In the legal world, and you learn to look for a few things in fraud.
A first tell-tale sign is "superfluous adjectives". Farrar says he is "completely" neutral. The insertion of the word "completely" here is defensive (why?), and a giveaway Freudian Slip.
Again he uses "completely" when referring to "open-minded discussion". Again, the use of the word is superfluous unless it is defensive, and points that the opposite is being organised.
And again, when he is referring to the future WHO investigation in Wuhan, he describes an "expert group" with a "completely open mind".
I found the repeated use of "completely" when referring to being unbiased, to be telling.
Another example of a defensive, superflous adjective, when he says he is "honestly" at 50 on a scale 0-100. And then the use of exclamation marks. Very defensive. It is also non-credible by this stage. He is trying to sound like he has no opinion, without sounding like an idiot. A difficult circle to square. He clearly does have an opinion, but does not want to say it, lest he be accused of guiding the "debate" (which this is not - it is a closed conversation between a group of people clearly worried about external debate and scrutiny).
The repeated reference to "best minds" is also strange. On the one hand, he appears to be buttering-up the group, while on the other, setting up a scenario whereby this group will have the final say.
Another clue: look for what is not there. Farrar is clearly organising this, and the intention - as opposed to the declared intention - is to have a sealed consultation among the participants. Where is the reaching out to the larger scientific community? Not there. Instead there is a call at the beginning for secrecy "in total confidence" until "agreement" is reached. It is disturbing that no one objects to this or says "let's bring so-and-so in on this". But why would they? They are already the "best minds". No one else matters.
There is also a clear worry about the public debate on Twitter and WeChat. This is seen as a threat. The objective of this group is evidently to counter this public debate.
And finally, note the "respected organisation". Collins says that if WHO is not available, maybe Farrar can bring Welcome on board. The menu is limited, to organisations that the participants can control.
Some things are still missing, unless I have missed them, such as the "forceful" argument by Drosten, the PCR wizard. Or maybe I missed it.
It would be good to have other samples of his (their) writing to compare to pieces on this chain of thought. Superfluous words are often used simply as a style. Many years ago I took a course in technical-forensic report writing, and cutting to the bone was emphasized, and I noted my own tendency to add extraneous adjectives & adverbs that * added nothing (I just edited out the word “really” where I put the *, a real-time example!).
That said, I cannot disagree that there is stilted language w/ unnatural “over emphasis.” The depth of conspiracies occurring staggers the mind - not a single, unified plan, but various actors with competing although often complementary goals.
So often I have heard the idea (which I see as valid) it would be impossible to have such large scale conspiracies operational as people can’t keep secrets. Perhaps progress in communications tech makes this easier to a point, yet further down more trails are left by careless or uninformed participants. Compartmentalization of information occurs, but WOW! Considering Event 201 as dress rehearsal, I do have to give the globalists credit for pulling this off. Humanity has been so dumbed-down, people will go along with anything. If Peter McCullough’s statement is true (96% of MDs in US took the jab), the dumbing down appeases terminal 🥺
I agree. Maybe 007 Farrar has a tendency to say "completely" all the time.
However, going back and reading over what is released here, he only used the word "completely" in those three instances I picked up on, and I picked up on them because the word seemed so over-the-top unnecessary in those three cases. It appeared deliberately - albeit perhaps unconsciously - inserted. A bit like the furin site! Ha Ha!
As for "I am honesty at 50!", that struck me as an obviously false statement. I would even say, desperately false statement.
And as for Peter McCullough's estimate of 96% of MDs took the shot, I would like to see where he writes that, only to see his source. We know doctors are targetted if they are critical of these injections, and in many cases would lose their job, so I accept a great majority did take them.
However, the one missing statistic so far (I have not seen it) is an assessment of how many "fake" certificates were issued? There certainly was a vibrant trade, and I am guessing that for medical doctors (I am a mere DPhil) it would be much easier to organise fake certificates.
I know from first hand reports that fake certs were prevalent in the military. McCullough mentioned that in NY at a hearing a couple of weeks ago, I haven’t seen this in writing, either. And I don’t disagree with your point about “completely”, this gets to an important point:
Observation => analysis => hypothesis => further data => rinse & repeat. I see far too much hypothesis-generation based on limited data or ignorance of crucial data. Critical thinking has been removed from education, so we get sheep & creative people making (often unsupported) assertions.
How could this man plan the poisoning of 2500 hospitalized COVID patients, plan the COVID coverup, and now be the W.H.O.’s Chief Scientist, helping to effect a world coup?
Here's an explanation for this provided by Yale professor Ian Shapiro. In his 2003 book, 'The Moral Foundations of Politics,' the Yale professor writes: "Recall that (JS) Mill does not say that when harm occurs, the government should enact policies designed to minimize it or protect those who are most vulnerable to it, but rather government should act in 'the general interest of mankind.'" (p. 69) This aptly explains Hitler's Aktion T4 & Heindrich's Final Solution at the Wansee Conference (and Göring, who later signed the decree for the murder of countless people). Shapiro further adds: "The accepted scientific wisdom of the day may hold that the general interest of mankind is best served by [...] eugenics policies, or worse. So long as those wielding the tortometer decide that they are acting in an area where harm of some kind can occur to someone, there is nothing in Mill's argument to stop them from pursuing these coercive policies in response to it." (p. 70)
Thank you for that, my education in political theory is less developed than other areas. Individual & group psychology impact the acceptance of the political ideologies, but the expressed theories come with a ‘tone of authority’ that many fond irresistible. Reading Fromm’s “Escape from Freedom” back in high school opened my eyes to psychology of groups & the same concepts continue to appear.
On the 04th February 2020 there was a teleconference held that was initiated by Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome trust) that discussed “desired outcomes”.
I requested information from the UK’s Government Office of Science, the department that Chief Science Officer Vallance is head of, on what these “desired outcomes” were.
The questions asked:
1 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available) with the subject “Teleconference”.
Please supply the e-mails in the e-mail chain and conversation with the subject line “Teleconference” or “Re:Teleconference".
2 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Anthony Fauci amongst others (full list of names available).
Please supply the written minutes of this telephone call, any written notes that were taken during this telephone call and any audio recordings that were taken during this telephone call.
3 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion and a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available). In one of these e-mails Jeremy Farrar stated:
Agenda
• Introduction, focus and desired outcomes - JF
What were the “desired outcomes” he was referring to as discussed in the teleconference call?”
Response
There answer was:
1 - the call did take place on the date stated
2 - there were no records taken of what was discussed
3 - They could not supply all the e-mails due to Section 41 of the Official Secrets Act due to personal information being included.
The quote:
“I confirm we do not hold the information you request in Question 2. No additional notes or minutes were recorded outside of the email correspondence provided in answer to Question 1. Nor do we hold any audio recordings of the conference call. “
This call was also admitted to in a FOI release of Fauci’s e-mails with no further information included. The file is 386 MB but can be downloaded here:
This is the call that initiated the use of PCR tests using a paper written by Drosten and that was accepted without challenge by Government’s worldwide and that then led on to restrictions on individuals and businesses based on that paper plus over £400 BILLION of Government spending in this country alone.
I have made the Public Accounts Committee aware of this call and they replied they were interested in it but whether they did anything further I don’t know.
Why was this call not thought important enough for notes to be taken?
But nothing real. Gaslighting as far as the eye can see. Pure narcissism from TonyTheRat et al.
Somehow TPTB got their 'not at all real' narrative out there, all over MSM, all over SM, cancelled SM commentators for hinting at the opposite, and moved every Organ of State power in Lockstep.
Bland words in FOI'd emails aside, these are political operatives with decades of experience.
Did the shoe drop as expected or did something about the deployment of the 1st bioweapon go awry? Are these hiccups in emails the sign of careerists adapting to circumstance on the fly? Doesn't feel natural. Nothing has, from day 1.
We know Murderna had a vaxx candidate, BC. In collab with VRC, part of NIAID. Someone kept that company funded for a decade, waiting for that day. A company that had never produced anything, somehow front runner? Captain's pick by The Rat long before any evidence could have informed such a decision?
Collins et al didn't know this in early 2020? Fraudchi?
Wheels within wheels. A grand criminal conspiracy.
3+ years on, we still have no hard facts to hang anything on. And no-one in Power is looking for them, or doing anything with the clues that have been dug up by the likes of Martin et al. That speaks volumes.
That is the tell.
No-one in Power will act against The Monster, because The Monster is in change.
Love their language - a natural origin of the furin cleavage site is "certainly not impossible". That also means that a lab origin is "certainly not impossible"... nothingspeak that sounds like something.... Would a natural origin have to be determined to be "certainly impossible"? If so, what type of science are they doing? We scientistgens do not broker in certainty. They write tells... "the backbone"... WHAT backbone? Shi tried to claim that there were no restriction enzyme sites in beta coronaviruses... yet Baric et al had published there were plenty of them, many years ago... Illogic + Agenda to exonerate = disastrous consequences.
Cant wait until that is released, oh I mean, an exact copy jump from a flea, to rabbit, to duck and person eats duck.
That will also prove we must eat bugs because bugs do not carry disease. (New science) like the foods we eat now. Yuck that food we have eaten all these centuries!
first, you are frigging AMAZING - to wade through all of this stuff and organize for us all - but it gives me a deep grief in the pit of. my stomach - that these murderers are allowed to walk the earth - and I'm astounded at the thought of those poor people who lost their lives in that HCQ study - Dear God- millions have died - and there seem to be no consequences -and now we hear that this mRNA is in our meat supply. I fear for the future.
Does anybody find it absolutely bizarre that Fauci , with all the documented exposure of the lies and corruption, coverups, hubris, misery pimping,sadistic perpetration of global crimes against humanity, the destruction of our economy, damage to our children’s health, psyches, education setbacks, suicides. Broken homes , Lib losses, business closures, toxic vaccines, loved one left to die alone…. He maintains a slavishly deviated. worshipful cult of acolytes? Mass psychosis? More like mass Stockholm Syndrome.
The same can be said for Trump and Biden.I’ll NEVER forgive any of them. For whatever reason, Trump has become the brunt of my anger. I was fooled by him. Repeatedly turned the other cheek. His failure to assume an iota of responsibility while attacking others has proven he is. completely devoid of character,unfit to lead and like Faustus, consumed by malignant narcissism. Instead of pinning specious, absurd crimes on him , take him down with Faustus. Birx, Azar, Gottlieb, Kadlec , Bright, Biden, Grady Milley, Wallensky, Collins, Farrar. Hotez, Murthy, Gates , Baric. Daszak,Schwab. Soros , Haines ,Zuck,Bloomberg , Bourla, Bancel, Jerome Adams,Emanuel, Gupta, Nuland , Andersen,Pence and all the peripheral players!
I’m with you. I was finally red pilled October 2021 but I can’t vote for trump. I gave him a chance for awhile but I don’t think he’s learned anything. He did so much? No. He was just there at the beginning of the storm, the calm before, so to speak after he was elected, and let the danger flood right in. He was the “useful idiot” for both sides. I think he actually understood that eventually but he can’t seem to change. Leaders must have some humility and admit mistakes but he ,along with the current sociopaths leading us to circle the drain, can’t or won’t anymore. They double down. Health freedom is my one issue. If they control your very body and mind, nothing else matters eventually. I’m furious and want justice along with some vengeance. NOW.
believe that mike draws on the work of denis rancourt which validates that whatever "covid" was stopped abruptly at the state line. viruses don't do that.
rancourt also discovered 50% decrease in prescriptions for antibiotics - mostly elderly population with bacterial pneumonia was sent home to die. and also fentanyl/propofol/starvation protocols in US hospitals before the deadly remdesivir rollout
That’s correct. I’ve no original sources of my own. Unless Denis et al are completely wrong in their analyses or unless a novel pathogen has acquired special techniques for stopping at jurisdictional boundaries, there isn’t the evidence to support the narrative claim.
Yes the virus was never isolated so there is no virus just a bit worse than a common cold I should know as I had it 2 years ago never to get it again..I have 97% immunity now.
I apparently had it January 2021 as an antibody test showed in September. But who knows. It was less than a cold and I was 73 yo then. Nothing since but a runny nose when I came back from a Christmas trip. . Unvaxxed. I never test though. Ever.
To be clear, I don’t know if a pathogen existed / exists. I don’t take a strong position on the existential question.
I do take a strong position on the absence of a novel respiratory illnesss causing mass death. The epidemiological evidence simply speaks against that. I’ve heard no rebuttal offered to those observations and unless rebutted, all other evidence falls to the side.
For example, lab sequencing using NGS from whole samples is decidedly edgy and one should not place reliance upon the “results” declared. Thumbs on scales and all that.
But absence of evidence of the pattern of deaths expected from a novel respiratory pathogen is hard to get past. It has to be got past to stand up the narrative claim of a novel pathogen.
Remember, those needing to stand up the claim are in the heart of the machine. They’re not neutrals.
In the legal world, and you learn to look for a few things in fraud.
A first tell-tale sign is "superfluous adjectives". Farrar says he is "completely" neutral. The insertion of the word "completely" here is defensive (why?), and a giveaway Freudian Slip.
Again he uses "completely" when referring to "open-minded discussion". Again, the use of the word is superfluous unless it is defensive, and points that the opposite is being organised.
And again, when he is referring to the future WHO investigation in Wuhan, he describes an "expert group" with a "completely open mind".
I found the repeated use of "completely" when referring to being unbiased, to be telling.
Another example of a defensive, superflous adjective, when he says he is "honestly" at 50 on a scale 0-100. And then the use of exclamation marks. Very defensive. It is also non-credible by this stage. He is trying to sound like he has no opinion, without sounding like an idiot. A difficult circle to square. He clearly does have an opinion, but does not want to say it, lest he be accused of guiding the "debate" (which this is not - it is a closed conversation between a group of people clearly worried about external debate and scrutiny).
The repeated reference to "best minds" is also strange. On the one hand, he appears to be buttering-up the group, while on the other, setting up a scenario whereby this group will have the final say.
Another clue: look for what is not there. Farrar is clearly organising this, and the intention - as opposed to the declared intention - is to have a sealed consultation among the participants. Where is the reaching out to the larger scientific community? Not there. Instead there is a call at the beginning for secrecy "in total confidence" until "agreement" is reached. It is disturbing that no one objects to this or says "let's bring so-and-so in on this". But why would they? They are already the "best minds". No one else matters.
There is also a clear worry about the public debate on Twitter and WeChat. This is seen as a threat. The objective of this group is evidently to counter this public debate.
And finally, note the "respected organisation". Collins says that if WHO is not available, maybe Farrar can bring Welcome on board. The menu is limited, to organisations that the participants can control.
Some things are still missing, unless I have missed them, such as the "forceful" argument by Drosten, the PCR wizard. Or maybe I missed it.
It would be good to have other samples of his (their) writing to compare to pieces on this chain of thought. Superfluous words are often used simply as a style. Many years ago I took a course in technical-forensic report writing, and cutting to the bone was emphasized, and I noted my own tendency to add extraneous adjectives & adverbs that * added nothing (I just edited out the word “really” where I put the *, a real-time example!).
That said, I cannot disagree that there is stilted language w/ unnatural “over emphasis.” The depth of conspiracies occurring staggers the mind - not a single, unified plan, but various actors with competing although often complementary goals.
So often I have heard the idea (which I see as valid) it would be impossible to have such large scale conspiracies operational as people can’t keep secrets. Perhaps progress in communications tech makes this easier to a point, yet further down more trails are left by careless or uninformed participants. Compartmentalization of information occurs, but WOW! Considering Event 201 as dress rehearsal, I do have to give the globalists credit for pulling this off. Humanity has been so dumbed-down, people will go along with anything. If Peter McCullough’s statement is true (96% of MDs in US took the jab), the dumbing down appeases terminal 🥺
I agree. Maybe 007 Farrar has a tendency to say "completely" all the time.
However, going back and reading over what is released here, he only used the word "completely" in those three instances I picked up on, and I picked up on them because the word seemed so over-the-top unnecessary in those three cases. It appeared deliberately - albeit perhaps unconsciously - inserted. A bit like the furin site! Ha Ha!
As for "I am honesty at 50!", that struck me as an obviously false statement. I would even say, desperately false statement.
And as for Peter McCullough's estimate of 96% of MDs took the shot, I would like to see where he writes that, only to see his source. We know doctors are targetted if they are critical of these injections, and in many cases would lose their job, so I accept a great majority did take them.
However, the one missing statistic so far (I have not seen it) is an assessment of how many "fake" certificates were issued? There certainly was a vibrant trade, and I am guessing that for medical doctors (I am a mere DPhil) it would be much easier to organise fake certificates.
I know from first hand reports that fake certs were prevalent in the military. McCullough mentioned that in NY at a hearing a couple of weeks ago, I haven’t seen this in writing, either. And I don’t disagree with your point about “completely”, this gets to an important point:
Observation => analysis => hypothesis => further data => rinse & repeat. I see far too much hypothesis-generation based on limited data or ignorance of crucial data. Critical thinking has been removed from education, so we get sheep & creative people making (often unsupported) assertions.
Superfluous adjectives are the wink wink.
Too many goers.
How could this man plan the poisoning of 2500 hospitalized COVID patients, plan the COVID coverup, and now be the W.H.O.’s Chief Scientist, helping to effect a world coup?
“Exterminate All the Brutes”
Nice.
Learning something every day about reading between the lines! Thanks.
Wow, lots of good stuff here, u r 1 sharp cookie
Here's an explanation for this provided by Yale professor Ian Shapiro. In his 2003 book, 'The Moral Foundations of Politics,' the Yale professor writes: "Recall that (JS) Mill does not say that when harm occurs, the government should enact policies designed to minimize it or protect those who are most vulnerable to it, but rather government should act in 'the general interest of mankind.'" (p. 69) This aptly explains Hitler's Aktion T4 & Heindrich's Final Solution at the Wansee Conference (and Göring, who later signed the decree for the murder of countless people). Shapiro further adds: "The accepted scientific wisdom of the day may hold that the general interest of mankind is best served by [...] eugenics policies, or worse. So long as those wielding the tortometer decide that they are acting in an area where harm of some kind can occur to someone, there is nothing in Mill's argument to stop them from pursuing these coercive policies in response to it." (p. 70)
And I would add that the theory of neo-Darwinian evolution continues to provide rationalizations to monsters.
Thank you for that, my education in political theory is less developed than other areas. Individual & group psychology impact the acceptance of the political ideologies, but the expressed theories come with a ‘tone of authority’ that many fond irresistible. Reading Fromm’s “Escape from Freedom” back in high school opened my eyes to psychology of groups & the same concepts continue to appear.
Farrar certainly a big player behind the scam:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/vallance-farrar-drosten-fauci-and
On the 04th February 2020 there was a teleconference held that was initiated by Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome trust) that discussed “desired outcomes”.
I requested information from the UK’s Government Office of Science, the department that Chief Science Officer Vallance is head of, on what these “desired outcomes” were.
The questions asked:
1 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available) with the subject “Teleconference”.
Please supply the e-mails in the e-mail chain and conversation with the subject line “Teleconference” or “Re:Teleconference".
2 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Anthony Fauci amongst others (full list of names available).
Please supply the written minutes of this telephone call, any written notes that were taken during this telephone call and any audio recordings that were taken during this telephone call.
3 - About or on the 01st February 2020 the Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was involved in an e-mail discussion and a teleconference call with Jeremy Farrar and Marion Koopmans amongst others (full list of names available). In one of these e-mails Jeremy Farrar stated:
Agenda
• Introduction, focus and desired outcomes - JF
What were the “desired outcomes” he was referring to as discussed in the teleconference call?”
Response
There answer was:
1 - the call did take place on the date stated
2 - there were no records taken of what was discussed
3 - They could not supply all the e-mails due to Section 41 of the Official Secrets Act due to personal information being included.
The quote:
“I confirm we do not hold the information you request in Question 2. No additional notes or minutes were recorded outside of the email correspondence provided in answer to Question 1. Nor do we hold any audio recordings of the conference call. “
This call was also admitted to in a FOI release of Fauci’s e-mails with no further information included. The file is 386 MB but can be downloaded here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561-leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails - page 3200 area.
This is the call that initiated the use of PCR tests using a paper written by Drosten and that was accepted without challenge by Government’s worldwide and that then led on to restrictions on individuals and businesses based on that paper plus over £400 BILLION of Government spending in this country alone.
I have made the Public Accounts Committee aware of this call and they replied they were interested in it but whether they did anything further I don’t know.
Why was this call not thought important enough for notes to be taken?
Something to hide by Vallance?
That was awesome Meryl. I will follow up with all the Science that points to a natural origin.
Never mind, there isnt any.
Absolutely. Lots of sound and fury.
But nothing real. Gaslighting as far as the eye can see. Pure narcissism from TonyTheRat et al.
Somehow TPTB got their 'not at all real' narrative out there, all over MSM, all over SM, cancelled SM commentators for hinting at the opposite, and moved every Organ of State power in Lockstep.
Bland words in FOI'd emails aside, these are political operatives with decades of experience.
Did the shoe drop as expected or did something about the deployment of the 1st bioweapon go awry? Are these hiccups in emails the sign of careerists adapting to circumstance on the fly? Doesn't feel natural. Nothing has, from day 1.
We know Murderna had a vaxx candidate, BC. In collab with VRC, part of NIAID. Someone kept that company funded for a decade, waiting for that day. A company that had never produced anything, somehow front runner? Captain's pick by The Rat long before any evidence could have informed such a decision?
Collins et al didn't know this in early 2020? Fraudchi?
Wheels within wheels. A grand criminal conspiracy.
3+ years on, we still have no hard facts to hang anything on. And no-one in Power is looking for them, or doing anything with the clues that have been dug up by the likes of Martin et al. That speaks volumes.
That is the tell.
No-one in Power will act against The Monster, because The Monster is in change.
Of everything.
Peace.
Love their language - a natural origin of the furin cleavage site is "certainly not impossible". That also means that a lab origin is "certainly not impossible"... nothingspeak that sounds like something.... Would a natural origin have to be determined to be "certainly impossible"? If so, what type of science are they doing? We scientistgens do not broker in certainty. They write tells... "the backbone"... WHAT backbone? Shi tried to claim that there were no restriction enzyme sites in beta coronaviruses... yet Baric et al had published there were plenty of them, many years ago... Illogic + Agenda to exonerate = disastrous consequences.
Thank you Meryl! You are one of the courageous Warriors pulling back the curtain on this evil global cabal.
God bless you!
Directed engineering sounds like directed evolution which I heard for the first time in Project Veritas James Okefe video from the Pfizer employee.
dr fraudci is starting a new lab venture in italy with a former Imperial college vaxx researcher ...
Cant wait until that is released, oh I mean, an exact copy jump from a flea, to rabbit, to duck and person eats duck.
That will also prove we must eat bugs because bugs do not carry disease. (New science) like the foods we eat now. Yuck that food we have eaten all these centuries!
first, you are frigging AMAZING - to wade through all of this stuff and organize for us all - but it gives me a deep grief in the pit of. my stomach - that these murderers are allowed to walk the earth - and I'm astounded at the thought of those poor people who lost their lives in that HCQ study - Dear God- millions have died - and there seem to be no consequences -and now we hear that this mRNA is in our meat supply. I fear for the future.
Does anybody find it absolutely bizarre that Fauci , with all the documented exposure of the lies and corruption, coverups, hubris, misery pimping,sadistic perpetration of global crimes against humanity, the destruction of our economy, damage to our children’s health, psyches, education setbacks, suicides. Broken homes , Lib losses, business closures, toxic vaccines, loved one left to die alone…. He maintains a slavishly deviated. worshipful cult of acolytes? Mass psychosis? More like mass Stockholm Syndrome.
The same can be said for Trump and Biden.I’ll NEVER forgive any of them. For whatever reason, Trump has become the brunt of my anger. I was fooled by him. Repeatedly turned the other cheek. His failure to assume an iota of responsibility while attacking others has proven he is. completely devoid of character,unfit to lead and like Faustus, consumed by malignant narcissism. Instead of pinning specious, absurd crimes on him , take him down with Faustus. Birx, Azar, Gottlieb, Kadlec , Bright, Biden, Grady Milley, Wallensky, Collins, Farrar. Hotez, Murthy, Gates , Baric. Daszak,Schwab. Soros , Haines ,Zuck,Bloomberg , Bourla, Bancel, Jerome Adams,Emanuel, Gupta, Nuland , Andersen,Pence and all the peripheral players!
I’m with you. I was finally red pilled October 2021 but I can’t vote for trump. I gave him a chance for awhile but I don’t think he’s learned anything. He did so much? No. He was just there at the beginning of the storm, the calm before, so to speak after he was elected, and let the danger flood right in. He was the “useful idiot” for both sides. I think he actually understood that eventually but he can’t seem to change. Leaders must have some humility and admit mistakes but he ,along with the current sociopaths leading us to circle the drain, can’t or won’t anymore. They double down. Health freedom is my one issue. If they control your very body and mind, nothing else matters eventually. I’m furious and want justice along with some vengeance. NOW.
Great article I know why I subscribed
Is Mike Yeadon, who is now stating that he believes there was no virus, aware of this?
good point
believe that mike draws on the work of denis rancourt which validates that whatever "covid" was stopped abruptly at the state line. viruses don't do that.
rancourt also discovered 50% decrease in prescriptions for antibiotics - mostly elderly population with bacterial pneumonia was sent home to die. and also fentanyl/propofol/starvation protocols in US hospitals before the deadly remdesivir rollout
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/denis-rancourt-and-teams-new-report
That’s correct. I’ve no original sources of my own. Unless Denis et al are completely wrong in their analyses or unless a novel pathogen has acquired special techniques for stopping at jurisdictional boundaries, there isn’t the evidence to support the narrative claim.
Yes the virus was never isolated so there is no virus just a bit worse than a common cold I should know as I had it 2 years ago never to get it again..I have 97% immunity now.
I apparently had it January 2021 as an antibody test showed in September. But who knows. It was less than a cold and I was 73 yo then. Nothing since but a runny nose when I came back from a Christmas trip. . Unvaxxed. I never test though. Ever.
Yes. I think it’s theatre.
To be clear, I don’t know if a pathogen existed / exists. I don’t take a strong position on the existential question.
I do take a strong position on the absence of a novel respiratory illnesss causing mass death. The epidemiological evidence simply speaks against that. I’ve heard no rebuttal offered to those observations and unless rebutted, all other evidence falls to the side.
For example, lab sequencing using NGS from whole samples is decidedly edgy and one should not place reliance upon the “results” declared. Thumbs on scales and all that.
But absence of evidence of the pattern of deaths expected from a novel respiratory pathogen is hard to get past. It has to be got past to stand up the narrative claim of a novel pathogen.
Remember, those needing to stand up the claim are in the heart of the machine. They’re not neutrals.
What does a "natural" virus genome look like, and how do you know... (scientifically speaking)?
Awesome!
Released as per planned Scamdemic.
The rats are getting outed. Thanks Meryl!
"How could this man plan the poisoning of 2500 hospitalized COVID patients"
I'm not at all clear on what exactly you mean by your use of the word COVID in that phrase.
The widely varying usages of COVID I observed since late 2019, and continuing to this day, is what led me on a search to make sense of it all.
The entire "virus" meme looks like a racket to me.