27 Comments

Ah, the great priests of the climate cult. It is LITERALLY a cult, built on falsehoods, guilt, and a perceived absolution if one grovels and drives an EV. It is the biggest scam in human history: how easy people are beguiled by unproven Orwellian fears. Meanwhile the war on our children persists -- a war of invisible ecotoxins that stay in the environment forever, poured over our children and grandchildren at a frenzied pace using borrowed money to "Build Back Better" and "reduce inflation" by mass-producing EVs and solar panels that spew unprecedented quantities of the world's most harmful chemicals ... to "save" us from life-giving carbon dioxide. A death cult, where all adherents self-sacrifice their kids. The Aztecs were more civilized, sacrificing their children for food rather than killing them with it.

Expand full comment
Sep 15·edited Sep 15Liked by Meryl Nass

A cult yes, well said, foisted on the top end by the usual oligarch string pullers waging psychologic warfare on the world population to implement total control and a new economic slave grid. The UN blueprints of Climate Action plans rolled out in lockstep globally, like the jabs, and adopted by our local governments (cities, towns and villages) openly state the goal to reinvent us and our culture. The cult is propelled into our backyards by ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability), an international NGO, a non-governmental syndicate intercepting and replacing our voices in our national and local governments with largely non-local Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP) which monetize ‘the cult’, ‘incentivize’ elected officials and install its tentacles in our legal and bureaucratic framework. Get involved and take your local governments back! These are your captured neighbours, within your electoral reach, installing a foreign ideology in your backyard. When it comes to poisoning let’s not forget the murderous childhood ‘vaccine’ schedule, now including new mRNA LNP gene therapeutics (whatever that means) despite still lacking longterm safety testing AND an independent review of the new and fast-tracked (no time to test, you’re the guinea pigs) C-19 ‘therapeutics’. Our children are THE test!

Expand full comment
Sep 17·edited Sep 17Liked by Meryl Nass

Thank You, John and Meryl.

I see the climate-change narrative as a "stalking horse" for The Limits To Growth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth , which must not be openly discussed, but (99%) humanity is being "weaned off" fossil-fuels and industrial economy, which will gradually reduce our numbers by 90% or so... gently, kindly, without discussion, which would only trouble and upset us...

Stay in the middle of the crowd, now. Don't stray!

;-(

Expand full comment

This is an important 2018 booklet that describes in great detail how narrative science, social and behavioral science (the mind-farkery science of propaganda/censorship) has been integrated into the natural sciences, climatology and meteorology. In a coordinated attack on the public mind to push the climate fear porn for their population control agenda.

Social and Behavioral Sciences (SBS) has been The Science (TM) of the pandemic: masking, jabbing, lockdowns, vax passports, nudging, manipulation, coercion.

In this application of SBS they call it, "The Weather Enterprise" that ”includes the network of government agencies, private-sector companies, and academic institutions that provide weather services to the nation."

You'll even find infamous propaganda specialist Kate Starbird listed in it as a contributor. It further details how they use the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to advance climate fear porn propaganda with health regulatory powers under the auspices of public health. As well as a collection naming of all of the centers of power that are coordinating and collaborating with this massive psychological mind-farkery operation. It's a big, big, big man-caused climate change "Enterprise." Aka, "Racket":

Integrating Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018.

https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/24865/chapter/1

https://doi.org/10.17226/24865

Front Matter [you've gotta check out the names of some of these Boards and Committees that contributed!]

Summary

Ch 1 Introduction

Ch 2 The Motivation for Integrating Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

Ch 3 Assessing the Current State of Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

Ch 4 Social and Behavioral Sciences for Road Weather Concerns

Ch 5 Research Needs for Improving the Nation’s Weather Readiness and Advancing Fundamental Social and Behavioral Science Knowledge

Ch 6 A Framework to Sustainably Support and Effectively Use Social and Behavioral Science Research in the Weather Enterprise

Ch 7 Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations

Appendix A Examples of Funding for Social and Behavioral Science Activities by NOAA, NSF, DHS1

Appendix B Lessons from SBS Integration into the “Public Health Enterprise”

Appendix C People Who Provided Input to the Committee

Appendix D Committee Biosketches

FF - I've seen no better single resource to putting together their operational plan and strategies in one place than this book. For those who wish to do a very deep dive. A 182-page exercise describing the imposition of stupidity masquerading as intelligence and enlightened thought on an unwitting nation, and world.

Expand full comment

Cloak of green by Dewar, Elaine is a book, that although a bit lengthy and written in a journalistic style, covers Maurice Strong thoroughly. The lies and deception it discusses are truly amazing. The Club of Rome, also around the early 70's, articulated the need for a 'crisis' to perfect their ultimate plans for better control of the world's resources. It in a brazen way told you exactly what they were doing, and were going to do. Similar to a 'Mein Kampf' statement. Not hiding anything.

M Robert Weiss, MD

Expand full comment

Brilliant. Thank you so much for taking this on.

Expand full comment

A great book that traces the history of "climate change" BS and population control:

"Rockefeller, Controlling The Game" by Jacob Nordangard

Expand full comment

Thanks for the post and historical perspective. The Council on Foreign Relations is another nest of similarly-minded cretinous snakes (stupid, arrogant "educated" "leaders") who have long-infiltrated our government and further the global govvie agenda.

Expand full comment

Al Gore invented it for the same reason all the other grifters like the U.N. bought into the HOAX.

"Give us money to do the impossible, CHANGE THE WEATHER. "

BOUGHT BY A GULLIBLE FOOLISH NAIVE POPULACE.

Expand full comment

It’s all about climate change. As if the planet’s climate is never supposed to change. Which it has and does, regularly or we would be a lifeless ball of dirt. Environmental health is, and should be about the toxins we inject in the air, water, soil, food and us. Not because that causes temp fluctuations which are normal. But because those toxic chemicals poison us and the planet we live on. Something She can fix over time if we ever got our of Her way. The Planet has worked hard to create an awesome, flexible, life giving, life changing environment on and in which we could live happily and in harmony with It. Instead we are using it for a dump and toilet and beat our chests over our rightful mastery over it.

Expand full comment

Maurice Strong spearheading the Green New Deal along with Prince Philip and now Canada 2020's Mark Carney (former British Bankster) the LaRouche Organization and now Promethean Action writes a LOT about their Malthusian plans to depopulate the World: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/eirv34n13-20070330/51_713_glowarm.pdf

Expand full comment

And the governing Liberal party in Canada is promoting Mark Carney as their replacement for Trudeau, whose popularity is in the basement. Bankster crony extraordinaire.

Expand full comment

All pre-planned and mapped out ages ago...

Expand full comment

I thought conservation and Rockefeller was a prime mover but that would go back a century or more? It was globalists back then too? “conserving” land under federal auspices to protect it from…..the people

Expand full comment

We know about the Club of Rome “Limits to Growth “ (1972) but before that was the REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN: ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE With introductory material by Leonard C. Lewin. 1967 https://ia801603.us.archive.org/10/items/pdfy-A5uQx1ByqfwWuHma/Report_from_Iron_Mountain%201967.pdf

This secret group of NWO parasites brainstormed on what could be use as a substitute for war – which apparently was not as effective at decreasing the population to the extent they wished.

“SUBSTITUTES FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR: MODELS The following substitute institutions, among others, have been proposed for consideration as replacements for the nonmilitary functions of war. That they may not have been originally set forth for that purpose does not preclude or invalidate their possible application here.

ECONOMIC. a) A comprehensive social-welfare program, directed toward maximum improvement of general conditions of human life. b) A giant openend space research program, aimed at unreachable targets. c) A permanent, ritualized, ultra-elaborate disarmament inspection system, and variants of such a system.

POLITICAL a) An omnipresent, virtually omnipotent international police force. b) An established and recognized extraterrestrial menace. c) Massive global environmental pollution. d) Fictitious alternate enemies.

SOCIOLOGICAL: CONTROL FUNCTION. a) Programs generally derived from the Peace Corps model. b) A modern, sophisticated form of slavery.

MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTION. a) Intensified environmental pollution. b) New religions or other mythologies. c) Socially oriented blood games. d) Combination forms.

ECOLOGICAL. A comprehensive program of applied eugenics.

CULTURAL. No replacement institution offered.

SCIENTIFIC. The secondary requirements of the space research, social welfare, and / or eugenics programs.

SUBSTITUTES FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR: EVALUATION The models listed above reflect only the beginning of the quest for substitute institutions for the functions of war, rather than a recapitulation of alternatives. It would be both premature and inappropriate, therefore, to offer final judgments on their applicability to a transition to peace and after. Furthermore, since the necessary but complex project of correlating the compatibility of proposed surrogates for different functions could be treated only in exemplary fashion at this time, we have elected to withhold such hypothetical correlations as were tested as statistically inadequate. Nevertheless, some tentative and cursory comments on these proposed functional "solutions" will indicate the scope of the difficulties involved in this area of peace planning.

ECONOMIC. The social-welfare model cannot be expected to remain outside the normal economy after the conclusion of its predominantly capital investment phase; its value in this function can therefore be only temporary The space-research substitute appears to meet both major criteria, and should be examined in greater detail, especially in respect to its probable effects on other war functions. "Elaborate inspection" schemes, although superficially attractive, are inconsistent with the basic premise of a transition to peace. The "unarmed forces" variant, logistically similar, is subject to the same functional criticism as the general social-welfare model.

POLITICAL. Like the inspection-scheme surrogates, proposals for plenipotentiary international police are inherently incompatible with the ending of the war system. The "unarmed forces" variant, amended to include unlimited powers of economic sanction, might conceivably be expanded to constitute a credible external menace. Development of an acceptable threat from "outer space," presumably in conjunction with a space-research surrogate for economic control, appears unpromising in terms of credibility. The environmental pollution model does not seem sufficiently responsive to immediate social control, except through arbitrary acceleration of current pollution trends; this in turn raises questions of political acceptability. New, less regressive, approaches to the creation of fictitious global "enemies" invite further investigation.

SOCIOLOGICAL: CONTROL FUNCTION. Although the various substitutes proposed for this function that are modeled roughly on the Peace Corps appear grossly inadequate in potential scope, they should not be ruled out without further study. Slavery, in a technologically modern and conceptually euphemized form, may prove a more efficient and flexible institution in this area.

MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTION. Although none of the proposed substitutes for war as the guarantor of social allegiance can be dismissed out of hand, each presents serious and special difficulties. Intensified environmental threats may raise ecological dangers; mythmaking dissociated from tar may no longer be politically feasible; purposeful blood games and rituals can far more readily be devised than implemented. An institution combining this function with the preceding one, based on, but not necessarily imitative of, the precedent of organized ethnic repression, warrants careful consideration. ECOLOGICAL. The only apparent problem in the application of an adequate eugenic substitute for war is that of timing; it cannot be effectuated until the transition to peace has been completed, which involved a serious temporary risk of ecological failure.

CULTURAL. No plausible substitute for this function of war has yet been proposed. It may be, however, that a basic cultural value-determinant is not necessary to the survival of a stable society.

SCIENTIFIC. The same might be said for the function of war as the prime mover of the search for knowledge. However, adoption of either a giant space-research program, a comprehensive social-welfare program, or a master program of eugenic control would provide motivation for limited technologies."

Climate Change and the Environmental movement were not organic movements. True some environmental groups started that way with all sincerity – but as far as I can tell all have been captured. Like the music revolutions (rock, Jazz, HipHop,and rap) they were created by the CIA and MI5 (Travistock) as was the drug culture, feminism and the Hippie Movement. Feminism had several purposes – destroy the family unit, reduce the birth rate, and create more taxable income from the working wife.

The Death Cult is very old.

Expand full comment
founding

This is a helpful piece of the puzzle, but the larger mysteries remain incomprehensible to me. This movement started off as a genuine struggle between conservationists and the oil industry. Somehow, the oil industry switched sides and the arguments for greater fuel efficiency, public transit, and reduced waste morphed into de-industrialization.

Initially, the hypothesis that CO2 warmed the planet through the greenhouse effect seemed plausible, but as climate models revealed that the situation was not so simple, the movement not only dug in their heels, but engulfed the environmental nonprofit advocacy organizations. The weaker the scientific support, the greater the obsessive fanaticism.

Cui bono? I don't get it. Who is doing this, and what do they hope to get from it?

Expand full comment

Well, there's climate scammer extraordinaire Mark Carney - who's made I don’t know how much money off it - or the oil deals in non-western countries. With solar and windmills for us.

Former head of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England.

Trudeau’s just brought him back to Canada. Possibly to finish off our economy completely, possibly to run him as prime minister in the next election because nobody is going to vote for Trudeau. And of course he's WEF.

I wish we hadn't been born in such 'interesting times'.

It will, indeed, be interesting.

Expand full comment

Centralised and optimum control of what the Rockefeller-financed Club Of Rome members referred to as the 'Enemy,' that is HUMANITY, whose way too developed and rich economies have and will continue to plunder earth's resources to cater to the needs of billions of consumers and destroy the planet even more.

The Club Of Rome created the imaginary earth-heating pollution, the bogeyman Co2 which must be fought against and reduced at all costs.

Irresponsible national governments' decisions must therefore be handed over to more responsable and intelligent Technocratic Central Planners at the UN and elsewhere and the ONLY way to bring this about is by creating imaginary crises that can't possibly be solved by the existing national representatives.

All must be done to slow down damaging economic growth and the green transition has alas been imposed to do this, especially in the Five Eyes-influenced parts of the world. The more economy-enriching hydrocarbons are used, the greater the economic growth and population rise are to be expected. Two destructive things which have been deemed a NO-NO:((

Hence the UN's Agenda 2030 and so on.

These are a few of my thoughts gleaned from various sources.

Expand full comment

If I'm not mistaken, I've read recently that Co2 makes up only .03% of the atmosphere. If so, where's the great C02 threat ? And supposedly, there have been many eras that had far higher Co2 levels in the past. And glaciers continued into 2020's in certain parts of the world. Also, a number of well accredited scientists claim that we are entering a phase of global cooling. Not warming. And very few seem to be aware about the Hunga Tonga underwater Volcanic blast that sent 1 trillon gallons of super heated sea water into the stratosphere, causing a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees for 5 years. Hunga Tonga happened in 2022. I wish that all of this contrasting data could be collected in a book and made available to the public ? Call it: The case against Global Warming. Or does such book already exist ?

Expand full comment

Matthew Ehret has written an excellent compendium of this Depopulation/Great Reset Malthusian Agenda and its history, with a good discussion of Maurice Strong's role.

The Roots Of Modern Eco-Terrorism: From MK Ultra And The Unabomber To Maurice Strong And Yuval Harari:

https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-roots-of-modern-eco-terrorism

Expand full comment

Probably to bid up the price of oil with regs small producers could not compete profitably with.

Expand full comment

My take is that people who have no God to believe in, can be made to believe in anything, I.e. the sky is falling or the climate changed, from winter to summer, we're all gunna die if we don't act fast & empower big government to save us!

Expand full comment