35 Comments

A complete and utter waste of time and money.. Disband and defund the UN, WHO, WEF... then convene Nuremberg 2

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

I couldn't even finish reading all the download Dr. Nass.

It's such of crock of doodoo. Everything you highlight and underlined, I was saying outloud, "that's such a crock!!

The way they're so incredibly vague yet try to make everything sound like fairyland and the yellow brick road, except in this case it's the road to hell.

Thank you so much Dr. Nass for continuing to tackle these issues that are such a threat to all humanity and bringing them to us in such an easy manner to "see through." God bless you. You are a blessing to us all.

Expand full comment

Amen Mari-G...We must Put on the full Armor-of-God (AoG) so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the Devil. Because the SDG's are a method under a guise to implement to total control system - the Mystery Beast System

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

Thank you for this. Anything that disrupts the "rules-based order"; i.e. control of the world by billionaires, is verboten.

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

They make up the rules as they please, and everyone else is required to obey them.

Expand full comment

#39 'Addressing the risks to sustaining peace posed by' allowing free speech.

So which la la land do these idiots live in. Sustaining peace?

How can these jokers even propose to have a solution to any problem?

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

"Sustaining peace". The same guys who have started dozens of useless, murderous wars and right now are busily trying to start WW3 with Russia. These creeps have no self-awareness whatsoever.

Expand full comment
Sep 15·edited Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

The UN is no longer fit for purpose! The UN is now regarded by the world's population as OBSOLETE!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) We will rid ourselves of unelected tyrants and be free once more!

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

Action 2. We will place the eradication of poverty at the centre of our efforts to achieve the 2030 Agenda.

21. Eradicating poverty, in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is an imperative for all humankind. We decide to:

(a) Take comprehensive and targeted measures to eradicate poverty by addressing the multidimensional nature of poverty, including through rural development strategies and investments and innovations in the social sector, especially education and health.

(b) Take concrete actions to prevent people falling back into poverty, including by establishing well-designed, sustainable and efficient social protection systems for all that are responsive to shocks.

p.3

https://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2024/09/Pact-for-the-Future_Rev3_under-silence-until-3-September-13h00.pdf

Eradicate: erase, abolish, destroy, obliterate, exterminate, annihilate, expunge, extirpate.

Extirpate: Root out and destroy completely "the use of every legal measure to extirpate this horrible evil from the land"

Exterminate: destroy completely "after exterminating the entire population, the soldiers set fire to the buildings"

Eradicating poverty --- by investing in innovation, education [research] in health [disease]

It sounds fishy to me, and stinks.

Expand full comment

They can eradicate poverty by owning everything themselves. We will all become ubi renters. Voila! No one will own anything so no poverty. They will own everything so unfair ownership among the people they allow to survive will no longer exist! Poof no ownership by the peasants= no poverty! Problem solved.

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

I knew I was gonna hate the pact and I do w8th a passion.

Thank you Dr. Nass for wading through the word salad crap and translating it.

Scary as fuck, what they want to do.

Expand full comment

Thank You, Stalwart Warrior-Sister.

:-/

Expand full comment

Thanks for your precious time, experience and efforts for this distillation to save our time !!! ...

But for sure, you won't mind, if I still prefer the well aged, casked stuff 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
author

I try to create documents that will speak to a range of people. I am working on more ways to present this info.

Expand full comment

👍👍💪💪🌹🌹❤❤

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

Just a few observations.

There are lots of seemingly insurmountable problems and injustices in the world.

The UN "Pact for the Future" proposals and goals in which they say they will solve all these massive problems all over the world is a total fairy tale. If only it were so easy. The UN declaring they will solve them, in a short time without specific realistic strategies, would be laughable if the issues were not so serious and the real agenda not so evil.

We have to do our absolute best to address these problems. It is right that we should have international bodies to work towards their solution..

For any world body to make significant progress on these problems they would certainly need Massive buy-in by many countries and Massive funding. History tells us that it is possible to get significant voluntary buy-in to address many serious world problems. The UN is not looking to go down the voluntary route. The UN is proposing the mandatory route where they will have the power to compel compliance.

In setting up any body that will be given power and money it is necessary to build in safeguards keeping in mind the truism "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely". Democratic countries have over the years instituted checks and balances, laws and free courts in an effort to prevent corruption in Governments. Some have succeeded to some extent and many have failed miserably.

The UN as envisaged by "Pact for the future" would have a bigger role than any individual country, a bigger budget than any country and a bigger Government. It would however be without the electoral mandate of democratic Governments, the checks and balances of democratic countries and no free court that they could be brought to to achieve justice. A recipe for corruption certainly but corruption would be the least of the problems the people of the world would have to deal with.

John

Expand full comment
Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

One of the recognizable terms signifying "corporate ownership involved" is "rules based" - at 24. This term, meaning "to be enforced by us, your owners" is meant to silently replace the term "according to international law" which (also) was abandoned by that ownership long ago.

Extensively explained (= long article) in

https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/484925448.pdf

Nobody would object to "international law based" as that would imply voting per country and before that, intensive discussions IOW exactly what "self-proclaimed owners" try to avoid at all costs, irrespective the loss of lives and damage to the environment.

Expand full comment

Excellent work as always, TYVM 🤝

Expand full comment

Nope.

Expand full comment

They can't even get Israel and Palestine to get along, let alone the entire world.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your effort to prepare these slides. Very helpful!

Expand full comment

"23. (i) Promote inclusive and effective International Tax Cooperation": Thievery, by extortion or intimidation of everybody everywhere; as in the classic Mafia Protection Racket.

Expand full comment