They did not consider a person fully vaccinated until 2 weeks after the second shot. So if a person had a positive "covid" test prior to being considered "fully vaccinated" they would be considered and counted as "unvaccinated". If this is indeed how they were doing this then "unvaccinated" may have included folks that were partially "va…
They did not consider a person fully vaccinated until 2 weeks after the second shot. So if a person had a positive "covid" test prior to being considered "fully vaccinated" they would be considered and counted as "unvaccinated". If this is indeed how they were doing this then "unvaccinated" may have included folks that were partially "vaccinated". I recall looking at some HHS data on long-term care and they were listing folks that had their initial shots but were not up to date with the CDC recommended boosters as unvaccinated and counting them as such. I don't believe the shots were effective at all against "covid" whatever "covid" was. We also have the problem with the test. As for hospitalizations - many reported that if a person was listed as having covid they were not inquiring about the vaccine status - there was even some problem with trying to enter the status in the database. The Cleveland Clinic Data, I think was probably the first published data that showed how ineffective these shots were.
NHS data from early 2021 did indeed show a lower infection rate, but 8x higher death rate in the shot group. They didn’t use the 2 week window that caused our data to “miss” deaths. Scroll down to Figure 1:
Using big words like "Vaccine" should be based on the definition of Vaccine!!! Vaccine is not a non scientifically tested (normally taking 10 years of DBPC studies to confirm efficacy & safety!) But "what our 50 billion in fraud fines industry sold fools & suckers is a snake oil identifying as a Vaccine! I guess if Godless fools & suckers can identify a boy as a girl, they can identify piss as a vaccine! [It's probably safer!]
They did not consider a person fully vaccinated until 2 weeks after the second shot. So if a person had a positive "covid" test prior to being considered "fully vaccinated" they would be considered and counted as "unvaccinated". If this is indeed how they were doing this then "unvaccinated" may have included folks that were partially "vaccinated". I recall looking at some HHS data on long-term care and they were listing folks that had their initial shots but were not up to date with the CDC recommended boosters as unvaccinated and counting them as such. I don't believe the shots were effective at all against "covid" whatever "covid" was. We also have the problem with the test. As for hospitalizations - many reported that if a person was listed as having covid they were not inquiring about the vaccine status - there was even some problem with trying to enter the status in the database. The Cleveland Clinic Data, I think was probably the first published data that showed how ineffective these shots were.
NHS data from early 2021 did indeed show a lower infection rate, but 8x higher death rate in the shot group. They didn’t use the 2 week window that caused our data to “miss” deaths. Scroll down to Figure 1:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459929/
Using big words like "Vaccine" should be based on the definition of Vaccine!!! Vaccine is not a non scientifically tested (normally taking 10 years of DBPC studies to confirm efficacy & safety!) But "what our 50 billion in fraud fines industry sold fools & suckers is a snake oil identifying as a Vaccine! I guess if Godless fools & suckers can identify a boy as a girl, they can identify piss as a vaccine! [It's probably safer!]
Excellent points. Thank you!