The Globalist Elite started rolling this crap out to the veterinary community about ten or fifteen years ago. I made my feelings known at the time but was ignored as usual. I quit the AVMA 25 years ago because of garbage like this although I still receive their daily emails. They’re now and have been since the term was first rolled out, fully on board. OneHealth has NOT been fully embraced by all veterinarians. Only the Big Pharma plants in our professional organizations. News flash: Mars et al are quietly buying up all the veterinary practices and clinics in the country. First thing they do is raise prices through the roof. This pushes pet owners to either choose euthanasia or buy pet insurance. Guess who owns the pet insurance companies? They’re doing the same thing to vet med that they’ve done to human med.
Also a vet and I despair to see what has happened to the profession. AVMA proudly pushing DEI garbage and corporate buying up everything. As in human medicine, the patients and professionals suffer while the management parasites suck the lifeblood out of them.
Very insightful comment. I'm interested in hearing more from the veterinary community on this as it seems they are the testing ground/first stage of this bizarre biomedical totalitarianism. Do you know any good substacks that write on this from the vet perspective?
No I don’t other than the comments I make. However, Meryl’s post here has spurred me to begin writing on this topic soon. Looking back over my 30 years in the profession, I now see how the Globalist cabal has been using us as a testing ground. I had noticed the Big Pharma grift but the full reality has come into stark relief for me these past three years. The scales have fallen from my eyes.
I think you are spot on with what they might try to do with this. Could be just like how they are trying to seize farms in the Netherlands under the guise of reducing carbon emissions. They steal the farmer's land for themselves and they manage to create more food shortages in order to kill more people.
I prefer Anne Gibbons’s visualization of One Health (https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/one-health) to their hideous diagram (appropriately so to represent a hideous concept) and used it to illustrate this piece:
Thank you, Margaret. Clearly, WHO is a top-down (authoritarian) organization, but you point out that its top executive is controlled by money, similar to the WEF. Such hydras will be brought under control only when the money is cut off. Until that happens, money (corruption) will reign.
That's why Putin forbade Russian oligarchs from interfering in politics. Khodorkovsky defied Putin, who managed to dis-empower Khodorkovsky and prosecute him. Since then, private money is essentially barred from Russian politics, and that's why Putin is so reviled in the plutocratic West. The weakness of plutocracy and its inherent corruption is the splintering that may occur as different oligarchs vie for control of everything. We're seeing that now with Trump and Musk.
Corruption can only be brought under control when the people check corruption either through their own inherent power and the natural rights of individuals (the Glorious Revolution followed a century later by the American Revolution), through a leader who listens to and acts for the benefit of his people, or through an alliance of such forces (Washington's Presidency). Russia has achieved that (for now). For decades, China achieved that through authoritarian leaders and the Mandate of Heaven (which recognizes the inherent power of the people), starting with Deng Xiaoping and his successors culminating in Hu Jintao, who voluntarily relinquished power in 2012. The jury is still out on Xi Jinping. Will he respect the Mandate of Heaven, or is he so enthralled with his own power that he ignores the natural rights of individuals and pushes the people to assert their inherent right under the Mandate of Heaven?
Perhaps Xi has already gone "a bridge too far" through extreme lockdown measures, and the people will bring him down. But that's a decision to be made by the people of China and their culture, not by US. Nor does what happens in China or Russia control our own problems. We do.
Thank you Dr Nass for this information. I was born in Alaska and lived here continually for 67 years in harmony with the wonderous nature all around me. I have felt, every since I heard the WEF flaunt meaningless terms like "equitable" and "sustainably balance" that my days here are numbered and a smart city is where I will end up if there isn't a lot of resistance from everybody. Personally the end of my driveway is the hill I will likely die on.
The main objective is to tie Climate Change to health, and then they can tie agriculture to Climate Change and Health to tell us what to Eat (for example less meat because it causes Climate Change which causes Pandemics from new viruses). Climate Lockdowns and Rationing imposed by WHO will then follow. Fortunately in the US the IHR only applies to the Fed Govt and they are restrained by the constitution from imposing on the states unless its a treaty ratified by the states
I imagine them speaking out this word salad with mouths full of marbles. The language is vacuous and preening, meant to impress and sound morally imperative. But it is as hollow as the nonsensical words used in the woke world to redefine the good, take control of the dialogue and various operations, and to intimidate and bully. These ridiculous words they string together are supposed to impress us with their concern and expertise, but the costuming is nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't believe they believe any of this and only the weak minded will fall for it. Pure disguise.
Dr Nass, I truly admire you. I've just been following you for a few months and am impressed by all you've done and been through. You are an inspiration. Thank you.
One Health sounds a lot like One Salvation, but with salvation pulled from beyond this life's boundary (death) to within this life (for the living).
In other words, to those of us practicing a religion, One Health is obviously a competing religion meant to be universal like Christianity.
I think more people would, and could, object to these globalist initiatives if more people understood that thinking themselves outside of religion doesn't prevent them being drawn into religion by another name. The conceit is that this globalist initiative is based on objective truth only known by science.
Having rejected the possibility of objective truth revealed or discovered by any other means than science, people are at the mercy of what credentialed scientists say the science says. Instead of faith in God, you have faith in scientists and you entrust yourself to their perfect good will towards men.
Last session House bill 419 called for defunding the WHO. If we get our reps to put such a bill forward... it would take a great deal of education of our fellow citizens.
James Roguski is the very sharp tip of the spear on all the (best, latest, comprhensive) info re: hijinks, insanity, secrecy, etc. going within the Global entities and orgs, who have nominated themselves to be the quasi rulers of the planet and everything on it. He needs and welcomes everyone's interest and support.
I am working with James and we are discussing strategies. Right now, getting to your politicians on the state level, especially new ones, and explaining the WHO and One Health to them, and food sovereignty--some of these issues can be addressed at the state level. And they communicate with the federal reps who tend to be harder to reach.
Meryl - If you haven't already, you might think about if it were possible to canvas or penetrate the people at the vet schools, (not many) throughout the U.S. University systems. I say this because I think the hijacking and infiltration of the Universities for One Health was done under quasi false pretenses. Meaning that well intentioned academics didn't realize the scope of what was really being designed right under their noses & within their departments. For example, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have a high profile for grant giving etc. and easy money lure and hungry for money academia, likely proved to be effective once again. I looked at UC Davis Vet School awhile back and could imagine what likely happened, and how the trap was possibly set. I suspect the people (DVM's and PhD's) at ground level academia, ever realized the big picture. In over their heads? Years invested in jobs that cannot be abandoned? Interesting also is Tedros background, in consideration of this line of inquiry.
This Senate Bill, (SB960), was signed into law to be eff. Jan. 1, 2023. It appears, that the powers of arrest will now be given to non-citizens, along with a badge and a gun. Another brilliant law signed by Gavin Newsom.
TKU - very helpful to my research. I was afraid that UCD vet school might be a vortex of sorts. Also saw this on UCD website, you simply cannot make this stuff up! https://summer.ucdavis.edu/staff/learn-viper
Always good to pay attention to words and their meanings, (as you are teaching those of us who are paying close attention :)........Thanks (is not enuf) for all you do, and helping us learn the truth as well as the ways of the world.
I greatly appreciate clear and brilliant expositions of the details of the deceits to which we are being subjected like those in David Bell’s guest essay yesterday, but I confess to being alarmed by the larger picture of our oppression. Articulating the horrid errors of Public Health policy matters most where there is a social or political infrastructure concerned with them and with correcting policy in accordance with them, but we face another problem. “One Health” is the hand wave of the magician or hypnotist—you pick the metaphor—to whose will and authority we are supposed to have submitted ourselves without thought or resistance in a new Social Contract that was negotiated unilaterally. It is a deliberately meaningless phrase for some unstable incoherent “balance” between our individual interests and those of the world at large, a pretext for totalitarianism as spelled out by the late, great Rosa Koire:
[BEGIN QUOTE] If you are not aware of SDG’s (sustainable development goals) they are part of the United Nations Agenda 21 program which is described accurately by one of its critics, Rosa Koire, as follows:
[The] United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development…has its basis in
Communitarianism. …The plan calls for government to take control of all land
use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of privacy property
owners. …Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of
communities as determined by a globalist governing body. Moreover, people
should be rounded up off of the land and packed into human settlements or
islands of human habitation …close to employment centers and transportation.
[MG: For now, staying at home may do.] …UN Agenda 21 cites the affluence
of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls
for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer
countries will have more; a redistribution of wealth. …Only then will there be
social justice which is a cornerstone of the UN Agenda 21 plan.
This plan is a whole life plan. It involves the educational system, the energy
market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care
system, food production, and more. It is a plan to inventory and control all the
natural resources, means of production, and human beings in the world. The
plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and
take away your voice. Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, 2011, pp. 12-
13, and 17. [END QUOTE]
The single essay I found that best expresses what we are facing from such mayonnaise concepts as “One Health” is Paul Cudenec’s “Klaus Schwab and his great fascist reset” https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/ The key paragraphs amount to this: Stop thinking, bare your bottom, and trust the algorithm!
[BEGIN QUOTE] “All things will be smart and connected to the internet”, says Schwab, and this will extend to animals, as “sensors wired in cattle can communicate to each other through a mobile phone network”. (17)
He loves the idea of “smart cell factories” which could enable “the accelerated generation of vaccines” (18) and “big-data technologies”. (19) These, he assures us, will “deliver new and innovative ways to service citizens and customers” (20) and we will have to stop objecting to businesses profiting from harnessing and selling information about every aspect of our personal lives. “Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital,” insists Schwab. “Citizen concerns over privacy and establishing accountability in business and legal structures will require adjustments in thinking”. (21) At the end of the day it is clear that all this technological excitement revolves purely around profit, or “value” as Schwab prefers to term it in his 21st century corporate newspeak.
Thus blockchain technology will be fantastic and provoke “an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain”. (22) [END QUOTE]
The “new value” created is a parasitic creation of finance capital best thought of as the power to control resources and to control and cripple human freedom until it is extinguished. To appreciate its form in high finance, listen to Augusten Carstens, general manager of the Bank of International Settlements tell us that the soul of money is Trust—yes, the same trust in the same algorithm of political and personal submission because, after all, it is so safe and convenient. “Digital currencies and the soul of money” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtC26lYhrQY&t=21s&ab_channel=BankforInternationalSettlements
More empty words. As long as the rain forest is being bulldozed for aluminum ore and other atrocities against nature continue with no attempt to address corporate behavior, I will know it is all just words. Anyone see an improvement in anything for poor people? Just words to create false hope. Like hyping climate change but not addressing the behavior behind biodiversity loss. If it is covered by media that is by design. Welcome to the for real Truman Show.
The Globalist Elite started rolling this crap out to the veterinary community about ten or fifteen years ago. I made my feelings known at the time but was ignored as usual. I quit the AVMA 25 years ago because of garbage like this although I still receive their daily emails. They’re now and have been since the term was first rolled out, fully on board. OneHealth has NOT been fully embraced by all veterinarians. Only the Big Pharma plants in our professional organizations. News flash: Mars et al are quietly buying up all the veterinary practices and clinics in the country. First thing they do is raise prices through the roof. This pushes pet owners to either choose euthanasia or buy pet insurance. Guess who owns the pet insurance companies? They’re doing the same thing to vet med that they’ve done to human med.
Also a vet and I despair to see what has happened to the profession. AVMA proudly pushing DEI garbage and corporate buying up everything. As in human medicine, the patients and professionals suffer while the management parasites suck the lifeblood out of them.
Very insightful comment. I'm interested in hearing more from the veterinary community on this as it seems they are the testing ground/first stage of this bizarre biomedical totalitarianism. Do you know any good substacks that write on this from the vet perspective?
No I don’t other than the comments I make. However, Meryl’s post here has spurred me to begin writing on this topic soon. Looking back over my 30 years in the profession, I now see how the Globalist cabal has been using us as a testing ground. I had noticed the Big Pharma grift but the full reality has come into stark relief for me these past three years. The scales have fallen from my eyes.
Any list available of Veterinarians not involved and willing to take new cases?
Our vet retired, and was replaced by a psychopath.
Our lower nature emerges under the cover of corporations.
I think you are spot on with what they might try to do with this. Could be just like how they are trying to seize farms in the Netherlands under the guise of reducing carbon emissions. They steal the farmer's land for themselves and they manage to create more food shortages in order to kill more people.
I prefer Anne Gibbons’s visualization of One Health (https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/one-health) to their hideous diagram (appropriately so to represent a hideous concept) and used it to illustrate this piece:
• “What If They Threw a Pandemic and Nobody Came?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/what-if-they-threw-a-pandemic-and)
Thank you, Margaret. Clearly, WHO is a top-down (authoritarian) organization, but you point out that its top executive is controlled by money, similar to the WEF. Such hydras will be brought under control only when the money is cut off. Until that happens, money (corruption) will reign.
That's why Putin forbade Russian oligarchs from interfering in politics. Khodorkovsky defied Putin, who managed to dis-empower Khodorkovsky and prosecute him. Since then, private money is essentially barred from Russian politics, and that's why Putin is so reviled in the plutocratic West. The weakness of plutocracy and its inherent corruption is the splintering that may occur as different oligarchs vie for control of everything. We're seeing that now with Trump and Musk.
Corruption can only be brought under control when the people check corruption either through their own inherent power and the natural rights of individuals (the Glorious Revolution followed a century later by the American Revolution), through a leader who listens to and acts for the benefit of his people, or through an alliance of such forces (Washington's Presidency). Russia has achieved that (for now). For decades, China achieved that through authoritarian leaders and the Mandate of Heaven (which recognizes the inherent power of the people), starting with Deng Xiaoping and his successors culminating in Hu Jintao, who voluntarily relinquished power in 2012. The jury is still out on Xi Jinping. Will he respect the Mandate of Heaven, or is he so enthralled with his own power that he ignores the natural rights of individuals and pushes the people to assert their inherent right under the Mandate of Heaven?
Perhaps Xi has already gone "a bridge too far" through extreme lockdown measures, and the people will bring him down. But that's a decision to be made by the people of China and their culture, not by US. Nor does what happens in China or Russia control our own problems. We do.
Thank you Dr Nass for this information. I was born in Alaska and lived here continually for 67 years in harmony with the wonderous nature all around me. I have felt, every since I heard the WEF flaunt meaningless terms like "equitable" and "sustainably balance" that my days here are numbered and a smart city is where I will end up if there isn't a lot of resistance from everybody. Personally the end of my driveway is the hill I will likely die on.
One Health = one means of controlling everything by invoking "health" to do it.
#exitwho
"One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems."
Right here: balance humans with the rest -> eugenics! And WHO is doing the balancing act?
"One Hell" reminds me of a certain artist's work.
Hieronymous Bosch was prescient?
Yes he was
When they say anything about so called Public health and safety that means they want to kill and terrorize .
Digital means easier to steal.
And One health is a lie on it's face, like the scamdemic Harmacide hacksxxxine.
Run away screaming
The main objective is to tie Climate Change to health, and then they can tie agriculture to Climate Change and Health to tell us what to Eat (for example less meat because it causes Climate Change which causes Pandemics from new viruses). Climate Lockdowns and Rationing imposed by WHO will then follow. Fortunately in the US the IHR only applies to the Fed Govt and they are restrained by the constitution from imposing on the states unless its a treaty ratified by the states
I imagine them speaking out this word salad with mouths full of marbles. The language is vacuous and preening, meant to impress and sound morally imperative. But it is as hollow as the nonsensical words used in the woke world to redefine the good, take control of the dialogue and various operations, and to intimidate and bully. These ridiculous words they string together are supposed to impress us with their concern and expertise, but the costuming is nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't believe they believe any of this and only the weak minded will fall for it. Pure disguise.
Dr Nass, I truly admire you. I've just been following you for a few months and am impressed by all you've done and been through. You are an inspiration. Thank you.
rest assured
there is steel (steal?)
hidden in the oatmeal
One Health sounds a lot like One Salvation, but with salvation pulled from beyond this life's boundary (death) to within this life (for the living).
In other words, to those of us practicing a religion, One Health is obviously a competing religion meant to be universal like Christianity.
I think more people would, and could, object to these globalist initiatives if more people understood that thinking themselves outside of religion doesn't prevent them being drawn into religion by another name. The conceit is that this globalist initiative is based on objective truth only known by science.
Having rejected the possibility of objective truth revealed or discovered by any other means than science, people are at the mercy of what credentialed scientists say the science says. Instead of faith in God, you have faith in scientists and you entrust yourself to their perfect good will towards men.
Honest crowdsource question: Are there any mechanisms of leverage that exist whereby US citizens can call for exiting the WHO?
Last session House bill 419 called for defunding the WHO. If we get our reps to put such a bill forward... it would take a great deal of education of our fellow citizens.
James Roguski is the very sharp tip of the spear on all the (best, latest, comprhensive) info re: hijinks, insanity, secrecy, etc. going within the Global entities and orgs, who have nominated themselves to be the quasi rulers of the planet and everything on it. He needs and welcomes everyone's interest and support.
https://substack.com/profile/4762818-james-roguski
I am working with James and we are discussing strategies. Right now, getting to your politicians on the state level, especially new ones, and explaining the WHO and One Health to them, and food sovereignty--some of these issues can be addressed at the state level. And they communicate with the federal reps who tend to be harder to reach.
Meryl - If you haven't already, you might think about if it were possible to canvas or penetrate the people at the vet schools, (not many) throughout the U.S. University systems. I say this because I think the hijacking and infiltration of the Universities for One Health was done under quasi false pretenses. Meaning that well intentioned academics didn't realize the scope of what was really being designed right under their noses & within their departments. For example, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have a high profile for grant giving etc. and easy money lure and hungry for money academia, likely proved to be effective once again. I looked at UC Davis Vet School awhile back and could imagine what likely happened, and how the trap was possibly set. I suspect the people (DVM's and PhD's) at ground level academia, ever realized the big picture. In over their heads? Years invested in jobs that cannot be abandoned? Interesting also is Tedros background, in consideration of this line of inquiry.
Agree--however it was UC Davis where much of this as concocted--by Peter Daszac's close colleague in the vet school, Jonna Mazet
https://www.aavmc.org/becoming-a-veterinarian/a-career-in-veterinary-medicine/veterinarian-profiles/dr-jonna-mazet/
I actually knew another prof in the vet school who had no idea what she was up to
Hi Meryl - Just ran across this post on another board and thought it might be of interest regarding our conversation on UCD. For what it is worth....
(Makes me wonder what's really going on there??) Happy New Year!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This Senate Bill, (SB960), was signed into law to be eff. Jan. 1, 2023. It appears, that the powers of arrest will now be given to non-citizens, along with a badge and a gun. Another brilliant law signed by Gavin Newsom.
https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/state-law-expands-eligibility-peace-officers
https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20212022/SB960/
TKU - very helpful to my research. I was afraid that UCD vet school might be a vortex of sorts. Also saw this on UCD website, you simply cannot make this stuff up! https://summer.ucdavis.edu/staff/learn-viper
Always good to pay attention to words and their meanings, (as you are teaching those of us who are paying close attention :)........Thanks (is not enuf) for all you do, and helping us learn the truth as well as the ways of the world.
Edited comment just now, and wondering about the people resigning from WHO. https://shabnampalesamohamed.substack.com/p/why-are-half-the-whos-senior-leadership?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=811091&post_id=86877941&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
Yes! already a subscriber. It’s important work, but not exactly what I was speaking to…
Pack humans into small spaces. Easier to vax (or whatever) them for illnesses that arise from humans being packed into smaller spaces.
Sounds familiar, in a wierd way
I greatly appreciate clear and brilliant expositions of the details of the deceits to which we are being subjected like those in David Bell’s guest essay yesterday, but I confess to being alarmed by the larger picture of our oppression. Articulating the horrid errors of Public Health policy matters most where there is a social or political infrastructure concerned with them and with correcting policy in accordance with them, but we face another problem. “One Health” is the hand wave of the magician or hypnotist—you pick the metaphor—to whose will and authority we are supposed to have submitted ourselves without thought or resistance in a new Social Contract that was negotiated unilaterally. It is a deliberately meaningless phrase for some unstable incoherent “balance” between our individual interests and those of the world at large, a pretext for totalitarianism as spelled out by the late, great Rosa Koire:
[BEGIN QUOTE] If you are not aware of SDG’s (sustainable development goals) they are part of the United Nations Agenda 21 program which is described accurately by one of its critics, Rosa Koire, as follows:
[The] United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development…has its basis in
Communitarianism. …The plan calls for government to take control of all land
use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of privacy property
owners. …Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of
communities as determined by a globalist governing body. Moreover, people
should be rounded up off of the land and packed into human settlements or
islands of human habitation …close to employment centers and transportation.
[MG: For now, staying at home may do.] …UN Agenda 21 cites the affluence
of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls
for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer
countries will have more; a redistribution of wealth. …Only then will there be
social justice which is a cornerstone of the UN Agenda 21 plan.
This plan is a whole life plan. It involves the educational system, the energy
market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care
system, food production, and more. It is a plan to inventory and control all the
natural resources, means of production, and human beings in the world. The
plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and
take away your voice. Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, 2011, pp. 12-
13, and 17. [END QUOTE]
The single essay I found that best expresses what we are facing from such mayonnaise concepts as “One Health” is Paul Cudenec’s “Klaus Schwab and his great fascist reset” https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/ The key paragraphs amount to this: Stop thinking, bare your bottom, and trust the algorithm!
[BEGIN QUOTE] “All things will be smart and connected to the internet”, says Schwab, and this will extend to animals, as “sensors wired in cattle can communicate to each other through a mobile phone network”. (17)
He loves the idea of “smart cell factories” which could enable “the accelerated generation of vaccines” (18) and “big-data technologies”. (19) These, he assures us, will “deliver new and innovative ways to service citizens and customers” (20) and we will have to stop objecting to businesses profiting from harnessing and selling information about every aspect of our personal lives. “Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital,” insists Schwab. “Citizen concerns over privacy and establishing accountability in business and legal structures will require adjustments in thinking”. (21) At the end of the day it is clear that all this technological excitement revolves purely around profit, or “value” as Schwab prefers to term it in his 21st century corporate newspeak.
Thus blockchain technology will be fantastic and provoke “an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain”. (22) [END QUOTE]
The “new value” created is a parasitic creation of finance capital best thought of as the power to control resources and to control and cripple human freedom until it is extinguished. To appreciate its form in high finance, listen to Augusten Carstens, general manager of the Bank of International Settlements tell us that the soul of money is Trust—yes, the same trust in the same algorithm of political and personal submission because, after all, it is so safe and convenient. “Digital currencies and the soul of money” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtC26lYhrQY&t=21s&ab_channel=BankforInternationalSettlements
More empty words. As long as the rain forest is being bulldozed for aluminum ore and other atrocities against nature continue with no attempt to address corporate behavior, I will know it is all just words. Anyone see an improvement in anything for poor people? Just words to create false hope. Like hyping climate change but not addressing the behavior behind biodiversity loss. If it is covered by media that is by design. Welcome to the for real Truman Show.