77 Comments

Great to see the NWO PR debunked by its mumbo jumbo jargon alone: a wakeup call for everyone.

Reading this article

https://ericzuesse.substack.com/p/why-nato-cannot-be-and-never-was

explains the deceptive role of UN and related organizations too. One of the conclusions is that NATO and all related wars (genocide included) have been and are part and parcel of the totalitarian NWO scheme.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link !!

Expand full comment

My pleasure. There's still enough time for voters to realize that R and D have been played against each other to continue the NWO agenda, and that agenda only serves "the owners".

Expand full comment

Unless the people of the planet agree to a pact, we will not be bound by it. If the UN, or any other tyrant, tries to impose their schemes on us, we will oppose them until they are vanquished. It's time to dismantle the United Nations and send the members home, or to prison. The days of slavery are ending.

Expand full comment
author

Or restarting

Expand full comment

Meryl…. I just saw a post by Classie Thomas Massie that the FDA itself did not force vax on its own people? Only half took it?

Why was that never a screaming headline? Every food has labels about FDA approval Or not on the items? If they are such a big deal why weren’t we told they refused to take the shot?

None of their concerns were widely shared with the public?

Well , I commented that!

they comprise a great control group?

They should follow up and look at whether some took placebos?

How many refused altogether, how many who took it had adverse reactions? How many died if any?

Who got cancer if any? Who took boosters?

You’ve got a group of supposed

Big Wigs in an organization that we have relied on for health info so let’s find out what happened here?

Where’s the follow up?

Expand full comment
author

In May 2021 a Senator asked Rochelle, Fauci and Peter Marks what per cent of their employees had taken the shot. None would give a number. They waffled and said "about 50 or 60%"

This was prior to mandates. I do not know whether mandates were imposed on these fed employees later, or not.

Expand full comment

Harris will sign it.

Expand full comment

Thankyou for continuing to monitor the UN and the WHO for their deceptions.

Expand full comment
Jul 23Liked by Meryl Nass

"Governments, if they endure, always tend increasingly toward aristocratic forms. No government in history has been known to evade this pattern. And as the aristocracy develops. government tends more and more to act exclusively in the interests of the ruling class. [Frank Herbert, Children of Dune]

Expand full comment

A hell world planned by the globalists for the peasants

Expand full comment

Well done Meryl. I love your commentary.

Expand full comment

Fabulous commentary! I detest these hideous people! EVIL!!!! 😈

Expand full comment

I'm a 76-year-old hard-headed Scot/Celtic heritage. I don't comply well.

Expand full comment
Jul 23Liked by Meryl Nass

Another note: So basically the U.N. is trying to move forward on their plans WITHOUT the votes from member Nations? To bypass Nation State citizens and enforce their "orders", while pandering to "stake-holders" for more funding of federal dollars., and special interest investors.

Expand full comment

Their language needs to be called Babylon Blubbering of Billionaires! Like the lipid they used to disguise their poison, their words disguise the ugly poison they will deliver after their smooth lies.

Expand full comment

Gayle

“Their language needs to be called Babylon Blubbering of Billionaires!”

Absolutely brilliant. !!!

That referenced title is perfect and so true at the same time.

Well said.

Expand full comment

B.S. on steroids. These bullshitters actually appear to believe they can continue to pull the wool over the world's eyes. I believe (and hope) that they are likely to meet with a different reception to their fancy words from what they got the first time they bamboozled us in the COVID crisis. Many many are sick and tired of the flim-flam and are likely to raise an unholy stink. I plan on being one of them!

Expand full comment
Jul 23Liked by Meryl Nass

"International law" is apparently one of those things honored more in the breach than in the observance. Realistically, there can be no such thing without some kind of enforcement mechanism and a common acceptance of the ground rules by all nations. But just like national law, which is corrupted to various degrees in many nations, "international law" can be seen to be corrupted by the UN as well, in its picking and choosing of which UN resolutions to follow.

One good recent example would be UN Resolution 2202, the UN codification of the Minsk Agreement--completely ignored. Others might include the numerous resolutions about Israel and Palestine. In essence, the most powerful and influential nations in the UN are allowed to ignore these with impunity, while others have the boot placed on their necks.

The short version is that no one trusts the UN to be an impartial arbiter of the common good.

Expand full comment

We, the people, reject the United Nations as being out of control and malfunctioning for the benefit of the Elite few!

We hereby reject all future intrusions into normal human life by such corrupt organisations.

Unjabbed Mick (UK) I'll live longer without the UN, the WEF's New World Order and intrusive medical intervention.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your post and relentless follow-up of the Global Gang !!👍👍💪💪💯💯❤❤

I just finished reading the UDHR from 1-30.

Compared it to current general situation, and could have had my best laugh if it wasn't all so damn depressing ...

Expand full comment

Your comments will making reading this abomination bearable, Meryl, thank you! I did a cartoon on the UN a few weeks ago: https://open.substack.com/pub/annecantstandit/p/united-nations-machinations?r=qowdg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
author

good one! sorry I missed it.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this great summary! C.S. Lewis nailed it when he said, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

Why do people want global governance?

Local municipalities can’t even agree, let alone at the state level. Don’t even try at the federal level. Oh yeah right. Our founding fathers warned us with the 10th Amendment and WTP blew that allowing the monster federal government that created the deep state we know today.

Expand full comment

If it does get signed by the leaders, then what? Do we lose?

Expand full comment
author

It is a framework. Maybe next will be a treaty.

Expand full comment

Wait, so this summit isn't a gathering where a possible document will be signed?

Expand full comment
author

They will no doubt work hard to get "consensus" on this document or a later version and then justify the stuff they do going forward on the basis of this... at least that is what I have seen happen.

Expand full comment

English, please, Miss Nass?

Expand full comment