Guess we need to exit the WHO or encourage nations to stop paying for it and let it whither away or become the avowed plaything of industry, without the charitable cover story
My health-care is provided by the Medical University of South Carolina, supposedly an esteemed teaching hospital. While I like My doctor, I still have to play a lot of guessing games with my my treatments because his livelihood is dependent upon playing ball with his institution who os playing ball with the mainstream medical industry who is playing ball with the W.H.O. What a quandary we are left in which can certainly be attested to by the brave doctors like Meryl and others on this post who have suffered the consequences of doing what is right. Since this catch 22 is probably our major obsticle to reform, how can we protect the rights of the army of professionals that we need to come forward in this fight?
The WHO would never have existed, if American taxpayer dollars had not supported the UN. The most important issue is get out of the UN. I have written senators and representatives to get out. One of my senators is calling to DEfund the UN...it has never been a friend of the USA.
“Guess we need to exit the WHO or encourage nations to stop paying for it and let it whither away or become the avowed plaything of industry, without the charitable cover story”
Covid-19 by the World Health Organization's own definition is the pneumonia found in conjunction with the virus SARS-CoV-2 - and all treatment protocols for pneumonia, which is created by inflammation and bacterial overgrowth in the lungs, has always since it was invented used antibiotics to stop the bacterial pneumonia. Even Fauci admitted this in his 2008 paper on the Spanish Flu cadavers where he noted it was not the virus that killed them but 97% died from bacterial pneunomia and the way to prepare for future pandemics was to stock up on 'antibiotics.'
That the W.H.O. would write that "Overall, antibiotic use did not improve clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19. But rather, it might create harm for people without bacterial infection, compared to those not receiving antibiotics" is misinformation at best and deadly disinformation at worst, which is far more likely.
And on what basis are they claiming more antibiotics were used when countless studies showed due to the protocols dictated from the top that antibiotic use fell in most western nations by 50%.
Whack a mole indeed! Whack the communists at the W.H.O. would be better.l
Dr. Denis Rancourt's thesis of the non-existence of a pandemic includes observing that governments restricted the use of antibiotics for Covid. He asserts that most of the illness was in fact bacterial, and that deaths resulted from the withholding of antibiotics. Sounds like WHO wants to continue this denial of life-saving care.
It is a private entity and has no business telling anybody what to do, for any reason.
Dr. Nass keeps identifying heath care scams on top of healthcare scams. Somebody who is coming up with all these programs is a diabolical genius.
I still say we have to nuke all of these Alphabet Health Agencies ... "just to be sure."
My health-care is provided by the Medical University of South Carolina, supposedly an esteemed teaching hospital. While I like My doctor, I still have to play a lot of guessing games with my my treatments because his livelihood is dependent upon playing ball with his institution who os playing ball with the mainstream medical industry who is playing ball with the W.H.O. What a quandary we are left in which can certainly be attested to by the brave doctors like Meryl and others on this post who have suffered the consequences of doing what is right. Since this catch 22 is probably our major obsticle to reform, how can we protect the rights of the army of professionals that we need to come forward in this fight?
The WHO would never have existed, if American taxpayer dollars had not supported the UN. The most important issue is get out of the UN. I have written senators and representatives to get out. One of my senators is calling to DEfund the UN...it has never been a friend of the USA.
.
I Wouldn’t Jump To Conclusions
About The Vaccine.
I’d Wait Until They’re All Dead
Just To Be Sure.
.
As usual they are creating many false stories! They have nothing to do with health only harm!
“Guess we need to exit the WHO or encourage nations to stop paying for it and let it whither away or become the avowed plaything of industry, without the charitable cover story”
It’s far past time for this.
Thank you for your on going tenacity
Covid-19 by the World Health Organization's own definition is the pneumonia found in conjunction with the virus SARS-CoV-2 - and all treatment protocols for pneumonia, which is created by inflammation and bacterial overgrowth in the lungs, has always since it was invented used antibiotics to stop the bacterial pneumonia. Even Fauci admitted this in his 2008 paper on the Spanish Flu cadavers where he noted it was not the virus that killed them but 97% died from bacterial pneunomia and the way to prepare for future pandemics was to stock up on 'antibiotics.'
That the W.H.O. would write that "Overall, antibiotic use did not improve clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19. But rather, it might create harm for people without bacterial infection, compared to those not receiving antibiotics" is misinformation at best and deadly disinformation at worst, which is far more likely.
And on what basis are they claiming more antibiotics were used when countless studies showed due to the protocols dictated from the top that antibiotic use fell in most western nations by 50%.
Whack a mole indeed! Whack the communists at the W.H.O. would be better.l
PURE EVIL IS ALWAYS SCHEMING, WAKEY WAKEY RISE UP & SHINE & STOP THIS DEMOCIDE. BEFORE THEY DESTROY HUMANKIND!
True, teddy is a mole who needs some whacking.
Dr. Denis Rancourt's thesis of the non-existence of a pandemic includes observing that governments restricted the use of antibiotics for Covid. He asserts that most of the illness was in fact bacterial, and that deaths resulted from the withholding of antibiotics. Sounds like WHO wants to continue this denial of life-saving care.
I've started demanding that the US exit the UN completely and eject it from our soil.
Serious Problems Remain: A Complete Guide to the New Draft Amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations
by Dr David Bell and Dr Thi Thuy Van Dinh
26 April 2024 5:00 PM
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/04/26/serious-problems-remain-an-annotated-guide-to-the-new-draft-amendments-to-the-who-international-health-regulations/
whack a mole!!
More distractions for negotiations rather than flat out exit?