Share this comment
I received an email pointing to this comment of yours; but, It's not readily apparent to me exactly who in this thread you are criticizing. Pointing to Meryl Nass' thread doesn't explain anything with regard to your criticism. Many of us realize that there have been somewhere between 13 million to 20 million deaths caused by this Plandem…
I received an email pointing to this comment of yours; but, It's not readily apparent to me exactly who in this thread you are criticizing. Pointing to Meryl Nass' thread doesn't explain anything with regard to your criticism. Many of us realize that there have been somewhere between 13 million to 20 million deaths caused by this Plandemic. If I'm reading Dr. Nass' post correctly, the 17,000 is that due to improper use of HCQ on hospitalized patients who allegedly have been diagnosed as presenting with lleged Covid-19 symptoms. So, which post are you criticizing?
I am actually criticising Meryl Nass for distracting from the 17,000 deaths caused by the bioweapon shots as per Denis Rancourts post. Now, we have Meryl Nass citing 17,000 deaths allegedly due to HCQ. Many other replies have also negatively commented on the quality of the research study she used as the basis for her post, and also thought she was muddying the waters. We need to stay focussed on the bioweapon shots and related, unprecedented deaths as a result. Not have Meryl Nass reactivating the party line that HCQ or Ivermectin were suppressed for any justifiable reason.
Thanks for the explanation.
You are welcome. Sorry I was unclear. A bit too hasty.