5 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I believe 9/11 was enhanced to be sure that it was successful. Gave Bush and his M/I handlers the ability to re-invigorate and control the production of oil in Iraq and etc. Hillary came along to demonstrate her leadership ability and went after Gadhafi.

Expand full comment

He is absolutely right about building 7 which is the Achilles heal of the 9/11 cover story. It’s amazing how people reject the logical conclusion of the video that it had to be a demolition. There is tremendous cognitive resistance to believing that your own government could possibly be involved in a false flag of that nature.

Expand full comment

Sad isn't it. People are not taught to think and evaluate. Growing up, even as a little kid, my Father's favorite word was 'why' over and over. Guess we now call it root cause analysis. Yup, I agree with you 100%. Too, don't forget the time lag news report from the UK describing the collapse when the current time video behind her was being shown of the collapse as it happened.

Expand full comment

I resisted any truther stuff about 9/11 for about 21 years. Then, after the Jan 6th thing, GW Bush said they were "domestic terrorists". That was after years of refusing to rebut anything Obama did ("whadda ya wahnt me tuh be, a puuuundit?"). That snapped it into place - he was just a globalist shill, not someone who was trying to protect our country. Also, once I saw the Covid psyop and why it was deployed, it was easier to see how 9/11 was a useful part of the overall plan.

Of course, there is a lot besides building 7 that makes no sense at all. Dr. Judy Wood's (structural engineer) superb textbook "Where did the towers go?" shows very clearly that a whole bunch of what happened to the twin towers and surrounding area couldn't possibly have been a result of jet fuel burning. There are also a ton problems with the passengers making cell phone calls at peak altitude, and the supposed plane crashes in Shanksville PA and at the Pentagon. James Fetzer has written some good material on it (his conclusion about what brought the towers down does differ somewhat from Dr. Wood's).

There is always the question in my mind: did they pass the Patriot Act with the idea of eventually deploying it to kill and intern US citizens w/o due process, or did the idea of applying it for this purpose come later? I suspect the former.

Expand full comment

Agree there are a lot of suspicious things that happened on 9/11, but the Building 7 problem is so obvious that it's a wonder that people can swallow it. I find in most cases people do not even know the basic facts and assure me that Building 7 was hit by a jet plane too.

Once you accept that Building 7 was deliberately demolished (and understand why!) then your mind should be able to open to other possibilities, including the remarkable coincidence of their being a security drill at that exact same time and the fact that air force jets were never scrambled until it was too late.

As for the Patriot Act it seems clearer as time goes on that it had less to do with protecting the Homeland from terrorists aa it did with protecting the Deep State from real patriots trying to uphold our Constitutional form of government.

Expand full comment