30 Comments
Jul 6·edited Jul 6

“fully vaccinated”—2 weeks after the second shot

Don't forget Professors Fenton and Neil have already shown at wherearethenumbers.substack.com that using such a delay in vaccination status completely invalidates the official efficacy.

Expand full comment

It's crazy that people still trust Pharma

Expand full comment

I was "fully vaccinated" after Delta-COVID for Christmas 2021. The Ivermectin smoothed it out.

;-)

Expand full comment

Re: “fully vaccinated”—2 weeks after the second shot Thankyou for your life, but I never wanted it.

Expand full comment
RemovedJul 8
Comment removed
Expand full comment

"This detox" removed all of this you think: Dr Mike Yeadon: Question: The carbon oxide particles in the vaccines are different again to the LNP's, is that right and if so, if the carbon particles are inert, what is the possibility of turning off the The Moderna contains 40*10^12 LNPs, to the best of my knowledge (Pfizer 12*10^12). This equates to 40/12 trillion in short scale. AZ has 50*10^9, which would be 1 milliard in long scale LNP's have on the carbon particles in the vaccines and might that activate them, which occurs probably by 5G?

I have a one second way of exterminating the LNP's free, but it is the carbon particles which have given me pause and are the greatest of concerns to me?

DrMikeYeadon

5 hrs ago

I regret I don’t know anything about carbon oxide.

Perhaps you meant some other compound?

I definitely know nothing useful about electromagnetic fields.

It isn’t something I can guess at.

Dr Noack: They show that it is not graphene oxide, but rather graphene hydroxide. I would like to explain what this graphene hydroxide is. It is mono-layer activated carbon. There are C6 rings. He found it in all samples. Every corner is a carbon atom. This is on a nanoscale.

I’ll cut this up a bit here. If it is 50nm long, there are 500 rings in a row. These are hydroxy groups (OH). In graphene oxide you have double bonded oxygen, and in graphene hydroxide you have an OH group. The electrons are delocalised (fully mobile). The piece is 50nm long but only 0.1 nm thick. These C6 structures are extremely stable. You can make brake pads out of this. It is not biologically decomposable.

These nanoscale structures can best be described as razor blades. These razor blades are injected into the body. Nano-scale, tiny razor blades. Only one atom layer thick. Relatively wide and high. They are razors, biologically not decomposable. The OH (hydroxy) groups can split off a proton. When the proton is split off, they gain a negative charge spread out over the whole system.

It is basically an acid. It suspends well in water because of the negative charge. So these are razor blades spread homogenously in the liquid. This is basically Russian roulette. You can see it very clearly in this woman. It cuts the blood vessels. The blood vessels have epithel cells as their inner lining. The epithel is extremely smooth. like a mirror. And it is cut up by these razor blades. That is what’s so dangerous.

If you inject the vaccine into a vein, the razors will circulate in the blood and cut up the epithel. The mean thing is that toxicological tests are done in Petri dishes. And there you will not find anything. These are the sharpest imaginable structures because they are only one atom layer thick.

This is a huge molecule which is extremely sharp. I am a specilist in activated carbon. In my doctoral thesis, I have converted graphen oxide to graphene hydroxide. I joined the world’s leading activated carbon manufacturer. After a year I was in charge of new activated carbon products. We bought a small company in Durham, near Newcastle, England. I was in charge of “new carbon products”, Europe-wide. I was in application scouting.

If you perform an autopsy on the victims, you will not find anything. Toxicologists do their tests in Petri dishes. They can’t imagine that there are structures that can cut up blood vessels. There are pictures of coagulated blood coming out of the nose. People bleed to death on the inside. Especially the top athletes who are dropping dead have fast flowing blood. The faster the blood flows, the more damage the razors will do.

As a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer. It’s a new material, toxocologists are not aware of it yet. Suddenly it makes sense that victims look like this. And that top athletes with high blood circulation, completely healthy, suddenly drop dead. You see people collapse immediately after vaccination and have a seizure. These people had bad luck in the Russian roulette. Very likely, a vein was hit by the syringe.

The question you have to ask politicians and the question doctors should ask Pfizer, is: Why are these razor blades in the vaccine?

Now they want to force vaccinate children from the age of 6 months.

DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID19 VACCINES

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES

Dr Noack was exterminated shortly after releasing this information back in 2020, possibly for having released the information of the secret military weapon by 5G side of these vaccines which was not for public consumption, after all, the best vaccine weapons are the ones nobody knows about - right?

So are the Graphene Hydroxide particles active or inactive, that is the question and what it means to everyone vaccinated with them, irrespective of brand name, sooner or later.

You kidding right?

Expand full comment

Calling an experimental, unproven, toxic snake oil a "Vaccine" from our 60 Billion in fraud fines and leader in cause of iatrogenic/ [medicine caused] death, is the same type of fraud big pharma uses on chumps and suckers, "Born every minute." So just Stop it!!! Call it what it is, not what shysters identify it as!

Expand full comment

They had the CDC change the definition of vaccine, and so did Merriam Webster dictionary.

Expand full comment

And the complete news blockout of this important evidence is so predictable that it is literally nauseating! Thank you again Meryl for "following the science."

Expand full comment

The evidence of negative efficacy was available in July 2021; data from Israel, and the Barnstable county data were clear. Modeling in France says it started with Delta. https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/study-suggests-that-moderna-and-pfizer

Expand full comment

Hi James, I imagine I'll have to submit something to your journal in time!

Expand full comment

Please show us the POSITIVE efficiency for ANY vaccine over time as compared to no vaccinations. Otherwise, vaccination is NEVER a consideration for any reason for anything.

Expand full comment

Don't like the title. Vaccines have always been and will always be poison. Time to catch on, people.

Expand full comment

Conveniently, any vax deaths that occurred within 2 weeks were no way, no how connected. Brilliant.

Expand full comment

Correction: 'By six weeks the younger children,who been vaxed, have already reached negative efficacy continue to DROP DEAD at seven weeks'

Expand full comment

We can confidently say that this was never supposed to be a remedy in the first place. This was always designed to harm and kill and to pretend otherwise is delusional.

Expand full comment

Isn't it safe to say they have been testing this kind of technology in animals for years, if not decades? I find it nearly impossible to believe they didn't see negative efficacy, immune disfunction and the rise of cancers in pre-human trials. And somewhere there must be a vast pile of hidden testing data that would confirm that they've known along what would happen when this technology was rolled out in humans. The only logical and moral reason to use this technology is that you feared the virus would be far more lethal than it turned out to be. Or, they are perfectly comfortable with the negative side effects, if it means debuting and normalizing a novel treatment that promises them billions of dollars in new revenue. The latter scares me the most.

Expand full comment
Jul 6·edited Jul 6

“MY PUBLICATION RECORD AS A SCIENTIST PUTS ME IN THE TOP 4% IN THE WORLD”

Dr Steven Pelech from Kinexus laboratory who has a unique very intricate antibody test. Everyone has a different, unique immune response to the same virus. Most people who have had covid don’t make antibodies to the N protein they make them to other proteins underestimating natural immunity etc.

He checked his people three years later they were still immune, he says that type of immunity lasts for decades if not life long, just like other viruses because of immune memory.

He talks about the injected and OAS original antigenic sin, ADE Antibody dependant enhancement, and tolerance. ADE immune response on one part of the virus allows virus to attach to immune cells and kill them. Well known for coronaviruses, SARS 1, 20 years ago the vaccines had ADE and all the ferrets died.

🔥❤️13 MINS

So people who have natural immunity .....

its unlikely they will get sick again so that immunity protects them as you go out in the environment and the virus is there your constantly being boosted naturally against the virus. That enhances the level of antibodies your producing to protect you while that virus is in the environment. Thats called immune memory memory B Cells and T Cells, the B Cells produce the antibodies, the T Cells attack cells that are infected with the virus

The good news is that these antibodies can last for decades these antibody producing B Cells and T Cells you can have immune protection for probably the rest of your life.

DR STEVEN PELECH

ELO WANTS TO KNOW PODCAST

https://youtu.be/MSfjvrx8tK4

Expand full comment

Immunological memory is the ability of the immune system to quickly and specifically recognize an antigen that the body has previously encountered and initiate a corresponding immune response. Generally these are secondary, tertiary and other subsequent immune responses to the same antigen. Immunological memory is responsible for the adaptive component of the immune system, special T and B cells — the so-called memory T and B cells.

.

IgG antibodies are Y-shaped protein molecules that are produced by special white blood cells (B lymphocytes) in response to foreign substances (antigens) such as viruses or bacteria. Antibodies can attach to these viruses or bacteria, rendering them harmless and unable to penetrate healthy cells. They GO AWAY with time and could fall to a NEGATIVE level DOESN'T mean susceptible.

.

Total immunity against viral diseases includes:

1. Local IgA and IgM

2. Humoral immunity of IgG antibodies, both those present in the blood AND those that can be produced quickly when the antigen is present

3. Cellular immunity or MEMORY

4. Other mechanisms.

When we measure antibody titers, we are ONLY documenting the IgG antibodies present in the bloodstream.

.

The Immune System fires up when a pathogen, like a virus, enters the body. The pathogen releases a protein called an antigen, which calls into action the immune system’s special disease-fighting cells. "Called B and T lymphocytes", these cells NOT only destroy the virus, but they REMEMBER what it looked like so they can fend it off in the FUTURE.

.

IMMUNOLOGIC MEMORY allows the immune system to REMEMBER the antigens or organisms to which it has previously been exposed. MEMORY EFFECTOR B cells (long-lived plasma cells) and MEMORY T-cells specific to a virus, give long-term immunity against these diseases.

.

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY.

.

The “Adaptive Immune Response" is younger than the “Innate Immune Response" in evolutionary terms and is more specific and considerably MORE POTENT in its effects.

.

The constituents of the adaptive immune response are the lymphoid cells. These include:

.

The T lymphocytes and the cytokine and chemokine messenger proteins released by these cells, which direct and REGULATE the adaptive immune response.

.

The B lymphocytes, which transform to the late-stage plasma cells that produce and secrete antibody.

.

The lymphoid cells of the adaptive immune response reside in, and circulate between, the various lymphoid tissues of the body (e.g. the lymph nodes, spleen and mucosal lymphoid tissues). In the adaptive immune response, antigen is first transported from a site of infection by a dendritic cell to the regional lymphoid tissue. That dendritic cell in turn activates "Antigen-Specific T lymphocytes," which further activate Antigen-Specific B lymphocytes.”

.

These activated, Antigen-Specific lymphocytes must then be mobilized from the regional lymphoid tissue and sent to the site of infection, a process that involves these cells moving into the lymphatic and blood circulation and interacting with the endothelial lining of blood vessels.

.

Once these cells reach the site of infection, they are able to mount a full-scale ‘EFFECTOR’ response, which is considerably STRONGER than that permitted by innate immunity. As these processes take some time to occur (in the order of 4–7 days), there is a delay before adaptive immunity ‘takes over’ from the innate form of defence.

.

The final component of Adaptive Immunity is the development of a “REGULATORY RESPONSE" that will "SWITCH OFF" the system when it is NO LONGER REQUIRED (i.e. when the pathogen has been ELIMINATED) so as NOT to cause DAMAGE to normal body tissue.

.

HOWEVER, once this is achieved, the immune system retains the “MEMORY” of that immune response.

IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY is another key feature of the Adaptive Immune Response. MEMORY allows the generation of a much MORE effective SECONDARY IMMUNE RESPONSE (Anamnestic MEMORY Response) if that same antigen is EVER RE-ENCOUNTERED.

Expand full comment

Back in September 2021 there was ample evidence of negative effectivenss coming from ONS data. By March, infection rates in the vaccinated were 3 to 5 times higher. This was age stratified data over 38 million or so people. With no explanation given, the ONS stopped reporting on ifx rates by vaccination status.

What I believe is more damning is how counting windows drove up effectiveness. It is very likely that these shots never worked at all. The way the CDC calculates infection rates gives rise to a vaccine effectiveness curve that nearly matches that of a placebo using their flawed methodology.

You and I talked about on CHD-TV:

https://madhavasetty.substack.com/p/did-the-mrna-shots-really-save-millions

Expand full comment

Was the covid jab EVER intended to 'cure' or is it 'DEPOPULATION' by the corrupted Big Pharma?

Since 2020, the English dictionary has been destroyed with new meanings for many words and expressions.

'Rare' now means 'Frequent'. As in "Myocarditis is a 'rare' (side effect)".

'Vaccine' used to mean an injected substance that included a part of a disease that would encourage the human body to build a natural resistance to that disease. The new mRNA injections do not warrant the term 'VACCINE'. Perhaps mRNA injections ('Vaccines') should now be described as 'a deadly injection to depopulate the planet'?

'Safe & Effective' now means 'Dangerous and ineffective'

'Safety Trials' means 'Pay the FDA sufficient to avoid such an inconvenient and impossible exercise'.

There are many new expressions that have become everyday expressions, such as 'Myocarditis', which seems to impact young boys and young men. This new dangerous post mRNA injection phenomena is played down as 'rare' and a non-deadly occurrence. The reality is that those youngsters have to "avoid strenuous physical exercise for at least 28 days". The DEADLY mRNA jabs cause Heart attacks, strokes, palpitations, chest pains in youngsters who gain zero benefit from being injected with poison for a man-modified disease that has zero health consequences to them.

Any heart damage, even if not 'terminal', is serious and is likely to compromise humans at some point in the future. The best a Covid or Bird Flu recipient can expect is a SHORTENED LIFE EXPECTANCY!

And still Pfizer, et al, continue to enjoy NO LIABILITY for side effects, health injuries, or even directly related vax induced DEATHS. They just keep counting the 'Insane Profits' from the CULL.

Unjabbed Mick. (UK) I'll live longer to get 'Full LIABILITY' re-introduced for all Big Pharma products!

Expand full comment

I wonder about the effect of bias in the studiers. Particularly they get the data and use it to prove as much efficacy as possible. Rather than using the data to tell what is actually happening.

Proof not truth

Expand full comment

Is there a reason the Cleveland Clinic study isn't mentioned? It is always my go-to study.

Expand full comment

The Lancet, back in early 2020 published that the Pfizer vaccine was 0.84% effective (less than 1%) against Covid with AstraZeneca being the most potent at around 2.3% (as I seem to recall) with all the other vaccines makers vaccines efficiency against Covid being between these two. Pfizer's vaccine was the least potent.

That had me thinking back then, before the Disinformation Laws were put in place by our respective governments on behalf of WHO, from early 2020 to mid 2023, that the vaccines were for a very different purpose than to stop Moderna's Covid-19 Neucloids patented virus 2013 and whatever that was, I was going to eventually find out.

So, in the case of Pfizer's vaccine - Covid was 99.16% effective in getting you and the Pfizer's vaccine was going to probably be, bloody hopeless, which it eventually proved to be - and BionTech, for Pfizer published that their vaccine was designed to leave the arm and target the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes after having passed through all of the body's organs in 12 hours from injection while changing the Human Genome and DNA in 6 hours, according to a Swedish Study - which opened up a range of a whole lot more possibilities of whatever the vaccines ultimately were for - which is why I never had any.

Expand full comment