189 Comments

i think it is also very important to disallow regulators from sharing patents and profiting from “partnerships” with the pharma entities they regulate directly or indirectly

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

END PHARMA LIABILITY SHIELD

PROHIBIT GOVT DRUG PROPAGANDA

Expand full comment

The medical and science and academic community needs to recommit itself to an updated nuremburg 2.0 code of medical ethics and medical freedoms. Never Again.

Expand full comment

Great piece Meryl. The one thing I would disagree with is having small fines for people that don't vote. I am a single issue medical freedom voter and plan to vote accordingly in elections moving forward. That being said, the only way there should be a law forcing people to vote is if there is a 'None of the Above' option. Trump and Biden were both terrible for different reasons. If it comes down to those two in 2024, I'll have no part of it.

Keep up the great work, Dr Nass!

Expand full comment

You are a credit to humanity… your unending attempts to help us with all you write is profound and every day I pray for you’

This list to restore our nation is extremely

well written … I am proud of you . You are like a light in the darknessI! I share all you write and encourage others to subscribe!

God bless!

Expand full comment

No self spreading pharmaceuticals. They bypass informed consent. No funding for them.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

Already forwarded to my congressman, with additional items included.

I hope others will do so as well. Please share this! (I'd remove the fines for people who don't vote. I'd want all voter registrations to require SPECIFIC and SEPARATE effort to register to vote, and not have people added willy-nilly by default because they use government programs.)

Expand full comment

Something needs to be done about the mercenary science that is performed in service of big pharma (or any products that can harm). Because there is a compelling public interest in getting high quality transparent science, we need to put our heads together for a solution. I don’t think declaring public health science to be regulated as a utility is the right approach. We need a decentralized science model where pharma-captured science cannot influence the outcomes.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023·edited Jan 1, 2023

"10. Consider small fines for those citizens who do not vote." As a Voluntaryist, I am highly opposed to this. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.

Expand full comment

Maybe testing the dangerous levels of 5g phone towers and put safety measures into place to protect all life that's exposed

Expand full comment

For #1, there should not even be two weeks. There is no excuse whatsoever to demand of the people lockdowns or social distancing. It's blatantly unconstitutional, and here in Arizona, so many of us ignored that tyrannical idiocy the first time that traffic was only somewhat lighter. Even more will ignore any nonsense coming out of the mouths of the wannabe tyrants in the future. No, they do not get two weeks to violate the Constitution; no time at all.

Expand full comment

Great principles, in layman’s rather than legalese. Perhaps something should be said about banning synbio though that is alluded to somewhat loosely. Geoengineering is another thing to specifically campaign against.

Yes, it is a daunting challenge to get anyone in power to accept this pledge but it can’t happen if the objectives aren’t clearly stated and pursued.

Happy New Year Dr. N and everyone.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

With Right to Food, it is not only the right to garden but the right to Farm. I am currently working in Vermont to secure the Right to Farm. You already have that in Maine.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this effort on everyone's behalf!!

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

The arsonists are in all three branches. Hence my statement.

Expand full comment

Yeah ... I don't think so. Very nice work writing this. It's an important document and I support it 100%. That said, totalitarians doing tyranny and genocide are acting on the basis of pure raw power. They are committed. They can only double down. They must oppose those goals military else voluntarily cede power. That the will NEVER do. Instead, for several years now they have waged unconventional warfare on their own citizenry. This is not an error.

Our opposing tactics can vary greatly. History tells us that building life-affirming parallel structures is probably our best strategy. Which this document is a start for. It must go way beyond documents, though. Here's some background:

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/your-guide-to-fifth-generation-warfare

Expand full comment