survey because from what I see most people support eugenics and culling
"they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black." The fracturing of the psyche from reality, if achieved in childhood before the transition to the adult brain, leads to a ghost of a person, and is the goal of groups behind many of these educational and government sponsored programs designed to look as if they are a hand up but are in reality, and kick into a mental, philosophical and theological grave.
This is a philosophical construct that can go off on many tangents, and I appreciate such a short comment is open to many interpretations. If you mean "undue punishment" from nature or a god, I think both not only look out for those who need that assistance, while both, in some way, providing the discipline against those who are overreaching in negative designs. I do not negate compassion, love and mercy as part of humanities or nature's way that it looks out for itself and others and by doing so, fulfill the designs of nature and Divine Providence, but I also think there is a thing as "False Mercy", where the fear of death as a natural part of the life cycle can affect decisions to draw things out not only unnecessarily, but inflict more misery on those whom they thought to save. Where anyone or any situation falls in this flux of change is, by design, going to continue to evolve and lead to adaptations of responsibility and acceptance in doing good, while not believing we are "gods" in control of the entire cosmic play.
"This is a philosophical construct that can go off on many tangents, and I appreciate such a short comment is open to many interpretations. If you mean "undue punishment" from nature or a god..."
The people I know who believe in eugenics feel the earth has too many people, too little resources, climate catastrophe is fast approaching and their solution is NOT to think-tank solutions, have mercy, let God handle it, etc. They want less people on earth of all races period.
My 17 year old daughter has been trained to believe the earth is a big disaster waiting to come to a head and is depressed about the future, doubting whether she would want to have a family. She confided that in me and seemed heartened to hear that all my life climate activists have been screaming warnings about one thing or another...and that the frenzy in the 70's was that we were heading into another ice age.
Also the many who sound the alarm on climate catastrophe are placing themselves in a superior order of importance, in my opinion. Man can neither destroy nor save the planet for that matter and only shows even more self righteous indignation. What will they do for an encore, save the universe but first cull a few billion more for their superior justification.
I was responding to Heidi, for some reason substack randomly assigns responses that make it difficult to follow a conversation. But I would say that leaving Nature to do its own "culling" is of better design, but then one comes up against the mental paradox of the inborn will to survive, which will lead to an animal or humans' ability to use deceit, trickery or just brute strength to survive, even at the expense of another species or human. Much of this problem is found in that part of this becomes a circular problem.
And I find it, both humorous and somewhat ironic, that they don't practice their own preaching and lead the way by taking themselves out of the equation. There is much in eugenics that presupposes they view themselves as the "keepers of humanity", that some god has appointed them their neighbor's keeper to the point of killing Him for His own good. There is much unspoken and ancient spiritual and religious notions in eugenics that likes to hide itself behind the seeming naturalistic "survival of the fittest" propaganda it puts forth.
Thank you Heidi, not only for the brutal honesty, but exposing your vulnerability and compassion into a matter that has far reaching implications. It wasn't even in my consciousness a few short years ago.
My comment was directed towards Heidi but as long as you ask, I don't quite follow in the 'nature or a god'. I only see that someone practicing eugenics is going to be doing the culling.
My Father was drafted into WW2 at the age of 17. His punishment for dropping out of high school at 16 to work at the local papermill. The government figured if you couldn't stay in school, you must be prime for the front lines and cannon fodder. (The government's own way of equating who should live or die). He scored so high on the I.Q. tests, and as the world turns, He ended up assigned to Military Intelligence motorcade as the assigned drivers to one of the American Colonels there. On a few occasions He helped guard some of the S.S. prisoners. They thought that He being of German extraction, they would be more comfortable with German blooded guards. It had the opposite effect, they hated Him as a traitor to the Fatherland. The fact our ancestors left Darmstadt in the1760's was irrelevant. He said it was the first time in His life, after growing up in a rural community, that He stood face to face with what He considered to be true and pure Evil. Not something that could be written off as human weakness or poor decision making, or the inbred human will to survive gone awry in times of national stress as is the case with some of mass formation psychosis, but Evil as an entity in and of itself. Much of what He experienced affected Him greatly, and we were forbidden to ever be cremated but we were instructed to be buried whole. He came to equate cremation with Evil's design to eradicate from all memory those who were disposed of in such a fashion, as if they were not humans with eternal souls, with no place of remembrance that they had ever walked the earth. I was raised with what I would say was a higher level of concern for the physical survival of others, but the truth and the tragedy of all of life's suffering, is that we can all only do so much. At some point, despite our best efforts, either nature, fate, "god" or another evil befalls our plans. The notion of death being an ever-present reality was likely ingrained in me to a greater extent than others, and I think for it I see or perceive things differently than my peers. But His mentorship did leave me with a heightened ability to sense psychological predators and how they foment their designs. To take out a den of vipers, one must be accepted by them as one of their own, but in doing so, one must be careful, as the precept reminds us all: "Those who lay down with dogs wake up with fleas." I hope that helps explain some what the mentality from which I view these sorts of things.
Yes. Everyone I know who I'm close enough to ask believes in some form of eugenics. Culling of weak old and disabled or just depop because there are too many people.
I do not judge people. Not my job. The people around me know how I am and feel comfortable admitting their views to some degree. I was curious and asked, had NO IDEA I would get the responses I did. I thought all but one would be against it.
I'd like to see a survey of different groups of people, asking how many support eugenics. If as many support it as I have seen, it's no wonder people don't care to stop what's happening.
Also I have to admit I'm a bit surprised you're even commenting on this topic with surprise.... since you just got done agreeing it might be good to cull all white people in another post on SH SS, as if if would solve all of our problems.
As for the SH post it was sarcasm, I replied to you but it's missing. What I wrote 15 20 min. ago was, first off I was in no way trying to offend and I apologize if it did. My implications of polite society are those in the "self proclaimed leaders of the world" club. Such as WEF, WHO, CDC etc. along with their employers.
I am sure that was not my intention, although I am not sure of which topic you speak. Your substacks are interesting. I look forward to reading more of them.
Your wording is interesting. You're either inferring I'm not part of polite society, not deep enough to discuss these topics or your insulting polite society and saying I'm an oddball for being interested in others views? Feels like a lose-lose either way.
He said he was under the assumption only those involved in polite society discussed deep social issues such as these. I'm not sure how to take that lol. Apparently, to him, I'm not polite society and not deep enough to discuss these things.
Considering those providing the solutions are responsible for the creation of the problems, the notion of Eugenics and culling the herd as a solution should start at the very top of the pyramid indeed.
I had a charity attack yesterday afternoon, driving back to Austin with Jenny, from Yoakum, where the electricity never went out.
About an hour from Austin and an hour from sunset we passed an older guy with a backpack hitch-hiking. He looked frustrated as we went by.
I turned around and offered him a ride after Jenny moved stuff on the back seat.
He was chatty, been to 47 of the contiguous states, not Rhode Island, and had a lot of street level perspective on them. He knew COVID was a military lab virus and the vaccines were as bad or worse, so he didn’t get any. He , born in 1960, was one of 2 kids that an unwed mother gave up for adoption before she hit the road again. He didn’t do well in school, though he was intelligent enough. He clearly had a double dose of ADHD.
He went to AA and gave up alcohol, then quit AA, but just smokes pot now.
We dropped him off near a Wal Mart at the interstate that heads to Waco. i gave him the 3 ones in my pocket. It wasn’t dark yet.
His pack could have held considerably more than he had in it, sign of a traveler.
He might do better than most. Would the Eugenicists pass him or fail him?
If the eugenicists are gathering up all carbon emitters, all people who are not working a productive job, everyone who isnt vaccinated, microchipped then, yes.
What if all cash money is done away with, gifting money to homeless is forbidden, punished, small farmland co ops no longer exist, food is rationed? Will it make a difference that he isnt on a cull list, when people like him will not survive the extreme technocratic dictatorship ahead of us?
I feel like there are a lot of factors in this which makes it hard to know whether he is in a better position.
He's been practicing his whole life as a homeless freeloader depending on benevolent people like you; living a life similar to people who didnt have long life spans, subject to the elements, lack of proper hygiene, clean water and healthy food. Youth, being unvaccinated and if he eats healthy when he does eat, may get him by for a period of time.
We aren't living in a Chinese technocratic dictatorship yet. People who go against gov there are rounded up into re education camps, killed for their organs, etc.
Whether this man will weather the collapse of the USSR (in the USA) better than average is uncertain. This man has worked. He described selling cars 30 years ago. He has not much "contributed" to society, nor has he taken much "wealth" for his own use.
It seems like eugenicists and those at the levers of power would prefer to jettison such people, but he has not been much of a draw, and has not had children, so maybe his elimination doesn't merit any expense, either.
What is the "value" in human life?
We are considering the taking and giving of one person in the context of many human lives, which are all of the experiences of those lives, the "qualia", right?
This man related an experience-rich life. What is his contribution to Universal Consciousness?
The only "qualia" typically considered by power-people are what they feel and want, maybe the secondary consideration of how much people will suffer without attacking their system.
If each person has a "right" to live, how does society fund that "right" if the person is not self-sustaining, or sustained by family/friends?
In the collapse of the Soviet Union 10% of the Russian people died in 10 years. No economic value could be assigned to preserving the lives of the sick and elderly. Who lived? Who died?
We might look at the causes of death, rather than the relative merits of each life, which are harder for us to know at this great distance. Apparently "good" citizens and "bad" citizens died when the food and paychecks stopped coming.
In Canada they are now advocating euthanasia and also organ donation for those who choose to die, making it a "win-win" proposition for "society" and the organ donors, as they put it.
I personally think that we cannot judge the "value" of a lived human experience, but it is also inevitable that economic systems break and fail, and that people either die without help, or may live by helping each other directly sometimes.
Who do we choose to help when we do not quite have enough food for our own needs, and there are many who are worse off?
No answer is required. Hypothetical questions can be deceptive, but they are useful to consider.
You don't get published in Newsweek if you're not elected to be part of the club. Vague tweets about eugenics fits. His genealogy might prove interesting. There's a reason the question "Who are your parents" used to be a regular inquiry after questionable behavior.
Dr Nass is going to be on WVOM -FM Radio (The Voice of Maine) tomorrow morning. * https://www.wvomfm.com/episode/ghrt-rewind-02-06-what-tees-you-off-1145 *. Let them know how the Medical quacks testifying against you got caught in their own lies /misrepresentations. We love you out here and are so grateful that Maine has at least 1 real doctor that isn't afraid of the Rockefeller Drug pushing so called "medical" establishment.
It's frightening how people who believe in eugenics will work in health care. The way I've seen it play out is that these doctors/nurses will quickly push extreme medical measures onto their patients.
The subsequent lives of the patients are severely inhibited, when instead a practitioner could have put in effort to heal them compassionately.
Interesting background on the guy. He offers no information about why he says ya’ll aren’t the serious scientific ones to listen to so why should anyone listen to him? No specifics equals no credibility in my book. Sounds like Dr. Horvitz has his number.
A propagandist yesterday, today and tomorrow. Words may change but the propaganda’s nature does not. The ultimate aim of propaganda is strategic in nature. Words change only due to tactical adjustments. Walking back the unsustainable narrative is a tactical adjustment.
Meryl- I blocked him years ago as he was a self promoting troll arguing against the Low Carb community. I found him just looking for attention and he writes before he thinks, otherwise he has little understanding of cordial relationships. I believe he got lambasted after he had a harsh comment about a low carb doc whose office burnt down. My guess is he found another way to gain attention. He should just be ignored.
I'd like to see a survey of people who believe in culling and or eugenics.
Every person close to me believes in Eugenics, even the ones who believe in the Bible, who cry over people suffering. One is on government aid, is against the covid vax and still feels people should be culled, that maybe this is all for the best.
I'm the only person I know who doesn't, aside from my son who cannot speak
Maybe this is naive, but I believe every creature on the planet that is meant to survive and adapt will, and to tamper either way, to keep a species afloat past it's time or to tamper with the reproduction of another for any reason leaves everything more out of balance than allowing Mother nature and whatever higher power looking down upon us all providing its own nurturing and discipline will accomplish..
Reality is, if you ask a real biologist about "survival of the fittest," you'll get the reality from much observation by many, that species actually survive by COOPERATION, and NOT by killing everything they see because it's a "rival." Only stupid, heartless humans who "need" to be "on top" all of the time do that. And notice how The Homicidal are also the Suicidal. The "Survival of the Fittest" was uttered by a 19th-Century white man who only saw part of The Elephant, so to speak, then declared it to be the Total of reality-- NOT.
Get a Heart. Your mind has been programmed with your 'survival of the fittest theory'. We are all victims. Your heart will lead you to the true way of God, our Creator...
I have no such theory as usually ascribed. I merely believe God and nature have the greater wisdom in how things should evolve over time. Both God and nature reward the good and punish evil. I would ascribe to a god the programming of nature to this end, but I do not exclude God from intervening outside of the normal patterns as it sees fit. It is man who, thinking he is God, believes he knows better what species, races or people should be either exterminated or carried along past their time. That is not an issue of the "fittest" per se, but of controlled intelligent design that does grant part of its workings to what may appear as such without a broader look of the philosophical notion of things. Enjoy your week.
Very true.
I find your comment somewhat fascinating yet mostly depressing if, as you say, you know so many with thoughts to push the agenda further. And who are the unfortunate receivers of this undue punishment in their eyes ?
"with thoughts to push the agenda further"
They seem to think they are innocent in their thoughts. I'm not exactly sure who they aim to kill but for those who've taken the vaccine, I doubt they see the person being culled is them.
yeap is okay for other people, not for them.
bottom line bad people.
I agree.
2 of the people I spoke with are poor, on aid, older who admitted they are worthless. They lump themselves and other people I love into a category of, maybe they should die. They believe in eugenics so much they dont even care their own grandson would be in the cull category because he is disabled. Sick. Pisses me off. This is why I'd like to see an honest survey because from what I see most people support eugenics and culling
Shows what 50 years of intense propaganda will do. Half of them don't realize they would be among those culled.
Wow. That is a tragic, propaganda filled mindset.
Perhaps give them a mirror and direct them to carry on !!
The Fabian Society, Eugenics and the Historic Forces Behind Today’s Systemic Breakdown
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-fabian-society-eugenics-and-the
"they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black." The fracturing of the psyche from reality, if achieved in childhood before the transition to the adult brain, leads to a ghost of a person, and is the goal of groups behind many of these educational and government sponsored programs designed to look as if they are a hand up but are in reality, and kick into a mental, philosophical and theological grave.
Usually, it's the people who think OTHERS should be culled.
I, myself, would vote for Chinese upper management. 😉🤣😋
...and everyone who's a member or a graduate of W.T.F., er, I mean, W.E.F.
This is a philosophical construct that can go off on many tangents, and I appreciate such a short comment is open to many interpretations. If you mean "undue punishment" from nature or a god, I think both not only look out for those who need that assistance, while both, in some way, providing the discipline against those who are overreaching in negative designs. I do not negate compassion, love and mercy as part of humanities or nature's way that it looks out for itself and others and by doing so, fulfill the designs of nature and Divine Providence, but I also think there is a thing as "False Mercy", where the fear of death as a natural part of the life cycle can affect decisions to draw things out not only unnecessarily, but inflict more misery on those whom they thought to save. Where anyone or any situation falls in this flux of change is, by design, going to continue to evolve and lead to adaptations of responsibility and acceptance in doing good, while not believing we are "gods" in control of the entire cosmic play.
"This is a philosophical construct that can go off on many tangents, and I appreciate such a short comment is open to many interpretations. If you mean "undue punishment" from nature or a god..."
The people I know who believe in eugenics feel the earth has too many people, too little resources, climate catastrophe is fast approaching and their solution is NOT to think-tank solutions, have mercy, let God handle it, etc. They want less people on earth of all races period.
My 17 year old daughter has been trained to believe the earth is a big disaster waiting to come to a head and is depressed about the future, doubting whether she would want to have a family. She confided that in me and seemed heartened to hear that all my life climate activists have been screaming warnings about one thing or another...and that the frenzy in the 70's was that we were heading into another ice age.
Show her the Malone covers of Time magazine I posted about a month ago warning of exactly that--then how it flipped to fear of heat.
Meanwhile the climate is about where it has always been.
Also the many who sound the alarm on climate catastrophe are placing themselves in a superior order of importance, in my opinion. Man can neither destroy nor save the planet for that matter and only shows even more self righteous indignation. What will they do for an encore, save the universe but first cull a few billion more for their superior justification.
I was responding to Heidi, for some reason substack randomly assigns responses that make it difficult to follow a conversation. But I would say that leaving Nature to do its own "culling" is of better design, but then one comes up against the mental paradox of the inborn will to survive, which will lead to an animal or humans' ability to use deceit, trickery or just brute strength to survive, even at the expense of another species or human. Much of this problem is found in that part of this becomes a circular problem.
There is a higher guidance than animal drives, instincts and urges, but one must want to hear, and must want to follow Divine guidance,
and it takes a bit of practice, so don't delay.
:-)
And I find it, both humorous and somewhat ironic, that they don't practice their own preaching and lead the way by taking themselves out of the equation. There is much in eugenics that presupposes they view themselves as the "keepers of humanity", that some god has appointed them their neighbor's keeper to the point of killing Him for His own good. There is much unspoken and ancient spiritual and religious notions in eugenics that likes to hide itself behind the seeming naturalistic "survival of the fittest" propaganda it puts forth.
Thank you Heidi, not only for the brutal honesty, but exposing your vulnerability and compassion into a matter that has far reaching implications. It wasn't even in my consciousness a few short years ago.
🙏💞
My comment was directed towards Heidi but as long as you ask, I don't quite follow in the 'nature or a god'. I only see that someone practicing eugenics is going to be doing the culling.
You know people that are ok with eugenics???
My Father was drafted into WW2 at the age of 17. His punishment for dropping out of high school at 16 to work at the local papermill. The government figured if you couldn't stay in school, you must be prime for the front lines and cannon fodder. (The government's own way of equating who should live or die). He scored so high on the I.Q. tests, and as the world turns, He ended up assigned to Military Intelligence motorcade as the assigned drivers to one of the American Colonels there. On a few occasions He helped guard some of the S.S. prisoners. They thought that He being of German extraction, they would be more comfortable with German blooded guards. It had the opposite effect, they hated Him as a traitor to the Fatherland. The fact our ancestors left Darmstadt in the1760's was irrelevant. He said it was the first time in His life, after growing up in a rural community, that He stood face to face with what He considered to be true and pure Evil. Not something that could be written off as human weakness or poor decision making, or the inbred human will to survive gone awry in times of national stress as is the case with some of mass formation psychosis, but Evil as an entity in and of itself. Much of what He experienced affected Him greatly, and we were forbidden to ever be cremated but we were instructed to be buried whole. He came to equate cremation with Evil's design to eradicate from all memory those who were disposed of in such a fashion, as if they were not humans with eternal souls, with no place of remembrance that they had ever walked the earth. I was raised with what I would say was a higher level of concern for the physical survival of others, but the truth and the tragedy of all of life's suffering, is that we can all only do so much. At some point, despite our best efforts, either nature, fate, "god" or another evil befalls our plans. The notion of death being an ever-present reality was likely ingrained in me to a greater extent than others, and I think for it I see or perceive things differently than my peers. But His mentorship did leave me with a heightened ability to sense psychological predators and how they foment their designs. To take out a den of vipers, one must be accepted by them as one of their own, but in doing so, one must be careful, as the precept reminds us all: "Those who lay down with dogs wake up with fleas." I hope that helps explain some what the mentality from which I view these sorts of things.
😪🙏❤
Yes. Everyone I know who I'm close enough to ask believes in some form of eugenics. Culling of weak old and disabled or just depop because there are too many people.
I do not judge people. Not my job. The people around me know how I am and feel comfortable admitting their views to some degree. I was curious and asked, had NO IDEA I would get the responses I did. I thought all but one would be against it.
I'd like to see a survey of different groups of people, asking how many support eugenics. If as many support it as I have seen, it's no wonder people don't care to stop what's happening.
That would explain a lot.
The complete lack of care for others, that’s the real virus.
I find it so difficult to fathom.
Yet, I have friends that if something isn’t effecting them personally, they don’t care.
🎯🎯🎯
I was surprised by the answer as well. I was under the assumption only those involved in polite society discussed deep social issues such as these.
Also I have to admit I'm a bit surprised you're even commenting on this topic with surprise.... since you just got done agreeing it might be good to cull all white people in another post on SH SS, as if if would solve all of our problems.
As for the SH post it was sarcasm, I replied to you but it's missing. What I wrote 15 20 min. ago was, first off I was in no way trying to offend and I apologize if it did. My implications of polite society are those in the "self proclaimed leaders of the world" club. Such as WEF, WHO, CDC etc. along with their employers.
I am sure that was not my intention, although I am not sure of which topic you speak. Your substacks are interesting. I look forward to reading more of them.
Your wording is interesting. You're either inferring I'm not part of polite society, not deep enough to discuss these topics or your insulting polite society and saying I'm an oddball for being interested in others views? Feels like a lose-lose either way.
My apologies for any misunderstanding. I stand assured you are of the utmost highest in ethics and intent.
No apologies please. I was replying to Michael.
He said he was under the assumption only those involved in polite society discussed deep social issues such as these. I'm not sure how to take that lol. Apparently, to him, I'm not polite society and not deep enough to discuss these things.
I'm sure there was a misunderstanding on my part
I think sub stack does a very poor job of placing reply comments where they belong, and it is likely the cause of misunderstandings.
Interesting view of the worlds problems
Considering those providing the solutions are responsible for the creation of the problems, the notion of Eugenics and culling the herd as a solution should start at the very top of the pyramid indeed.
I had a charity attack yesterday afternoon, driving back to Austin with Jenny, from Yoakum, where the electricity never went out.
About an hour from Austin and an hour from sunset we passed an older guy with a backpack hitch-hiking. He looked frustrated as we went by.
I turned around and offered him a ride after Jenny moved stuff on the back seat.
He was chatty, been to 47 of the contiguous states, not Rhode Island, and had a lot of street level perspective on them. He knew COVID was a military lab virus and the vaccines were as bad or worse, so he didn’t get any. He , born in 1960, was one of 2 kids that an unwed mother gave up for adoption before she hit the road again. He didn’t do well in school, though he was intelligent enough. He clearly had a double dose of ADHD.
He went to AA and gave up alcohol, then quit AA, but just smokes pot now.
We dropped him off near a Wal Mart at the interstate that heads to Waco. i gave him the 3 ones in my pocket. It wasn’t dark yet.
His pack could have held considerably more than he had in it, sign of a traveler.
He might do better than most. Would the Eugenicists pass him or fail him?
Interesting story. Thank you for sharing it. 🙏💕
If the eugenicists are gathering up all carbon emitters, all people who are not working a productive job, everyone who isnt vaccinated, microchipped then, yes.
What if all cash money is done away with, gifting money to homeless is forbidden, punished, small farmland co ops no longer exist, food is rationed? Will it make a difference that he isnt on a cull list, when people like him will not survive the extreme technocratic dictatorship ahead of us?
I give him better-than-average odds of survival. He's been in training his whole life.
I feel like there are a lot of factors in this which makes it hard to know whether he is in a better position.
He's been practicing his whole life as a homeless freeloader depending on benevolent people like you; living a life similar to people who didnt have long life spans, subject to the elements, lack of proper hygiene, clean water and healthy food. Youth, being unvaccinated and if he eats healthy when he does eat, may get him by for a period of time.
We aren't living in a Chinese technocratic dictatorship yet. People who go against gov there are rounded up into re education camps, killed for their organs, etc.
Whether this man will weather the collapse of the USSR (in the USA) better than average is uncertain. This man has worked. He described selling cars 30 years ago. He has not much "contributed" to society, nor has he taken much "wealth" for his own use.
It seems like eugenicists and those at the levers of power would prefer to jettison such people, but he has not been much of a draw, and has not had children, so maybe his elimination doesn't merit any expense, either.
What is the "value" in human life?
We are considering the taking and giving of one person in the context of many human lives, which are all of the experiences of those lives, the "qualia", right?
This man related an experience-rich life. What is his contribution to Universal Consciousness?
The only "qualia" typically considered by power-people are what they feel and want, maybe the secondary consideration of how much people will suffer without attacking their system.
If each person has a "right" to live, how does society fund that "right" if the person is not self-sustaining, or sustained by family/friends?
In the collapse of the Soviet Union 10% of the Russian people died in 10 years. No economic value could be assigned to preserving the lives of the sick and elderly. Who lived? Who died?
We might look at the causes of death, rather than the relative merits of each life, which are harder for us to know at this great distance. Apparently "good" citizens and "bad" citizens died when the food and paychecks stopped coming.
In Canada they are now advocating euthanasia and also organ donation for those who choose to die, making it a "win-win" proposition for "society" and the organ donors, as they put it.
I personally think that we cannot judge the "value" of a lived human experience, but it is also inevitable that economic systems break and fail, and that people either die without help, or may live by helping each other directly sometimes.
Who do we choose to help when we do not quite have enough food for our own needs, and there are many who are worse off?
No answer is required. Hypothetical questions can be deceptive, but they are useful to consider.
"Who will he be tomorrow?"
He could reinvent himself again if he comes clean about who put him up to it.
He’s fluid don’t ya know.
His opinions he pontificates as facts, change with the money flow is my guess.
🙌 Very likely. He is going to be a doctor. He may as well get his knee pads broken in now.
The more I see of his posts and thoughts the more of an utter flake he becomes in my mind.
Great catch on the eugenics part.
There's a detailed discussion on my page in the pinned comment about him.
I also added some things to the end of it (I knew you'd appreciate him directly attacking you and other members of the Sweden conference).
My overall feeling is that the newsweek article was ghost written and he just signed off on it.
Right on. "Kevin N. Bass" is a Nom de Plume.
You don't get published in Newsweek if you're not elected to be part of the club. Vague tweets about eugenics fits. His genealogy might prove interesting. There's a reason the question "Who are your parents" used to be a regular inquiry after questionable behavior.
If they knew my Dad's brothers kids and grand kids, it would be a very apt question.
Obviously, I do not associate with that part of the family. My Aunt's children and grandchildren are very nice, good people.
Stockholm conference was called "Strategies", it wasn't called "science". I guess Kevin's handlers can't read :)
This guy has followers? What a joke. He's an idiot.
I think "influencer" is the job description these days. :-o
Dr Nass is going to be on WVOM -FM Radio (The Voice of Maine) tomorrow morning. * https://www.wvomfm.com/episode/ghrt-rewind-02-06-what-tees-you-off-1145 *. Let them know how the Medical quacks testifying against you got caught in their own lies /misrepresentations. We love you out here and are so grateful that Maine has at least 1 real doctor that isn't afraid of the Rockefeller Drug pushing so called "medical" establishment.
A firm "no amnesty." That way we don't have to deal with clowns (and possible 'assets') like this.
Dutch Citizens Cover Top News Agency Windows In Stickers Representing Deaths Caused By Covid Jabs
https://newspunch.com/dutch-citizens-cover-windows-of-top-news-agency-in-stickers-representing-deaths-caused-by-covid-jabs/
The hubris of the self proclaimed superior.
It's frightening how people who believe in eugenics will work in health care. The way I've seen it play out is that these doctors/nurses will quickly push extreme medical measures onto their patients.
The subsequent lives of the patients are severely inhibited, when instead a practitioner could have put in effort to heal them compassionately.
Just another fraud seeking attention 😙. Look at me, look at me!!! I am important!! I have purpose!! He defines the word, “A*SS-HOLE.”
Newsweek is a leftist rag 🤭. No one takes that non-journalist, “excuse for news” seriously 🙄.
I suppose you can gauge the quality of your enemies by the fodder they throw at you. No further comment on this guy 😆
Yes I agree, this is so true and perhaps a lesson for us all.
Interesting background on the guy. He offers no information about why he says ya’ll aren’t the serious scientific ones to listen to so why should anyone listen to him? No specifics equals no credibility in my book. Sounds like Dr. Horvitz has his number.
A propagandist yesterday, today and tomorrow. Words may change but the propaganda’s nature does not. The ultimate aim of propaganda is strategic in nature. Words change only due to tactical adjustments. Walking back the unsustainable narrative is a tactical adjustment.