The WHO did a meta- analysis and stated that Remdisivir was not good for COVID treatment. The U.S. ignored that completely and continued promoting Remdisivir anyway. What would have happened if the new WHO politics were in place when that occurred?
The WHO and the U.N. have no standing army to force nations to follow its rulings. I don't …
The WHO did a meta- analysis and stated that Remdisivir was not good for COVID treatment. The U.S. ignored that completely and continued promoting Remdisivir anyway. What would have happened if the new WHO politics were in place when that occurred?
The WHO and the U.N. have no standing army to force nations to follow its rulings. I don't think losing status with the WHO would greatly affect even poor nations, unless the rich nations use a WHO ruling as an excuse to stop foreign aid to those nations.
Didn't Trump pull the U.S. out of the WHO? Or something like that?
Have you any memory of the trampling, mounted response to Canadian mandate protests? UN trucks were photographed in proximity.
Only a uniparty explains why Trump left intact ANY Obama Executive Orders--no less one penned just prior to "exiting" in 2016--allowing UN forces to occupy U.S. streets in a support capacity(circumventing the Posse Comitatus Act). Another odd alignment of the coincidence stars?
As for the WHO/UN lacking a "standing army", would it be too conspiracy theorist of me to speculate the legion of single, military-aged males flooding, "unstoppably", across the welcoming southern border must have basic needs met?
This has all been done behind the scenes using legalese to submit the US to the authority of the WHO in the event of some emergency that the WHO determines, and as such the police powers of the US come into play to enforce these laws.
I believe Trump did pull us out of the WHO but one of the first things Biden did was put us back in. So now all of those laws written behind the scenes and without a vote, that subvert our liberty to the WHO, are active.
The WHO did a meta- analysis and stated that Remdisivir was not good for COVID treatment. The U.S. ignored that completely and continued promoting Remdisivir anyway. What would have happened if the new WHO politics were in place when that occurred?
The WHO and the U.N. have no standing army to force nations to follow its rulings. I don't think losing status with the WHO would greatly affect even poor nations, unless the rich nations use a WHO ruling as an excuse to stop foreign aid to those nations.
Didn't Trump pull the U.S. out of the WHO? Or something like that?
Biden undid it immediately
Have you any memory of the trampling, mounted response to Canadian mandate protests? UN trucks were photographed in proximity.
Only a uniparty explains why Trump left intact ANY Obama Executive Orders--no less one penned just prior to "exiting" in 2016--allowing UN forces to occupy U.S. streets in a support capacity(circumventing the Posse Comitatus Act). Another odd alignment of the coincidence stars?
As for the WHO/UN lacking a "standing army", would it be too conspiracy theorist of me to speculate the legion of single, military-aged males flooding, "unstoppably", across the welcoming southern border must have basic needs met?
🤔💡
This has all been done behind the scenes using legalese to submit the US to the authority of the WHO in the event of some emergency that the WHO determines, and as such the police powers of the US come into play to enforce these laws.
I believe Trump did pull us out of the WHO but one of the first things Biden did was put us back in. So now all of those laws written behind the scenes and without a vote, that subvert our liberty to the WHO, are active.