It would be good to have other samples of his (their) writing to compare to pieces on this chain of thought. Superfluous words are often used simply as a style. Many years ago I took a course in technical-forensic report writing, and cutting to the bone was emphasized, and I noted my own tendency to add extraneous adjectives & adverbs th…
It would be good to have other samples of his (their) writing to compare to pieces on this chain of thought. Superfluous words are often used simply as a style. Many years ago I took a course in technical-forensic report writing, and cutting to the bone was emphasized, and I noted my own tendency to add extraneous adjectives & adverbs that * added nothing (I just edited out the word “really” where I put the *, a real-time example!).
That said, I cannot disagree that there is stilted language w/ unnatural “over emphasis.” The depth of conspiracies occurring staggers the mind - not a single, unified plan, but various actors with competing although often complementary goals.
So often I have heard the idea (which I see as valid) it would be impossible to have such large scale conspiracies operational as people can’t keep secrets. Perhaps progress in communications tech makes this easier to a point, yet further down more trails are left by careless or uninformed participants. Compartmentalization of information occurs, but WOW! Considering Event 201 as dress rehearsal, I do have to give the globalists credit for pulling this off. Humanity has been so dumbed-down, people will go along with anything. If Peter McCullough’s statement is true (96% of MDs in US took the jab), the dumbing down appeases terminal 🥺
I agree. Maybe 007 Farrar has a tendency to say "completely" all the time.
However, going back and reading over what is released here, he only used the word "completely" in those three instances I picked up on, and I picked up on them because the word seemed so over-the-top unnecessary in those three cases. It appeared deliberately - albeit perhaps unconsciously - inserted. A bit like the furin site! Ha Ha!
As for "I am honesty at 50!", that struck me as an obviously false statement. I would even say, desperately false statement.
And as for Peter McCullough's estimate of 96% of MDs took the shot, I would like to see where he writes that, only to see his source. We know doctors are targetted if they are critical of these injections, and in many cases would lose their job, so I accept a great majority did take them.
However, the one missing statistic so far (I have not seen it) is an assessment of how many "fake" certificates were issued? There certainly was a vibrant trade, and I am guessing that for medical doctors (I am a mere DPhil) it would be much easier to organise fake certificates.
I know from first hand reports that fake certs were prevalent in the military. McCullough mentioned that in NY at a hearing a couple of weeks ago, I haven’t seen this in writing, either. And I don’t disagree with your point about “completely”, this gets to an important point:
Observation => analysis => hypothesis => further data => rinse & repeat. I see far too much hypothesis-generation based on limited data or ignorance of crucial data. Critical thinking has been removed from education, so we get sheep & creative people making (often unsupported) assertions.
It would be good to have other samples of his (their) writing to compare to pieces on this chain of thought. Superfluous words are often used simply as a style. Many years ago I took a course in technical-forensic report writing, and cutting to the bone was emphasized, and I noted my own tendency to add extraneous adjectives & adverbs that * added nothing (I just edited out the word “really” where I put the *, a real-time example!).
That said, I cannot disagree that there is stilted language w/ unnatural “over emphasis.” The depth of conspiracies occurring staggers the mind - not a single, unified plan, but various actors with competing although often complementary goals.
So often I have heard the idea (which I see as valid) it would be impossible to have such large scale conspiracies operational as people can’t keep secrets. Perhaps progress in communications tech makes this easier to a point, yet further down more trails are left by careless or uninformed participants. Compartmentalization of information occurs, but WOW! Considering Event 201 as dress rehearsal, I do have to give the globalists credit for pulling this off. Humanity has been so dumbed-down, people will go along with anything. If Peter McCullough’s statement is true (96% of MDs in US took the jab), the dumbing down appeases terminal 🥺
I agree. Maybe 007 Farrar has a tendency to say "completely" all the time.
However, going back and reading over what is released here, he only used the word "completely" in those three instances I picked up on, and I picked up on them because the word seemed so over-the-top unnecessary in those three cases. It appeared deliberately - albeit perhaps unconsciously - inserted. A bit like the furin site! Ha Ha!
As for "I am honesty at 50!", that struck me as an obviously false statement. I would even say, desperately false statement.
And as for Peter McCullough's estimate of 96% of MDs took the shot, I would like to see where he writes that, only to see his source. We know doctors are targetted if they are critical of these injections, and in many cases would lose their job, so I accept a great majority did take them.
However, the one missing statistic so far (I have not seen it) is an assessment of how many "fake" certificates were issued? There certainly was a vibrant trade, and I am guessing that for medical doctors (I am a mere DPhil) it would be much easier to organise fake certificates.
I know from first hand reports that fake certs were prevalent in the military. McCullough mentioned that in NY at a hearing a couple of weeks ago, I haven’t seen this in writing, either. And I don’t disagree with your point about “completely”, this gets to an important point:
Observation => analysis => hypothesis => further data => rinse & repeat. I see far too much hypothesis-generation based on limited data or ignorance of crucial data. Critical thinking has been removed from education, so we get sheep & creative people making (often unsupported) assertions.