How can it be that not one Democrat, or Independent, joined these 17 Senators? Not one Democratic Senator cares about sovereignty. Not one. The Senate is where every state has an equal number of votes. It represents not the population, but the nation of equal states. No treaty should be effectuated with out approval of the Senate. We are off our rocker!
Because Big Pharma and lobbyists fund their PACs (Left and Right), and they are the cabal who are really controlling WHO (along with Gates Jnr)
Corruption will be their end because when evil takes over it won’t require representatives for the people any longer. Democracy will be a dream of the past.
No treaty to give up our sovereignty and freedoms should ever be considered or voted on. Under this bill, it appears that even if there was a vote in Congress, WHO could still take over our medical system.
Meryl....this just could backfire big time. With the Democrats in the majority the Senate would surely pass the treaty and not pass this bill. I would be better if the House would defund the WHO, WEF and the UN. They need to hold out until all funds for these organizations is stricken from the budget. There is already legislation in the House to defund the WHO and the WEF. Rep. Rogers also had legislation last year (HR7806) to get the US out of the UN. He is supposedly going to submit the same legislation this year but we do have legislation to defund the WHO and the WEF. Even if the Senate, by some miracle, passes this bill Biden will never sign it. Sen. Johnson is not a dumb man and he knows this. When Congress tries to pass bills they KNOW cannot get passed or signed by the President it smells of a campaign ploy.
It also draws publicity to the issue. This is a big issue, and forcing Congressmembers to actually say which way they stand could be very important, in terms of their reelection.
Furthermore, oftimes the House and Senate figure out how to make different bills align sufficiently for passage of something meaningful.
I think the way to win is public education--no member will want to be seen to sell out his constituents.
If elections were not corrupt I would agree but these politicians know we have selections not elections and surest way for them to lose is to buck the system.
Nope not this time. They are on board this time. A little $$$$ and some arm twisting works miracles to change people's minds. Here is a list of the countries that submitted amendments to the IHR: Sixteen States Parties, including 4 on behalf of four different groups of states, i.e. European Union (EU), WHO Africa Region Member States, Eurasian Economic Union, and MERCOSUR (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) have submitted amendment proposals. These are Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Czech Republic on behalf of the Member States of the EU, Eswatini on behalf the WHO African Region Member States, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Namibia, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation on behalf of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union, Switzerland, the United States of America, and Uruguay on behalf of MERCOSUR. All the proposed amendments are publicly available except for the proposals from Japan.
The US must exit the WHO entirely. There is nothing good that can come from being affiliated with it. It's past time to embrace the philosophy of subsidiarity, meaning, whatever can be dealt with at the local level should be. Virtually nothing should be relegated to the international sphere. The past 3 years have proven the superiority of local control. When DJT, by sleight of hand, stopped funding the WHO, he transferred the payments to GAVI which served as a pass-through to WHO, thereby preserving their funding. Americans of good will must demand their government stops any and all affiliation with the WHO.
The sad part is our local and state governments have become addicted on the federal handouts and do as they are told so as not to forfeit one penny of federal money. No the power is in WE THE PEOPLE and again sadly most of them are looking for the handout too. It will take a dedicated majority of the people to make the difference. It has come to that in this country.
Only 2 likes which portends great global tribulation in my estimation. The old adage, "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" seems extremely relevant.
Many have been brainwashed over the years to think the WHO and the UN are our friends. Nothing could be further from the truth. The UN was NEVER meant to be our friend. They were created to destroy the US from the very start. And they will use health to do it. It the amendments to the IHR and the pandemic treaty get passed its over. IHR are already international law and the treaty can be passed without the Senate. IHR was passed without one vote from Congress. They always find a way. Many countries are in full support because they all think they are going to get a boat load of money from of course the US. Last year just the US tried to pass 13 amendment changes to the IHR. As we speak we see 16 countries and several groupings of countries (Ie EU, African nations) submitting tons of amendment changes that will in essence change most of the current IHR (International Health Regulations) Digital ID, no choice all will be mandated, the WHO can call an emergency if the leaves turn brown in autumn and much more. This will be a total loss of sovereignty. Funny, it was Africa that stopped the amendments last year and now they have bought in......I wonder why $$$. These actions are extremely dangerous but people are too distracted by things that are not important.
We need to get OUT of having America-hating traitors run our country! Stolen elections have consequences! A dumbed-down, Left-wing-educated and propagandized electorate that voted-in Commie-Demonrat "progressive" candidates that then took control of running our elections was the actual "final nail in our coffin".
Yes I know. But they will never get passed either. HR7806 from 2022 (Rep. Rogers) needs to be resubmitted but so far he has not done so I have been in contact with his office. The Defund Davos bill and Defund the WHO may get passed in the House but they will never get passed in the Senate and again if by some miracle they do Biden will veto them. This Congress needs to spend the next 2 years impeaching everyone they can and doing REAL investigation. The House could also hold Congress hostage by refusing to pass a debt ceiling increase until all funding for the UN, all affiliate agencies of the UN, WEF, WHO is removed. Now THAT just might really make a difference.
Congress attempts to pass bills for many reasons: 1) Most bills start out as test drives to be rewritten several times as officials debate the language and the issues which become clearer only through the process of inclusion of all voices; 2) When a roll call vote will be called, officials are more likely to go on record listing agreement and disagreement areas to be able to convince their voters of their actual position; 3) The roll call vote makes elected officials accountable for what they promised their voters on the campaign trail before getting elected. This process increases transparency, which is always a good quality.
Congress never knows if it can get a bill passed or signed until it tries to do that, as we've repeatedly watched through the decades the type of negotiations and other strategies used to get a bill passed. Nobody knows if a bill can get passed until they start to work on it. However, if one does not put the bill into writing, the formal debate to frame the issue with actual words on paper hasn't seriously started to do its work until language can be pointed to in a bill as the working draft that can be changed and perfected to bring enough on board to vote for the bill.
Senator Johnson's bill does not conflict or overstep 'defunding' legislation bills which are different and which may need refinements. The bill that expressly identifies that defunding will not become applicable until 2 years after it goes into law needs refinement in my opinion. An institution that does not respect the rights of individuals as sovereign over their bodies and medical choices pertaining to their Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness should not be supported with the hard-earned taxes of a nation that values these things as its top priority.
Senator Johnson's bill is perfect. It simply re-states the basic power that the Senate will not give up to ratify treaties, which is its unique job. It is restating its job and authority source, reminding everyone of the Senate's powers given to it by the US Constitution. In a mature and rational US Senate full of distinguished US Senators that position should not be controversial at all, as it is restating what already exists, what already is not controversial, what has been the way of the Senate since its founding. It should be bipartisan in a rational world, and the Senate is supposed to be deliberative, which means logical and rational with great consideration from every viewpoint.
Senator Johnson's bill should be quickly approved of by all Senators, as it is assumed we have distinguished deliberative and rational Senators, when the Senate truly recognizes its own best interests to not give away its powers. This bill isn't about the WHO. This bill is to protect the Senate from encroachment and overreach by others, specifically the WHO. This concept is perfect from my view as a political scientist, and any language changes that align with this concept would be rational.
In fact, from my viewpoint, anyone who refuses to vote yes on this bill will actually be showing the world in this way that their oath of office to put the US Constitution as first and foremost in priority is insincere, creating a significant ethics problem. Any public wavering about the sincerity and trustworthiness of a Senator's oath of office becomes very dangerous ground for any Senator to tread. Given each Senator's ability to serve the Senate and take one's Senatorial seat had a required prerequisite involving one's sworn a duty to protect and uphold the US Constitution as one's highest duty of that very office.
Each branch of Congress was given the power from the US Constitution to police its own members for ethics.
As a political scientist, I would view that any possible blatant refusal to support the US Constitution's separation of powers given expressly to the Senate and to its branch as part of Congress would be the greatest grounds for impeachment or removal from office on the grounds of ethics that can be enforced by one's peers--the other Senators. This occurs to the extent that any US Senator violates one's oath of office which promises by this sworn oath that in this job as Senator the highest duty will always be to respect and prioritize the US Constitution as the highest law, which surely includes the power of the Senate to ratify, alter, or reject treaties based upon their respect and prioritization of the US Constitution.
In the Senate, reclaiming the Senate's power should be natural and without controversy, if we have sane, rational, and logical Senators that have sworn a binding oath of office to prioritize the US Constitution as the highest law of the land.
I'm not going to get into the inconsistencies perceived about health, medical, and wellness freedoms of choice over one's body, after I state the basic right to freedom of choice specifically over one's Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness is inalienable granted by one's Creator, and that right existed before government was formed to protect that very primary inalienable right. Informed medical consent contains the right to access to all the data to analyze the advantages and disadvantages as well as the right refuse to comply. Having exemption documents is merely formalizing one's inalienable right to these choices, endowed by one's Creator, and that does not give anybody else the right to pushback these rights with personal judgment over anybody's inalienable choices. All citizens in the USA have the status of an equal among equals, and that status includes the richest and poorest, the most popular and the most unpopular. The issue is consistency of values where all individuals have the right to make free and unfettered choices over the broadest ranges of medical, health, wellness, and pursuit of happiness decisions that were given to all persons to be inalienably endowed by their Creator for nobody else to decide or judge for them without their consent.
Moreover this right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness is expressly endowed upon all persons to be inalienable by their Creator, and that right remains primary to each person in a way that cannot be separated from each individual. This right does not transfer away from each person, and this right is reserved for each person and is not included in the personal transfer of power through each citizen's vote for elected officials to form each new government because that power of individual choice is reserved to the individual's freedom of choices.
I would like to see confirmation that each US Senator has not become disloyal in some way to the oath sworn to protect the Constitution. I would like to see this vote taken with a roll call vote to be on each US Senator's record of office accountability for upholding the Founding documents--Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights--as the highest law of this land.
yes I am aware of how it works. The bill will never get passed and if it does Biden will never sign it. If they want the treaty passed it will pass with or without the Senate. The IHR was never voted on in Congress and they are internationally binding. Where there is a will there is always a way with these evil sociopaths.
Yes I know that. Even more reason it will never pass and Johnson knows it. AND there are several ways to pass a treaty and it does not always take a Senate vote. That is how the original IHR got passed. No Congressional vote at all. currently there are two processes taking place and if the IHR amendments get passed they will pretty much do the same thing as the treaty. Johnson is giving people false hope. Believe me there will be Republicans that would vote for the treaty especially if there is $$$$$ involved.
Exactly--what they want is for it to go quietly through without a vote (IHR amendments) but if everyone knows what is going on, they won't be able to let that happen. It would be a career-ending move and they know that.
The bill itself will never get passed. And if they want this treaty passed it will be passed with our without the Senate. I believe what Johnson is doing is a distraction away from the IHR Amendments. The WHO meets on Feb. 20-24 to again work on the amendments which will do the job should the treaty not get passed. I believe the amendments is what they really want and the treaty is a just a distraction. The WHO meets again on Feb. 27-Mar. 3 to work on the Zero Draft of the treaty (CA+).
Any state that is serious must consider separation if the WHO treaty or IHR's pass as expected. Nullification is probably not enough, should that transpire. If it does, each state should vote for total separation by referendum. This is where the rubber meets the road.
Oh right like our state leadership isn't on the federal take. They will not do anything if it would interfere with their federal hand outs. The House could easily end this but they have no intention but making it look like they are on our side. No debt ceiling increase until ALL funding to the UN, it affiliates, WEF and WHO is ended. It is a start. The IHR is legally binding and not one vote from Congress made it happen. There are ways they can do all.of this, make it legally binding wether the Senate votes for it or not. Cutting off all funding is the best we can do right now.
Every Democrat voting against this would be identified as a traitor and WHO lackey, giving away our rights to a corrupt WHO. We'll have to see how the voting goes.
Do you really think they care? Look at what they have done so far. They know is they follow the agenda their next election is solid in their favor. We now have selections not elections and this is why the Democrats are not worried about being replaced. There is no way the Rs did not take the majority in the Senate and a huge majority in the House but rigged selections are the reason why it did not happen. So lets say the House and Senate both pass this bill......do you REALLY think Biden will be allowed to sign it into law? It is time for a reality check Duane.
Sure it could be a dead end, but it helps illustrate those in favor of tyranny and injustice. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. There are positive steps under way to address the election fraud, but a long way to go.
I agree it does bring attention to an issue that most people do not even know exists but this bill is not being covered ANYWHERE. Not FOX and not even Steve Bannon and this is not the first year he submitted this bill. Makes ya wonder doesn't it??? So how many uninformed are really going to know about it?? Still think there are better more advantageous ways to address this situation that just might actually have a positive outcome. The House has the ability to END funding to the UN, WHO, WEF but they do not have to guts to do it. We need statesmen in office not politicians.
Most Republicans are cowards, pussies, and wimps. The House should be impeaching Biden right now for opening the border, killing thousands of Americans with fentanyl, attacking our essential energy sector, and for implementing illegal vaccine mandates.
This may well boil down to our individual state legislators being the only shield we have against this.
The main problem resides in the fact that the criminals will crash the financial payment/banking systems and force us into a programmable digital currency. Once that happens they can turn our entire money access off and force us into a die or comply situation. I expect them to do exactly this sooner or later because they will NOT stop.
That IS exactly their plan! The only chance we have is enough people waking up to what the demon-creatures are who actually run the world, and to STOP COMPLYING with their AI-takeover nonsense!
AI will allow them to distance themselves from decisions on health care, law, etc . Blame it on the AI. Don’t ya love calling to reach a “human” to resolve a problem and you go through an AI asking you dumb questions for 20 mins!
Imagine when you have a SERIOUS problem and have that happening.
I cannot believe we are living this insanity. What happened to our world!
I saw the Idaho Bill and I have always been torn in two directions when it comes to creating legislation in situations where we already have laws that protect us.
Without any new laws/bills we already have the right not to be coerced into medical procedures.
My fear is that if we create NEW laws to protect us that the public will forget that we are already lawfully protected, and if these new laws are repealed/overturned in the future, the public will think that NEW law was the end all be all and cave into compliance.
I'm more in favor of standing the legal ground we already have, because if we don't, it will become forgotten.
Our criminal government and Federal agencies do not and will not obey the Constitution and laws. That's what criminals do— commit crimes! Refusing to uphold one's Oath of Office is a crime. Refusing to uphold the Constitution is a crime. Refusing to obey laws is—duh— a crime! But when Soros-elected District Attorneys, a corrupt FBI, DOJ, etc. are running our criminal justice system, AND there is a traitor in the White House, and plenty more in Congress, AND the Supreme Court won't take cases of importance regarding stolen elections and traitors in government violating their Oaths, we as a country are basically "down the tubes". It will take a miracle to reverse our situation now. The Globalists really planned this out well, and have us in near "check-mate" because too many good people were oblivious to what they have been doing. But they are evil and more stupid than they want to admit. They have made a lot of miscalculations because they ARE fundamentally stupid — after all, serving evil is about as ignorant and stupid as you can get!
You are fundamentally correct that the States have more power than the federal government, but most of them yield to the federal government to get federally-collected tax monies. The answer revolves around tax collection, around the power of the Federal Reserve, and the power to print money, and making centralization of banking illegal. Do you think the Progressives, Libertarians, Democrats, and Greens like surveillance and control over their money? In 2020 US Rep Mark Pocan leading the Progressive Caucus joined together with Trump Republicans to defeat the Patriot Act and to not renew it. This was major, but perhaps this Patriot Act has just been replaced with worst, more insidieous privacy violations of innocents.
Applauding Dr Nass in this fight! Thanks for continuing to inform us of the WHO machinations. It is Unconscionable that Biden and his cronies DRaFTED the illegal and anti-US sovereignty language that was debated in May 2022 and is still apparently being pushed. Thank you to Ron Johnson.
Is this getting too technical and complicated - surely people should take the view that their inalienable rights under the constitution are being ridden over rough-shod.
I celebrate and express my gratitude to those who, no matter how small a step it may seem to others, stand for America. Thank you, may God bless each and every one of you.
Why not just write a bill that rejects it outright as unconstitutional and simply affirms why it cannot even be considered? Why do they have to water this down with "only with Senate approval"? Weak and dangerous.
I’m glad to know this effort is being made; however, the dems control the Senate, and a bill must be signed by the President, who won’t sign it, so I don’t see this going far enough unless there is bi-partisan support.
Defunding the WHO and getting out of the WHO are mutually exclusive, that is, two different things. Even if the bill passed and made it past the tricks the president could use to make it look like not a veto, defunding does not solve the problem with the UN and the WHO. We would still be under the authority of the WHO treaty.
Most of us cannot begin to understand all the angles and tricks that our many Deep-State politicians have up their sleeve. I identify the name of all those Rs going along with this as what are referred to as RINOs. I have noticed many of the old Republican congress members that I had written off about 30 years ago as working against USA national sovereignty and the Constitution coming out of the woodwork now like they really care about sovereignty and the Constitution, and subtly using the "pandemic" and "COVID-19" so as to “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”
I have already posted how Trump got the USA officially out of the USA and then two months later gave 1.16 billion taxpayer dollars to Bill Gates' GAVI foundation, so that was some kind of political trick too.
So tired of all D and R political theater and tricks.
How can it be that not one Democrat, or Independent, joined these 17 Senators? Not one Democratic Senator cares about sovereignty. Not one. The Senate is where every state has an equal number of votes. It represents not the population, but the nation of equal states. No treaty should be effectuated with out approval of the Senate. We are off our rocker!
How can it be that only 17 R senators signed onto this?
Because Big Pharma and lobbyists fund their PACs (Left and Right), and they are the cabal who are really controlling WHO (along with Gates Jnr)
Corruption will be their end because when evil takes over it won’t require representatives for the people any longer. Democracy will be a dream of the past.
They are thinking so short term.
Agreed. Plus they are shifting all children vaxxes to MRNA platform, so their children will be dead, sterilized or disabled
Right.
As the anonymous JFK Papers Insider told Tucker recently: It’s all fake!
No treaty to give up our sovereignty and freedoms should ever be considered or voted on. Under this bill, it appears that even if there was a vote in Congress, WHO could still take over our medical system.
❤
How can it be? All Democratic Congressmen are part of The Cult:
https://sashastone.substack.com/p/did-i-just-leave-a-cult
Meryl....this just could backfire big time. With the Democrats in the majority the Senate would surely pass the treaty and not pass this bill. I would be better if the House would defund the WHO, WEF and the UN. They need to hold out until all funds for these organizations is stricken from the budget. There is already legislation in the House to defund the WHO and the WEF. Rep. Rogers also had legislation last year (HR7806) to get the US out of the UN. He is supposedly going to submit the same legislation this year but we do have legislation to defund the WHO and the WEF. Even if the Senate, by some miracle, passes this bill Biden will never sign it. Sen. Johnson is not a dumb man and he knows this. When Congress tries to pass bills they KNOW cannot get passed or signed by the President it smells of a campaign ploy.
It also draws publicity to the issue. This is a big issue, and forcing Congressmembers to actually say which way they stand could be very important, in terms of their reelection.
Furthermore, oftimes the House and Senate figure out how to make different bills align sufficiently for passage of something meaningful.
I think the way to win is public education--no member will want to be seen to sell out his constituents.
If elections were not corrupt I would agree but these politicians know we have selections not elections and surest way for them to lose is to buck the system.
Absolutely!! It failed the last time due to the African nations saying NO! I hope they are back and strong once more!
Nope not this time. They are on board this time. A little $$$$ and some arm twisting works miracles to change people's minds. Here is a list of the countries that submitted amendments to the IHR: Sixteen States Parties, including 4 on behalf of four different groups of states, i.e. European Union (EU), WHO Africa Region Member States, Eurasian Economic Union, and MERCOSUR (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) have submitted amendment proposals. These are Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Czech Republic on behalf of the Member States of the EU, Eswatini on behalf the WHO African Region Member States, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Namibia, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation on behalf of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union, Switzerland, the United States of America, and Uruguay on behalf of MERCOSUR. All the proposed amendments are publicly available except for the proposals from Japan.
The US must exit the WHO entirely. There is nothing good that can come from being affiliated with it. It's past time to embrace the philosophy of subsidiarity, meaning, whatever can be dealt with at the local level should be. Virtually nothing should be relegated to the international sphere. The past 3 years have proven the superiority of local control. When DJT, by sleight of hand, stopped funding the WHO, he transferred the payments to GAVI which served as a pass-through to WHO, thereby preserving their funding. Americans of good will must demand their government stops any and all affiliation with the WHO.
The sad part is our local and state governments have become addicted on the federal handouts and do as they are told so as not to forfeit one penny of federal money. No the power is in WE THE PEOPLE and again sadly most of them are looking for the handout too. It will take a dedicated majority of the people to make the difference. It has come to that in this country.
Only 2 likes which portends great global tribulation in my estimation. The old adage, "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" seems extremely relevant.
Many have been brainwashed over the years to think the WHO and the UN are our friends. Nothing could be further from the truth. The UN was NEVER meant to be our friend. They were created to destroy the US from the very start. And they will use health to do it. It the amendments to the IHR and the pandemic treaty get passed its over. IHR are already international law and the treaty can be passed without the Senate. IHR was passed without one vote from Congress. They always find a way. Many countries are in full support because they all think they are going to get a boat load of money from of course the US. Last year just the US tried to pass 13 amendment changes to the IHR. As we speak we see 16 countries and several groupings of countries (Ie EU, African nations) submitting tons of amendment changes that will in essence change most of the current IHR (International Health Regulations) Digital ID, no choice all will be mandated, the WHO can call an emergency if the leaves turn brown in autumn and much more. This will be a total loss of sovereignty. Funny, it was Africa that stopped the amendments last year and now they have bought in......I wonder why $$$. These actions are extremely dangerous but people are too distracted by things that are not important.
Yes we need to get out of the WHO!!
We need to get OUT of having America-hating traitors run our country! Stolen elections have consequences! A dumbed-down, Left-wing-educated and propagandized electorate that voted-in Commie-Demonrat "progressive" candidates that then took control of running our elections was the actual "final nail in our coffin".
There are bills to do that, too in the House.
Yes I know. But they will never get passed either. HR7806 from 2022 (Rep. Rogers) needs to be resubmitted but so far he has not done so I have been in contact with his office. The Defund Davos bill and Defund the WHO may get passed in the House but they will never get passed in the Senate and again if by some miracle they do Biden will veto them. This Congress needs to spend the next 2 years impeaching everyone they can and doing REAL investigation. The House could also hold Congress hostage by refusing to pass a debt ceiling increase until all funding for the UN, all affiliate agencies of the UN, WEF, WHO is removed. Now THAT just might really make a difference.
You clearly understand the situation.. Americans must wake up and to it fast.
Congress attempts to pass bills for many reasons: 1) Most bills start out as test drives to be rewritten several times as officials debate the language and the issues which become clearer only through the process of inclusion of all voices; 2) When a roll call vote will be called, officials are more likely to go on record listing agreement and disagreement areas to be able to convince their voters of their actual position; 3) The roll call vote makes elected officials accountable for what they promised their voters on the campaign trail before getting elected. This process increases transparency, which is always a good quality.
Congress never knows if it can get a bill passed or signed until it tries to do that, as we've repeatedly watched through the decades the type of negotiations and other strategies used to get a bill passed. Nobody knows if a bill can get passed until they start to work on it. However, if one does not put the bill into writing, the formal debate to frame the issue with actual words on paper hasn't seriously started to do its work until language can be pointed to in a bill as the working draft that can be changed and perfected to bring enough on board to vote for the bill.
Senator Johnson's bill does not conflict or overstep 'defunding' legislation bills which are different and which may need refinements. The bill that expressly identifies that defunding will not become applicable until 2 years after it goes into law needs refinement in my opinion. An institution that does not respect the rights of individuals as sovereign over their bodies and medical choices pertaining to their Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness should not be supported with the hard-earned taxes of a nation that values these things as its top priority.
Senator Johnson's bill is perfect. It simply re-states the basic power that the Senate will not give up to ratify treaties, which is its unique job. It is restating its job and authority source, reminding everyone of the Senate's powers given to it by the US Constitution. In a mature and rational US Senate full of distinguished US Senators that position should not be controversial at all, as it is restating what already exists, what already is not controversial, what has been the way of the Senate since its founding. It should be bipartisan in a rational world, and the Senate is supposed to be deliberative, which means logical and rational with great consideration from every viewpoint.
Senator Johnson's bill should be quickly approved of by all Senators, as it is assumed we have distinguished deliberative and rational Senators, when the Senate truly recognizes its own best interests to not give away its powers. This bill isn't about the WHO. This bill is to protect the Senate from encroachment and overreach by others, specifically the WHO. This concept is perfect from my view as a political scientist, and any language changes that align with this concept would be rational.
In fact, from my viewpoint, anyone who refuses to vote yes on this bill will actually be showing the world in this way that their oath of office to put the US Constitution as first and foremost in priority is insincere, creating a significant ethics problem. Any public wavering about the sincerity and trustworthiness of a Senator's oath of office becomes very dangerous ground for any Senator to tread. Given each Senator's ability to serve the Senate and take one's Senatorial seat had a required prerequisite involving one's sworn a duty to protect and uphold the US Constitution as one's highest duty of that very office.
Each branch of Congress was given the power from the US Constitution to police its own members for ethics.
As a political scientist, I would view that any possible blatant refusal to support the US Constitution's separation of powers given expressly to the Senate and to its branch as part of Congress would be the greatest grounds for impeachment or removal from office on the grounds of ethics that can be enforced by one's peers--the other Senators. This occurs to the extent that any US Senator violates one's oath of office which promises by this sworn oath that in this job as Senator the highest duty will always be to respect and prioritize the US Constitution as the highest law, which surely includes the power of the Senate to ratify, alter, or reject treaties based upon their respect and prioritization of the US Constitution.
In the Senate, reclaiming the Senate's power should be natural and without controversy, if we have sane, rational, and logical Senators that have sworn a binding oath of office to prioritize the US Constitution as the highest law of the land.
I'm not going to get into the inconsistencies perceived about health, medical, and wellness freedoms of choice over one's body, after I state the basic right to freedom of choice specifically over one's Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness is inalienable granted by one's Creator, and that right existed before government was formed to protect that very primary inalienable right. Informed medical consent contains the right to access to all the data to analyze the advantages and disadvantages as well as the right refuse to comply. Having exemption documents is merely formalizing one's inalienable right to these choices, endowed by one's Creator, and that does not give anybody else the right to pushback these rights with personal judgment over anybody's inalienable choices. All citizens in the USA have the status of an equal among equals, and that status includes the richest and poorest, the most popular and the most unpopular. The issue is consistency of values where all individuals have the right to make free and unfettered choices over the broadest ranges of medical, health, wellness, and pursuit of happiness decisions that were given to all persons to be inalienably endowed by their Creator for nobody else to decide or judge for them without their consent.
Moreover this right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness is expressly endowed upon all persons to be inalienable by their Creator, and that right remains primary to each person in a way that cannot be separated from each individual. This right does not transfer away from each person, and this right is reserved for each person and is not included in the personal transfer of power through each citizen's vote for elected officials to form each new government because that power of individual choice is reserved to the individual's freedom of choices.
I would like to see confirmation that each US Senator has not become disloyal in some way to the oath sworn to protect the Constitution. I would like to see this vote taken with a roll call vote to be on each US Senator's record of office accountability for upholding the Founding documents--Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights--as the highest law of this land.
Amen.
Takes 2/3 vote
https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/treaties.htm
This bill takes a majority. The ratification takes a supermajority--67 votes
yes I am aware of how it works. The bill will never get passed and if it does Biden will never sign it. If they want the treaty passed it will pass with or without the Senate. The IHR was never voted on in Congress and they are internationally binding. Where there is a will there is always a way with these evil sociopaths.
You are correct. Global psychopaths infiltrated virtually all governments.
Yes I know that. Even more reason it will never pass and Johnson knows it. AND there are several ways to pass a treaty and it does not always take a Senate vote. That is how the original IHR got passed. No Congressional vote at all. currently there are two processes taking place and if the IHR amendments get passed they will pretty much do the same thing as the treaty. Johnson is giving people false hope. Believe me there will be Republicans that would vote for the treaty especially if there is $$$$$ involved.
Exactly--what they want is for it to go quietly through without a vote (IHR amendments) but if everyone knows what is going on, they won't be able to let that happen. It would be a career-ending move and they know that.
Which is why I urged the ET to write about it.
Ok, some don't know the process.
I don't think it could get 2/3 of the votes, which is why there won't be a vote.
The bill itself will never get passed. And if they want this treaty passed it will be passed with our without the Senate. I believe what Johnson is doing is a distraction away from the IHR Amendments. The WHO meets on Feb. 20-24 to again work on the amendments which will do the job should the treaty not get passed. I believe the amendments is what they really want and the treaty is a just a distraction. The WHO meets again on Feb. 27-Mar. 3 to work on the Zero Draft of the treaty (CA+).
Any state that is serious must consider separation if the WHO treaty or IHR's pass as expected. Nullification is probably not enough, should that transpire. If it does, each state should vote for total separation by referendum. This is where the rubber meets the road.
Oh right like our state leadership isn't on the federal take. They will not do anything if it would interfere with their federal hand outs. The House could easily end this but they have no intention but making it look like they are on our side. No debt ceiling increase until ALL funding to the UN, it affiliates, WEF and WHO is ended. It is a start. The IHR is legally binding and not one vote from Congress made it happen. There are ways they can do all.of this, make it legally binding wether the Senate votes for it or not. Cutting off all funding is the best we can do right now.
Every Democrat voting against this would be identified as a traitor and WHO lackey, giving away our rights to a corrupt WHO. We'll have to see how the voting goes.
Do you really think they care? Look at what they have done so far. They know is they follow the agenda their next election is solid in their favor. We now have selections not elections and this is why the Democrats are not worried about being replaced. There is no way the Rs did not take the majority in the Senate and a huge majority in the House but rigged selections are the reason why it did not happen. So lets say the House and Senate both pass this bill......do you REALLY think Biden will be allowed to sign it into law? It is time for a reality check Duane.
They clearly don't. RINO's and Dems are controlled. Each state must start making plans to enact subsidiarity. It's way past time.
Sure it could be a dead end, but it helps illustrate those in favor of tyranny and injustice. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. There are positive steps under way to address the election fraud, but a long way to go.
I agree it does bring attention to an issue that most people do not even know exists but this bill is not being covered ANYWHERE. Not FOX and not even Steve Bannon and this is not the first year he submitted this bill. Makes ya wonder doesn't it??? So how many uninformed are really going to know about it?? Still think there are better more advantageous ways to address this situation that just might actually have a positive outcome. The House has the ability to END funding to the UN, WHO, WEF but they do not have to guts to do it. We need statesmen in office not politicians.
Most Republicans are cowards, pussies, and wimps. The House should be impeaching Biden right now for opening the border, killing thousands of Americans with fentanyl, attacking our essential energy sector, and for implementing illegal vaccine mandates.
This may well boil down to our individual state legislators being the only shield we have against this.
The main problem resides in the fact that the criminals will crash the financial payment/banking systems and force us into a programmable digital currency. Once that happens they can turn our entire money access off and force us into a die or comply situation. I expect them to do exactly this sooner or later because they will NOT stop.
Exactly! And we know a Cyberattack is on the way to make sure this plan is fulfilled.
Yep. We are going to get Cyber Polygon and I feel sure of that.
That IS exactly their plan! The only chance we have is enough people waking up to what the demon-creatures are who actually run the world, and to STOP COMPLYING with their AI-takeover nonsense!
AI will allow them to distance themselves from decisions on health care, law, etc . Blame it on the AI. Don’t ya love calling to reach a “human” to resolve a problem and you go through an AI asking you dumb questions for 20 mins!
Imagine when you have a SERIOUS problem and have that happening.
I cannot believe we are living this insanity. What happened to our world!
Is this what you are referring to, or did you have something else in mind as it relates to WHO and WEF?
https://thekylebecker.substack.com/p/groundbreaking-new-bill-would-make
I saw the Idaho Bill and I have always been torn in two directions when it comes to creating legislation in situations where we already have laws that protect us.
Without any new laws/bills we already have the right not to be coerced into medical procedures.
My fear is that if we create NEW laws to protect us that the public will forget that we are already lawfully protected, and if these new laws are repealed/overturned in the future, the public will think that NEW law was the end all be all and cave into compliance.
I'm more in favor of standing the legal ground we already have, because if we don't, it will become forgotten.
The emergency laws took protections away. That has to be fixed, or goodbye constitution each time an emergency is declared.
Absolutely agree! Now THAT will be a REALLY worthwhile legal “VACCINE!”
Our criminal government and Federal agencies do not and will not obey the Constitution and laws. That's what criminals do— commit crimes! Refusing to uphold one's Oath of Office is a crime. Refusing to uphold the Constitution is a crime. Refusing to obey laws is—duh— a crime! But when Soros-elected District Attorneys, a corrupt FBI, DOJ, etc. are running our criminal justice system, AND there is a traitor in the White House, and plenty more in Congress, AND the Supreme Court won't take cases of importance regarding stolen elections and traitors in government violating their Oaths, we as a country are basically "down the tubes". It will take a miracle to reverse our situation now. The Globalists really planned this out well, and have us in near "check-mate" because too many good people were oblivious to what they have been doing. But they are evil and more stupid than they want to admit. They have made a lot of miscalculations because they ARE fundamentally stupid — after all, serving evil is about as ignorant and stupid as you can get!
Well said!
Agree. There are also a number of other non-mRNA shots that have shown to cause harm. There is a broader issue at hand.
To Mike H,
You are fundamentally correct that the States have more power than the federal government, but most of them yield to the federal government to get federally-collected tax monies. The answer revolves around tax collection, around the power of the Federal Reserve, and the power to print money, and making centralization of banking illegal. Do you think the Progressives, Libertarians, Democrats, and Greens like surveillance and control over their money? In 2020 US Rep Mark Pocan leading the Progressive Caucus joined together with Trump Republicans to defeat the Patriot Act and to not renew it. This was major, but perhaps this Patriot Act has just been replaced with worst, more insidieous privacy violations of innocents.
Read the Founding documents for your answer and
Applauding Dr Nass in this fight! Thanks for continuing to inform us of the WHO machinations. It is Unconscionable that Biden and his cronies DRaFTED the illegal and anti-US sovereignty language that was debated in May 2022 and is still apparently being pushed. Thank you to Ron Johnson.
Mississippi’s Senators we missing so need to get on a call with them next week.
One of mine is too (Cornyn, Texas). I just emailed him.
Cornyn is a traitor and a globalist.
It is always good to know where people stand.
87 Senators stand against the Constitution and for tyranny.
Is this getting too technical and complicated - surely people should take the view that their inalienable rights under the constitution are being ridden over rough-shod.
I think its intentionally complicated. and intentionally prefaced with flowery language and vague, if any, definable terms.
Not one Democrat Senator wants to live past the next pandemic...weird ass people
I celebrate and express my gratitude to those who, no matter how small a step it may seem to others, stand for America. Thank you, may God bless each and every one of you.
Why not just write a bill that rejects it outright as unconstitutional and simply affirms why it cannot even be considered? Why do they have to water this down with "only with Senate approval"? Weak and dangerous.
You have to know how things work in Washington. If the bill is broad, it is much less likely to pass. You go for what is doable.
I don't like it, but this is how things get done.
I’m glad to know this effort is being made; however, the dems control the Senate, and a bill must be signed by the President, who won’t sign it, so I don’t see this going far enough unless there is bi-partisan support.
Defunding the WHO and getting out of the WHO are mutually exclusive, that is, two different things. Even if the bill passed and made it past the tricks the president could use to make it look like not a veto, defunding does not solve the problem with the UN and the WHO. We would still be under the authority of the WHO treaty.
Most of us cannot begin to understand all the angles and tricks that our many Deep-State politicians have up their sleeve. I identify the name of all those Rs going along with this as what are referred to as RINOs. I have noticed many of the old Republican congress members that I had written off about 30 years ago as working against USA national sovereignty and the Constitution coming out of the woodwork now like they really care about sovereignty and the Constitution, and subtly using the "pandemic" and "COVID-19" so as to “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”
I have already posted how Trump got the USA officially out of the USA and then two months later gave 1.16 billion taxpayer dollars to Bill Gates' GAVI foundation, so that was some kind of political trick too.
So tired of all D and R political theater and tricks.
Ron Johnson is the most courageous and honest member of the Senate. I pray for his success in this legislative endeavor.
Good article, however, l think the constant anti-China propaganda is wrong and damaging.
We seem to be using words like “ socialism”, and “communism” without any idea of their real meaning.
agree
Also, to add to my previous comment The WHO can get everything they want just by passing the amendments to the IHR. They really don't need the Treaty.
We are fighting both, and they are playing with us by running two scams simultaneously.
I am very aware of what is going on. I have worked with James Roguski since last year when we fought the first IHR amendment battle.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/dont-fall-for-the-decoy