I'm surprised at you Meryl. I'm afraid you have swallowed the cult juice. I'm not impressed with this comment. You know it's not true for a majority of people. Being empathic isn't a crime.
Whether you belive in God or not, we all have the inate ability to know what is right and what is wrong. I've never seen a choice made on the Godly spectrum to be wrong. Though I admittedly belive in God, I don't condem people who do not, but only those who act on the side of the "UnGodly" spectrum. What's in a name? Often it's an attempt to change the essence of what is.
Would you mind further explaining what you mean by your comment? Thanks.
And the controversy is….???
a) Pitting a christian nations against jews, muslims, etc
b) Daring to imply he might make a legal judgement due to religious or godly ramifications.
Today God, spirit, religion are no-nos, while changing your child's sex is the new religion
I agree with you, I just didn’t see that what he said was so threatening
I'm surprised at you Meryl. I'm afraid you have swallowed the cult juice. I'm not impressed with this comment. You know it's not true for a majority of people. Being empathic isn't a crime.
I was reply to "what is the controversy" and the controversy is that god is not allowed
Whether you belive in God or not, we all have the inate ability to know what is right and what is wrong. I've never seen a choice made on the Godly spectrum to be wrong. Though I admittedly belive in God, I don't condem people who do not, but only those who act on the side of the "UnGodly" spectrum. What's in a name? Often it's an attempt to change the essence of what is.
Would you mind further explaining what you mean by your comment? Thanks.