Thank you Meryl for bringing this to your readership.
For readers of Meryl's Newsletter, I am encouraged by the comments here. A mutual friend introduced me to Meryl in October 2020, and she quickly brought me up to speed on a number of Covid topics. I was already deeply suspicious of the Pandemic response because unlike many of my physician colleagues, I didn't suffer from the "they would never do such bad things" delusion. This is chiefly due to my research into 9/11.
Though I have made some modest contributions around exposing the distortion of science and media around the plandemic, Meryl knows that my focus of interest is around the 9/11 deception. I was excited when she asked me to be on her CHD.TV segment to talk about 9/11. The result was the YouTube video in the article.
After careful consideration, CHD decided to not air the interview as it was felt to be outside the organization's present scope of interest. I can understand that. To their credit they gave us the freedom to do what we wanted with the final product. So to let you all know, Meryl did not hesitate to bring this to you on her own platform.
In my opinion it is much easier to see the deception around 9/11 than Covid. All it takes is an open mind and some basic understanding of how the physical world reliably behaves and you can see it for yourselves. Trusting in an "expert" or any third party is not required.
As some have you mentioned, I did not bring up anything new. A tremendous amount of work has been previously done over the years by organizations like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, The International Center for 9/11 Justice and people like Richard Gage and the late David Ray Griffin. In this piece I sought to highlight the most basic problems with the official account and the grossest examples of negligence by NIST and all mainstream media. There is a large body of other evidence I did not mention.
The 9/11 Truth movement and the Health Freedom movement have at least one common adversary: legacy media. Breaking the stranglehold that this powerful and corrupt institution has over our perception is not easy. That's why if I there is any potential for synergy in uniting the two groups it needs to be exploited sooner than later, while what happened over these last four years is still fresh in people's minds.
Thank you for your interest in the subject. And thank you, Meryl, for putting your reputation as a hard nosed researcher behind the 9/11 Truth movement.
I'm a classmate of Dr Meryl Nass, I'm SB XV MIT 72( hardly an engineer), but have been active in the 9/11 truth movement since 2002. Here are my simple critiques of the official story( We call it the OCT for official conspiracy theory) 1. Symmetry of collapse
Fire meanders and can’t be controlled. Symmetry requires precision, which could only come from expertly designed destruction rather than happenstance fire and gravity.
2. Totality of collapse
If the descending mass was able to destroy every floor below it, why are there no pictures of what crushed the ground floor?
3. Speed of collapse
Why didn’t the floors right below where the plane hit, which were no hotter than the rest of Manhattan, not slow the falling floors? Were they not as strong as they had been since the 70’s?
4. The arrested rotation of the tipping top of WTC2.
5. The pulverization of 180,000 tons of concrete floors. Don't expect it to pulverize if you drop a brick from a very high distance.
6. Squibs: High-speed ejections of pulverized building materials from isolated windows as much as 40 stories below the collapse zone.
7. Bldg 7 was slated to collapse and predicted accurately to do so in four hours. Larry Silverstein ON CAMERA, stated they are going to "pull it", which is a term used only in that industry of demolition. And its demolition was picture perfect and right on time. There were allegedly documents surrounding the mishandling of the billions of US dollars which went missing as the narrative went, inside bldg 7, which by the way was of a WELDED steel girder construction that could NEVER have collapsed as seen. Studies proved that it "free-fell" with out interference and therefore MUST have been demolished professionally.
8. Conveniently, the "terrorists" claimed to be involved left suicide letters in their hotel rooms and a "PASSPORT" of one of them was "found" lying on the sidewalk by someone who gave it to the authorities. Lucky break! And within mere hours of the incident these "men" were all identified, along with their enrollment in a flight school in Florida for their training.
9. There were a group of five NY firefighters standing speaking NY dialect, and one of them excitedly said, "I heard this...boom, boom, boom, boom, boom!".... Along with hundreds of other accounts of audible explosions long after the planes hit.
10. Jet fuel will burn under the conditions presented, at approximately 1890 F. Steel melts at 2200-2500 F. Yet nothing of the HUGE support girders was left standing. I personally viewed a picture taken the day after showing rescue workers amongst the wreckage. There was a monstrous girder in the picture just laying there, with an angled cut at its end. The cut was precise, and followed specifically through. There was nothing put forth toward clean up until the site was claimed empty of potential survivors. Besides, if a "clean up" effort was attributable to such a cut with a huge cutting torch, it would not be done at a perfect angle, nor with that amount of precision.
11. The dust that blanketed the extended area was independently analyzed and its composition included military-grade thermite, which is exactly what demo companies use to cut through steel like butter at 4500 F. As for the massive amounts of concrete being turned to dust, I cannot comment.
12. The intensely heated steel components lying in the basement were noted to be too hot to manage by the crews. Naturally, the FD uses I.R. heat sensing "guns" to get readings. They found the steel to be way past the expected temps given the conditions.
13. Larry Silverstein, the lessee of the towers and I think bldg 7 went to lengths to acquire "terrorist insurance " just previous to the incident which was previously unprecedented but finally granted. His gross worth is around 10 Billion now.
14. Merely a coincidence, I’m sure: There were at that very same day, “military exercises” being conducted which were designed to simulate terrorist attacks using planes hijacked and flown into bldgs.. Confusion, anyone? Many of the fighter aircraft were conveniently removed to a distant location previous to the incident as Dick Cheney acquired full control of the situation room that day.
15. Flight 77 was reported to have hit the pentagon. Yet there was only a “hole” in the structure, no wing imprints or damage thereby. No engines even. No plane parts whatsoever. Oh, and no videos of a commercial airliner flying near ground level toward the world’s most secure and surveyed bldg. All of the potential monitors’ recording apparatus were simultaneously being reloaded and missed the event. Bad break!
16. (Deserving of a number of its own): Flight 93 was reported to have crashed into a field with its 44 occupants leaving all but a moderate crater, but ZERO plane parts, nor any bodies strewn about. The immediate aftermath of the incident was witnessed by that town’s public official, who discredited the narrative, since he was practically the first to arrive on the scene, where no plane parts or anything was found. He just stated there was a loud explosion and a limited black mushroom cloud which dissipated quickly.
17. Claims made by individuals at the clean-up site in N.Y. were shocked that not even a telephone or a desk chair survived the incident.
So I hope that these additional factors will weigh-in and help fence-sitters to join the Truth Seekers. Few are expected to actually climb up and hop over, but that’s humans for you!
Other reported stuff pops into mind: There were reports of "fine dust" being noticed by unsuspecting employees for many weeks, possibly months seemingly coming by way of the air conditioning system. And there was reportedly one designated floor which was said to be under construction or rehabilitation, which was highly secure and locked out of the elevators' access to it. Maybe a designated "tools and equipment" floor?
Just one nit to pick. The Firefighters (some of whom died that day trying to rescue people trapped in the WTC) speak a New York dialect that is usually spoken in the working class sections of Brooklyn and The Bronx. If one talked with that working class accent under ordinary circumstances in Manhattan (especially the financial district downtown) one would get some snickers, maybe even get laughed at. Those guys had an outer boroughs working class accent. Manhattanites generally don't have regional accents. But then there are a million exceptions to the rule here.
Excellent post. Thank you for the details. A few brave souls have been covering the true story of 9/11 almost from the day it happened. I am particularly thinking of Mike Rivero at whatreallyhappened.com who has gotten all kinds of flak for his relentless truth telling for almost 30 years now.
Yes, I had forgotten about Mike Rivero, but he supports the ridiculous official story and fairy tale that a 757 hit the Pentagon, when there is so much evidence that it was not a jumbo jet, but a missile, that hit it. So, the guy should receive a lot of flack for his detraction(s) from the truth. People like him give 9/11 Truth a bad name, deflect from the real truth on the issue, and drive people away from 9/11 Truth and the real truth.
Neither Mr. Rivero nor I said he was 100% correct all the time. I agree with you about a missile hitting the Pentagon from the appearance of the debris field. But that raises the issue: Where did the plane go? And what happened to the passengers and crew? Mr. Rivero, I believe, makes a sincere and honest effort to report the truth unlike the Fox News, CNN bull*shit.
There is a theory that the flights (all Boeing aircraft ) were taken over via FTS (Flight Termination System) not hijackers. This system once activated from a ground operator cuts off radio comms and takes control of all flight controls. The crew of the plane can no longer control the aircraft nor communicate. The planes were all landed at Westover Airbase in Chicopee MA. . In the early evening of 9/11 2 large military transports (which is what is based there C5's) took off and landed at Andrews....
I'll admit it, Andy. I've never set foot in Manhattan. Except there was that one time when I saw you panhandling on Fifth Ave. I thought of throwing you a quarter. But then I thought, "Nah, he'll just use it to buy illicit drugs."
Like you, my eyes were opened when JFK was killed using that junk of a weapon, (Mannlicher–Carcanowhich) was held up as "the murder weapon" which H. Oswald supposedly used. The whole affair seemed too much like a skit. Of course, I was in Kindergarten on that day, but once I had grown up a bit and shown a few things, the picture that I had trusted previous, was distorted as the "facts" became questionable. The questionable affairs on that fateful day were so numerous, almost similar to 9-11, that anyone weighing the facts would be persuaded. VERY few folks were willing and able to assimilate the reality of things that happened that day. And as you (I think) correctly pointed out, they just couldn't stomach what was obviously the truth.
To this day, I think that Oswald did not even pull the trigger. The shot, you recall, was at quite a distance, and two shots, actually, not just one, hitting their mark, using that junk bolt action rifle on a distant moving target, with heart pumping and breathing erratic, seems to me to be a stretch. I think another professional hit man did the dirty work from that book depository probably from a different window using a hunting rifle trued to that distance. I also am TOTALLY convinced that the president was also shot from the front somewhere by another gunman. Otherwise his head would never have been thrown backward. Forward, yes, certainly from a shot from behind, but impossible to be then jerked backward, by anything coming from the rear.
I recall viewing an online gruesome pic of the president's body, a close up, of mainly his head, with the back of his skull all shredded. That's exactly what would be expected by a moderate-speed bullet shot from the front somewhere. The only way to really tell, is if an expert were to examine and determine the ENTRY wound's location and thereby a rough accounting of the trajectory of the bullet(s).
We the people don't have to determine every last detail. When the authorities which are slated to accomplish that gruesome task fail to do their job, we can assume foul play. And with so many other many questionable incidents having been reported since then, the trust in the govt has waned considerably, as we the people get fed the same propaganda, using the same outlets and techniques as the rest of them.
I'm not alone in these thoughts, I'm quite sure.
Now, to assume that Thomas Mathew Crooks intentionally grazed Mr. Trump's ear for a political advantage for the Right, is beyond wild. I would have to take the position that the monies he had stashed in those secluded accounts was not legitimately obtained. How could a young nerd amass such a cache? Why hide it? That has been swept under the rug. A scenario might be that he was secretly "hired" to do the hit, and was even paid up front. The kid then felt obligated to complete the work assigned and went through with his part of the deal, though the shot JUST missed.
The part that does not add up is why then would the kid fire the residual 5 shots sporadically? And why was so much ammo brought to the task, if he didn't want to just shoot people randomly, (after killing the target)? He MUST have had some deep seated emotional resentment harbored.
I guess we'll never know. I'm just super glad that his intentions were not successful in his attempt to murder Mr Trump.
'Shouldn't even be thinking about this stuff, but it's hard not to.
I’m pretty sure jet fuel burning at melting temperatures will not produce smoke. As I remember from my USCG firefighting lessons, white smoke means a relatively cool fire. Black smoke is unburned combustible material.
Yeah, I'm not real sure how that all works, but just from a layperson's perspective, it appears that when the jet (probably with plenty of fuel aboard) crashed and burned, that there was a huge fire-ball immediately showing itself. Then it dissipated, and I think the black smoke followed. In my thinking, when the fire ball dissipated, it was due to having run its course, burning up the liquid and fumes that was available to it. Sure, the stuff in the bldg (if flammable) would also then burn, but it would probably not reach the temp required to melt steel. The exact physical mechanics of things going on during those few minutes is immaterial, since the basic characteristics of jet fuel is pretty well understood, as you already know. Truth in its perfection is difficult to nail down in circumstances like that one. But that's OK.
Thank you, Ray for spelling it all out. My husband graduated first in his class (twice) in mechanical engineering and because he’s afraid to believe the narrative, doesn’t want to even look at the evidence. I never realized how threatening the truth really is. I’ll save this information for when he’s ready.
I agree with much of what you listed. Thanks. Let me add that Lucky Larry gave a speech in Israel after the catastrophe admitting he had designed an replacement building in 2000, before he should be sure that it would be needed. 15 year old steel and concrete skyscrapers can hardly be considered to have a need to be replaced. THE POINTS I LISTED ARE POINTS WHICH DID NOT REQUIRE EXTENSIVE STUDY. In addition, The 9/11 truth movement has been severely weakened because such a high percentage of activists only focus on debating what happened rather than simple outreach to non-choir. Because people did die at the Pentagon and Shanksville, its not irrelevant. Nevertheless, vicious debates about these issues have weakened the 9/11 truth movement. I respect scientifically based researchers who say 77 DID hit the pentagon. Here is a link where you can find a 5 plus hour video addressing this. My favorite of the 17 chapters is chapter 6, where a photo of the remnants of 77 are shown https://911speakout.org/pentagon-fl/
While I appreciate all these comments and concur, this is all old news.
The real question is: Why is Children's Health Defense bringing this up now and rehashing what was abundantly obvious?
Yes, I’m suspicious. This smells like a real pile of bullshit to me.
Timing is suspicious too…RFK announcing his support for Trump.
I don’t have and didn’t need an Engineering or Medical degree to know 9/11 was a controlled demolition and that Covid was a hoax. It’s abundantly clear they want us dead, they want to steal all of our money, and that they are psychotic, corrupt, criminals.
Now, let’s move on and figure out how we legally and officially remove each and every one of them and charge them with treason and prevent future incidents.
I always liked how the jet's wings & engines didn't chip or smudge the Pentagon's paint, just a nice round clean hole! I.e. a miracle! Praise [Muslim's Allah] & Satan!
Oh, that's an easy one! The jumbo jet's wings simply folded backward as the engines pivoted on them and followed the massive jet straight into the hole perfectly! Now the disappearing act of that same jumbo jet is a little harder to explain. I guess the same magician who made the jet that crashed in Pen. disappear, also made the one that "hit the Pentagon" disappear.
Kind of like all the dozens of video camera evidence of the missile strike on the Pentagon disappeared after the FBI confiscated all of the videotapes within one hour of the event. Never seen again. Except for a few frames of a security camera, almost indiscernible , that appear to show a plane skirting the ground before impact. Obviously fake. Funny how whenever the FBI releases those kind of videos (i.e. the Jan 6th pipe bomber), the video resolution goes down by ~10X and the frame rate is reduced by 5X, with the most important sections edited out. Real strange how that happens.
As long as we don't question the Muslim's religion of peace or 3000+ dead idolaters, Satan's people can/ will give us even more peace, next time! Praise Allah & Satan!
I'm glad you feel the evidence that 9/11 was a false flag is obvious. A Zogby poll on the 20th 9/11 anniversary showed that over 40% of Americans still hold that Al Queda did 9/11, with only 14% saying the US did it and 7% saying Israel did it. Do you doubt the power of the legacy media? Do you still hold public education is a waste of time?
The planes that hit WTC1 & WTC2 were drone aircraft, you can see the standard Air Force issue remote control pod on the bottom of the plane hitting WTC2. Obviously since a regular aircraft would just splatter in a big fireball against the heavy steel outer columns of the building, the drones had shaped charges in their nose and wings, which is an elementary technique of cutting through heavy steel.
"....First off, all serious researchers aside from Morgan Reynolds (a former Bush economist) agree that planes actually hit the towers, however the planes that hit the towers had no windows and extra equipment attached (PODs) and are believed to be remote control drone aircraft. In fact, a similar plan was devised in 1962 by Robert McNamara called OPERATION NORTHWOODS which detailed flying an aircraft filled with FBI agents (allegedly college students on vacation) in flight the plane would switch transponder signals with a drone aircraft which would then be shot down over Cuba. The FBI agents on the plane would then land safely and resume new covert identities. There is evidence that a similar plot was hatched on 9/11:
Thomas Deatherage, Former Airline Captain B- 747-400 and B- 737-300: "After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2. Also, I would like to find an insider A and P mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the N issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed."
MARTIN MARIETTA LANTIRN NAVIGATION AND TARGETING SYSTEM: The system consists of two externally-mounted pods carried on some fighter aircraft. LANTIRN was first employed during the Persian Gulf War.
Development of LANTIRN began in 1980, and the first production pod was delivered in 1987. The AAQ-13 navigation pod contains a Forward Looking InfraRed sensor (FLIR) and a Terrain Following Radar (TFR). FLIR imagery provides the pilot a view of terrain ahead of the aircraft at night. The TFR allows "hands-off" flight as low as 100 feet above the ground while avoiding obstacles in the aircraft's path. The AAQ-14 targeting pod has a FLIR and a laser designator/ranger to "illuminate" or mark the target for laser-guided bomb deliveries. The USAF ordered LANTIRN pods for F-15E and selected F-16C/D fighters. ..."
What is so important about Meryl is not her brilliance. There are so many brilliant people at MIT. She cares about people rather than personal advancement and has shown great courage for decades.
I was impressed. Without an engineering degree, she got right to the heart of the matter. She even brought up angles I hadn't heard others discuss. Such insight!
Said 'opinion' ignores the complete absence any photographic (and audible) evidence of a series of timed detonations as used by those in that business (and engineering specialty) of demolition. Left alone too is the degree of difficulty of maintaining the integrity of an array of placed shape charges in the face of deteriorating building condition due to fires started by aircraft collision and impact with the central columns and fires fed by jet fuel early on; NONE of these could be planned for in an actual demolition as planned out by any company in this business in an hour's time let alone a week (and going unnoticed in their activity.) Submit your theory depends heavily on magic.
While you may make a nice circumstantial case here, it fails when considering hard evidence., logistics, and the non-observation of persons placing detonation charges.
There is audio of explosions, not to mention eye witnesses and FDNY members themselves. If thermite charges were in the central core, it's doubtful anyone would hear those, as I don't believe they "explode" like dynamite charges do.
Nothing of the kind evidence I point to exists that I'm aware of. If such 'evidence' existed, it would predominate in discussions, but it doesn't. Nor are there any of the other artifacts I wrote of.
The totality of what I've seen written on this subject is the sum total of a collection of Dunning-Kruger types with no DRE (directly related experience) not in possession of all the facts and misinterpretation of those facts that they presume to know.
I find this to be true about the JFK assassination too; again, a collection of Dunning-Kruger types with no DRE (directly related experience) not in possession of all the facts and a misinterpretation of those facts that they presume to know.
Dunning Kruger describe you perfectly. You don't know what you are talking about. Rather than listen to a know-nothing like yourself, I would say listen to this guy, Structural Engineering Professor and chairman of his dept University of Alaska:
WTC7 could ONLY come down the way it did by simultaneously cutting all 49 support columns.
Expert DEMOLISHES Establishment Story About WTC Bldg. 7 Collapse! The Jimmy Dore Show:
"...The destruction of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, was not a result of fires, according to the much-anticipated final report issued today by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”..."
Idiot. You and the researchers you cite fail to examine certain primary evidence.
Failing to include that evidence renders ANY findings by you or the researchers you cite INVALID.
People like you fail to include ALL the obervations made that day and ONLY cite that so-called evidence that supports your preconceived conclusions.
You don't dare examine what it actually takes to demolish a building under controlled conditions, the weeks of work and planning, ALL that is immaterial to the dream world you and others live in with regards to understanding the field of building demolition.
NO individual handling explosives and det cord would enter a burning building like WTC 7 that day ... YOU FAIL UTTERLY to understand the inherent dangers involved. This makes you pretty much a nutcase that can imagine anything. Your word, your analysis, is subject to your 'make believe' world of fantasy.
You don't know what you are talking about. The demolition was setup well in advance of 9/11. The uber-establishment that did this, had complete control over the building and could close off an entire sublevel to their use, installing the demolition charges and controls. I wouldn't use det cord in this case I'd use all electric delay caps, prewired to test and fire. Which was meant to be after flight 93 (drone) hit the building which didn't happen because of its control failure. The drone had to be shot down.
It's not that difficult to cut 79 columns in a subfloor. And that's what they did, watch and learn:
"This man, one of Europe’s top demolition experts, died in a car accident in 2011.
5 years earlier, this video was taken, in which he makes a shocking claim about the destruction of WTC Building 7 on 9/11.
“This is a controlled demolition… it’s been imploded.” "
And he concluded that just watching a video of the WTC7 collapse. He wasn't familiar with the 9/11 event, so he wasn't interested in any conspiracies. Just the engineering.
Why not critique the 6 points I made above? You overlook the possibility that the legacy media is owned by those who have an interest in putting forth the official conspiracy theory.
Mario - if my memory serves me, more than 2 years ago, you were the one that sent me a link to go down the rabbit hole of 9/11. Now, I don’t believe anything I was ever told. We landed on the moon? Not a chance.
It's a sad journey...this rabbit hole--- but oh so necessary. Our government lied to us freely and copiously to support absurd beliefs....and to avoid admitting how much or tax money was simply stolen...
These are facts...
1. Space travel...and that includes to the moon-- is impossible for numerous reasons--
a Nasa engineer name of Bill Kaysing has laid it all out in a book...WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON. It is hard to find this book. Fact is....we have never even made it out of low earth orbit. Not ever. Before the instant transmission of photographs from locations was possible we could maintain this absurd fiction. We can't lie about this anymore.
2. The WTC was a bust and was losing so much money the owners needed to get rid of it. It had a very low occupancy rate and was not meeting its expenses. They took out huge insurance policies that covered "terrorist attacks" and blew it up.
3. There was no "pandemic"....it is impossible that any so-called virus could suddenly emerge all over the world and kill and/or sicken millions of people at the same time. This virus never existed as famous epidemiologists and scientists now clearly tell us. A "virus" is not a micro organism....but is misnamed. What are called viruses are nothing but debris and cellular waste that is on the way to being disposed of by our immune systems whose job it is to do that exact thing. The actual existence of Viruses is in severe doubt
Quite right about "viruses" as Antoine Bechamp revealed in the 1800s after meticulous research and experimentation; virologists continue to lie about observing viruses such as the one supposedly causing Covid when they have never, in fact, been able to culture and isolate a virus without contamination and only observe the debris and cellular waste of bacterial action (as you so correctly point out).
Common sense: we haven’t even been able to sustain environments on our own planet. You know, like the ocean. 30 feet deep is 1 atmosphere..Imagine leaving Earth in a tin can with a flimsy space suit.
You bring up a good point about timing, like the crack epidemic.
Everything hit the streets at the same time, in every major city! Then we found out Oliver North - along w the US Military - was selling crack for cash so the Government could hide its weapons sales. Oh my! WTAF?!
Now they just have Bkack book with that FASB-56 law or something like that.
Yes we did land on the moon and no the buildings were not vaporized by some fabled directed energy weapons. That's utter nonsense. The whole thing is explained with overwhelming evidence and accuracy by controlled demolitions. No need for any Sci-fi.
A high level engineer finally came up with a reason to explain why we never went back to the moon or why we never sent another manned mission to the moon.
This is what he said on national television:
"We have not returned to the moon because NASA lost that technology"
as in...a kid "lost his homework" ...NASA lost the technology????
No...NASA never had this technology... real "space travel" --as in leaving the earths atmosphere and gravitational field-- is still decades away and may never happen. Sorry to bust your balloon. This explains the highly suspicious behavior of these "astronauts" at the debriefing shown on television. Visibly uncomfortable--these men hemmed and hawed and acted like teenagers who had been joy riding in Dads car and crashed it....Fact is....these overgrown boys were had probably spent their "time on the moon" partying in Las Vegas with strippers and were photographed doing that. God forbid their wives should see those pictures. The moon photos have been analyzed ad nauseam. There are all kinds of anomalies proving these were not taken on the moon. The moon buggy is the most bizarre addition of all...pictures are shown of a vehicle that looks suspiciously like a beach buggy bumping around on the "moon's surface"...an obvious set. At points in the movies stage lights are visible. There are dozens of visible and strange inconsistencies in lighting and even the prints of the "astronaut's shoes" in the moon dust was incriminating. How can there be "dust" on the moon and why would a boot make an impression in it? So many questions and so few answers. It was a lie. Get over it.
Nonsense. The Chang'e 6 was just launched by China on May 3, this year, and orbited the Moon on May 8, Landed on the FAR SIDE of the Moon (most difficult, much more than Apollos) on June 1. And then the ascender module took off from the Moon on June 6, docked in orbit with Service Module, landing back on Earth on the 25th. What makes you think having humans on a larger version is somehow impossible. Musk is going to do it with Starship in a few years, there's no magic involved, its already been planned. Even a Youtuber was booked to fly on a mission around the Moon. Quit inventing worthless crap, like the CIA cares about whether we land on the Moon or not.
There is nothing stupendous about going to the moon or landing on the moon. China, Japan, India have all put landers on the moon recently. Even the Russians were able to land two large Rovers on the Moon in 1970 and 1973.
You can see the Moon Reconnaissance Orbiter photos right now. And the Japanese SELENE probe to the Moon & the Chandrayaan-2 Indian Moon orbiter. It would be an incredible job to fake those. They would have to match ground observations and invent fine detail to be compatible with that. For what purpose? A crazy notion.
In 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings.[1] On the left are two photos taken on the lunar surface by the Apollo 15 astronauts August 2, 1971 during EVA 3 at station 9A near Hadley Rille. On the right is a 2008 reconstruction from images taken by the SELENE terrain camera and 3D projected to the same vantage point as the surface photos. The terrain is a close match within the SELENE camera resolution of 10 metres.
AS15-82-11121: Apollo 15 Lunar Roving Vehicle
AS15-82-11121: Apollo 15 Lunar Roving Vehicle
AS15-82-11122: Apollo 15 photo
AS15-82-11122: Apollo 15 photo
3D SELENE reconstructed photo
3D SELENE reconstructed photo
I suppose you figure China's plan to send astronauts to the moon in 2027 is all to make a fake video landing. And all the amateur astronomers and hundreds of foreign science institutes with hundreds of radio & optical telescopes will be suckered in. I still can't figure out why you figure NASA would go to all that incredible expense & trouble to fake a moon landing. If they didn't want to spend the money, just cancel the program, they do it all the time. In fact cancelling these type of mission is the norm not the exception. And yet here they are going to great lengths and cost to do another series of human moon landings. I suppose you figure that's going to be fake too? Artemis missions? Fake? SpaceX's plans for private Moon flyby mission, already financed by a Japanese billionaire with the Youtuber, Everyday Astronaut selected as one passenger.
They may have landed a vehicle on the moon. But no living human being has ever walked on the moon. There're no pictures of humans on the moon. The reason for that is no humans have been to the moon. Sure-- there are tons of "space ships" circling around and even landing on the moon. But no one has ever walked on the moon let alone come back alive from such an adventure.
Perhaps Musk will overcome all the numerous facts of temperature, physics and aeronautics that make manned space travel impossible at this time. More power to him. I doubt I will live to see it. Hope you do, however.
Why because you say so? Who are you? I just posted you reams of evidence they were on the Moon. Was that fake too? What convoluted, pointless conspiracy have you weaved that has no point, no purpose, completely ridiculous. If the Politicians didn't want to go to the Moon it's the simplest thing on Earth, they do it ALL THE TIME, JUST CANCEL THE MISSION. They don't need to go through some extraordinary elaborate deception. That's a crazy idea.
Haha! China and India cannot even help their own citizens during a disaster (mining collapse is one example, earthquakes) and one is to believe they’re so technologically advanced. Yeah, I use to believe that too!!!
Oh another huge lie perpetuated that the whole world believed!!!! Lance Armstrong and the stour de France!!! I read recently that he had 2 children, naturally!!! At this point, I don’t believe the guy ever had cancer!!! They either duped him or he was in on the scam! Who benefitted?! Abramson Cancer Center, biotech, everyone wearing their yellow wrist bands! OmG! We are so gullible.
Most of the tech you use comes from China. They build a couple thousand kms of high speed rail every year while the USSA can't build 1 km even after spending $10B. What does Lance Armstrong have to do with anything?
I wonder if you have seen the video of NASA scientists saying that "we're working on the problem of getting through the radiation (Van Allen) belt; we knew how to do it in the 60s, but we've lost that information since then".
Space craft have landed on the moon several times, but not people.
That's no problem. Calculated dosage passing through the Van Allen belts to the moon and back is a meager 2.1 mSv. You will get 10mSv from a CAT scan. The overall dosage for a Moon mission is largely determined by the level of Solar Proton Flux. Which can in a bad year amount to 406mSv for an Apollo type Moon mission. That won't kill you, it won't even make you sick. Acute dosages of >1000mSv will lead to some radiation sickness. Some long term increase in cancer risk but lower than ~ a hundred things humans do with total apathy.
Yet we don’t have the technology or expertise to explore parts of our own planet, easily accessible, like…the Ocean. Sorry, not buying it. And people spew off these numbers as if they actually know what they mean. I know and understand temperatures. We can all relate to 100 degrees F or 38 degrees C and know it’s a hot day, but who the hell knows what it is that you just wrote and how to verify it? It sounds intimidating and as though you might be intelligent and educated, but you need prof that is relatable to people with no knowledge. For instance, we don’t need degrees to know oxygen exists.
That begs me to ask, did everyone forget their elementary school lesson on photosynthesis when there is a discussion on masking, climate change and CO2 cow farts?
look-- there are spectroscopic instruments that measure temperatures on the moon and the sun and elsewhere. The moon has very little atmosphere and is too hot and too cold in regions in or out of direct sunlight. Those are facts. Study Kaysings book and stop wasting your typewriters.
I haven't looked up the quantitative data, am merely taking the NASA scientists' word for it. I wonder if you have taken the qualitative nature of the "radiation" in the van Allen belts into account - large fast-moving ions?
L.O.L., hee hee hee hee heeee-- ya just gotta luv those Flat Earther trolls, Hah hah hah hah haaaah, boy it's great to end the day with a good laugh!!!
It's upsetting knowing that most of what we were told/taught is a lie. William Casey , former CIA head, said "We will know our disinformation program has worked when everything the public believes is a lie"..
Until recently I sided with the majority of 9/11 truthers in disagreeing with Dr. Wood, who I have met. My complaint for years was that a directed energy weapon could not have sufficient power to destroy such a large building. A friend from the electric power industry explained that the energy required equaled the amount of power east of the Rockies. More recently one supporter of Dr. Wood's hypothesis says the government used technology gleaned from extraterrestrials. I'm hardly sure there is no such technology, but I'm unwilling to rely of the existence of such in my organizing. Quite recently advocates of Dr. Wood's ideas explain she makes no claims and just presents evidence, which impressed me. I also agree the toasted cars cannot be ignored.
She might as well claim the buildings were beamed up into a giant alien space cruiser. Occam's razor, it is all explained very well by standard controlled explosive and thermal cutting charges. No need to go into hyperspace to find an alternative explanation. Sounds more like standard CIA "Poisoning The Well" strategy to discredit the Truth movement.
Yep. There is a certain mental "topography" or profile whereby the victim thereof suffers from the crazed belief that the more elaborate and convoluted the explanations, with the least actual evidence, is somehow most likely to be The True Answer. Go figure. My first cousin is married to one of 'em... Go figure.
The towers collapsed very neatly, and very visibly, inside their own foot print. They did NOT "just" turn "mostly to dust in mid air." I saw loads of vids of this, now wiped clean from JooTube. Judy Wood was/is a controversial commenter who showed up after the collapse, and not even very close to the collapse, of the towers. I have close friends who live in New York and witnessed the strikes as well as the collapse of the towers.
One thing is certain however.....guys with boxcutters who just barely learned to fly a Cesna did not fly a jet into the WTC. And even if they did.....nothing would have happened. These aluminum tubes would have disintegrated and the buildings would have been fine. There were only two of these jets.... the third planned was shot down in Pennsylvania. We know and everyone knows....the THREE buildings were demolished because the the whole WTC was a bust. It was never going to pay for itself. Money talks.
and besides that....apparently there terribly damning SEC records in the building #7 that needed to disappear.
Arguing over the details....blasting away at each other about the finer points is absurd. We never went to the moon and we still cannot "walk on the moon"
There was no "global pandemic" nor can there ever be....and the WTC towers were demolished with "controlled demolition" technology that is routinely used to bring down unwanted structures.
The people who now know the truth about the plandemic, but might not yet question the narrative surrounding 9/11 - I ask the question - if they lied about Covid, what else have they lied about.
At almost 5 hours long, this documentary doesn’t answer all the questions about that day. But it certainly asks them.
Probably safe to assume everything. Evolution is another questionable theory. Darwin was funded by Rothschilds...They dont want us to know what the world really is. What is going on in Antarctica?
To answer Dr Nass's question about how the explosives were placed. President Bush's relative was in control of the security company for the WTC until a year before the catastrophe.
The moon landings, Armstrong et al 3 day trip, now it takes a month, same rocket ship. Plus space suits not built to withstand cosmic and solar radiation; astronauts no jet lag. Did I miss something? The US has pulled off a few big ones. I’d imagine they could even do a rug pull on the national debt.
Yup...but sadly the poorly educated American football fans can't tear themselves away from the television long enough to find out the truth to any of this nonsense. Poor deluded fools who were conned into spending how many trillions in "space travel" Who got that money?
Rug pull on National Debt! Love it! Although I think their ‘rug pull’ will include stealing our assets. Right now they’re encouraging 2nd mortgages via HELOCs so people can tap their equity. At the same time they’re outsourcing all of our jobs to foreigners. No one seems to talk about that.
Now HELOCS are adjustable. It use to be that one could get a fixed rate.
So, it will be another financial terrorist tool to kill their citizens financially.
Since when, they are sending landers & orbiters to the moon all the time. Many nations. I don't know where you get a month from. By now going to the moon is just routine. Space suits don't block much solar or cosmic radiation but the amounts are normally well below human tolerances. Except if there is a serious solar storm, then you should take cover behind a significant mass of material.
no sorry....no human being has ever walked on the moon. Unmanned vehicles have been to the moon. I do not think they ever returned. A take-off from the moon would not be possible. Find a copy of Kaysings book. I'm done with you.
The temperature variations on the moon alone are enough to prohibit "walking on the surface of the moon." In sunlit areas the temperatures go into 1OOO degrees F. And in the shade the temperature plunges into the absolute O range. These are regions that are close together. No suit or vehicle could withstand those temperatures. End of story. Sorry.
Learn a bit of science before making dumb comments. The Moon is a vacuum, heat flows are minimal. The Sun is just a little hotter than on Earth. Heat flow determines temperature. Heat flows are far higher on Earth due to the atmosphere & wind.
i could say the same to you....but why bother. Some of us believe in fairy tales....that doesn't make them true. Please stop this blathering. It is boring. "The sun is just a little hotter than earth"...
I'll say!
The sun is as hot as a nuclear explosion. Get a grip.
I said the Sun is just little hotter on the Moon than on Earth. You just have to subtract atmospheric absorption. Probably around 30% I imagine. And no, I only believe in the truth not fairy tales about faking Moon Landings. And you figure every Rocket Engineer on Earth must be a Grifter who knows zip about science. Give it up.
One just returned on June 25th, two months ago, carrying Moon rock samples from the Far side of the Moon. A Chinese mission. Yeah, I guess China faked that too. Much easier to believe you are faking it. Musk must be a crazy person believing such things. The Starship never launched. It was all fake, everyone who seen it were hypnotized. Yep.
sorry but the Chinese moon mission was NOT MANNED. A machine collected rocks....so what? They have all been doing that....
No human being has yet to set foot on the lunar surface. End of story. And that includes the ridiculous John Glen....who actually did admit it was all a lie.
Get a grip. I hope you can grow up....but since you are most likely a machine....it is doubtful.
I stand by these truths:
1. There have been no manned moon missions by anyone. Yet. A key reason for this is the Van Allen Radiation belt. No one can survive passage through it and also the many circling mini astroids that would punch holes in any space ship.
2. The World Trade Center was demolished by high tech explosives probably backed by our own government and not "Arabs with boxcutters" according to numerous scientific studies at Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.org .
3. There was never a "pandemic" that killed millions the world over....as scientist Denis Rancourt has quite clearly explicated with his group who published papers on this topic. There was a mild flu and no cause for the world-wide lockdown that ensued.
These are all lies promoted by our government. Get a life. But you probably can't as you are most likely a robot.
They only took 2 weeks, limits on supplies to stay longer. Should be no problem. Why are you so adamant nobody went to the Moon. What are you a Luddite and Malthusian?
Mind control. A spell many people are under. We are living in an illusion. That's a fact. Much of what we were taught is a lie. Just like people don't believe the earth is flat. Just like people don't believe there are lands beyond the ice wall. Most people do not have time to really dig deeper into many things, and anything that goes against their beliefs is sci-fi. I have news. A lot of things we assumed were sci-fi are in fact not. We were told in movies and TV shows all along. The Simpsons doing an episode on Covid, verbatim, years back..2004. Another episode where Trump would be President. Many more. And Trump was brought in by the military. He was asked to run in 2016.
The movie The Matrix, the X-Files show, the movie Contagion, Red October, the show Blacklist, etc. We have been told truths on the patented mind control device called TV. The reality we think we live in is not real at all. Now it's time to wake up to what they have done to us. If people don't, then don't expect anything to get better. Once we know our real past, then we can move forward and not continue in the lie and keep repeating it.
Most people I find can't read long posts. They expect everything to be answered in 2 sentences. Our whole existence summed up in 2 sentences. Same with videos. Anything longer than 10 minutes is too long, but they can watch a 2 hour movie. I have watched 8 to 12 hour videos, but not all at once. I guess no one heard of pause and come back later. It's obvious people won't sit that long nor is it good to sit that long. Learning takes time. If people really care, they will do what it takes and however long it takes.
Another man on Substack has been harassed by the powers that be because of his research on the many school shootings, and other articles he wrote on many subjects. He did an excellent article on NASA.
There is no doubt that we are all being played and laughed at. This includes the manufacturered wars that are funded by both sides for power, money, and control.
a sad commentary .... Please keep "thinking" It is harmless...
I'd like to know where that moon landing money went and I'd like to know why no one else has ever walked on the moon if we have been back so many times....and shown us real live video footage. Since instant relay became a possibility suddenly....no one went to the moon anymore. Coincidence?
I'd advise all the "moon landing" fairy tale believers to take a look at the actual vehicle that they told us went to the moon. It is an hilarious contraption that looks like a 7th grade science project. I am not going to bother with this. Bye.
There’s a compelling documentary “Seven” that dives into the numerous problems with the mainstream expert opinions surrounding the building #7 collapse on 9/11.
There are a few more concerns regarding building #1 & #2 as well. Very little rubble was found following the “collapse” of the towers. No desks, chairs, phones, steel, concrete, bodily remains, etc. were found. Tons and tons of dust were found everywhere. Why?
Not too long ago I came across a vid showing one of the tower's center top pole as it fell along with some of the top floor(s) right in front of our eyes, turned to dust! A METAL structure! Now if it is true that some secret weapon has been developed to do weird things like that, it could have been also (maybe) employed to pulverize concrete. Of course, the demo industry has perfected its art, and knows how to demo without super explosive charges, but rather "just the right amount" to do the job sort of quietly and without launching debris for miles. In the many pictures and vids of the incident where the tower was collapsing, there is a LOT of cement powder and debris being "blown" out and away from the main bldg. Even at the top, where it would not be witnessed due to "pancaking" effect. The whole thing was orchestrated and the narrative long beforehand worked out to the best it could be. That's my not so humble opinion. Further, in Maui, strange but parallel things were documented and photographed, like cars' alum block engines were melted down and the liquid metal running down the gutter, while the tires were still in tact. The window glass of these cars was MELTED, not just shattered, and also ran in liquid or blob form. So many weird things, and so much to consider, but without having X-Ray vision, we cannot know what lies behind the curtain. What we CAN know is that it is not friendly to the common person.
It took a lot more than Israel to pull that off. That took a supranational organization that controls our governments. Remember this, ALL WARS ARE BANKER WARS:
It is well documented that Israelis rented/occupied an entire floor in one of the towers and had window coverings all around that floor and they also had 24/7 access along with a plethora of climbing equipment, whatever for...? Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer? Hmm...how about both at the same time.
Fifteen years ago, my contribution to this field was a proof from elementary physics that the acceleration with a "pancaking" scenario as claimed by the original NIST report must be slower than 1/3 gravity. The time for the actual collapse of the building was faster than this.
I helped organize and sponsor several 911 truth events in Ann Arbor Mi years ago. It was shocking to me how brainwashed people were then. We had top people come and speak: Richard Gage from Architects and Engineers for 911 truth and Col Robert Bowman who came out as a "truther" at great expense for himself. Quite a few others. I learned that people don't want to know.
They like/need their cultural myths as a "reality" replacement.
They literally get angry....very like when you wake up someone who is sleeping suddenly.
The 911 official story is among the foundation pieces of America's world view.
Too bad it is a disgraceful lie and that the buildings were slated for demolition long before
I remember looking at my husband that day and saying how did that building just fall down like that? He is also a commercial airline pilot and says with 30 years of experience there is no way he could fly a plane low into a building like the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon. That was not a plane.
Dear Lord! Admittedly I’ve not watched the interview. But I will. I doubt I’ll read the book though and here’s why….Too little and WAY too late!! I do NOT possess an engineering degree but I’ve watched controlled demolitions of high rise buildings as a teenager, while out in bicycle rides, exploring the world! This was completely obvious the minute it was seen on the TV screen on the day it happened!
The real question that requires deep thought and analysis is why are people, especially Americans, so gullible?! Why don’t people use their God-given common sense?! How is it possible to indoctrinate so many people and get away with crimes? How is it possible for people to fall for this not once but multiple times: JFK assassination, 9/11, and Covid?! What prohibits people from being able to do their own analysis?
In the first weeks of Covid, if one was listening, Dr. Birx said, “The PCR test had an 80% FALSE POSITIVE rate.” Yet, people ran out and got the test!!! It was as though they were lobotomized!!!
In fact, 9/11 was the day WW3 ‘officially’ started because they used it to implement the Patriot Act and pretend we are at war to strip us if our Constitutional rights by declaring martial law!! For me, and I’m not an Atty, my thoughts are that since these disasters were all based on fraud and carried out with evil, malicious intent to mass murder and profit, then none of their mandates are legitimate and legal. Therefore my God-give rights prevail.
Oh, and then you had the mass indoctrinated allowing their Government to pat them down in airports while freight trains traveling up and down the entire Eastern seaboard, filled with cargo, were completely unattended.
Oh, and the other more obvious notable questions I had as soon as Covid started were: Where were all the bio-hazard containers? Why weren’t dead homeless people all over parts of major Cities being dragged out in body bags?
I mean, they had their RESET stickers, and 6-Feet floor markers, masks, gloves, and hand sanitizer available en masse and ‘at the ready,’ but no biohazard containers for the masks and gloves. I haven’t heard one person with an MD or DO or Public Health degree ask about biohazard containers. People lined up for MILES in their cars to get a PCR test from a complete stranger in an unsterile environment!!!!! Think about that insanity!!! I mean, did anyone even ask themselves if this ‘stranger’ was licensed or qualified? Who was this stranger performing this test? Did they even have citizenship let alone an education or a license? And there was ample evidence EVERYWHERE!!! One just had to do Google searches (before they were heavily censored) to compile a quick list of all of the Corporations involved in the theater of Covid! Yet, people allowed them sobbed to be locked down for 2 years!!! I still believe the lockdown was about installing substations and the Utility infrastructure for the electrical grid. Keep people off the roads. I highly recommend people go find their local substations hidden behind foliage. That seems more important and timely than revisiting 9/11, doesn’t it? But I digressed…
Even having these discussions is completely fueled with stupidity. If you even watched one ALT video you can surely see black helicopters swoop in an detonate bombs at the base of the building. There is ample footage of this even though the full version, filmed by a professional, from a Hoboken vantage point, was taken down. If you listened to interviews of fire fighters and innocent bystanders in or near the building when it collapsed and who were able to successfully flee, they will repeat the same ‘lie’…that they heard multiple explosions in succession at the base of the building. If you have ever seen a controlled demolition, then you should have known it was a controlled demolition. If you have ever seen a high rise building on fire, you’d know they don’t destroy a building. I believe one of the worst high rise building fires was in Philadelphia. Burnt for days from what I recall. There was no collapse.
This was a terrorist event done by our own Government against our own citizens as was the Boston Marathon.
Notice nothing happens at the Olympics though. It’s not because of security. Its because the Olympics is ‘their’ event. The UNs event. Same with Cycling events. 11 of the 17 UN Sustainable Development goals involve cycling. Rosa Kiore found out what the Agenda was because she worked for CAL Trans. Watch out for the Transportation companies and the DOT.
Yeah, the real question is: what the hell is wrong with people?! The people seem to be the problem.
Well, as Jack Nicholson said in "A Few Good Men" : "You can't handle the truth!" which I would apply to people in general; also what Detrich Bonhoffer called the "collective stupidity" of the masses which prevents the use of critical and analytical thinking.
Welcome to the club to Mr. Setty! Truther here since 2003ish.
Horizontally ejected beams during collapse; streams of flowing molten steel under the subbasement; tons of gold gone missing; put options against airlines a day or so before the event; seismic signatures go BOOM BOOM the day of; plus extreme heat signatures on-site for months afterward... plus ___ (I'm sure I am forgetting a lot these days!)
Hank Paulson was Bush Jr.'s Secretary of Treasury. He was formally a high level Goldman Sachs insider in that investment banking firm. Paulson is yet another example of private companies capturing regulatory agencies; in this case Goldman capturing the Treasury Dept.
It was said by some that building seven, which collapsed later that afternoon, contained much incriminating evidence that some District Attorneys or Attorneys General had amassed against white collar criminals; needless to say all destroyed in the collapse of building seven.
One error the man makes. The collapse of the Towers occurred both from the top & the bottom. The big structural columns in the basement were blown out before the top was demolished..
Thank you Meryl for bringing this to your readership.
For readers of Meryl's Newsletter, I am encouraged by the comments here. A mutual friend introduced me to Meryl in October 2020, and she quickly brought me up to speed on a number of Covid topics. I was already deeply suspicious of the Pandemic response because unlike many of my physician colleagues, I didn't suffer from the "they would never do such bad things" delusion. This is chiefly due to my research into 9/11.
Though I have made some modest contributions around exposing the distortion of science and media around the plandemic, Meryl knows that my focus of interest is around the 9/11 deception. I was excited when she asked me to be on her CHD.TV segment to talk about 9/11. The result was the YouTube video in the article.
After careful consideration, CHD decided to not air the interview as it was felt to be outside the organization's present scope of interest. I can understand that. To their credit they gave us the freedom to do what we wanted with the final product. So to let you all know, Meryl did not hesitate to bring this to you on her own platform.
In my opinion it is much easier to see the deception around 9/11 than Covid. All it takes is an open mind and some basic understanding of how the physical world reliably behaves and you can see it for yourselves. Trusting in an "expert" or any third party is not required.
As some have you mentioned, I did not bring up anything new. A tremendous amount of work has been previously done over the years by organizations like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, The International Center for 9/11 Justice and people like Richard Gage and the late David Ray Griffin. In this piece I sought to highlight the most basic problems with the official account and the grossest examples of negligence by NIST and all mainstream media. There is a large body of other evidence I did not mention.
The 9/11 Truth movement and the Health Freedom movement have at least one common adversary: legacy media. Breaking the stranglehold that this powerful and corrupt institution has over our perception is not easy. That's why if I there is any potential for synergy in uniting the two groups it needs to be exploited sooner than later, while what happened over these last four years is still fresh in people's minds.
Thank you for your interest in the subject. And thank you, Meryl, for putting your reputation as a hard nosed researcher behind the 9/11 Truth movement.
I'm a classmate of Dr Meryl Nass, I'm SB XV MIT 72( hardly an engineer), but have been active in the 9/11 truth movement since 2002. Here are my simple critiques of the official story( We call it the OCT for official conspiracy theory) 1. Symmetry of collapse
Fire meanders and can’t be controlled. Symmetry requires precision, which could only come from expertly designed destruction rather than happenstance fire and gravity.
2. Totality of collapse
If the descending mass was able to destroy every floor below it, why are there no pictures of what crushed the ground floor?
3. Speed of collapse
Why didn’t the floors right below where the plane hit, which were no hotter than the rest of Manhattan, not slow the falling floors? Were they not as strong as they had been since the 70’s?
4. The arrested rotation of the tipping top of WTC2.
5. The pulverization of 180,000 tons of concrete floors. Don't expect it to pulverize if you drop a brick from a very high distance.
6. Squibs: High-speed ejections of pulverized building materials from isolated windows as much as 40 stories below the collapse zone.
Dear Brother David,
Continuing with your list:
7. Bldg 7 was slated to collapse and predicted accurately to do so in four hours. Larry Silverstein ON CAMERA, stated they are going to "pull it", which is a term used only in that industry of demolition. And its demolition was picture perfect and right on time. There were allegedly documents surrounding the mishandling of the billions of US dollars which went missing as the narrative went, inside bldg 7, which by the way was of a WELDED steel girder construction that could NEVER have collapsed as seen. Studies proved that it "free-fell" with out interference and therefore MUST have been demolished professionally.
8. Conveniently, the "terrorists" claimed to be involved left suicide letters in their hotel rooms and a "PASSPORT" of one of them was "found" lying on the sidewalk by someone who gave it to the authorities. Lucky break! And within mere hours of the incident these "men" were all identified, along with their enrollment in a flight school in Florida for their training.
9. There were a group of five NY firefighters standing speaking NY dialect, and one of them excitedly said, "I heard this...boom, boom, boom, boom, boom!".... Along with hundreds of other accounts of audible explosions long after the planes hit.
10. Jet fuel will burn under the conditions presented, at approximately 1890 F. Steel melts at 2200-2500 F. Yet nothing of the HUGE support girders was left standing. I personally viewed a picture taken the day after showing rescue workers amongst the wreckage. There was a monstrous girder in the picture just laying there, with an angled cut at its end. The cut was precise, and followed specifically through. There was nothing put forth toward clean up until the site was claimed empty of potential survivors. Besides, if a "clean up" effort was attributable to such a cut with a huge cutting torch, it would not be done at a perfect angle, nor with that amount of precision.
11. The dust that blanketed the extended area was independently analyzed and its composition included military-grade thermite, which is exactly what demo companies use to cut through steel like butter at 4500 F. As for the massive amounts of concrete being turned to dust, I cannot comment.
12. The intensely heated steel components lying in the basement were noted to be too hot to manage by the crews. Naturally, the FD uses I.R. heat sensing "guns" to get readings. They found the steel to be way past the expected temps given the conditions.
13. Larry Silverstein, the lessee of the towers and I think bldg 7 went to lengths to acquire "terrorist insurance " just previous to the incident which was previously unprecedented but finally granted. His gross worth is around 10 Billion now.
14. Merely a coincidence, I’m sure: There were at that very same day, “military exercises” being conducted which were designed to simulate terrorist attacks using planes hijacked and flown into bldgs.. Confusion, anyone? Many of the fighter aircraft were conveniently removed to a distant location previous to the incident as Dick Cheney acquired full control of the situation room that day.
15. Flight 77 was reported to have hit the pentagon. Yet there was only a “hole” in the structure, no wing imprints or damage thereby. No engines even. No plane parts whatsoever. Oh, and no videos of a commercial airliner flying near ground level toward the world’s most secure and surveyed bldg. All of the potential monitors’ recording apparatus were simultaneously being reloaded and missed the event. Bad break!
16. (Deserving of a number of its own): Flight 93 was reported to have crashed into a field with its 44 occupants leaving all but a moderate crater, but ZERO plane parts, nor any bodies strewn about. The immediate aftermath of the incident was witnessed by that town’s public official, who discredited the narrative, since he was practically the first to arrive on the scene, where no plane parts or anything was found. He just stated there was a loud explosion and a limited black mushroom cloud which dissipated quickly.
17. Claims made by individuals at the clean-up site in N.Y. were shocked that not even a telephone or a desk chair survived the incident.
So I hope that these additional factors will weigh-in and help fence-sitters to join the Truth Seekers. Few are expected to actually climb up and hop over, but that’s humans for you!
Yours in Christ,
Ray
Other reported stuff pops into mind: There were reports of "fine dust" being noticed by unsuspecting employees for many weeks, possibly months seemingly coming by way of the air conditioning system. And there was reportedly one designated floor which was said to be under construction or rehabilitation, which was highly secure and locked out of the elevators' access to it. Maybe a designated "tools and equipment" floor?
I've commented above, just repeating it here: if you've missed Massimo Mazzucco's September 11, it's really worth a watch.
Just one nit to pick. The Firefighters (some of whom died that day trying to rescue people trapped in the WTC) speak a New York dialect that is usually spoken in the working class sections of Brooklyn and The Bronx. If one talked with that working class accent under ordinary circumstances in Manhattan (especially the financial district downtown) one would get some snickers, maybe even get laughed at. Those guys had an outer boroughs working class accent. Manhattanites generally don't have regional accents. But then there are a million exceptions to the rule here.
Excellent post. Thank you for the details. A few brave souls have been covering the true story of 9/11 almost from the day it happened. I am particularly thinking of Mike Rivero at whatreallyhappened.com who has gotten all kinds of flak for his relentless truth telling for almost 30 years now.
Yes, I had forgotten about Mike Rivero, but he supports the ridiculous official story and fairy tale that a 757 hit the Pentagon, when there is so much evidence that it was not a jumbo jet, but a missile, that hit it. So, the guy should receive a lot of flack for his detraction(s) from the truth. People like him give 9/11 Truth a bad name, deflect from the real truth on the issue, and drive people away from 9/11 Truth and the real truth.
Neither Mr. Rivero nor I said he was 100% correct all the time. I agree with you about a missile hitting the Pentagon from the appearance of the debris field. But that raises the issue: Where did the plane go? And what happened to the passengers and crew? Mr. Rivero, I believe, makes a sincere and honest effort to report the truth unlike the Fox News, CNN bull*shit.
There is a theory that the flights (all Boeing aircraft ) were taken over via FTS (Flight Termination System) not hijackers. This system once activated from a ground operator cuts off radio comms and takes control of all flight controls. The crew of the plane can no longer control the aircraft nor communicate. The planes were all landed at Westover Airbase in Chicopee MA. . In the early evening of 9/11 2 large military transports (which is what is based there C5's) took off and landed at Andrews....
Please admit you’ve never set foot in Manhattan.
I'll admit it, Andy. I've never set foot in Manhattan. Except there was that one time when I saw you panhandling on Fifth Ave. I thought of throwing you a quarter. But then I thought, "Nah, he'll just use it to buy illicit drugs."
Oh snap! You wouldn’t have been wrong.
Kudos on your research Ray. It seems the number 1 obstacle for many is not what is in front of them, but what their minds will won't let them accept.
I was one of them who didn't want to believe there were those in government capable of such acts, but it took 911 to open my eyes.
Thanks for the confirmation, N.W.! Appreciated!
Like you, my eyes were opened when JFK was killed using that junk of a weapon, (Mannlicher–Carcanowhich) was held up as "the murder weapon" which H. Oswald supposedly used. The whole affair seemed too much like a skit. Of course, I was in Kindergarten on that day, but once I had grown up a bit and shown a few things, the picture that I had trusted previous, was distorted as the "facts" became questionable. The questionable affairs on that fateful day were so numerous, almost similar to 9-11, that anyone weighing the facts would be persuaded. VERY few folks were willing and able to assimilate the reality of things that happened that day. And as you (I think) correctly pointed out, they just couldn't stomach what was obviously the truth.
To this day, I think that Oswald did not even pull the trigger. The shot, you recall, was at quite a distance, and two shots, actually, not just one, hitting their mark, using that junk bolt action rifle on a distant moving target, with heart pumping and breathing erratic, seems to me to be a stretch. I think another professional hit man did the dirty work from that book depository probably from a different window using a hunting rifle trued to that distance. I also am TOTALLY convinced that the president was also shot from the front somewhere by another gunman. Otherwise his head would never have been thrown backward. Forward, yes, certainly from a shot from behind, but impossible to be then jerked backward, by anything coming from the rear.
I recall viewing an online gruesome pic of the president's body, a close up, of mainly his head, with the back of his skull all shredded. That's exactly what would be expected by a moderate-speed bullet shot from the front somewhere. The only way to really tell, is if an expert were to examine and determine the ENTRY wound's location and thereby a rough accounting of the trajectory of the bullet(s).
We the people don't have to determine every last detail. When the authorities which are slated to accomplish that gruesome task fail to do their job, we can assume foul play. And with so many other many questionable incidents having been reported since then, the trust in the govt has waned considerably, as we the people get fed the same propaganda, using the same outlets and techniques as the rest of them.
I'm not alone in these thoughts, I'm quite sure.
Now, to assume that Thomas Mathew Crooks intentionally grazed Mr. Trump's ear for a political advantage for the Right, is beyond wild. I would have to take the position that the monies he had stashed in those secluded accounts was not legitimately obtained. How could a young nerd amass such a cache? Why hide it? That has been swept under the rug. A scenario might be that he was secretly "hired" to do the hit, and was even paid up front. The kid then felt obligated to complete the work assigned and went through with his part of the deal, though the shot JUST missed.
The part that does not add up is why then would the kid fire the residual 5 shots sporadically? And why was so much ammo brought to the task, if he didn't want to just shoot people randomly, (after killing the target)? He MUST have had some deep seated emotional resentment harbored.
I guess we'll never know. I'm just super glad that his intentions were not successful in his attempt to murder Mr Trump.
'Shouldn't even be thinking about this stuff, but it's hard not to.
Yours in Christ,
Ray
I’m pretty sure jet fuel burning at melting temperatures will not produce smoke. As I remember from my USCG firefighting lessons, white smoke means a relatively cool fire. Black smoke is unburned combustible material.
Yeah, I'm not real sure how that all works, but just from a layperson's perspective, it appears that when the jet (probably with plenty of fuel aboard) crashed and burned, that there was a huge fire-ball immediately showing itself. Then it dissipated, and I think the black smoke followed. In my thinking, when the fire ball dissipated, it was due to having run its course, burning up the liquid and fumes that was available to it. Sure, the stuff in the bldg (if flammable) would also then burn, but it would probably not reach the temp required to melt steel. The exact physical mechanics of things going on during those few minutes is immaterial, since the basic characteristics of jet fuel is pretty well understood, as you already know. Truth in its perfection is difficult to nail down in circumstances like that one. But that's OK.
Thank you for your additional professional info.
R
Why all the "melting" talk? Hot steal bends easy, just ask a Back Smith!
There is quite a difference between steel bending and the issues I raised, especially my third point.
Thank you, Ray for spelling it all out. My husband graduated first in his class (twice) in mechanical engineering and because he’s afraid to believe the narrative, doesn’t want to even look at the evidence. I never realized how threatening the truth really is. I’ll save this information for when he’s ready.
Your sister in the Lord, Shanon
I agree with much of what you listed. Thanks. Let me add that Lucky Larry gave a speech in Israel after the catastrophe admitting he had designed an replacement building in 2000, before he should be sure that it would be needed. 15 year old steel and concrete skyscrapers can hardly be considered to have a need to be replaced. THE POINTS I LISTED ARE POINTS WHICH DID NOT REQUIRE EXTENSIVE STUDY. In addition, The 9/11 truth movement has been severely weakened because such a high percentage of activists only focus on debating what happened rather than simple outreach to non-choir. Because people did die at the Pentagon and Shanksville, its not irrelevant. Nevertheless, vicious debates about these issues have weakened the 9/11 truth movement. I respect scientifically based researchers who say 77 DID hit the pentagon. Here is a link where you can find a 5 plus hour video addressing this. My favorite of the 17 chapters is chapter 6, where a photo of the remnants of 77 are shown https://911speakout.org/pentagon-fl/
While I appreciate all these comments and concur, this is all old news.
The real question is: Why is Children's Health Defense bringing this up now and rehashing what was abundantly obvious?
Yes, I’m suspicious. This smells like a real pile of bullshit to me.
Timing is suspicious too…RFK announcing his support for Trump.
I don’t have and didn’t need an Engineering or Medical degree to know 9/11 was a controlled demolition and that Covid was a hoax. It’s abundantly clear they want us dead, they want to steal all of our money, and that they are psychotic, corrupt, criminals.
Now, let’s move on and figure out how we legally and officially remove each and every one of them and charge them with treason and prevent future incidents.
I always liked how the jet's wings & engines didn't chip or smudge the Pentagon's paint, just a nice round clean hole! I.e. a miracle! Praise [Muslim's Allah] & Satan!
I learned a lot about death & Islam on 9-11!
Oh, that's an easy one! The jumbo jet's wings simply folded backward as the engines pivoted on them and followed the massive jet straight into the hole perfectly! Now the disappearing act of that same jumbo jet is a little harder to explain. I guess the same magician who made the jet that crashed in Pen. disappear, also made the one that "hit the Pentagon" disappear.
Ray
Kind of like all the dozens of video camera evidence of the missile strike on the Pentagon disappeared after the FBI confiscated all of the videotapes within one hour of the event. Never seen again. Except for a few frames of a security camera, almost indiscernible , that appear to show a plane skirting the ground before impact. Obviously fake. Funny how whenever the FBI releases those kind of videos (i.e. the Jan 6th pipe bomber), the video resolution goes down by ~10X and the frame rate is reduced by 5X, with the most important sections edited out. Real strange how that happens.
As long as we don't question the Muslim's religion of peace or 3000+ dead idolaters, Satan's people can/ will give us even more peace, next time! Praise Allah & Satan!
I'm glad you feel the evidence that 9/11 was a false flag is obvious. A Zogby poll on the 20th 9/11 anniversary showed that over 40% of Americans still hold that Al Queda did 9/11, with only 14% saying the US did it and 7% saying Israel did it. Do you doubt the power of the legacy media? Do you still hold public education is a waste of time?
The planes that hit WTC1 & WTC2 were drone aircraft, you can see the standard Air Force issue remote control pod on the bottom of the plane hitting WTC2. Obviously since a regular aircraft would just splatter in a big fireball against the heavy steel outer columns of the building, the drones had shaped charges in their nose and wings, which is an elementary technique of cutting through heavy steel.
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMayTWzOGY0
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory - video Dailymotion WTC2 video, Flight 175, Boeing 767-222/ER:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2p7wmu
Gallery | 9/11 Anomalies Plane Boeing 767 crash into WTC2 pictures, remote control pod
https://911anomalies.wordpress.com/gallery/
"....First off, all serious researchers aside from Morgan Reynolds (a former Bush economist) agree that planes actually hit the towers, however the planes that hit the towers had no windows and extra equipment attached (PODs) and are believed to be remote control drone aircraft. In fact, a similar plan was devised in 1962 by Robert McNamara called OPERATION NORTHWOODS which detailed flying an aircraft filled with FBI agents (allegedly college students on vacation) in flight the plane would switch transponder signals with a drone aircraft which would then be shot down over Cuba. The FBI agents on the plane would then land safely and resume new covert identities. There is evidence that a similar plot was hatched on 9/11:
Thomas Deatherage, Former Airline Captain B- 747-400 and B- 737-300: "After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2. Also, I would like to find an insider A and P mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the N issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed."
MARTIN MARIETTA LANTIRN NAVIGATION AND TARGETING SYSTEM: The system consists of two externally-mounted pods carried on some fighter aircraft. LANTIRN was first employed during the Persian Gulf War.
Development of LANTIRN began in 1980, and the first production pod was delivered in 1987. The AAQ-13 navigation pod contains a Forward Looking InfraRed sensor (FLIR) and a Terrain Following Radar (TFR). FLIR imagery provides the pilot a view of terrain ahead of the aircraft at night. The TFR allows "hands-off" flight as low as 100 feet above the ground while avoiding obstacles in the aircraft's path. The AAQ-14 targeting pod has a FLIR and a laser designator/ranger to "illuminate" or mark the target for laser-guided bomb deliveries. The USAF ordered LANTIRN pods for F-15E and selected F-16C/D fighters. ..."
You were lucky..I just said I'd wished to go to school with the Smartest girl...meryl.
What is so important about Meryl is not her brilliance. There are so many brilliant people at MIT. She cares about people rather than personal advancement and has shown great courage for decades.
I was impressed. Without an engineering degree, she got right to the heart of the matter. She even brought up angles I hadn't heard others discuss. Such insight!
Said 'opinion' ignores the complete absence any photographic (and audible) evidence of a series of timed detonations as used by those in that business (and engineering specialty) of demolition. Left alone too is the degree of difficulty of maintaining the integrity of an array of placed shape charges in the face of deteriorating building condition due to fires started by aircraft collision and impact with the central columns and fires fed by jet fuel early on; NONE of these could be planned for in an actual demolition as planned out by any company in this business in an hour's time let alone a week (and going unnoticed in their activity.) Submit your theory depends heavily on magic.
While you may make a nice circumstantial case here, it fails when considering hard evidence., logistics, and the non-observation of persons placing detonation charges.
There is audio of explosions, not to mention eye witnesses and FDNY members themselves. If thermite charges were in the central core, it's doubtful anyone would hear those, as I don't believe they "explode" like dynamite charges do.
Nothing of the kind evidence I point to exists that I'm aware of. If such 'evidence' existed, it would predominate in discussions, but it doesn't. Nor are there any of the other artifacts I wrote of.
The totality of what I've seen written on this subject is the sum total of a collection of Dunning-Kruger types with no DRE (directly related experience) not in possession of all the facts and misinterpretation of those facts that they presume to know.
I find this to be true about the JFK assassination too; again, a collection of Dunning-Kruger types with no DRE (directly related experience) not in possession of all the facts and a misinterpretation of those facts that they presume to know.
Dunning Kruger describe you perfectly. You don't know what you are talking about. Rather than listen to a know-nothing like yourself, I would say listen to this guy, Structural Engineering Professor and chairman of his dept University of Alaska:
WTC7 could ONLY come down the way it did by simultaneously cutting all 49 support columns.
Expert DEMOLISHES Establishment Story About WTC Bldg. 7 Collapse! The Jimmy Dore Show:
https://rumble.com/v40kb91-expert-demolishes-establishment-story-about-wtc-bldg.-7-collapse.html
"...The destruction of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, was not a result of fires, according to the much-anticipated final report issued today by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”..."
Idiot. You and the researchers you cite fail to examine certain primary evidence.
Failing to include that evidence renders ANY findings by you or the researchers you cite INVALID.
People like you fail to include ALL the obervations made that day and ONLY cite that so-called evidence that supports your preconceived conclusions.
You don't dare examine what it actually takes to demolish a building under controlled conditions, the weeks of work and planning, ALL that is immaterial to the dream world you and others live in with regards to understanding the field of building demolition.
NO individual handling explosives and det cord would enter a burning building like WTC 7 that day ... YOU FAIL UTTERLY to understand the inherent dangers involved. This makes you pretty much a nutcase that can imagine anything. Your word, your analysis, is subject to your 'make believe' world of fantasy.
You don't know what you are talking about. The demolition was setup well in advance of 9/11. The uber-establishment that did this, had complete control over the building and could close off an entire sublevel to their use, installing the demolition charges and controls. I wouldn't use det cord in this case I'd use all electric delay caps, prewired to test and fire. Which was meant to be after flight 93 (drone) hit the building which didn't happen because of its control failure. The drone had to be shot down.
It's not that difficult to cut 79 columns in a subfloor. And that's what they did, watch and learn:
https://rumble.com/v4r61sx-this-man-one-of-europes-top-demolition-experts-died-in-a-car-accident-in-20.html
"This man, one of Europe’s top demolition experts, died in a car accident in 2011.
5 years earlier, this video was taken, in which he makes a shocking claim about the destruction of WTC Building 7 on 9/11.
“This is a controlled demolition… it’s been imploded.” "
And he concluded that just watching a video of the WTC7 collapse. He wasn't familiar with the 9/11 event, so he wasn't interested in any conspiracies. Just the engineering.
Why not critique the 6 points I made above? You overlook the possibility that the legacy media is owned by those who have an interest in putting forth the official conspiracy theory.
Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go? 1:15:59 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8
Dr. Judy Wood - “The Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in mid air.”
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/
Dr. Judy Wood - Toasted Cars 15:53 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLxdHlkzfpY
Mario - if my memory serves me, more than 2 years ago, you were the one that sent me a link to go down the rabbit hole of 9/11. Now, I don’t believe anything I was ever told. We landed on the moon? Not a chance.
disappointing isn't it?
It's a sad journey...this rabbit hole--- but oh so necessary. Our government lied to us freely and copiously to support absurd beliefs....and to avoid admitting how much or tax money was simply stolen...
These are facts...
1. Space travel...and that includes to the moon-- is impossible for numerous reasons--
a Nasa engineer name of Bill Kaysing has laid it all out in a book...WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON. It is hard to find this book. Fact is....we have never even made it out of low earth orbit. Not ever. Before the instant transmission of photographs from locations was possible we could maintain this absurd fiction. We can't lie about this anymore.
2. The WTC was a bust and was losing so much money the owners needed to get rid of it. It had a very low occupancy rate and was not meeting its expenses. They took out huge insurance policies that covered "terrorist attacks" and blew it up.
3. There was no "pandemic"....it is impossible that any so-called virus could suddenly emerge all over the world and kill and/or sicken millions of people at the same time. This virus never existed as famous epidemiologists and scientists now clearly tell us. A "virus" is not a micro organism....but is misnamed. What are called viruses are nothing but debris and cellular waste that is on the way to being disposed of by our immune systems whose job it is to do that exact thing. The actual existence of Viruses is in severe doubt
All of the above has been proven.
Quite right about "viruses" as Antoine Bechamp revealed in the 1800s after meticulous research and experimentation; virologists continue to lie about observing viruses such as the one supposedly causing Covid when they have never, in fact, been able to culture and isolate a virus without contamination and only observe the debris and cellular waste of bacterial action (as you so correctly point out).
Common sense: we haven’t even been able to sustain environments on our own planet. You know, like the ocean. 30 feet deep is 1 atmosphere..Imagine leaving Earth in a tin can with a flimsy space suit.
You bring up a good point about timing, like the crack epidemic.
Everything hit the streets at the same time, in every major city! Then we found out Oliver North - along w the US Military - was selling crack for cash so the Government could hide its weapons sales. Oh my! WTAF?!
Now they just have Bkack book with that FASB-56 law or something like that.
I’ll take it all with a grain of salt
That said, here’s the book you mentioned by Bill Kaysing:
https://annas-archive.org/md5/daca0b0f51ab0c8e645836eb98c3aec6
Looks like an interesting and quick read
Yes we did land on the moon and no the buildings were not vaporized by some fabled directed energy weapons. That's utter nonsense. The whole thing is explained with overwhelming evidence and accuracy by controlled demolitions. No need for any Sci-fi.
I'm not going to argue about that.
A high level engineer finally came up with a reason to explain why we never went back to the moon or why we never sent another manned mission to the moon.
This is what he said on national television:
"We have not returned to the moon because NASA lost that technology"
as in...a kid "lost his homework" ...NASA lost the technology????
No...NASA never had this technology... real "space travel" --as in leaving the earths atmosphere and gravitational field-- is still decades away and may never happen. Sorry to bust your balloon. This explains the highly suspicious behavior of these "astronauts" at the debriefing shown on television. Visibly uncomfortable--these men hemmed and hawed and acted like teenagers who had been joy riding in Dads car and crashed it....Fact is....these overgrown boys were had probably spent their "time on the moon" partying in Las Vegas with strippers and were photographed doing that. God forbid their wives should see those pictures. The moon photos have been analyzed ad nauseam. There are all kinds of anomalies proving these were not taken on the moon. The moon buggy is the most bizarre addition of all...pictures are shown of a vehicle that looks suspiciously like a beach buggy bumping around on the "moon's surface"...an obvious set. At points in the movies stage lights are visible. There are dozens of visible and strange inconsistencies in lighting and even the prints of the "astronaut's shoes" in the moon dust was incriminating. How can there be "dust" on the moon and why would a boot make an impression in it? So many questions and so few answers. It was a lie. Get over it.
Nonsense. The Chang'e 6 was just launched by China on May 3, this year, and orbited the Moon on May 8, Landed on the FAR SIDE of the Moon (most difficult, much more than Apollos) on June 1. And then the ascender module took off from the Moon on June 6, docked in orbit with Service Module, landing back on Earth on the 25th. What makes you think having humans on a larger version is somehow impossible. Musk is going to do it with Starship in a few years, there's no magic involved, its already been planned. Even a Youtuber was booked to fly on a mission around the Moon. Quit inventing worthless crap, like the CIA cares about whether we land on the Moon or not.
There is nothing stupendous about going to the moon or landing on the moon. China, Japan, India have all put landers on the moon recently. Even the Russians were able to land two large Rovers on the Moon in 1970 and 1973.
You can see the Moon Reconnaissance Orbiter photos right now. And the Japanese SELENE probe to the Moon & the Chandrayaan-2 Indian Moon orbiter. It would be an incredible job to fake those. They would have to match ground observations and invent fine detail to be compatible with that. For what purpose? A crazy notion.
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
"...SELENE photographs
In 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings.[1] On the left are two photos taken on the lunar surface by the Apollo 15 astronauts August 2, 1971 during EVA 3 at station 9A near Hadley Rille. On the right is a 2008 reconstruction from images taken by the SELENE terrain camera and 3D projected to the same vantage point as the surface photos. The terrain is a close match within the SELENE camera resolution of 10 metres.
AS15-82-11121: Apollo 15 Lunar Roving Vehicle
AS15-82-11121: Apollo 15 Lunar Roving Vehicle
AS15-82-11122: Apollo 15 photo
AS15-82-11122: Apollo 15 photo
3D SELENE reconstructed photo
3D SELENE reconstructed photo
I suppose you figure China's plan to send astronauts to the moon in 2027 is all to make a fake video landing. And all the amateur astronomers and hundreds of foreign science institutes with hundreds of radio & optical telescopes will be suckered in. I still can't figure out why you figure NASA would go to all that incredible expense & trouble to fake a moon landing. If they didn't want to spend the money, just cancel the program, they do it all the time. In fact cancelling these type of mission is the norm not the exception. And yet here they are going to great lengths and cost to do another series of human moon landings. I suppose you figure that's going to be fake too? Artemis missions? Fake? SpaceX's plans for private Moon flyby mission, already financed by a Japanese billionaire with the Youtuber, Everyday Astronaut selected as one passenger.
They may have landed a vehicle on the moon. But no living human being has ever walked on the moon. There're no pictures of humans on the moon. The reason for that is no humans have been to the moon. Sure-- there are tons of "space ships" circling around and even landing on the moon. But no one has ever walked on the moon let alone come back alive from such an adventure.
Perhaps Musk will overcome all the numerous facts of temperature, physics and aeronautics that make manned space travel impossible at this time. More power to him. I doubt I will live to see it. Hope you do, however.
Why because you say so? Who are you? I just posted you reams of evidence they were on the Moon. Was that fake too? What convoluted, pointless conspiracy have you weaved that has no point, no purpose, completely ridiculous. If the Politicians didn't want to go to the Moon it's the simplest thing on Earth, they do it ALL THE TIME, JUST CANCEL THE MISSION. They don't need to go through some extraordinary elaborate deception. That's a crazy idea.
Haha! China and India cannot even help their own citizens during a disaster (mining collapse is one example, earthquakes) and one is to believe they’re so technologically advanced. Yeah, I use to believe that too!!!
Oh another huge lie perpetuated that the whole world believed!!!! Lance Armstrong and the stour de France!!! I read recently that he had 2 children, naturally!!! At this point, I don’t believe the guy ever had cancer!!! They either duped him or he was in on the scam! Who benefitted?! Abramson Cancer Center, biotech, everyone wearing their yellow wrist bands! OmG! We are so gullible.
Most of the tech you use comes from China. They build a couple thousand kms of high speed rail every year while the USSA can't build 1 km even after spending $10B. What does Lance Armstrong have to do with anything?
I wonder if you have seen the video of NASA scientists saying that "we're working on the problem of getting through the radiation (Van Allen) belt; we knew how to do it in the 60s, but we've lost that information since then".
Space craft have landed on the moon several times, but not people.
Short and to the point. There have never been "moon walkers"....net yet anyway!
That's no problem. Calculated dosage passing through the Van Allen belts to the moon and back is a meager 2.1 mSv. You will get 10mSv from a CAT scan. The overall dosage for a Moon mission is largely determined by the level of Solar Proton Flux. Which can in a bad year amount to 406mSv for an Apollo type Moon mission. That won't kill you, it won't even make you sick. Acute dosages of >1000mSv will lead to some radiation sickness. Some long term increase in cancer risk but lower than ~ a hundred things humans do with total apathy.
Yet we don’t have the technology or expertise to explore parts of our own planet, easily accessible, like…the Ocean. Sorry, not buying it. And people spew off these numbers as if they actually know what they mean. I know and understand temperatures. We can all relate to 100 degrees F or 38 degrees C and know it’s a hot day, but who the hell knows what it is that you just wrote and how to verify it? It sounds intimidating and as though you might be intelligent and educated, but you need prof that is relatable to people with no knowledge. For instance, we don’t need degrees to know oxygen exists.
That begs me to ask, did everyone forget their elementary school lesson on photosynthesis when there is a discussion on masking, climate change and CO2 cow farts?
look-- there are spectroscopic instruments that measure temperatures on the moon and the sun and elsewhere. The moon has very little atmosphere and is too hot and too cold in regions in or out of direct sunlight. Those are facts. Study Kaysings book and stop wasting your typewriters.
You should inform NASA.
I haven't looked up the quantitative data, am merely taking the NASA scientists' word for it. I wonder if you have taken the qualitative nature of the "radiation" in the van Allen belts into account - large fast-moving ions?
I don’t believe we ever made it to the moon. There is overwhelming evidence that we are way too stupid. We’ll start with Covid and global lockdowns.
Where is all the airplane wreckage? You cant answer because there wasnt any.
L.O.L., hee hee hee hee heeee-- ya just gotta luv those Flat Earther trolls, Hah hah hah hah haaaah, boy it's great to end the day with a good laugh!!!
Nixon on a landline talking to Astronauts did it for me. My cellphone doesn’t work if there are too many trees!
yup......wasn't that too silly!
I’m with you Laura Kasner
Laura - Yes, I remember :)
Who controls the agreed upon reality through the mainstream media
and why they fear disclosing the truth about the extraterrestrial reality? by Dan Willis
https://thewebmatrix.net/
It's upsetting knowing that most of what we were told/taught is a lie. William Casey , former CIA head, said "We will know our disinformation program has worked when everything the public believes is a lie"..
Until recently I sided with the majority of 9/11 truthers in disagreeing with Dr. Wood, who I have met. My complaint for years was that a directed energy weapon could not have sufficient power to destroy such a large building. A friend from the electric power industry explained that the energy required equaled the amount of power east of the Rockies. More recently one supporter of Dr. Wood's hypothesis says the government used technology gleaned from extraterrestrials. I'm hardly sure there is no such technology, but I'm unwilling to rely of the existence of such in my organizing. Quite recently advocates of Dr. Wood's ideas explain she makes no claims and just presents evidence, which impressed me. I also agree the toasted cars cannot be ignored.
She might as well claim the buildings were beamed up into a giant alien space cruiser. Occam's razor, it is all explained very well by standard controlled explosive and thermal cutting charges. No need to go into hyperspace to find an alternative explanation. Sounds more like standard CIA "Poisoning The Well" strategy to discredit the Truth movement.
Yep. There is a certain mental "topography" or profile whereby the victim thereof suffers from the crazed belief that the more elaborate and convoluted the explanations, with the least actual evidence, is somehow most likely to be The True Answer. Go figure. My first cousin is married to one of 'em... Go figure.
Cars indeed toast when hit by thermite ;-).
Though I haven't been convinced by Dr. Wood's theory, could it be those "toasted" cars were a result of thermite debris raining down on them?
Much thermite residue discovered on tops of adjacent buildings was unburnt I've read
Technology Suppression
Brief History of Technology Suppression
The following circumstantial evidence reveals that medical solutions, anti-gravity and zero point energy technology exists
Ever wonder why...
We are still using gasoline to power our vehicles?
Why we are still using dangerous and obsolete energy technologies of nuclear, oil and coal?
Why we are using primitive rocket propulsion to overcome gravity?
Why today our average life span is a mere 75 years?
https://thewebmatrix.net/technologysuppression.html
https://thewebmatrix.net/
Why there are no cures for common diseases such as cancer?
Why we have not made open contact with advanced off planet civilizations?
The towers collapsed very neatly, and very visibly, inside their own foot print. They did NOT "just" turn "mostly to dust in mid air." I saw loads of vids of this, now wiped clean from JooTube. Judy Wood was/is a controversial commenter who showed up after the collapse, and not even very close to the collapse, of the towers. I have close friends who live in New York and witnessed the strikes as well as the collapse of the towers.
Could be true....who knows?
One thing is certain however.....guys with boxcutters who just barely learned to fly a Cesna did not fly a jet into the WTC. And even if they did.....nothing would have happened. These aluminum tubes would have disintegrated and the buildings would have been fine. There were only two of these jets.... the third planned was shot down in Pennsylvania. We know and everyone knows....the THREE buildings were demolished because the the whole WTC was a bust. It was never going to pay for itself. Money talks.
and besides that....apparently there terribly damning SEC records in the building #7 that needed to disappear.
Arguing over the details....blasting away at each other about the finer points is absurd. We never went to the moon and we still cannot "walk on the moon"
There was no "global pandemic" nor can there ever be....and the WTC towers were demolished with "controlled demolition" technology that is routinely used to bring down unwanted structures.
Get a life.
Exactly
The people who now know the truth about the plandemic, but might not yet question the narrative surrounding 9/11 - I ask the question - if they lied about Covid, what else have they lied about.
At almost 5 hours long, this documentary doesn’t answer all the questions about that day. But it certainly asks them.
https://rumble.com/v12urxr-september-11-the-new-pearl-harbor.html
Probably safe to assume everything. Evolution is another questionable theory. Darwin was funded by Rothschilds...They dont want us to know what the world really is. What is going on in Antarctica?
Ian - re: evolution. May I suggest the book, The Case for Creation by Lee Strobel.
👍🏼🎯
To answer Dr Nass's question about how the explosives were placed. President Bush's relative was in control of the security company for the WTC until a year before the catastrophe.
Not to mention reports of bomb sniffing security dogs being removed from the buildings for a time
The moon landings, Armstrong et al 3 day trip, now it takes a month, same rocket ship. Plus space suits not built to withstand cosmic and solar radiation; astronauts no jet lag. Did I miss something? The US has pulled off a few big ones. I’d imagine they could even do a rug pull on the national debt.
Yup...but sadly the poorly educated American football fans can't tear themselves away from the television long enough to find out the truth to any of this nonsense. Poor deluded fools who were conned into spending how many trillions in "space travel" Who got that money?
Rug pull on National Debt! Love it! Although I think their ‘rug pull’ will include stealing our assets. Right now they’re encouraging 2nd mortgages via HELOCs so people can tap their equity. At the same time they’re outsourcing all of our jobs to foreigners. No one seems to talk about that.
Now HELOCS are adjustable. It use to be that one could get a fixed rate.
So, it will be another financial terrorist tool to kill their citizens financially.
I was thinking paint bricks gold and claim tonnage, has anyone seen Fort Knox gold?
Since when, they are sending landers & orbiters to the moon all the time. Many nations. I don't know where you get a month from. By now going to the moon is just routine. Space suits don't block much solar or cosmic radiation but the amounts are normally well below human tolerances. Except if there is a serious solar storm, then you should take cover behind a significant mass of material.
no sorry....no human being has ever walked on the moon. Unmanned vehicles have been to the moon. I do not think they ever returned. A take-off from the moon would not be possible. Find a copy of Kaysings book. I'm done with you.
The temperature variations on the moon alone are enough to prohibit "walking on the surface of the moon." In sunlit areas the temperatures go into 1OOO degrees F. And in the shade the temperature plunges into the absolute O range. These are regions that are close together. No suit or vehicle could withstand those temperatures. End of story. Sorry.
Learn a bit of science before making dumb comments. The Moon is a vacuum, heat flows are minimal. The Sun is just a little hotter than on Earth. Heat flow determines temperature. Heat flows are far higher on Earth due to the atmosphere & wind.
i could say the same to you....but why bother. Some of us believe in fairy tales....that doesn't make them true. Please stop this blathering. It is boring. "The sun is just a little hotter than earth"...
I'll say!
The sun is as hot as a nuclear explosion. Get a grip.
I said the Sun is just little hotter on the Moon than on Earth. You just have to subtract atmospheric absorption. Probably around 30% I imagine. And no, I only believe in the truth not fairy tales about faking Moon Landings. And you figure every Rocket Engineer on Earth must be a Grifter who knows zip about science. Give it up.
You mean the atmosphere that doesnt get sucked into the vacuum?
One just returned on June 25th, two months ago, carrying Moon rock samples from the Far side of the Moon. A Chinese mission. Yeah, I guess China faked that too. Much easier to believe you are faking it. Musk must be a crazy person believing such things. The Starship never launched. It was all fake, everyone who seen it were hypnotized. Yep.
😂😂😂😂😂
You would believe ANYthing😂😂😂
sorry but the Chinese moon mission was NOT MANNED. A machine collected rocks....so what? They have all been doing that....
No human being has yet to set foot on the lunar surface. End of story. And that includes the ridiculous John Glen....who actually did admit it was all a lie.
Get a grip. I hope you can grow up....but since you are most likely a machine....it is doubtful.
I stand by these truths:
1. There have been no manned moon missions by anyone. Yet. A key reason for this is the Van Allen Radiation belt. No one can survive passage through it and also the many circling mini astroids that would punch holes in any space ship.
2. The World Trade Center was demolished by high tech explosives probably backed by our own government and not "Arabs with boxcutters" according to numerous scientific studies at Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.org .
3. There was never a "pandemic" that killed millions the world over....as scientist Denis Rancourt has quite clearly explicated with his group who published papers on this topic. There was a mild flu and no cause for the world-wide lockdown that ensued.
These are all lies promoted by our government. Get a life. But you probably can't as you are most likely a robot.
That’s one month for a human bound round trip.
Send me a postcard please when you get there. I'd love to see it. Have a good trip!
They only took 2 weeks, limits on supplies to stay longer. Should be no problem. Why are you so adamant nobody went to the Moon. What are you a Luddite and Malthusian?
That's great, I've had encounters of the 2nd kind, my "buddies" at the CIA & their MKUltra program. What does that have to do with the Moon landings?
Mind control. A spell many people are under. We are living in an illusion. That's a fact. Much of what we were taught is a lie. Just like people don't believe the earth is flat. Just like people don't believe there are lands beyond the ice wall. Most people do not have time to really dig deeper into many things, and anything that goes against their beliefs is sci-fi. I have news. A lot of things we assumed were sci-fi are in fact not. We were told in movies and TV shows all along. The Simpsons doing an episode on Covid, verbatim, years back..2004. Another episode where Trump would be President. Many more. And Trump was brought in by the military. He was asked to run in 2016.
The movie The Matrix, the X-Files show, the movie Contagion, Red October, the show Blacklist, etc. We have been told truths on the patented mind control device called TV. The reality we think we live in is not real at all. Now it's time to wake up to what they have done to us. If people don't, then don't expect anything to get better. Once we know our real past, then we can move forward and not continue in the lie and keep repeating it.
Most people I find can't read long posts. They expect everything to be answered in 2 sentences. Our whole existence summed up in 2 sentences. Same with videos. Anything longer than 10 minutes is too long, but they can watch a 2 hour movie. I have watched 8 to 12 hour videos, but not all at once. I guess no one heard of pause and come back later. It's obvious people won't sit that long nor is it good to sit that long. Learning takes time. If people really care, they will do what it takes and however long it takes.
Another man on Substack has been harassed by the powers that be because of his research on the many school shootings, and other articles he wrote on many subjects. He did an excellent article on NASA.
There is no doubt that we are all being played and laughed at. This includes the manufacturered wars that are funded by both sides for power, money, and control.
a sad commentary .... Please keep "thinking" It is harmless...
I'd like to know where that moon landing money went and I'd like to know why no one else has ever walked on the moon if we have been back so many times....and shown us real live video footage. Since instant relay became a possibility suddenly....no one went to the moon anymore. Coincidence?
I'd advise all the "moon landing" fairy tale believers to take a look at the actual vehicle that they told us went to the moon. It is an hilarious contraption that looks like a 7th grade science project. I am not going to bother with this. Bye.
?!? I don't understand what the hell you are talking about.
But then, you have proven you not only ‘can’t’ think you ‘don’t’ think …….
There’s a compelling documentary “Seven” that dives into the numerous problems with the mainstream expert opinions surrounding the building #7 collapse on 9/11.
There are a few more concerns regarding building #1 & #2 as well. Very little rubble was found following the “collapse” of the towers. No desks, chairs, phones, steel, concrete, bodily remains, etc. were found. Tons and tons of dust were found everywhere. Why?
Yes, and ....
Not too long ago I came across a vid showing one of the tower's center top pole as it fell along with some of the top floor(s) right in front of our eyes, turned to dust! A METAL structure! Now if it is true that some secret weapon has been developed to do weird things like that, it could have been also (maybe) employed to pulverize concrete. Of course, the demo industry has perfected its art, and knows how to demo without super explosive charges, but rather "just the right amount" to do the job sort of quietly and without launching debris for miles. In the many pictures and vids of the incident where the tower was collapsing, there is a LOT of cement powder and debris being "blown" out and away from the main bldg. Even at the top, where it would not be witnessed due to "pancaking" effect. The whole thing was orchestrated and the narrative long beforehand worked out to the best it could be. That's my not so humble opinion. Further, in Maui, strange but parallel things were documented and photographed, like cars' alum block engines were melted down and the liquid metal running down the gutter, while the tires were still in tact. The window glass of these cars was MELTED, not just shattered, and also ran in liquid or blob form. So many weird things, and so much to consider, but without having X-Ray vision, we cannot know what lies behind the curtain. What we CAN know is that it is not friendly to the common person.
R
R.
9/11 in a word ISRAEL
More specifically, Mossad/CIA…😉
It took a lot more than Israel to pull that off. That took a supranational organization that controls our governments. Remember this, ALL WARS ARE BANKER WARS:
https://rumble.com/v1ere47-all-wars-are-bankers-wars-by-michael-rivero.html
Who says Isra-hell doesn’t get everyone else to do their bidding?
It is well documented that Israelis rented/occupied an entire floor in one of the towers and had window coverings all around that floor and they also had 24/7 access along with a plethora of climbing equipment, whatever for...? Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer? Hmm...how about both at the same time.
Fifteen years ago, my contribution to this field was a proof from elementary physics that the acceleration with a "pancaking" scenario as claimed by the original NIST report must be slower than 1/3 gravity. The time for the actual collapse of the building was faster than this.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kLN_cNhLpkn3nWUQfHejEVfdVN-teOVMQ42uQBFi2Us/edit?usp=sharing
Elegant!
I helped organize and sponsor several 911 truth events in Ann Arbor Mi years ago. It was shocking to me how brainwashed people were then. We had top people come and speak: Richard Gage from Architects and Engineers for 911 truth and Col Robert Bowman who came out as a "truther" at great expense for himself. Quite a few others. I learned that people don't want to know.
They like/need their cultural myths as a "reality" replacement.
They literally get angry....very like when you wake up someone who is sleeping suddenly.
The 911 official story is among the foundation pieces of America's world view.
Too bad it is a disgraceful lie and that the buildings were slated for demolition long before
any fictional planes plowed into it.
but how did the yacht sink?
Must've been hit by a plane...lol
I remember looking at my husband that day and saying how did that building just fall down like that? He is also a commercial airline pilot and says with 30 years of experience there is no way he could fly a plane low into a building like the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon. That was not a plane.
Dear Lord! Admittedly I’ve not watched the interview. But I will. I doubt I’ll read the book though and here’s why….Too little and WAY too late!! I do NOT possess an engineering degree but I’ve watched controlled demolitions of high rise buildings as a teenager, while out in bicycle rides, exploring the world! This was completely obvious the minute it was seen on the TV screen on the day it happened!
The real question that requires deep thought and analysis is why are people, especially Americans, so gullible?! Why don’t people use their God-given common sense?! How is it possible to indoctrinate so many people and get away with crimes? How is it possible for people to fall for this not once but multiple times: JFK assassination, 9/11, and Covid?! What prohibits people from being able to do their own analysis?
In the first weeks of Covid, if one was listening, Dr. Birx said, “The PCR test had an 80% FALSE POSITIVE rate.” Yet, people ran out and got the test!!! It was as though they were lobotomized!!!
In fact, 9/11 was the day WW3 ‘officially’ started because they used it to implement the Patriot Act and pretend we are at war to strip us if our Constitutional rights by declaring martial law!! For me, and I’m not an Atty, my thoughts are that since these disasters were all based on fraud and carried out with evil, malicious intent to mass murder and profit, then none of their mandates are legitimate and legal. Therefore my God-give rights prevail.
Oh, and then you had the mass indoctrinated allowing their Government to pat them down in airports while freight trains traveling up and down the entire Eastern seaboard, filled with cargo, were completely unattended.
Oh, and the other more obvious notable questions I had as soon as Covid started were: Where were all the bio-hazard containers? Why weren’t dead homeless people all over parts of major Cities being dragged out in body bags?
I mean, they had their RESET stickers, and 6-Feet floor markers, masks, gloves, and hand sanitizer available en masse and ‘at the ready,’ but no biohazard containers for the masks and gloves. I haven’t heard one person with an MD or DO or Public Health degree ask about biohazard containers. People lined up for MILES in their cars to get a PCR test from a complete stranger in an unsterile environment!!!!! Think about that insanity!!! I mean, did anyone even ask themselves if this ‘stranger’ was licensed or qualified? Who was this stranger performing this test? Did they even have citizenship let alone an education or a license? And there was ample evidence EVERYWHERE!!! One just had to do Google searches (before they were heavily censored) to compile a quick list of all of the Corporations involved in the theater of Covid! Yet, people allowed them sobbed to be locked down for 2 years!!! I still believe the lockdown was about installing substations and the Utility infrastructure for the electrical grid. Keep people off the roads. I highly recommend people go find their local substations hidden behind foliage. That seems more important and timely than revisiting 9/11, doesn’t it? But I digressed…
Even having these discussions is completely fueled with stupidity. If you even watched one ALT video you can surely see black helicopters swoop in an detonate bombs at the base of the building. There is ample footage of this even though the full version, filmed by a professional, from a Hoboken vantage point, was taken down. If you listened to interviews of fire fighters and innocent bystanders in or near the building when it collapsed and who were able to successfully flee, they will repeat the same ‘lie’…that they heard multiple explosions in succession at the base of the building. If you have ever seen a controlled demolition, then you should have known it was a controlled demolition. If you have ever seen a high rise building on fire, you’d know they don’t destroy a building. I believe one of the worst high rise building fires was in Philadelphia. Burnt for days from what I recall. There was no collapse.
This was a terrorist event done by our own Government against our own citizens as was the Boston Marathon.
Notice nothing happens at the Olympics though. It’s not because of security. Its because the Olympics is ‘their’ event. The UNs event. Same with Cycling events. 11 of the 17 UN Sustainable Development goals involve cycling. Rosa Kiore found out what the Agenda was because she worked for CAL Trans. Watch out for the Transportation companies and the DOT.
Yeah, the real question is: what the hell is wrong with people?! The people seem to be the problem.
Well, as Jack Nicholson said in "A Few Good Men" : "You can't handle the truth!" which I would apply to people in general; also what Detrich Bonhoffer called the "collective stupidity" of the masses which prevents the use of critical and analytical thinking.
Is there a link to the helicopter video?
"It was as though they were lobotomized!!!"
Yes....were they?
Another term Ive heard is "protective stupidity" which always makes me laugh..becasue I am surrounded by it...
Thanks Meryl! You are an amazing truther! I so appreciate all you are sharing! I have tried to
share this truth about 911 for years and many think I am crazy. It will be nice to have this truth
finally out there for all to see without the media interference.
Welcome to the club to Mr. Setty! Truther here since 2003ish.
Horizontally ejected beams during collapse; streams of flowing molten steel under the subbasement; tons of gold gone missing; put options against airlines a day or so before the event; seismic signatures go BOOM BOOM the day of; plus extreme heat signatures on-site for months afterward... plus ___ (I'm sure I am forgetting a lot these days!)
Then there were the dancing Israelis... and the Mossad / Israeli "art student" public art installation continues to be a curiosity (among the dozens of others): https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/09/gelatin-and-e-team-israeli-art-students.html
Oh, and there were no crashes in Shanksville or the Pentagram.
R.I.P. Barry Jennings, Philip Marshall, Bill Cooper, and other truth-seeking and -telling patriots who were murdered in connection with this crime.
Dr. Nass, you are a brave person.
Hank Paulson was Bush Jr.'s Secretary of Treasury. He was formally a high level Goldman Sachs insider in that investment banking firm. Paulson is yet another example of private companies capturing regulatory agencies; in this case Goldman capturing the Treasury Dept.
It was said by some that building seven, which collapsed later that afternoon, contained much incriminating evidence that some District Attorneys or Attorneys General had amassed against white collar criminals; needless to say all destroyed in the collapse of building seven.
One error the man makes. The collapse of the Towers occurred both from the top & the bottom. The big structural columns in the basement were blown out before the top was demolished..
Isn’t that how they do a controlled demolition, blowing the base and stages up?
Definitely. There’s ample ‘man on the street’ footage proving that ‘in real-time.’