Suspect they're not worried so much about mob rule as them or family being targets like JFK RFK MLK, Lincoln, McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, etc - to name a few...
Well, come on. Their massive, “impartial” cognitive abilities are still challenged by, what is a girl, what is a boy. Apparently they skipped every remedial Junior High Biology class to ingest ‘shrooms.
The way I look at it is ACB & BK have kids at home and the Obama Biden Crime Families made it very clear that they were not going to let their families be protected from mob violence by the left if they voted the wrong way on Abortion, government censorship, etc.
The Supreme Court got it wrong – and has failed to uphold its responsibility to the Constitution by finding no standing in Murthy v. Missouri. My case of Kennedy v. Biden will proceed in the trial court where there is no question that @ChildrensHD
and I have standing. Justice Alito’s dissent outlines the correct analysis, finding standing and First Amendment violations on the merits. I will continue to fight for free speech in the courts and on the campaign trail.
The courts will not be coming in to save us. We have to come to terms with this, nobody is coming to save us. Meaning we have to do the hard work, take on all of the risks and burdens of figuring out how to save ourselves. And how to save our nation for our children and all who follow us. Censorship. Propaganda. Rigged elections. Injection mandates. Mask mandates. Church closures. Political prosecution. Excessive penalty. Double jeopardy. Our rights and our self-governance have become an illusion.
The courts, even the highest court in the land do not adhere to the US Constitution. They constantly reinterpret it to mean whatever the power center wants it to mean. While the Originalists stay closer to the Founder's intent than the Living Constitution Textualists, they do not interpret and never have interpreted it to mean what it says in the plain language it was written. And they became even further removed from faithfully interpreting the Constitution when they moved from the Natural Law jurisprudence it was written under to the Positive Law jurisprudence that insinuated itself and prevailed in the last century.
The very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It."
And this paper, albeit written by someone on the left lamenting failings they perceive, tells a harsh truth, which is that the jurists who interpret the constitution are little more than "high priests in black robes." Doing the bidding of those who really own this country:
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
The combination of forces at work to neuter the US Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights the elitists in the Founders never really liked or wanted, have succeeded in reinterpreting Freedom to mean Slavery, Ignorance to mean Strength, War to mean Peace. Linguistics. Clever linguistics have made us a post-constitutional republic. Without a bullet fired.
Now what do we do without waiting for permission from a court that will never come?
Worst news for medical freedom ~ consistent with the Texas Medical Association’s rejection of patient physician autonomy and informed consent. Ugh! Afraid many citizens and independent docs will suffer in health and licensure. A very sad day in the USA
SCOTUS has ducked the question rather than answering it. By denying standing they are not saying no violation occurred. Just that they won't deal with this case. As I understand it they are saying the applicants have no standing because the government has unilaterally agreed to stop doing this.
The problem is one of joint and several liability. If Missouri sued Facebook for a trillion dollars in damages alleging that Facebook had colluded with bureaucrats and lobbyists to deny access to life-saving information, they likely would have won some cooperation that gave them standing to go after the federal agencies that colluded with Facebook.
This was done multiple times by Soros-funded groups seeking to legalize pot. Justice Thomas, ruling on one such case, practically wrote a guidebook on what to sue for, and Soros was unwilling to pursue that. Thomas, J., correctly noted that there can be a 9th and 10th Amendment objection to the federal law if it is brought before the Court, asserting state's rights on the subject. The Left refused to care, looking instead to create communal property and destroy all fences. They kept losing and using the losses for fundraising to push a Marxian agenda.
Because the plaintiffs went on a fishing expedition against the federal agencies, there's lack of connection to the actual harm done.
Meanwhile we need a major focus on stopping future plandemics from being perpetrated. Gain of function research should be prohibited by law, which requires that Congress write a law prohibiting federal funding of it. States could do a lot by punishing universities that perform gain of function research, with budget reductions or by simply making the research illegal at the state level. That's not a judicial job but a legislative one.
THIS STANDING ISSUE HAS A SIMPLE (NOT EASY) SOLUTION. "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ET AL. ALL OF THE US CITIZENS WERE DAMAGED BY CENSORSHIP.
These "sentinel" decisions seem to never receive the approval needed to reject these globalist(communist) attacks on our Constitution.There is only ONE PARTY folks.
I wondered if there were a dissent written. One would have thought a determination of standing would have/should have been made in advance of granting certiorari.
Rather than SCOTUS making America wait so long only to be severely disappointed.
Supreme Courts all deepstate infiltrated
jewnited Snakes Of Israel is the Dep State silly!🤔😘😎
All UN governments are, in different ways, part of the deep state...
Sad day for democracy in America.
Sad day for the Republic.
A major lack of courage! Infuriating! I guess they are worried about the mob rule they may face so instead they take the easy way out! Shameful! 😡🤯🤬
Suspect they're not worried so much about mob rule as them or family being targets like JFK RFK MLK, Lincoln, McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, etc - to name a few...
WTF? Just how much freaking information do they need to do some critical thinking?
They are all compromised with the exception of a few....
Those few they want to get rid of or kill.
Well, come on. Their massive, “impartial” cognitive abilities are still challenged by, what is a girl, what is a boy. Apparently they skipped every remedial Junior High Biology class to ingest ‘shrooms.
I had hope for Barrett, that is gone.
The way I look at it is ACB & BK have kids at home and the Obama Biden Crime Families made it very clear that they were not going to let their families be protected from mob violence by the left if they voted the wrong way on Abortion, government censorship, etc.
I agree. But, still……
The Schumer vendetta in action.
Really...
tweet from rfk jr this AM
The Supreme Court got it wrong – and has failed to uphold its responsibility to the Constitution by finding no standing in Murthy v. Missouri. My case of Kennedy v. Biden will proceed in the trial court where there is no question that @ChildrensHD
and I have standing. Justice Alito’s dissent outlines the correct analysis, finding standing and First Amendment violations on the merits. I will continue to fight for free speech in the courts and on the campaign trail.
All of them are bought and paid for. The Supreme Court is a joke.
threatened is also possible -- to a grandkid or such
Threatened: nice little family you have there….
How can the “SUPREME” court rule this way ? The deep state has more sway than the Constitution. America is sliding down the road to totalitarianism
The courts will not be coming in to save us. We have to come to terms with this, nobody is coming to save us. Meaning we have to do the hard work, take on all of the risks and burdens of figuring out how to save ourselves. And how to save our nation for our children and all who follow us. Censorship. Propaganda. Rigged elections. Injection mandates. Mask mandates. Church closures. Political prosecution. Excessive penalty. Double jeopardy. Our rights and our self-governance have become an illusion.
The courts, even the highest court in the land do not adhere to the US Constitution. They constantly reinterpret it to mean whatever the power center wants it to mean. While the Originalists stay closer to the Founder's intent than the Living Constitution Textualists, they do not interpret and never have interpreted it to mean what it says in the plain language it was written. And they became even further removed from faithfully interpreting the Constitution when they moved from the Natural Law jurisprudence it was written under to the Positive Law jurisprudence that insinuated itself and prevailed in the last century.
The very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It."
And this paper, albeit written by someone on the left lamenting failings they perceive, tells a harsh truth, which is that the jurists who interpret the constitution are little more than "high priests in black robes." Doing the bidding of those who really own this country:
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=lawineq
The combination of forces at work to neuter the US Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights the elitists in the Founders never really liked or wanted, have succeeded in reinterpreting Freedom to mean Slavery, Ignorance to mean Strength, War to mean Peace. Linguistics. Clever linguistics have made us a post-constitutional republic. Without a bullet fired.
Now what do we do without waiting for permission from a court that will never come?
Power is taken. Not given.
Worst news for medical freedom ~ consistent with the Texas Medical Association’s rejection of patient physician autonomy and informed consent. Ugh! Afraid many citizens and independent docs will suffer in health and licensure. A very sad day in the USA
Yes Nicole … very sad day
They were scared of impact to them and their families. So much for freedom of speech.
And the fourteenth also never seems to actually grant any sovereign immunity except for the murderous killers
SCOTUS has ducked the question rather than answering it. By denying standing they are not saying no violation occurred. Just that they won't deal with this case. As I understand it they are saying the applicants have no standing because the government has unilaterally agreed to stop doing this.
But the govt did not stop doing it. Admittedly I have not read the decision
The problem is one of joint and several liability. If Missouri sued Facebook for a trillion dollars in damages alleging that Facebook had colluded with bureaucrats and lobbyists to deny access to life-saving information, they likely would have won some cooperation that gave them standing to go after the federal agencies that colluded with Facebook.
Odd they picked the wrong target...
This was done multiple times by Soros-funded groups seeking to legalize pot. Justice Thomas, ruling on one such case, practically wrote a guidebook on what to sue for, and Soros was unwilling to pursue that. Thomas, J., correctly noted that there can be a 9th and 10th Amendment objection to the federal law if it is brought before the Court, asserting state's rights on the subject. The Left refused to care, looking instead to create communal property and destroy all fences. They kept losing and using the losses for fundraising to push a Marxian agenda.
It's called diversion, seeming to pay "attention" to irrelevant things!
Because the plaintiffs went on a fishing expedition against the federal agencies, there's lack of connection to the actual harm done.
Meanwhile we need a major focus on stopping future plandemics from being perpetrated. Gain of function research should be prohibited by law, which requires that Congress write a law prohibiting federal funding of it. States could do a lot by punishing universities that perform gain of function research, with budget reductions or by simply making the research illegal at the state level. That's not a judicial job but a legislative one.
That’s not how things appear to mySelf … !
THIS STANDING ISSUE HAS A SIMPLE (NOT EASY) SOLUTION. "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ET AL. ALL OF THE US CITIZENS WERE DAMAGED BY CENSORSHIP.
Our First Amendment was damaged.
That is an elegant suggestion! Citizens of USA vs Biden, Harris, Garland, and a bunch of John Does (as yet unnamed deep state puppeteers).
Jeff Childers and his law firm just sued over the PREP Act and they won their two prior cases
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/unprepared-wednesday-june-26-2024
🙏
These "sentinel" decisions seem to never receive the approval needed to reject these globalist(communist) attacks on our Constitution.There is only ONE PARTY folks.
The government isn’t allowed to use outside entities to do the things they are prohibited from doing themselves… this is obvious interference
More interested in who the 3 “Good Guys” are.
In this particular instance (and others), that would be Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.
Yup!
And the dissenting opinion.
I wondered if there were a dissent written. One would have thought a determination of standing would have/should have been made in advance of granting certiorari.
Rather than SCOTUS making America wait so long only to be severely disappointed.