Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Meryl Nass's avatar

CBW weapons are designed for specific purposes. And the intention is always to prevent detection (make it seem natural) because there are laws against CBW. Otherwise a bullet is simpler and cheaper.

Some are designed to cause chronic illness (say brucellosis or low dose cyanide) some to cause brief incapacitation (say shigella) some to cause assassination (say snake venom, ricin, cyanide)

So what would be the purpose of using snake venom as opposed to hepatitis A or cholera in the water? If snake venom is found in water or medications it is obvious that something illegal happened, and the manufacturer is subject to liability where there was (perhaps) none due to the EUA.

So, what I would need to convince me that snake venom was being used would be:

1. Finding some in a product

2. Finding that people were being physiologically affected in a chronic way by venom that was different than the immediate, acute life-threatening effects of venom.

Happy to entertain the venom theory as long as there is a single piece of valid evidence to support it.

Meryl

Expand full comment
Kathy Palmer's avatar

Dr. Ardis' father-in-law did not die from Remdesivir, but other drugs. This led Dr. Ardis to investigate the drugs and then down the rabbit hole of the only authorized treatment allowed in hospitals, Remdesivir. He has been sounding the alarm since early 2020. The paralyzed diaphragm was from the vaccines compared with snake venom, not the virus. I trust and believe chiropractors more than medical doctors. A medical doctor almost killed me with a new drug, almost 30 years ago. It was a chiropractor and a nutritionist who brought me back to health. I think you need to view the video again and get your facts straight before bashing this information and spreading misinformation, which we have too much of today.

Expand full comment
173 more comments...

No posts