Just a few tweets provides a lot of information. Thx again to A Midwestern Doctor for decoding his hogwash (or someone's hogwash with his name appended to it) for us.
Meryl- I blocked him years ago as he was a self promoting troll arguing against the Low Carb community. I found him just looking for attention and he writes before he thinks, otherwise he has little understanding of cordial relationships. I believe he got lambasted after he had a harsh comment about a low carb doc whose office burnt down. My guess is he found another way to gain attention. He should just be ignored.
I'd like to see a survey of people who believe in culling and or eugenics.
Every person close to me believes in Eugenics, even the ones who believe in the Bible, who cry over people suffering. One is on government aid, is against the covid vax and still feels people should be culled, that maybe this is all for the best.
I'm the only person I know who doesn't, aside from my son who cannot speak
You don't get published in Newsweek if you're not elected to be part of the club. Vague tweets about eugenics fits. His genealogy might prove interesting. There's a reason the question "Who are your parents" used to be a regular inquiry after questionable behavior.
Dr Nass is going to be on WVOM -FM Radio (The Voice of Maine) tomorrow morning. * https://www.wvomfm.com/episode/ghrt-rewind-02-06-what-tees-you-off-1145 *. Let them know how the Medical quacks testifying against you got caught in their own lies /misrepresentations. We love you out here and are so grateful that Maine has at least 1 real doctor that isn't afraid of the Rockefeller Drug pushing so called "medical" establishment.
It's frightening how people who believe in eugenics will work in health care. The way I've seen it play out is that these doctors/nurses will quickly push extreme medical measures onto their patients.
The subsequent lives of the patients are severely inhibited, when instead a practitioner could have put in effort to heal them compassionately.
Interesting background on the guy. He offers no information about why he says ya’ll aren’t the serious scientific ones to listen to so why should anyone listen to him? No specifics equals no credibility in my book. Sounds like Dr. Horvitz has his number.
A propagandist yesterday, today and tomorrow. Words may change but the propaganda’s nature does not. The ultimate aim of propaganda is strategic in nature. Words change only due to tactical adjustments. Walking back the unsustainable narrative is a tactical adjustment.
Meryl- I blocked him years ago as he was a self promoting troll arguing against the Low Carb community. I found him just looking for attention and he writes before he thinks, otherwise he has little understanding of cordial relationships. I believe he got lambasted after he had a harsh comment about a low carb doc whose office burnt down. My guess is he found another way to gain attention. He should just be ignored.
I'd like to see a survey of people who believe in culling and or eugenics.
Every person close to me believes in Eugenics, even the ones who believe in the Bible, who cry over people suffering. One is on government aid, is against the covid vax and still feels people should be culled, that maybe this is all for the best.
I'm the only person I know who doesn't, aside from my son who cannot speak
"Who will he be tomorrow?"
He could reinvent himself again if he comes clean about who put him up to it.
Great catch on the eugenics part.
There's a detailed discussion on my page in the pinned comment about him.
I also added some things to the end of it (I knew you'd appreciate him directly attacking you and other members of the Sweden conference).
My overall feeling is that the newsweek article was ghost written and he just signed off on it.
You don't get published in Newsweek if you're not elected to be part of the club. Vague tweets about eugenics fits. His genealogy might prove interesting. There's a reason the question "Who are your parents" used to be a regular inquiry after questionable behavior.
Stockholm conference was called "Strategies", it wasn't called "science". I guess Kevin's handlers can't read :)
This guy has followers? What a joke. He's an idiot.
Dr Nass is going to be on WVOM -FM Radio (The Voice of Maine) tomorrow morning. * https://www.wvomfm.com/episode/ghrt-rewind-02-06-what-tees-you-off-1145 *. Let them know how the Medical quacks testifying against you got caught in their own lies /misrepresentations. We love you out here and are so grateful that Maine has at least 1 real doctor that isn't afraid of the Rockefeller Drug pushing so called "medical" establishment.
A firm "no amnesty." That way we don't have to deal with clowns (and possible 'assets') like this.
Dutch Citizens Cover Top News Agency Windows In Stickers Representing Deaths Caused By Covid Jabs
https://newspunch.com/dutch-citizens-cover-windows-of-top-news-agency-in-stickers-representing-deaths-caused-by-covid-jabs/
The hubris of the self proclaimed superior.
It's frightening how people who believe in eugenics will work in health care. The way I've seen it play out is that these doctors/nurses will quickly push extreme medical measures onto their patients.
The subsequent lives of the patients are severely inhibited, when instead a practitioner could have put in effort to heal them compassionately.
Just another fraud seeking attention 😙. Look at me, look at me!!! I am important!! I have purpose!! He defines the word, “A*SS-HOLE.”
Newsweek is a leftist rag 🤭. No one takes that non-journalist, “excuse for news” seriously 🙄.
I suppose you can gauge the quality of your enemies by the fodder they throw at you. No further comment on this guy 😆
Interesting background on the guy. He offers no information about why he says ya’ll aren’t the serious scientific ones to listen to so why should anyone listen to him? No specifics equals no credibility in my book. Sounds like Dr. Horvitz has his number.
A propagandist yesterday, today and tomorrow. Words may change but the propaganda’s nature does not. The ultimate aim of propaganda is strategic in nature. Words change only due to tactical adjustments. Walking back the unsustainable narrative is a tactical adjustment.