So please clarify what Covid is and what caused it. And also you have claimed a bacteriophage is a virus that invades bacteria. If it invades from outside bacteria where have bactetiophages been discovered in natural habitats?
So you’re one of the folks who doesn’t believe in viruses? Yes, viruses exist and millions have been spent in engineering weaponized versions of them. Bacteriophages are even large enough to be viewed under an electron microscope. The mRNA vaxx delivers a synthetic virus created by replacing the SARS-Cov shell protein with a nanolipid shell and substituting in pseudouridine amino acids in place of the uracil in the S protein of the viral RNA for enhanced stability. However, the idiots at Pfizer didn’t realize that the nanolipid particles would circulate throughout the body (instead of remaining in the arm) and are highly toxic themselves leading to blood clots and nerve damage, that pseudouridine is too stable and causes ribozomal frame shifting creating prion like misfolded junk proteins, and that the manufacturing process using E. coli bacteria led to massive contamination with bacterial DNA plasmids that are probably causing turbo cancers.
Great. This will be easy for you. What is Covid 19 and what causes it? If you say its a virus cite a paper that shows the virus you claim causes COVID19 has been isolated. Let's see how well you do with this simple assignment first before addressing your other claims. Fair?
Cool story, can you cite any valid scientific evidence to back it up? And really, you think the folks at Pfizer who developed the jabs are idiots as opposed to homicidal maniacs?
OK. Maybe the first challenge was a little too difficult. Perhaps something easier. What is a bacteriophage and is it exogenous to bacteria? If your answer is yes to the second question please provide evidence of where a bacteriophage can be found outside of bacteria.
Bacteriophahes are simply viruses that infect bacteria. Some are large enough to be filmed with an electron microscope. There are plenty of their images on the web.
Great, we are making progress. So bacteriophages as ‘viruses‘ infect bacteria??From outside the bacteria?? If yes please cite evidence such as a peer reviewed scientific paper proving its existence outside of bactera. By infect you mean an invasion from outside?
In which paper has it been demonstrated that bacteriophages have infected bacteria? I ask because bacteriophages have never been shown to exist in natural habitats.
Of course vaxx proponents would never characterize the jab as a synthetic virus, but it is a close functional approximation to an actual virus, except that Pfizer programmed the RNA to replicate only the S protein instead of the entire SARS- Cov backbone.
To make this claim you need to establish that a virus exists. Barics paper doesn't do that for the reasons I outlined in my earlier Gain of Fiction Alert!!
Great more progress. So to program the mRNA to an actual virus, there must be an actual virus physically present In nature, right? Please cite one paper that you stand by to back up that claim and lemme know in which part of the methods section that ‘virus‘ was isolated and demonstrated to be replication competent, i.e. capable of infecting another person. If you can do this you will have succeeded where all prior to you have failed.
Why don’t you start with the gain-of-function paper that led to Covid: Ralph Baric (UNC) and Shi Zhengli (Wuhan Institute of Virology) co-authored a 2015 study titled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,” published in the journal Nature Medicine. They welded a bat coronavirus spike protein onto the SARs-Cov backbone to engineer a chimeric virus with enhanced ability to infect humanized mice.
Must have been stuck in a computer screen and finally managed to escape and travel the world. These virus are very stealthy and just wait for the exact opportunity.
The two of them spent the night together at the " No Tell Motel " adjacent to the market. The bat then did the walk of shame across the street to the extremely wet market.
Appreciate your work for health freedom! However there's no evidence that "Covid-19" ever existed as it was never isolated per the Koch postulates and is nothing but a computer simulation. In addition the number of worldwide flu cases dropped to nearly zero during "Covid" - a first in recorded medical history! Obviously "Covid-19" was the flu re-branded. The death count was ginned up by the use of fraudulent PCR tests and by declaring gunshot victims, car accidents and garden-variety pneumonia etc, "Covid" deaths. And the lethal cherry on the sundae was the Remdesiver and ventilator protocols that murdered so many patients while lining the pockets of so many hospital administrators and Doctors. Truly a low point for the human race. Thanks for being on the right side of history during these dark times!
The memo also noted that "all other possible places of virus's origin have been proven false" and stated that "all other proposed theories are likely to be a decoy to prevent inquiry to WCDC and WIV."
Again meaningless as no virus fictitiously named SARS COV2 has been proven to exist other than on computer software.
Why did the Intelligence Community intentionally undermine an April 2020 determination that Covid came from a lab?
Cos, they didn't want peeps to know the following: The “virus” was certainly invented in a lab but it was a computer lab and the only entity that was intentionally leaked out was a computer simulation. The results of the simulation were sent around the world as digital code over the internet and the resulting PCR primers that were deployed in kits en masse created the “cases” for the COVID-19 fraud.
Now now KJ , you conspiracy theorist. But I will second that. Why else , with all the data , would the ACOG recommend the jab to pregnant women and VA folks . Sickening.
As with CoV-1, CoV-2 came from a computer algorithm as will the forthcoming CoV-3. All viruses are invented using slight-of-hand, nonexistent particles and voodoo-oligy. What better way to create fear and scare people into running for the fake health care system to get safe and effective death drugs?
We also know that the FBI was told by a Chinese informant in very early 2020 that Covid came from a lab leak and were investigating EcoHealth as being the entity behind the creation of the Covid virus no later than early April - but more likely in March 2020.
Hello, Kurt!! Did the Deep State advise you against answering a couple of simple questions??
Anyway, you will be pleased to know I took a closer look at your Baric paper of 2015 and found a few methodological issues. Please lemme know what I got wrong:
The first and foundational fraud of the paper you cited: “A SARS like cluster of circulating bat corona viruses, Zhengli-Li Shi, Baric, 2015” is the claim that a “SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV” has been isolated and is “currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations.” There is no “virus” involved in the study whatsoever other than one the researchers made up, "On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus.” The paper entails nothing but grandiose chemistry experimentation involving numerous chemicals and foreign substances combined and cultured together which were used to justify the killing of the animals experimented on.
For instance, the authors claimed to have created a new virus by, "Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. " Essentially, the researchers mixed numerous sources of genetic materials with added synthetic chemicals into a petri dish and claimed a new engineered “virus” existed within the cell culture soup. In order to do so, they utilized:
• Kidney Vero E6 cells from monkey kidneys which are the most commonly used cell line for culturing
• Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium contains various ingredients including amino acids, vitamins, glucose, sodium, glycine, serine, ferric nitrate, pyruvate, and sodium bicarbonate
• 5% Fetal Bovine Serum - blood taken from the heart of an unborn calf
o antibiotic/antimycotic refers to a combination of antibiotics and antifungal agents manufactured by (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA)
o DBT cells are a type of cell line derived from the brain tissue of transgenic mice.
o HeLa cells are a type of human cell line that originated from cervical cancer cells
o Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) typically contains a balanced mixture of amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, glucose, and other nutrients necessary for cell growth. It also includes buffering agents to maintain a stable pH and antibiotics
This soup was then forcibly injected into the nasal passages of baby mice with a mix of ketamine and xylazine – just like “transmission” naturally occurs. The mice were checked regularly to see if they showed any signs of the symptoms the researchers wanted to see such as 20-30% weight loss, reduced activity, ruffled fur and/or hunched posture. It was never considered whether or not the mode of injection and/or the use of ketamine and xylazine may have resulted in any symptoms. It was never considered whether the stress of the experimentation nor the artificial living conditions affected the health of the mice. Any signs and symptoms were assumed to be caused by an invisible “virus” which was never directly demonstrated to exist. In cases where weight loss greater than or equal to 30% occurred the mice were then considered moribund and euthanized.
“For individual mice, notations for infection including failure to inhale the entire dose, bubbling of inoculum from the nose, or infection through the mouth may have led to exclusion of mouse data at the discretion of the researcher; post-infection, no other pre-established exclusion or inclusion criteria are defined. No blinding was used in any animal experiments, and animals were not randomized...”
In other words, once the mice were “infected,” (ABUSED) the researchers didn't have any other specific rules for deciding which mice to include or exclude based on how they were doing. They didn't have a clear plan for which infected mice to keep studying and which ones to ignore. The lack of blinding and randomization could potentially affect the reliability of their results because it introduces the possibility of bias or unintentional influence on the outcomes such as closing the loop on the circular reasoning of the starting assumption that these researchers actually had a “virus” to gain the function of in the first place.
“The full-length genomic sequences and the amino acid sequences of the S1 domains of the spike of representative CoVs were downloaded from Genbank or Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC), aligned with ClustalX and phylogenetically compared by using maximum likelihood estimation using 100 bootstraps or by using the PhyML…… to generate homology models for SHC014 and Rs3367 of the SARS RBD in complex with ACE2 based on crystal structure 2AJF (Protein Data Bank). Homology models were visualized and manipulated in MacPyMol (version 1.3).”
Researchers gathered genetic information from various “coronaviruses (CoVs)” available in databases like GenBank or PATRIC. They compared these sequences using computer programs to understand how closely related different CoVs are to each other. They used a method called maximum likelihood estimation to build a family tree (phylogenetic tree) showing the evolutionary relationships between these fictional computer generated “viruses.” Additionally, they used computer simulations to create models of specific parts of the “virus's spike protein interacting with human cells”, based on known protein structures. These models were then visualized and analyzed using specialized software. All in silico smoke and mirrors. No actual physical virus demonstrated.
Prior to imaging the left lung was removed and submerged in buffered formalin .... then lung tissue was embedded in paraffin. This wouldn't impact tissue negatively prior to imaging, would it? Such as causing shrinkage and distortion of the tissue. Additionally, the infiltration of paraffin wax can fill in spaces within the tissue, potentially obscuring fine details and altering the overall morphology.
In summary, the study under scrutiny raises profound concerns regarding its foundational claims and methodological approach. The assertion of a "SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV," purportedly circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations, lacks substantiation as no actual “virus” has ever been isolated. Instead, the researchers synthetically engineered a “virus” through a convoluted process involving chemical experimentation and genetic manipulation. The methodology employed, characterized by a cocktail of chemicals and foreign substances combined and cultured together, undermines the validity of the study's findings.
Moreover, the experiment's treatment of animals further underscores the ethical and scientific shortcomings. The injection of a concoction into the nasal passages of baby mice, coupled with the use of ketamine and xylazine, raises questions about the reliability of observed symptoms and the potential for artificial induction. Furthermore, the lack of clear criteria for data inclusion and exclusion, along with the absence of blinding and randomization, introduces bias and compromises the study's integrity.
The genetic analysis conducted, ostensibly to characterize the “virus,” relies heavily on computer-generated simulations and comparisons rather than direct observation of physical “viral” entities. Similarly, the embedding of lung tissue in paraffin for imaging purposes may have introduced distortions and alterations, casting doubt on the accuracy of the morphological assessments.
In essence, the study fails to provide evidence for the existence of any purported “viruses” and calls into question the validity of its methodology and findings. It highlights the importance of rigorous scientific scrutiny and ethical considerations in research endeavours. Moving forward, it is imperative to uphold rigorous standards of scientific inquiry and transparency to ensure the integrity and credibility of research outcomes. Alas, these guys never started with a virus and never finished with one.
A lab leak? Maybe. Intentional? Of course! What lab in what country? And doesn't everyone know now that RNA CAN'T PANDEMIC???? It CAN'T!!! This lab leak fixation is taking up WAY too many parking spaces in people's brain's parking lots! Has ANYONE tried to come up with a definitive, APOLITICAL cure for all of the types of damage done to the people harmed by the poisonous potion? Or is Big Pharma, in cahoots and the entire medical industrial complex, going to always stand in the way, ever reaping the rewards of all of the sick and disabled people who fell, and will fall in the future, victim to their inoculations?
If only the peeps could realize there are no viruses to leak. As long as this fiction continues the parking lot will be full of broken down vehicles ruined by the corrosive gas of germ theory.
I read an article a while back that told of a lab here in the US that had used mice and deer in its gain of function research for covid, and they had determined that they needed to use bats in China instead. Makes sense that our own government would cover this up from the people! All Gain of Function research should be stopped before millions more die! Blood is on their hands.
Don't worry about Gain of Fiction rumour mills. Always, look to source. You can't gain the function of something that doesn't exist.
I will prove to you the "virus" that causes CONVID 19 exists. First swab someone's nose. 2. Put swab on a cell culture of monkey kidney cells. 3. Poison with antibiotics to produce breakdown of cell culture. Conclusion: The virus caused the breakdown. Any problems with my methodology???
There is absolutely NO VIRUS. It has NEVER been shown to exist, and the symptoms are from radiation and NANOTECHNOLOGY. The injections grow synthetic life inside of your body and ALTER YOUR DNA. The injections are the real reason they made up the fake nonexistent virus. and the injections (and sticks up the nose) are the mark of the beast and cause your face and forehead to glow orange when illuminated with a 365nm wavelength UV flashlight.
Of course the Deep State will do everything possible to cover-up the Military Bio Pharma Complex role in engineering Covid!
So please clarify what Covid is and what caused it. And also you have claimed a bacteriophage is a virus that invades bacteria. If it invades from outside bacteria where have bactetiophages been discovered in natural habitats?
The Deep state engineered COVID?? What is COVID?? What causes it? You still haven't answered the question.
What is Covid? What causes it?
So you’re one of the folks who doesn’t believe in viruses? Yes, viruses exist and millions have been spent in engineering weaponized versions of them. Bacteriophages are even large enough to be viewed under an electron microscope. The mRNA vaxx delivers a synthetic virus created by replacing the SARS-Cov shell protein with a nanolipid shell and substituting in pseudouridine amino acids in place of the uracil in the S protein of the viral RNA for enhanced stability. However, the idiots at Pfizer didn’t realize that the nanolipid particles would circulate throughout the body (instead of remaining in the arm) and are highly toxic themselves leading to blood clots and nerve damage, that pseudouridine is too stable and causes ribozomal frame shifting creating prion like misfolded junk proteins, and that the manufacturing process using E. coli bacteria led to massive contamination with bacterial DNA plasmids that are probably causing turbo cancers.
Great. This will be easy for you. What is Covid 19 and what causes it? If you say its a virus cite a paper that shows the virus you claim causes COVID19 has been isolated. Let's see how well you do with this simple assignment first before addressing your other claims. Fair?
Cool story, can you cite any valid scientific evidence to back it up? And really, you think the folks at Pfizer who developed the jabs are idiots as opposed to homicidal maniacs?
“Modified mRNA produces frameshifted peptides”
• Authors: Mulroney, T. E. et al.
• Journal: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2024.
That study is behind a paywall and based on the bit showing it doesn't even purport to be about a "virus".
The mRNA delivers a synthetic virus? How is that possible when you can't cite any evidence of a “real virus.“
You are aware that Team ‘Virus‘ claim regular ‘viruses‘ can be viewed by Electron Microscopy and not just bacteriophages??
OK. Maybe the first challenge was a little too difficult. Perhaps something easier. What is a bacteriophage and is it exogenous to bacteria? If your answer is yes to the second question please provide evidence of where a bacteriophage can be found outside of bacteria.
Bacteriophahes are simply viruses that infect bacteria. Some are large enough to be filmed with an electron microscope. There are plenty of their images on the web.
Great, we are making progress. So bacteriophages as ‘viruses‘ infect bacteria??From outside the bacteria?? If yes please cite evidence such as a peer reviewed scientific paper proving its existence outside of bactera. By infect you mean an invasion from outside?
In which paper has it been demonstrated that bacteriophages have infected bacteria? I ask because bacteriophages have never been shown to exist in natural habitats.
“Systematic exploration of Escherichia coli phage–host interactions with the BASEL phage collection” published in PLOS Biology
"Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline Lake Elmenteita, Kenya" published in PLOS ONE
Im pretty sure proponents of toxic mRNA jabs don't claim the kill shots deliver a synthetic virus. Lemme know if I got that one wrong. 😀
Of course vaxx proponents would never characterize the jab as a synthetic virus, but it is a close functional approximation to an actual virus, except that Pfizer programmed the RNA to replicate only the S protein instead of the entire SARS- Cov backbone.
To make this claim you need to establish that a virus exists. Barics paper doesn't do that for the reasons I outlined in my earlier Gain of Fiction Alert!!
Great more progress. So to program the mRNA to an actual virus, there must be an actual virus physically present In nature, right? Please cite one paper that you stand by to back up that claim and lemme know in which part of the methods section that ‘virus‘ was isolated and demonstrated to be replication competent, i.e. capable of infecting another person. If you can do this you will have succeeded where all prior to you have failed.
Why don’t you start with the gain-of-function paper that led to Covid: Ralph Baric (UNC) and Shi Zhengli (Wuhan Institute of Virology) co-authored a 2015 study titled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,” published in the journal Nature Medicine. They welded a bat coronavirus spike protein onto the SARs-Cov backbone to engineer a chimeric virus with enhanced ability to infect humanized mice.
Worse, the next gen “vaccines” will be self-replicating: full-on synthetic bacteria or viruses.
Did the DEEEEEEEP STATE advise you not answer the very simple by now questions: What is COVID 19 and what causes it?
Are bacteriophages viruses that invade bacteria from outside the bacteria?
Must have been stuck in a computer screen and finally managed to escape and travel the world. These virus are very stealthy and just wait for the exact opportunity.
I laugh when I hear that people believed that the bat and the pangolin went to the wet market and covid was born.
The two of them spent the night together at the " No Tell Motel " adjacent to the market. The bat then did the walk of shame across the street to the extremely wet market.
...and had unprotected drunken sex.
Does that mean that the virus is really an STD? I am going to dump my bat.
Dump the bat. Go with the pangolin.
Thank me later.
Lol
FUNNY!
Sad news is that there are thousands of people that still believe in that fraud misinformation 🫣😤
Crazeeeee
Pisses me off that you can't get a good bat soup anywhere now. Does anyone know a good recipe so I can make my own?
Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance has one.
Or the Bat Lady in Wuhan Institute of Virology would have one.
Appreciate your work for health freedom! However there's no evidence that "Covid-19" ever existed as it was never isolated per the Koch postulates and is nothing but a computer simulation. In addition the number of worldwide flu cases dropped to nearly zero during "Covid" - a first in recorded medical history! Obviously "Covid-19" was the flu re-branded. The death count was ginned up by the use of fraudulent PCR tests and by declaring gunshot victims, car accidents and garden-variety pneumonia etc, "Covid" deaths. And the lethal cherry on the sundae was the Remdesiver and ventilator protocols that murdered so many patients while lining the pockets of so many hospital administrators and Doctors. Truly a low point for the human race. Thanks for being on the right side of history during these dark times!
I'm sure The House Select Committee will get right to the bottom of it; pronto!
"Strongly worded letter" forthcoming.
Yep. That will do the trick!
The memo also noted that "all other possible places of virus's origin have been proven false" and stated that "all other proposed theories are likely to be a decoy to prevent inquiry to WCDC and WIV."
Again meaningless as no virus fictitiously named SARS COV2 has been proven to exist other than on computer software.
Early in 2020, Dr. Francis Boyle appeared on Infowars and stated that covid was a bioweapon.
Later, Dr. Francis Boyle called the covid shots "Frankenshots" and stated they were bioweapons.
Wonder shots to maim and kill
Why did the Intelligence Community intentionally undermine an April 2020 determination that Covid came from a lab?
Cos, they didn't want peeps to know the following: The “virus” was certainly invented in a lab but it was a computer lab and the only entity that was intentionally leaked out was a computer simulation. The results of the simulation were sent around the world as digital code over the internet and the resulting PCR primers that were deployed in kits en masse created the “cases” for the COVID-19 fraud.
Intel community wants us dead.
Now now KJ , you conspiracy theorist. But I will second that. Why else , with all the data , would the ACOG recommend the jab to pregnant women and VA folks . Sickening.
Ain't that the truth!!
They want us barely alive so we can soon be vaccinated.
As with CoV-1, CoV-2 came from a computer algorithm as will the forthcoming CoV-3. All viruses are invented using slight-of-hand, nonexistent particles and voodoo-oligy. What better way to create fear and scare people into running for the fake health care system to get safe and effective death drugs?
Pray for those who were coerced to take the clot shots! LET THE CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS BEGIN
We also know that the FBI was told by a Chinese informant in very early 2020 that Covid came from a lab leak and were investigating EcoHealth as being the entity behind the creation of the Covid virus no later than early April - but more likely in March 2020.
Which computer lab did the code leak from?
UNC Chapel Hill
LOL! They have good computers there!
Yup, started in Chapel Hill, N.C., finished in Wuhan, China.
UNC Chapel Hill also developed the kill drug Remdesivir.
If they didn't kill you with the covid bioweapon, they got a second chance with Remdesivir.
https://sph.unc.edu/sph-news/remdesivir-developed-at-unc-chapel-hill-proves-effective-against-covid-19-in-niaid-human-clinical-trials/
A lab close to Fort Detrick?
UNC Chapel Hill
Hello, Kurt!! Did the Deep State advise you against answering a couple of simple questions??
Anyway, you will be pleased to know I took a closer look at your Baric paper of 2015 and found a few methodological issues. Please lemme know what I got wrong:
The first and foundational fraud of the paper you cited: “A SARS like cluster of circulating bat corona viruses, Zhengli-Li Shi, Baric, 2015” is the claim that a “SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV” has been isolated and is “currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations.” There is no “virus” involved in the study whatsoever other than one the researchers made up, "On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus.” The paper entails nothing but grandiose chemistry experimentation involving numerous chemicals and foreign substances combined and cultured together which were used to justify the killing of the animals experimented on.
For instance, the authors claimed to have created a new virus by, "Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. " Essentially, the researchers mixed numerous sources of genetic materials with added synthetic chemicals into a petri dish and claimed a new engineered “virus” existed within the cell culture soup. In order to do so, they utilized:
• Kidney Vero E6 cells from monkey kidneys which are the most commonly used cell line for culturing
• Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium contains various ingredients including amino acids, vitamins, glucose, sodium, glycine, serine, ferric nitrate, pyruvate, and sodium bicarbonate
• 5% Fetal Bovine Serum - blood taken from the heart of an unborn calf
o antibiotic/antimycotic refers to a combination of antibiotics and antifungal agents manufactured by (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA)
o DBT cells are a type of cell line derived from the brain tissue of transgenic mice.
o HeLa cells are a type of human cell line that originated from cervical cancer cells
o Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) typically contains a balanced mixture of amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, glucose, and other nutrients necessary for cell growth. It also includes buffering agents to maintain a stable pH and antibiotics
This soup was then forcibly injected into the nasal passages of baby mice with a mix of ketamine and xylazine – just like “transmission” naturally occurs. The mice were checked regularly to see if they showed any signs of the symptoms the researchers wanted to see such as 20-30% weight loss, reduced activity, ruffled fur and/or hunched posture. It was never considered whether or not the mode of injection and/or the use of ketamine and xylazine may have resulted in any symptoms. It was never considered whether the stress of the experimentation nor the artificial living conditions affected the health of the mice. Any signs and symptoms were assumed to be caused by an invisible “virus” which was never directly demonstrated to exist. In cases where weight loss greater than or equal to 30% occurred the mice were then considered moribund and euthanized.
“For individual mice, notations for infection including failure to inhale the entire dose, bubbling of inoculum from the nose, or infection through the mouth may have led to exclusion of mouse data at the discretion of the researcher; post-infection, no other pre-established exclusion or inclusion criteria are defined. No blinding was used in any animal experiments, and animals were not randomized...”
In other words, once the mice were “infected,” (ABUSED) the researchers didn't have any other specific rules for deciding which mice to include or exclude based on how they were doing. They didn't have a clear plan for which infected mice to keep studying and which ones to ignore. The lack of blinding and randomization could potentially affect the reliability of their results because it introduces the possibility of bias or unintentional influence on the outcomes such as closing the loop on the circular reasoning of the starting assumption that these researchers actually had a “virus” to gain the function of in the first place.
“The full-length genomic sequences and the amino acid sequences of the S1 domains of the spike of representative CoVs were downloaded from Genbank or Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC), aligned with ClustalX and phylogenetically compared by using maximum likelihood estimation using 100 bootstraps or by using the PhyML…… to generate homology models for SHC014 and Rs3367 of the SARS RBD in complex with ACE2 based on crystal structure 2AJF (Protein Data Bank). Homology models were visualized and manipulated in MacPyMol (version 1.3).”
Researchers gathered genetic information from various “coronaviruses (CoVs)” available in databases like GenBank or PATRIC. They compared these sequences using computer programs to understand how closely related different CoVs are to each other. They used a method called maximum likelihood estimation to build a family tree (phylogenetic tree) showing the evolutionary relationships between these fictional computer generated “viruses.” Additionally, they used computer simulations to create models of specific parts of the “virus's spike protein interacting with human cells”, based on known protein structures. These models were then visualized and analyzed using specialized software. All in silico smoke and mirrors. No actual physical virus demonstrated.
Prior to imaging the left lung was removed and submerged in buffered formalin .... then lung tissue was embedded in paraffin. This wouldn't impact tissue negatively prior to imaging, would it? Such as causing shrinkage and distortion of the tissue. Additionally, the infiltration of paraffin wax can fill in spaces within the tissue, potentially obscuring fine details and altering the overall morphology.
In summary, the study under scrutiny raises profound concerns regarding its foundational claims and methodological approach. The assertion of a "SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV," purportedly circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations, lacks substantiation as no actual “virus” has ever been isolated. Instead, the researchers synthetically engineered a “virus” through a convoluted process involving chemical experimentation and genetic manipulation. The methodology employed, characterized by a cocktail of chemicals and foreign substances combined and cultured together, undermines the validity of the study's findings.
Moreover, the experiment's treatment of animals further underscores the ethical and scientific shortcomings. The injection of a concoction into the nasal passages of baby mice, coupled with the use of ketamine and xylazine, raises questions about the reliability of observed symptoms and the potential for artificial induction. Furthermore, the lack of clear criteria for data inclusion and exclusion, along with the absence of blinding and randomization, introduces bias and compromises the study's integrity.
The genetic analysis conducted, ostensibly to characterize the “virus,” relies heavily on computer-generated simulations and comparisons rather than direct observation of physical “viral” entities. Similarly, the embedding of lung tissue in paraffin for imaging purposes may have introduced distortions and alterations, casting doubt on the accuracy of the morphological assessments.
In essence, the study fails to provide evidence for the existence of any purported “viruses” and calls into question the validity of its methodology and findings. It highlights the importance of rigorous scientific scrutiny and ethical considerations in research endeavours. Moving forward, it is imperative to uphold rigorous standards of scientific inquiry and transparency to ensure the integrity and credibility of research outcomes. Alas, these guys never started with a virus and never finished with one.
A lab leak? Maybe. Intentional? Of course! What lab in what country? And doesn't everyone know now that RNA CAN'T PANDEMIC???? It CAN'T!!! This lab leak fixation is taking up WAY too many parking spaces in people's brain's parking lots! Has ANYONE tried to come up with a definitive, APOLITICAL cure for all of the types of damage done to the people harmed by the poisonous potion? Or is Big Pharma, in cahoots and the entire medical industrial complex, going to always stand in the way, ever reaping the rewards of all of the sick and disabled people who fell, and will fall in the future, victim to their inoculations?
AWESOME 👊💥👍🎯🎯🎯
If only the peeps could realize there are no viruses to leak. As long as this fiction continues the parking lot will be full of broken down vehicles ruined by the corrosive gas of germ theory.
The FBI. The folks that bring you 90% of domestic terrorism in the USA. We can believe anything they say.
I read an article a while back that told of a lab here in the US that had used mice and deer in its gain of function research for covid, and they had determined that they needed to use bats in China instead. Makes sense that our own government would cover this up from the people! All Gain of Function research should be stopped before millions more die! Blood is on their hands.
Don't worry about Gain of Fiction rumour mills. Always, look to source. You can't gain the function of something that doesn't exist.
I will prove to you the "virus" that causes CONVID 19 exists. First swab someone's nose. 2. Put swab on a cell culture of monkey kidney cells. 3. Poison with antibiotics to produce breakdown of cell culture. Conclusion: The virus caused the breakdown. Any problems with my methodology???
YOU ARE AWESOME!!!
👍👍CHEERS!! MUCH APPRECIATED!!
What is COVID 19? What causes it?
There is absolutely NO VIRUS. It has NEVER been shown to exist, and the symptoms are from radiation and NANOTECHNOLOGY. The injections grow synthetic life inside of your body and ALTER YOUR DNA. The injections are the real reason they made up the fake nonexistent virus. and the injections (and sticks up the nose) are the mark of the beast and cause your face and forehead to glow orange when illuminated with a 365nm wavelength UV flashlight.