57 Comments
Dec 6, 2022Liked by Meryl Nass

The Globalist Elite started rolling this crap out to the veterinary community about ten or fifteen years ago. I made my feelings known at the time but was ignored as usual. I quit the AVMA 25 years ago because of garbage like this although I still receive their daily emails. They’re now and have been since the term was first rolled out, fully on board. OneHealth has NOT been fully embraced by all veterinarians. Only the Big Pharma plants in our professional organizations. News flash: Mars et al are quietly buying up all the veterinary practices and clinics in the country. First thing they do is raise prices through the roof. This pushes pet owners to either choose euthanasia or buy pet insurance. Guess who owns the pet insurance companies? They’re doing the same thing to vet med that they’ve done to human med.

Expand full comment

I think you are spot on with what they might try to do with this. Could be just like how they are trying to seize farms in the Netherlands under the guise of reducing carbon emissions. They steal the farmer's land for themselves and they manage to create more food shortages in order to kill more people.

Expand full comment

I prefer Anne Gibbons’s visualization of One Health (https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/one-health) to their hideous diagram (appropriately so to represent a hideous concept) and used it to illustrate this piece:

• “What If They Threw a Pandemic and Nobody Came?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/what-if-they-threw-a-pandemic-and)

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr Nass for this information. I was born in Alaska and lived here continually for 67 years in harmony with the wonderous nature all around me. I have felt, every since I heard the WEF flaunt meaningless terms like "equitable" and "sustainably balance" that my days here are numbered and a smart city is where I will end up if there isn't a lot of resistance from everybody. Personally the end of my driveway is the hill I will likely die on.

Expand full comment

One Health = one means of controlling everything by invoking "health" to do it.

Expand full comment
Dec 6, 2022Liked by Meryl Nass

#exitwho

Expand full comment

"One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems."

Right here: balance humans with the rest -> eugenics! And WHO is doing the balancing act?

Expand full comment

"One Hell" reminds me of a certain artist's work.

Hieronymous Bosch was prescient?

Expand full comment

When they say anything about so called Public health and safety that means they want to kill and terrorize .

Digital means easier to steal.

And One health is a lie on it's face, like the scamdemic Harmacide hacksxxxine.

Run away screaming

Expand full comment
Dec 7, 2022Liked by Meryl Nass

The main objective is to tie Climate Change to health, and then they can tie agriculture to Climate Change and Health to tell us what to Eat (for example less meat because it causes Climate Change which causes Pandemics from new viruses). Climate Lockdowns and Rationing imposed by WHO will then follow. Fortunately in the US the IHR only applies to the Fed Govt and they are restrained by the constitution from imposing on the states unless its a treaty ratified by the states

Expand full comment
Dec 6, 2022Liked by Meryl Nass

I imagine them speaking out this word salad with mouths full of marbles. The language is vacuous and preening, meant to impress and sound morally imperative. But it is as hollow as the nonsensical words used in the woke world to redefine the good, take control of the dialogue and various operations, and to intimidate and bully. These ridiculous words they string together are supposed to impress us with their concern and expertise, but the costuming is nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't believe they believe any of this and only the weak minded will fall for it. Pure disguise.

Dr Nass, I truly admire you. I've just been following you for a few months and am impressed by all you've done and been through. You are an inspiration. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Dec 6, 2022·edited Dec 6, 2022Liked by Meryl Nass

One Health sounds a lot like One Salvation, but with salvation pulled from beyond this life's boundary (death) to within this life (for the living).

In other words, to those of us practicing a religion, One Health is obviously a competing religion meant to be universal like Christianity.

I think more people would, and could, object to these globalist initiatives if more people understood that thinking themselves outside of religion doesn't prevent them being drawn into religion by another name. The conceit is that this globalist initiative is based on objective truth only known by science.

Having rejected the possibility of objective truth revealed or discovered by any other means than science, people are at the mercy of what credentialed scientists say the science says. Instead of faith in God, you have faith in scientists and you entrust yourself to their perfect good will towards men.

Expand full comment

Honest crowdsource question: Are there any mechanisms of leverage that exist whereby US citizens can call for exiting the WHO?

Expand full comment

Pack humans into small spaces. Easier to vax (or whatever) them for illnesses that arise from humans being packed into smaller spaces.

Sounds familiar, in a wierd way

Expand full comment

I greatly appreciate clear and brilliant expositions of the details of the deceits to which we are being subjected like those in David Bell’s guest essay yesterday, but I confess to being alarmed by the larger picture of our oppression. Articulating the horrid errors of Public Health policy matters most where there is a social or political infrastructure concerned with them and with correcting policy in accordance with them, but we face another problem. “One Health” is the hand wave of the magician or hypnotist—you pick the metaphor—to whose will and authority we are supposed to have submitted ourselves without thought or resistance in a new Social Contract that was negotiated unilaterally. It is a deliberately meaningless phrase for some unstable incoherent “balance” between our individual interests and those of the world at large, a pretext for totalitarianism as spelled out by the late, great Rosa Koire:

[BEGIN QUOTE] If you are not aware of SDG’s (sustainable development goals) they are part of the United Nations Agenda 21 program which is described accurately by one of its critics, Rosa Koire, as follows:

[The] United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development…has its basis in

Communitarianism. …The plan calls for government to take control of all land

use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of privacy property

owners. …Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of

communities as determined by a globalist governing body. Moreover, people

should be rounded up off of the land and packed into human settlements or

islands of human habitation …close to employment centers and transportation.

[MG: For now, staying at home may do.] …UN Agenda 21 cites the affluence

of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls

for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer

countries will have more; a redistribution of wealth. …Only then will there be

social justice which is a cornerstone of the UN Agenda 21 plan.

This plan is a whole life plan. It involves the educational system, the energy

market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care

system, food production, and more. It is a plan to inventory and control all the

natural resources, means of production, and human beings in the world. The

plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and

take away your voice. Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, 2011, pp. 12-

13, and 17. [END QUOTE]

The single essay I found that best expresses what we are facing from such mayonnaise concepts as “One Health” is Paul Cudenec’s “Klaus Schwab and his great fascist reset” https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/ The key paragraphs amount to this: Stop thinking, bare your bottom, and trust the algorithm!

[BEGIN QUOTE] “All things will be smart and connected to the internet”, says Schwab, and this will extend to animals, as “sensors wired in cattle can communicate to each other through a mobile phone network”. (17)

He loves the idea of “smart cell factories” which could enable “the accelerated generation of vaccines” (18) and “big-data technologies”. (19) These, he assures us, will “deliver new and innovative ways to service citizens and customers” (20) and we will have to stop objecting to businesses profiting from harnessing and selling information about every aspect of our personal lives. “Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital,” insists Schwab. “Citizen concerns over privacy and establishing accountability in business and legal structures will require adjustments in thinking”. (21) At the end of the day it is clear that all this technological excitement revolves purely around profit, or “value” as Schwab prefers to term it in his 21st century corporate newspeak.

Thus blockchain technology will be fantastic and provoke “an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain”. (22) [END QUOTE]

The “new value” created is a parasitic creation of finance capital best thought of as the power to control resources and to control and cripple human freedom until it is extinguished. To appreciate its form in high finance, listen to Augusten Carstens, general manager of the Bank of International Settlements tell us that the soul of money is Trust—yes, the same trust in the same algorithm of political and personal submission because, after all, it is so safe and convenient. “Digital currencies and the soul of money” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtC26lYhrQY&t=21s&ab_channel=BankforInternationalSettlements

Expand full comment

More empty words. As long as the rain forest is being bulldozed for aluminum ore and other atrocities against nature continue with no attempt to address corporate behavior, I will know it is all just words. Anyone see an improvement in anything for poor people? Just words to create false hope. Like hyping climate change but not addressing the behavior behind biodiversity loss. If it is covered by media that is by design. Welcome to the for real Truman Show.

Expand full comment