Do they really want to make animals equal to people? Decoded, One Health wants to lower the status of humans.
What did the Lancet say last January about One Health? That non-human animals are of equal concern as humans.
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2823%2900090-9
“The reality is that One Health will be delivered in
countries, not by concordats between multilateral
organisations, but by taking a fundamentally different
approach to the natural world, one in which we are as
concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and
the environment as we are about humans. In its truest
sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely
health, equity.”
It is in the last paragraph below. Please reassure yourself that this is really what the WHO, Biden administration, EU, World Bank and all the other One Health scammers are planning for us. Hey, animals need equity too.
Here is what the Treaty says about One Health on page 9. It is a word salad, difficult to decode, but clearly they are very serious about this ONE HEALTH thing, devoting an entire Article (of 36 articles total) to it. Bsically they do not want us to know what it means.
All the animals are equal some are just more equal than others
If caring about the environment would be an issue, the findings of Soviet scientists about (serious!) damage caused by nonionizing radiation would have been implemented long ago, making a 24/7 wireless surveillance system punishable by law. From that perspective, "One Health" only regards the financial condition of the oligarchs, at the expense of everyone and everything else.
Many indigenous population already know how to live in balance with the environment, in fact practiced holobiontism before that term was invented. More movements like permaculture are needed, not another army of apparatchiks.