And let us not forget about the ragtag band of terrorists who against all odds were able to penetrate the greatest most powerful defense shield the world has ever known to fly hijacked planes on 9/11.
...to fly hijacked planes at 500 mph at sea level!
Not many think about this. I didn't, until I saw a video about it. 767s can fly at 500 mph at 30,000 feet because the air is thin. At sea level, the maximum speed is 250 mph because the air itself creates more resistance. When you exceed that speed, the plane becomes subject to a phenomenon known as "flutter", where the wings and tail start wobbling and will eventually tear themselves apart. (Think Scotty on Star Trek, "she's breaking up, Jim!")
So now we have these inexperienced pilots not only defying the odds by successfully navigating into those incredibly specific targets (both vertically and laterally,!) we also have them defying the laws of physics, with that 500 mph approach.
The pentagon attack was a missile. The two tower attacks were drones. Flight 93 was also a drone but had a control malfunction so had to be shot down. (No it didn't fly into a little hole in the ground). It was meant to fly into WTC7. The drones must have had shaped charges in front to penetrate the thick steel shell of the two twin towers. You can actually see in video the Martin Marietta control pod on the bottom of the plane flying into WTC2.
The actual aircraft flew directly to Westover air base which had been evacuated that morning. Likely all the passengers were gassed & murdered.
No evidence except it certainly wasn't heading to Chicago and was shot down. They took a big chance doing a controlled demolition of WTC7 without it being hit by a plane. In fact it is WTC7 that has convinced most skeptics that the whole operation was a False Flag operation. Pretty obvious the target of the Flight 93 substitute drone must have been WTC7, no way you would wire that up for demolition without having a narrative to explain it.
In 1913, we created the Federal Reserve. This was such a common topic of discussion for the American people. “Should it be gold backed, should it be silverbacked?” L Frank Baum authored a book called “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”. That is an economic fairytale Oz.
Oz stands for ounce. You travel the “yellow brick road,” which was gold. Dorothy did it in silver slippers -- which was changed by M G M to ruby slippers, to be more colorful on screen. And you had the wizard behind the curtain, the Emerald City -- that was greenbacks – both with no power behind them.
The Wicked Witch of the East was the bankers. The Munchkins were the common people. The Scarecrow was the farm community. The Tin Man was the manufacturing community. The Cowardly Lion was William Jennings. Bryan, the great orator who go. And then you had Toto who stood for the Teetotalers, which it was a large voting bloc in 1900. This was an economic allegory -- and people don't even know it.
My goodness. How obvious the various metaphors. I wonder how many actually connected those dots? Fwiw, as a child I read my father's first editions of the various editions--he born in 1915. Certainly he never made mention of their being anything but delightful fantasies. His father (my whole family on both sides, actually), despised FDR. Typing those initials, I see how closely they resemble FeDeral Reserve. I am hoping that the BRICS will indeed create their own gold-backed currency.
William McKinley (January 29, 1843 – September 14, 1901) was an American politician who served as the 25th president of the United States from 1897 until his assassination in 1901
Killed right about the time Rockefeller started WW1
World War 1 started in 1914. President McKinley was assassinated in 1901. So, maybe there is more to how this is related to the claim about Rockefeller starting World War 1 (thirteen years later)?
Fractional reserve banking, the gold standard, bimetallism, the Bank of England, the Rothschilds, etc., etc. have a long history. Officially, the Federal Reserve System was started in 1913. Lincoln was assassinated in 1865, and McKinley was assassinated in 1901, so these both predated the Federal Reserve by a good number of years. Although the assassinations of these presidents may have been at least partly related to policies concerning money and banking, I think that it is quite clear that they did not oppose the Federal Reserve System per se, since it did not exist.
America's "paper of record" also just went on the record (after 3 1/2 years) and allowed that Covid vaccines - in "very rare" circumstances - MIGHT cause harm. But that's only if we "believe" the very few people who think this.
Always pay close attention to the people the journalists at our "paper of record" do NOT interview.
For example, they didn't interview this lawyer who had no problem finding people who suffered serious harm from vaccines, including many doctors. These injuries - one million plus of them - are documented on VAERS, which the NY Times says is the "least reliable" source of vaccine injuries.
Thanks to Transcriber B for archiving these transcripts for the accurate HISTORIC RECORD - which won't come from the archives of The NY Times.
Funny if it is the rare occasion that a left neoliberal type who is attacked, it's NEVER a "lone wolf". It's always an ULTRA, hard right wing extremist with ties to a pro-Trump insurrectionist group.
Hopefully Slovakia will protect this suspect very well so he can give his story for the record, and not let any Jack Ruby like characters near him.
The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, etc. no longer control the news, the WSJ editor publicly admitted as much, and that's a big reason why the World Stealth Organization is driven to such reckless tactics.
Those that are not awake will belive the Lone wolf crap. I am not joking, the PM is a populist that suports and cares for his people and does not care a bit about stakeholder communism.
Dr. Nass, I'm sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you had, on your computer, copies of the 9 pages of adverse reactions to the pfizer vax that were released in the data dump ordered by SCOTUS? I thought I had downloaded them, but can no longer find them. If you do would it be possible to reply with them in an attachment? I will understand if this is too much to ask. Thank-you! Bandit
I think the only way we can dissuade the CIA is to make the head of the CIA, perhaps the 2nd layer of management, too, physically liable. As in, "if anything happens to {head of state} then you forfeit your life too."
Thank you Dr. Nass!
Reminds one of the lone wolves throughout our history:
The lone wolf who shot Lincoln
The lone wolf who shot McKinley
The lone wolf who shot Kennedy
The lone wolf who shot Reagan
All 4 victims had attempted to do away with the Federal Reserve, bTW.
The lone wolf who shot RFK.
The lone wolf who shot MLK.
The lone wolf who perpetrated the anthrax attacks.
And let us not forget about the ragtag band of terrorists who against all odds were able to penetrate the greatest most powerful defense shield the world has ever known to fly hijacked planes on 9/11.
...to fly hijacked planes at 500 mph at sea level!
Not many think about this. I didn't, until I saw a video about it. 767s can fly at 500 mph at 30,000 feet because the air is thin. At sea level, the maximum speed is 250 mph because the air itself creates more resistance. When you exceed that speed, the plane becomes subject to a phenomenon known as "flutter", where the wings and tail start wobbling and will eventually tear themselves apart. (Think Scotty on Star Trek, "she's breaking up, Jim!")
So now we have these inexperienced pilots not only defying the odds by successfully navigating into those incredibly specific targets (both vertically and laterally,!) we also have them defying the laws of physics, with that 500 mph approach.
Them weren't no airplanes, man. 🙈
That speed must have been possible because of global warming.
Or pandemics or something.
The pentagon attack was a missile. The two tower attacks were drones. Flight 93 was also a drone but had a control malfunction so had to be shot down. (No it didn't fly into a little hole in the ground). It was meant to fly into WTC7. The drones must have had shaped charges in front to penetrate the thick steel shell of the two twin towers. You can actually see in video the Martin Marietta control pod on the bottom of the plane flying into WTC2.
The actual aircraft flew directly to Westover air base which had been evacuated that morning. Likely all the passengers were gassed & murdered.
I never heard that Building 7 was supposed to be the target of UA 93. Can you post any evidence or content about it?
No evidence except it certainly wasn't heading to Chicago and was shot down. They took a big chance doing a controlled demolition of WTC7 without it being hit by a plane. In fact it is WTC7 that has convinced most skeptics that the whole operation was a False Flag operation. Pretty obvious the target of the Flight 93 substitute drone must have been WTC7, no way you would wire that up for demolition without having a narrative to explain it.
Ah yes!
(But careful Barry - you don’t want to be labeled a conspiracy theorist!)
Many lone wolves.
All of the lone wolves who perpetrate the school shooting.
The lone wolf Timothy McVey who conveniently destroyed the building which housed docs which would incriminate whitewater Clinton’s.
Columbine lone wolf.
but behind it all EVIL that presents it as nothing more than what can be
found in any city, any community. . .ie quite common
Wizard of Oz
In 1913, we created the Federal Reserve. This was such a common topic of discussion for the American people. “Should it be gold backed, should it be silverbacked?” L Frank Baum authored a book called “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”. That is an economic fairytale Oz.
Oz stands for ounce. You travel the “yellow brick road,” which was gold. Dorothy did it in silver slippers -- which was changed by M G M to ruby slippers, to be more colorful on screen. And you had the wizard behind the curtain, the Emerald City -- that was greenbacks – both with no power behind them.
The Wicked Witch of the East was the bankers. The Munchkins were the common people. The Scarecrow was the farm community. The Tin Man was the manufacturing community. The Cowardly Lion was William Jennings. Bryan, the great orator who go. And then you had Toto who stood for the Teetotalers, which it was a large voting bloc in 1900. This was an economic allegory -- and people don't even know it.
My goodness. How obvious the various metaphors. I wonder how many actually connected those dots? Fwiw, as a child I read my father's first editions of the various editions--he born in 1915. Certainly he never made mention of their being anything but delightful fantasies. His father (my whole family on both sides, actually), despised FDR. Typing those initials, I see how closely they resemble FeDeral Reserve. I am hoping that the BRICS will indeed create their own gold-backed currency.
Do you have a link for this? I would love to share.
I tell the entire story of the hijacking of the US monetary system and creation of the Federal Reserve by the US Money Trust and the Rothschilds.
See https://www.amazon.com/Our-Country-Then-Richard-Cook/dp/1949762858
We're not in Kansas anymore, are we?
Oz is the abbreviation for ounce, the standard measure used for gold.
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/were-not-in-kansas-anymore-are-we
No such thing as COINCIDENCE ☝️
I don't know enough about the McKinley assassination. Why is that story so much smaller in our history? I'd love to hear some details.
William McKinley (January 29, 1843 – September 14, 1901) was an American politician who served as the 25th president of the United States from 1897 until his assassination in 1901
Killed right about the time Rockefeller started WW1
World War 1 started in 1914. President McKinley was assassinated in 1901. So, maybe there is more to how this is related to the claim about Rockefeller starting World War 1 (thirteen years later)?
See: https://www.amazon.com/Our-Country-Then-Richard-Cook/dp/1949762858
He was an obscure president from Ohio.
Somehow related by marriage, which prompted me to look into him.
It was a short presidency, and little was written about it.
See this:
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Country-Then-Richard-Cook/dp/1949762858
Federal Reserve created in 1913.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Country-Then-Richard-Cook/dp/1949762858
Fractional reserve banking, the gold standard, bimetallism, the Bank of England, the Rothschilds, etc., etc. have a long history. Officially, the Federal Reserve System was started in 1913. Lincoln was assassinated in 1865, and McKinley was assassinated in 1901, so these both predated the Federal Reserve by a good number of years. Although the assassinations of these presidents may have been at least partly related to policies concerning money and banking, I think that it is quite clear that they did not oppose the Federal Reserve System per se, since it did not exist.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Country-Then-Richard-Cook/dp/1949762858
Tomorrow's headline:
"Fico may have brought assassination attempt upon himself"
;-(
Here is what I automatically think whenever I see an article in the NYT: ‘This is what the government wants me to think happened.’
That rubric will not let you down.
If this guy had "antigovernment sentiments" he would have loved Fico and not tried to murder him.
Well the gov has done away with critical thinkers so not many would realize this point
America's "paper of record" also just went on the record (after 3 1/2 years) and allowed that Covid vaccines - in "very rare" circumstances - MIGHT cause harm. But that's only if we "believe" the very few people who think this.
Always pay close attention to the people the journalists at our "paper of record" do NOT interview.
For example, they didn't interview this lawyer who had no problem finding people who suffered serious harm from vaccines, including many doctors. These injuries - one million plus of them - are documented on VAERS, which the NY Times says is the "least reliable" source of vaccine injuries.
Thanks to Transcriber B for archiving these transcripts for the accurate HISTORIC RECORD - which won't come from the archives of The NY Times.
https://transcriberb.substack.com/p/who-was-speaking-out-in-21-attorney?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1263006&post_id=144236012&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=e1r6q&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Ask them to "Define Very Few". Put their cajones to the fire
Fauci probably has his burner phone # on speed dial!
Funny if it is the rare occasion that a left neoliberal type who is attacked, it's NEVER a "lone wolf". It's always an ULTRA, hard right wing extremist with ties to a pro-Trump insurrectionist group.
Hopefully Slovakia will protect this suspect very well so he can give his story for the record, and not let any Jack Ruby like characters near him.
The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, etc. no longer control the news, the WSJ editor publicly admitted as much, and that's a big reason why the World Stealth Organization is driven to such reckless tactics.
Those that are not awake will belive the Lone wolf crap. I am not joking, the PM is a populist that suports and cares for his people and does not care a bit about stakeholder communism.
the EVIL behind it is palpable
PM Fico is NOT alone in refusing to bend to the will of those who seek
to destroy.
PMs of Poland and Hungary seek what is best for their people but have been labeled
dangerous nationalists.
"stakeholder communisim"--and since under communism, you own nothing, you have no stake either. Well done and thank you.
Dr. Nass, I'm sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you had, on your computer, copies of the 9 pages of adverse reactions to the pfizer vax that were released in the data dump ordered by SCOTUS? I thought I had downloaded them, but can no longer find them. If you do would it be possible to reply with them in an attachment? I will understand if this is too much to ask. Thank-you! Bandit
1. Death
2. Turbo Cancer
3. Autoimmune diseases
4. Neurological diseases
5. Tendency to be vicious towards those not injected
etc.
😂🤣
Thank-you, Tommy! But I want to see if the multiple new ailments that a friend has acquired in the last 4 years are on those 9 pages.
🙏 sympathies
Thank-you!
I keep trying to "Like" your comment, but it seems to not be taking. I don't know if it's my phone or SS.
I'm having the same trouble!
The substack gods must be angry.
Hi Big Brother 👋
We are coming for you.
Sorry, you're having trouble, too, BUT very relieved it's not my phone acting up.
Edited: phobe 😂🤣😂🤣
I think the only way we can dissuade the CIA is to make the head of the CIA, perhaps the 2nd layer of management, too, physically liable. As in, "if anything happens to {head of state} then you forfeit your life too."
The NY Times is like a crackhead that just can't stop until it eventually kills them.
It's like the liar who has to keep telling even more lies, all more preposterous than the original lies, to cover-up all their past lies.
Judith Miller told us to invade Iraq. She is a lone wolfstress
In this age of freshly revised definitions, let's just make "lone wolf" the proper name for a CIA hit man.
Let the memes roll out!
I saw him; he was in the book depository!
Well, at least no one is saying Putin did it, or Hamas. Yet.
(Whatever happened to Al-qaeda? It was such a useful go-to hang-it-here.)