36 Comments

Propaganda always precedes genocide.

Expand full comment

Bingo!

Expand full comment

These posts are extremely helpful, thanks Dr Nass

Expand full comment

The WHO treaty is total, 100 percent fascism.

Expand full comment

Global fascism

Expand full comment

They propagandize that nations are in agreement on propagandizing their populations.

Expand full comment

This explains where "they" are trying to take us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIULmTprQ6o

Expand full comment

Have them give you a call - so you can explain to them the real "causes, impacts and drivers" of plandemics- and the "efficacy and safety" of plandemic related "health products"

Expand full comment

So, they don't understand that trust depends on factual truthfulness and transparency? Hence, lying and misusing science by getting paid-for results, denying the fact, controlling and suppressing truth (as we've seen) is better? This is definitely not about health but delusion.

Expand full comment

Yes, the pretense is over - we’ve seen behind the stage curtain.

Expand full comment

Trust is something the authorities don't get after they put you in jail. Why would you trust the folks who take away your freedom, your business, and your life?

Expand full comment

Once bitten…

Expand full comment

Wow more good news 🙄

Expand full comment

Tried finding a list of countries that have so far rejected the treaty. Google wasn't much help. Do you know of a substack that is publishing a running list?

Expand full comment

Mine showed what we know re 15 countries. Then Slovakian PM Fico was shot 5 days after announcing he would not sign the treaties.

I am not sure I can in good conscience encourage these announcements before the meeting any more.

Expand full comment

"I am not sure I can in good conscience encourage these announcements before the meeting any more."

In your capacity as a doctor, maybe not.

But in your capacity as an advocate for freedom, you should encourage such announcements.

Expand full comment

Trust ‘science’? Really? 🌪️☄️💥 A bit late, about several decades but at least 4 years.

Expand full comment

Not good for SCOTUS

Expand full comment

New gag order on who we need most.

Expand full comment

PROPAGANDA! Untrustworthy people promise??? All connected to this worldwide chaos had to have been injected with brain-destroying injections many times over. They have lost their ability to think! They are so focused on simply keeping their positions and money...They are like the monkey who puts his fist into the jar to get goodies and can't get it out, because of being greedy; and grabbing too much. People should not permit ignorant and very greedy people... make decisions benefiting them, which would destroy everyone else..

Expand full comment

A society based on science and technology - An interview by Charley Rose in 1996 with Carl Sagan - C.R., But what is the danger of all this? I mean this is not the thing C.S., There's two kinds of danger. One is what i just talked about, that we've arranged a society based on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology. And this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces. I mean, who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don't know anything about it? The second reason I'm worried about this is that science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something that is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs for the next charlatan, political or religious, who comes ambling along. It's a thing that Jefferson lay great stress upon. It wasn't enough, he said, to enshrine some rights in a Constitution or a Bill of Rights. The people had {have} to be educated and they had [have} to practice their skepticism and their education. Otherwise, we don't run the government. The government runs us.

Expand full comment

And "they" get to decide what "science" we see. Unbelievable.

Expand full comment

It all sounds so innocent and goodhearted, eh? Like, the ordinary people in all nations are so stupid and helpless that only their wise, caring, altruistic governments can teach them what to do.

Expand full comment